Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Modern Optics

Quantum-optical Phase and Canonical Conjugation

David Thomas Pegg, Joan A. Vaccaro, Stephen Mark Barnett

Published Nov 1, 1990• 71 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We use a new limiting procedure, developed to study quantum-optical phase, to examine canonically conjugate operators in general. We find that Dirac's assumption that photon number and phase should be canonically conjugate variables, similar to momentum and position, is essentially correct. The difficulties with Dirac's approach are shown to arise through use of a form of the canonical commutator which, although the only possible form in the usual infinite Hilbert space approach, is not sufficiently general to be used as a model for a number-phase commutator. The approach in this paper unifies the theory of conjugate operators, which include photon number and phase, angular momentum and angle, and momentum and position as particular cases. The usual position-momentum commutator is regained from a more generally applicable expression by means of a domain restriction which cannot be used for the phase-number commutator.

DOI
10.1080/09500349014551931

Related papers

Formulation and picture of quantum phase

Yao Zhi

Based on the concept of classical phase,we formulate a new explanation for the quantum phase from the quantum mechanical point of view. The quantum phase is the canonically conjugate variable of an angular momentum operator,which corresponds to the angular position θ in an actual physical space with a classical reference frame,but it takes a complex exponential form eiθ ≡cosθ +i sinθ in the abstract Hilbert space of a quantum reference frame. This formulation is simply the famous Euler formula in a complex number field. In particular,when θ = π/2,the correlative quantum phase is a unitary pure imaginary number eiπ/2 ≡cos(π/2)+i sin(π/2) ≡ i. By using a photon state-vector function that is the general solution of photon Schrdinger equation and can completely describe a photon's behavior,we discuss the relationship between the angular momentum of a photon and the phase of the photon; we also analyze the intrinsic relationship between the macroscopic light wave phase and the microscopic photon phase.

Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Quantum phase: A different approach

Marco A. Tapia-Valerdi, I. Ramos-Prieto, Francisco Soto +2 more

It is generally thought that, in the same way that position and momentum are canonical variables in quantum mechanics, the number operator should have a canonical operator, i.e., there should be a possibility of defining a well-defined phase operator associated with it. From the point of view of the phase space, it becomes clearer as position and momentum uncertainties are well reflected. Indeed, the same occurs in the phase space for phase and intensity. In this contribution, we do a small survey on the possibilities of defining a phase operator via discrete Fourier operators and introduce some possible applications.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Dec 6, 2025•0 citations

Quantum formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum

Jörg B. Götte, Stephen Mark Barnett

The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 8, 2012•2 citations

The quantum absolute phase observable

Gilad Gour

Defining the observable ${\bf ϕ}$ canonically conjugate to the number observable ${\bf N}$ has long been an open problem in quantum theory. Here we show how to define the absolute phase observable ${\bf Φ}\equiv |{\bfϕ}|$ by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of $x$ and $p$ like variables. This ${\bf Φ}$ is actually the absolute value of the phase and has the correct classical limit. A correction to the ``cosine'' ${\bf C}$ and ``sine'' ${\bf S}$ operators of Carruthers and Nieto is obtained.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102092•Feb 19, 2001•0 citations

Canonical transformations to action and phase-angle variables and phase operators

Alfredo Luis, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

The well-known difficulties of defining a phase operator of an oscillator are considered from the point of view of the canonical transformation to action and phase-angle variables. This transformation turns out to be nonbijective, i.e., it is not a one-to-one onto mapping. In order to make possible the unitarity of its representations in quantum optics we should enlarge the Hilbert space of the problem. In this enlarged space we find a phase operator that, after projection, reproduces previous candidates to represent a well-behaved phase operator in the quantum domain.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1993•18 citations

Derivation of the coordinate-momentum commutation relations from canonical invariance

Moshe Shapiro

Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value $ih$ where $h$ is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.

Physical Review A•Oct 31, 2006•5 citations
We use a new limiting procedure, developed to study quantum-optical phase, to examine canonically conjugate operators in general. We find that Dirac's assumption that photon number and phase should be canonically conjugate variables, similar to momentum and position, is essentially correct. The difficulties with Dirac's approach are shown to arise through use of a form of the canonical commutator which, although the only possible form in the usual infinite Hilbert space approach, is not sufficiently general to be used as a model for a number-phase commutator. The approach in this paper unifies the theory of conjugate operators, which include photon number and phase, angular momentum and angle, and momentum and position as particular cases. The usual position-momentum commutator is regained from a more generally applicable expression by means of a domain restriction which cannot be used for the phase-number commutator.
Based on the concept of classical phase,we formulate a new explanation for the quantum phase from the quantum mechanical point of view. The quantum phase is the canonically conjugate variable of an angular momentum operator,which corresponds to the angular position θ in an actual physical space with a classical reference frame,but it takes a complex exponential form eiθ ≡cosθ +i sinθ in the abstract Hilbert space of a quantum reference frame. This formulation is simply the famous Euler formula in a complex number field. In particular,when θ = π/2,the correlative quantum phase is a unitary pure imaginary number eiπ/2 ≡cos(π/2)+i sin(π/2) ≡ i. By using a photon state-vector function that is the general solution of photon Schrdinger equation and can completely describe a photon's behavior,we discuss the relationship between the angular momentum of a photon and the phase of the photon; we also analyze the intrinsic relationship between the macroscopic light wave phase and the microscopic photon phase.
It is generally thought that, in the same way that position and momentum are canonical variables in quantum mechanics, the number operator should have a canonical operator, i.e., there should be a possibility of defining a well-defined phase operator associated with it. From the point of view of the phase space, it becomes clearer as position and momentum uncertainties are well reflected. Indeed, the same occurs in the phase space for phase and intensity. In this contribution, we do a small survey on the possibilities of defining a phase operator via discrete Fourier operators and introduce some possible applications.
The quantum mechanical description of the azimuthal rotation angle and the orbital angular momentum around the polar axis differs greatly from the description of position and momentum. This has led to a controversy over the existence of a self-adjoint angle operator in the literature. It is possible to circumvent the problems of defining a self-adjoint operator for a periodic variable by using trigonometric functions of operators as a basis for the quantum mechanical description. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the properties of the angle operator itself. By using a state space of an arbitrarily large yet finite number of dimensions, it is possible to introduce angle and orbital angular momentum as a conjugate pair of variables both represented by Hermitian matrices. After physical and measurable quantities have been calculated in this state space the number of dimensions is allowed to tend to infinity in a limiting procedure. The first part of this chapter reviews the difficulties associated with the quantum mechanical formulation of angle and orbital angular momentum and presents a way to overcome these problems using a finite-dimensional state space. In the second part this formulation is generalised to include the phenomenon of non-integer orbital angular momentum. This part is based on a chapter of the PhD thesis of Götte [1], where further details may be found. Introduction The correct description of a periodic variable such as a rotation angle or the optical phase has been a long standing problem in quantum mechanics. At the root of the problem is the question of whether the variable itself is restricted in a 2 π radian range or whether it evolves continuously without bound.
Defining the observable ϕ{\bf ϕ}ϕ canonically conjugate to the number observable N{\bf N}N has long been an open problem in quantum theory. Here we show how to define the absolute phase observable Φ≡∣ϕ∣{\bf Φ}\equiv |{\bfϕ}|Φ≡∣ϕ∣ by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of xxx and ppp like variables. This Φ{\bf Φ}Φ is actually the absolute value of the phase and has the correct classical limit. A correction to the ``cosine'' C{\bf C}C and ``sine'' S{\bf S}S operators of Carruthers and Nieto is obtained.
The well-known difficulties of defining a phase operator of an oscillator are considered from the point of view of the canonical transformation to action and phase-angle variables. This transformation turns out to be nonbijective, i.e., it is not a one-to-one onto mapping. In order to make possible the unitarity of its representations in quantum optics we should enlarge the Hilbert space of the problem. In this enlarged space we find a phase operator that, after projection, reproduces previous candidates to represent a well-behaved phase operator in the quantum domain.
Based on (i) the spectral resolution definition of the momentum operator, (ii) the linearity of correspondence between physical observables and quantum Hermitian operators, (iii) the definition of conjugate coordinate-momentum variables in classical mechanics, and (iv) the invariance of the classical Hamiltonian to canonical transformations (transformations that change from one set of conjugate variables to another), we show that the $[\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{x},\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{p}]$ coordinate-momentum commutator must have the value ihihih where hhh is a real nonzero number (which we can identify with the experimentally determined $\ensuremath{\hbar}$). The results are then extended to include all generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta as well as the Cartesian special-relativistic case.