Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

A stochastic derivation of the Sivashinsky equation for the self-turbulent motion of a free particle

Kh. Namsrai

Published Oct 1, 1980• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00708419

Related papers

Self-turbulence in the motion of a free particle

G. I. Sivashinsky

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 1978•7 citations

Self-fluctuations in the motion of a free particle and the Schrödinger equation

G. I. Sivashinsky

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Oct 1, 1980•2 citations

Turbulence in the motion of a free particle and de Broglie waves

G. I. Sivashinsky

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Apr 1, 1980•3 citations

Uniform formalism for description of dynamic and stochastic systems

Yuri A. Rylov

The formalism of dynamics in the space-time, where motion of free particles is primordially stochastic, is considered. The conventional dynamic formalism, obtained for the space-time, where the motion of free particles is primordially deterministic, seems to be unsuitable. The statistical ensemble of stochastic (or deterministic) systems is considered to be the main object of dynamics. At such an approach one can describe deterministic, stochastic and quantum particles by means of the uniform technique. The quantum particle is described as a stochastic particle, i.e. without a reference to the quantum principles. Besides, by means of this technique one can describe classical inviscid fluid. There are four different versions of the formalism. One of versions uses equations, which describes evolution of the labelling (Lagrangian coordinates at fixed initial conditions for the density and the momentum density. These fixed initial conditions enter in the evolution equations. A nonuniqueness of irrotational flow and the mismatch between the velocity and the momentum density appear at this description. The mismatch is determined by the fluid vorticity and by some arbitrary parameter. Appearance of mismatch may be associated with the turbulence. The united formalism is purely dynamic. Even describing stochastic systems, it does not refer to probability and probabilistic structures.

•Mar 28, 2006•2 citations

On the derivation of the Schr�dinger equation from stochastic mechanics

Timothy C. Wallstrom

Foundations of Physics Letters•Mar 1, 1989•59 citations

SYMMETRY REDUCTION OF BROWNIAN MOTION AND QUANTUM CALOGERO–MOSER MODELS

Simon Hochgerner

Let Q be a Riemannian G-manifold. This paper is concerned with the symmetry reduction of Brownian motion in Q and ramifications thereof in a Hamiltonian context. Specializing to the case of polar actions, we discuss various versions of the stochastic Hamilton–Jacobi equation associated to the symmetry reduction of Brownian motion and observe some similarities to the Schrödinger equation of the quantum–free particle reduction as described by Feher and Pusztai [10]. As an application we use this reduction scheme to derive examples of quantum Calogero–Moser systems from a stochastic setting.

arXiv:1103.4531•Stochastics and Dynamics•May 30, 2012•1 citation
The formalism of dynamics in the space-time, where motion of free particles is primordially stochastic, is considered. The conventional dynamic formalism, obtained for the space-time, where the motion of free particles is primordially deterministic, seems to be unsuitable. The statistical ensemble of stochastic (or deterministic) systems is considered to be the main object of dynamics. At such an approach one can describe deterministic, stochastic and quantum particles by means of the uniform technique. The quantum particle is described as a stochastic particle, i.e. without a reference to the quantum principles. Besides, by means of this technique one can describe classical inviscid fluid. There are four different versions of the formalism. One of versions uses equations, which describes evolution of the labelling (Lagrangian coordinates at fixed initial conditions for the density and the momentum density. These fixed initial conditions enter in the evolution equations. A nonuniqueness of irrotational flow and the mismatch between the velocity and the momentum density appear at this description. The mismatch is determined by the fluid vorticity and by some arbitrary parameter. Appearance of mismatch may be associated with the turbulence. The united formalism is purely dynamic. Even describing stochastic systems, it does not refer to probability and probabilistic structures.
Let Q be a Riemannian G-manifold. This paper is concerned with the symmetry reduction of Brownian motion in Q and ramifications thereof in a Hamiltonian context. Specializing to the case of polar actions, we discuss various versions of the stochastic Hamilton–Jacobi equation associated to the symmetry reduction of Brownian motion and observe some similarities to the Schrödinger equation of the quantum–free particle reduction as described by Feher and Pusztai [10]. As an application we use this reduction scheme to derive examples of quantum Calogero–Moser systems from a stochastic setting.