Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Isometric and unitary phase operators: explaining the Villain transform

J. Leo van Hemmen, Walter Felipe Wreszinski

Published Jan 23, 2007• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

The Villain transform plays a key role in spin-wave theory, a bosonization of elementary excitations in a system of extensively many Heisenberg spins. Intuitively, it is a representation of the spin operators in terms of an angle and its canonically conjugate angular momentum operator and, as such, has a few nasty boundary-condition twists. We construct an isometric phase representation of spin operators that conveys a precise mathematical meaning to the Villain transform and is related to both classical mechanics and the Pegg–Barnett–Bialynicki-Birula boson (photon) phase operators by means of suitable limits. In contrast to the photon case, unitary extensions are inadequate because they describe the wrong physics. We also discuss in some detail the application to spin-wave theory, pointing out some examples in which the isometric representation is indispensable.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/40/6/015

Related papers

The exact meaning of the angular-momentum and spin operators in quantum mechanics

G. Coddens

The theory of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics seems to defy common-sense intuition.We render the theory intelligible again by pointing out that this apparent impenetrability merely stems from an {\em undue} parallel interpretation of the algebraic expressions for the angular-momentum and spin operators in the group representation theory of SO(3) and SU(2). E.g. the correct meaning of the quantumoperator ${\hat{L}}_{z} = {\hbar\over{\imath}}\,(x{\partial\over{\partial y}} - y{\partial\over{\partial x}} )$ is not that it is the operatorfor the $z$-component $L_{z}$ of the angular momentum ${\mathbf{L}}$, but rather the expression of the operator for the angular momentum ${\mathbf{L}}$ when it is aligned with the $z$-axis. Hence what we are used to note (erroneously) as ${\hat{L}}_{z}$ is not a scalar but a vector operator.The same applies{\em mutatis mutandis} for the spin operators. In the correct interpretation, the wholealgebraic formalism is just the group representation theory for the rotationsof three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. It is thus mere,elementary high-school mathematics (in a less usual, more technical guise) and as such totally exempt of any physics, let alone quantum mysteries.The change of interpretation has no impact on the algebraic results, such that they remain in agreement with experimental data and the algebra quantum mechanics remains correct. It is all only a matter of the correct geometrical meaning of the algebra.All these statements are proved within the framework of the group representation theory for SO(3) and SU(2) which is the basic tool used to describe rotational motion in quantum mechanics.

•Sep 11, 2021•0 citations

Quantum-optical Phase and Canonical Conjugation

David Thomas Pegg, Joan A. Vaccaro, Stephen Mark Barnett

We use a new limiting procedure, developed to study quantum-optical phase, to examine canonically conjugate operators in general. We find that Dirac's assumption that photon number and phase should be canonically conjugate variables, similar to momentum and position, is essentially correct. The difficulties with Dirac's approach are shown to arise through use of a form of the canonical commutator which, although the only possible form in the usual infinite Hilbert space approach, is not sufficiently general to be used as a model for a number-phase commutator. The approach in this paper unifies the theory of conjugate operators, which include photon number and phase, angular momentum and angle, and momentum and position as particular cases. The usual position-momentum commutator is regained from a more generally applicable expression by means of a domain restriction which cannot be used for the phase-number commutator.

Journal of Modern Optics•Nov 1, 1990•71 citations

Some formal properties of operator polar decomposition

Stig Stenholm

In this paper I consider the general mathematical problem of the polar decomposition of an operator in a linear space. Extending the space makes it possible to define a unitary operator related to the original nonhermitean one. By Stone's theorem this guarantees the existence of a phase operator in the extended space. The connection with supersymmetry is pointed out. Applying the general results to harmonic oscillator creation and annihilation operators we regain a phase description originally introduced by Newton. Projecting the phase operator from the extended space to the original one, we find a phase representation for the Boson operators. Introducing the conjugate rotation operator, one can describe the oscillator dynamics in the phase representation. The connection with the Barnett–Pegg phase operator is pointed out.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•7 citations

Alternative derivation of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

An alternative derivation of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator is presented. This approach is based on the properties of the representation in quantum mechanics of a nonlinear nonbijective canonical transformation. It does not use as its starting point either a finite-dimensional space or the definition of phase states. The features of this formalism are analyzed in terms of this transformation.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1993•19 citations

Formulation and picture of quantum phase

Yao Zhi

Based on the concept of classical phase,we formulate a new explanation for the quantum phase from the quantum mechanical point of view. The quantum phase is the canonically conjugate variable of an angular momentum operator,which corresponds to the angular position θ in an actual physical space with a classical reference frame,but it takes a complex exponential form eiθ ≡cosθ +i sinθ in the abstract Hilbert space of a quantum reference frame. This formulation is simply the famous Euler formula in a complex number field. In particular,when θ = π/2,the correlative quantum phase is a unitary pure imaginary number eiπ/2 ≡cos(π/2)+i sin(π/2) ≡ i. By using a photon state-vector function that is the general solution of photon Schrdinger equation and can completely describe a photon's behavior,we discuss the relationship between the angular momentum of a photon and the phase of the photon; we also analyze the intrinsic relationship between the macroscopic light wave phase and the microscopic photon phase.

Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Phase Operator Theory for an Electron Moving in a Uniform Magnetic Field

Fan Hong‐Yi, Wang Yihua, Fan Yue

We show that the newly found complete and orthonormal representation , which is constructed in terms of guiding centers and canonical momenta of an electron moving in a uniform magnetic field, also helps us to establish a systematic phase operator theory. The unitary phase operator, interpreted as a quantity canonically conjugated to the electron angular momentum, manifestly exhibits in the representation its phase behavior. As a byproduct, the phase distribution function, in the correct sense of probability in quantum mechanics, can also be defined by the representation.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jul 30, 1998•1 citation
The Villain transform plays a key role in spin-wave theory, a bosonization of elementary excitations in a system of extensively many Heisenberg spins. Intuitively, it is a representation of the spin operators in terms of an angle and its canonically conjugate angular momentum operator and, as such, has a few nasty boundary-condition twists. We construct an isometric phase representation of spin operators that conveys a precise mathematical meaning to the Villain transform and is related to both classical mechanics and the Pegg–Barnett–Bialynicki-Birula boson (photon) phase operators by means of suitable limits. In contrast to the photon case, unitary extensions are inadequate because they describe the wrong physics. We also discuss in some detail the application to spin-wave theory, pointing out some examples in which the isometric representation is indispensable.
The theory of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics seems to defy common-sense intuition.We render the theory intelligible again by pointing out that this apparent impenetrability merely stems from an {\em undue} parallel interpretation of the algebraic expressions for the angular-momentum and spin operators in the group representation theory of SO(3) and SU(2). E.g. the correct meaning of the quantumoperator L^z=ℏı (x∂∂y−y∂∂x){\hat{L}}_{z} = {\hbar\over{\imath}}\,(x{\partial\over{\partial y}} - y{\partial\over{\partial x}} )L^z​=ℏ​(x∂y∂​−y∂x∂​) is not that it is the operatorfor the zzz-component LzL_{z}Lz​ of the angular momentum L{\mathbf{L}}L, but rather the expression of the operator for the angular momentum L{\mathbf{L}}L when it is aligned with the zzz-axis. Hence what we are used to note (erroneously) as L^z{\hat{L}}_{z}L^z​ is not a scalar but a vector operator.The same applies{\em mutatis mutandis} for the spin operators. In the correct interpretation, the wholealgebraic formalism is just the group representation theory for the rotationsof three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. It is thus mere,elementary high-school mathematics (in a less usual, more technical guise) and as such totally exempt of any physics, let alone quantum mysteries.The change of interpretation has no impact on the algebraic results, such that they remain in agreement with experimental data and the algebra quantum mechanics remains correct. It is all only a matter of the correct geometrical meaning of the algebra.All these statements are proved within the framework of the group representation theory for SO(3) and SU(2) which is the basic tool used to describe rotational motion in quantum mechanics.
We use a new limiting procedure, developed to study quantum-optical phase, to examine canonically conjugate operators in general. We find that Dirac's assumption that photon number and phase should be canonically conjugate variables, similar to momentum and position, is essentially correct. The difficulties with Dirac's approach are shown to arise through use of a form of the canonical commutator which, although the only possible form in the usual infinite Hilbert space approach, is not sufficiently general to be used as a model for a number-phase commutator. The approach in this paper unifies the theory of conjugate operators, which include photon number and phase, angular momentum and angle, and momentum and position as particular cases. The usual position-momentum commutator is regained from a more generally applicable expression by means of a domain restriction which cannot be used for the phase-number commutator.
In this paper I consider the general mathematical problem of the polar decomposition of an operator in a linear space. Extending the space makes it possible to define a unitary operator related to the original nonhermitean one. By Stone's theorem this guarantees the existence of a phase operator in the extended space. The connection with supersymmetry is pointed out. Applying the general results to harmonic oscillator creation and annihilation operators we regain a phase description originally introduced by Newton. Projecting the phase operator from the extended space to the original one, we find a phase representation for the Boson operators. Introducing the conjugate rotation operator, one can describe the oscillator dynamics in the phase representation. The connection with the Barnett–Pegg phase operator is pointed out.
Based on the concept of classical phase,we formulate a new explanation for the quantum phase from the quantum mechanical point of view. The quantum phase is the canonically conjugate variable of an angular momentum operator,which corresponds to the angular position θ in an actual physical space with a classical reference frame,but it takes a complex exponential form eiθ ≡cosθ +i sinθ in the abstract Hilbert space of a quantum reference frame. This formulation is simply the famous Euler formula in a complex number field. In particular,when θ = π/2,the correlative quantum phase is a unitary pure imaginary number eiπ/2 ≡cos(π/2)+i sin(π/2) ≡ i. By using a photon state-vector function that is the general solution of photon Schrdinger equation and can completely describe a photon's behavior,we discuss the relationship between the angular momentum of a photon and the phase of the photon; we also analyze the intrinsic relationship between the macroscopic light wave phase and the microscopic photon phase.
We show that the newly found complete and orthonormal representation , which is constructed in terms of guiding centers and canonical momenta of an electron moving in a uniform magnetic field, also helps us to establish a systematic phase operator theory. The unitary phase operator, interpreted as a quantity canonically conjugated to the electron angular momentum, manifestly exhibits in the representation its phase behavior. As a byproduct, the phase distribution function, in the correct sense of probability in quantum mechanics, can also be defined by the representation.