In a former publication [D. Schuch and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062111 (2006)] we have shown that the time evolution of a quantum system with at most quadratic Hamiltonian that can be described by different methods, namely, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, the time propagator or Feynman kernel, and the Wigner function is connected via a dynamical invariant, the so-called Ermakov invariant. Since exact invariants of this type also exist for certain effective descriptions of dissipative quantum systems, we will show the relations between these descriptions and the corresponding invariants and will discuss how the results obtained for the conservative systems must be modified in the presence of a linear velocity dependent frictional force.
In a former publication [D. Schuch and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. A 73, 062111 (2006)] we have shown that the time evolution of a quantum system with at most quadratic Hamiltonian that can be described by different methods, namely, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, the time propagator or Feynman kernel, and the Wigner function is connected via a dynamical invariant, the so-called Ermakov invariant. Since exact invariants of this type also exist for certain effective descriptions of dissipative quantum systems, we will show the relations between these descriptions and the corresponding invariants and will discuss how the results obtained for the conservative systems must be modified in the presence of a linear velocity dependent frictional force.
The time evolution of a quantum system with at most quadratic Hamiltonian is described with the help of different methods, namely the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation, the time propagator or Feynman kernel, and the Wigner function. It is shown that all three methods are connected via a dynamical invariant, the so-called Ermakov invariant. This invariant introduces explicitly the quantum aspect via the position uncertainty and its possible time dependence. The importance of this aspect, also for the difference between classical and quantum dynamics, and in particular the role of the initial position uncertainty is investigated.
The time-evolution of the maximum and the width of exact analytic wave packet (WP) solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (SE) represents the particle and wave aspects, respectively, of the quantum system.The dynamics of the maximum, located at the mean value of position, is governed by the Newtonian equation of the corresponding classical problem.The width, which is directly proportional to the position uncertainty, obeys a complex nonlinear Riccati equation which can be transformed into a real nonlinear Ermakov equation.The coupled pair of these equations yields a dynamical invariant which plays a key role in our investigation.It can be expressed in terms of a complex variable that linearizes the Riccati equation.This variable also provides the time-dependent parameters that characterize the Green's function, or Feynman kernel, of the corresponding problem.From there, also the relation between the classical and quantum dynamics of the systems can be obtained.Furthermore, the close connection between the Ermakov invariant and the Wigner function will be shown.Factorization of the dynamical invariant allows for comparison with creation/annihilation operators and supersymmetry where the partner potentials fulfil (real) Riccati equations.This provides the link to a nonlinear formulation of timeindependent quantum mechanics in terms of an Ermakov equation for the amplitude of the stationary state wave functions combined with a conservation law.Comparison with SUSY and the time-dependent problems concludes our analysis.
In the first part of the lectures dynamical invariants in classical mechanics and conventional quantum mechanics will be considered. In particular, we will begin with some remarks on classical mechanics and on quantization in order to establish the theory in the form that will be used later on. Starting from the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, the dynamics of Gaussian wave packets and Ermakov invariants, the time‐dependent Green function/Feynman kernel, quantum‐classical connections, energetics and Lagrange—Hamilton formalism for quantum uncertainties, momentum space representation and the relation between the Wigner function and the Ermakov invariant will be discussed. The representation of canonical transformations in time‐independent and time‐dependent quantum mechanics, factorization of the Ermakov invariant and generalized creation/annihilation operators will be studied. Subsequently, the time‐independent Schrödinger equation, leading to nonlinear quantum mechanics related to Riccati/Ermakov systems as well as the occurrence of Riccati/Ermakov systems in the treatment of Bose—Einstein condensates via the so‐called moment method will be analyzed.In part two, irreversible dynamics of dissipative systems, classical and quantum mechanical descriptions and corresponding invariants will be treated. After some general remarks on classical and quantum mechanics with unitary time‐evolution and energy conservation, phenomenological Langevin and Fokker—Planck equations, master equations in classical and quantum mechanics and the system‐plus‐reservoir approach will be mentioned briefly. Then follows a more detailed discussion of modified Schrödinger equations and, particularly, of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with complex logarithmic nonlinearity; its properties, solutions, invariants and energetics will be studied. Finally, a comparison with a classical description in expanding coordinates will lead to a non‐unitary connection between the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Caldirola‐Kanai approach and the expanding coordinate approach.
In the first part of the lectures dynamical invariants in classical mechanics and conventional quantum mechanics will be considered. In particular, we will begin with some remarks on classical mechanics and on quantization in order to establish the theory in the form that will be used later on. Starting from the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation, the dynamics of Gaussian wave packets and Ermakov invariants, the time‐dependent Green function/Feynman kernel, quantum‐classical connections, energetics and Lagrange—Hamilton formalism for quantum uncertainties, momentum space representation and the relation between the Wigner function and the Ermakov invariant will be discussed. The representation of canonical transformations in time‐independent and time‐dependent quantum mechanics, factorization of the Ermakov invariant and generalized creation/annihilation operators will be studied. Subsequently, the time‐independent Schrödinger equation, leading to nonlinear quantum mechanics related to Riccati/Ermakov systems as well as the occurrence of Riccati/Ermakov systems in the treatment of Bose—Einstein condensates via the so‐called moment method will be analyzed.In part two, irreversible dynamics of dissipative systems, classical and quantum mechanical descriptions and corresponding invariants will be treated. After some general remarks on classical and quantum mechanics with unitary time‐evolution and energy conservation, phenomenological Langevin and Fokker—Planck equations, master equations in classical and quantum mechanics and the system‐plus‐reservoir approach will be mentioned briefly. Then follows a more detailed discussion of modified Schrödinger equations and, particularly, of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with complex logarithmic nonlinearity; its properties, solutions, invariants and energetics will be studied. Finally, a comparison with a classical description in expanding coordinates will lead to a non‐unitary connection between the logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the Caldirola‐Kanai approach and the expanding coordinate approach.
For physical systems where the Hamiltonian is no longer a constant of motion, like oscillators with time-dependent frequency or dissipative systems, a dynamical invariant of the Ermakov type might still exist. This invariant depends on the classical position and velocity and an auxiliary variable that is proportional to position uncertainty. It is possible to construct this invariant via an algebraic method based on the classical Poisson bracket. A modified version for dissipative systems that also employs anti-Poisson brackets and is related to a description in an expanding coordinate system will be presented. The resulting invariant is identical to that obtained from a logarithmic nonlinear Schrödinger equation. The uncertainties of position and momentum, expressed in terms of the auxiliary variable, can be compared with the so-called moment-method for the description of the time-evolution of Bose–Einstein condensates, corresponding to a description in terms of the cubic nonlinear Gross–Pitaevskii equation. It will be shown how this method can be extended to also include dissipative damping effects into the Bose–Einstein dynamics.
Quantum mechanics is essentially described in terms of complex quantities like wave functions. The interesting point is that phase and amplitude of the complex wave function are not independent of each other, but coupled by some kind of conservation law. This coupling exists in time-independent quantum mechanics and has a counterpart in its time-dependent form. It can be traced back to a reformulation of quantum mechanics in terms of nonlinear real Ermakov equations or equivalent complex nonlinear Riccati equations, where the quadratic term in the latter equation explains the origin of the phase-amplitude coupling. Since realistic physical systems are always in contact with some kind of environment this aspect is also taken into account. In this context, different approaches for describing open quantum systems, particularly effective ones, are discussed and compared. Certain kinds of nonlinear modifications of the Schrödinger equation are discussed as well as their interrelations and their relations to linear approaches via non-unitary transformations. The modifications of the aforementioned Ermakov and Riccati equations when environmental effects are included can be determined in the time-dependent case. From formal similarities conclusions can be drawn how the equations of time-independent quantum mechanics can be modified to also incluce the enviromental aspects.