Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Journal of Chemical Physics

Comment on ‘‘A quantum mechanical representation in phase space’’ [J. Chem. Phys. 98, 3103 (1993)]

Xu‐Guang Hu, Qian-Shu Li

Published Oct 15, 1994• 6 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this comment questions about the improper eigenfunctions in J. Chem. Phys. 98, 3103 (1993) are addressed and the other suitable eigenfunctions are suggested at the same time.
DOI
10.1063/1.468276

Related papers

Comment on "Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator'' [J. Chem. Phys. 77, 4604 (1982)]

Dimitris Kakofengitis, Maxime Oliva, Ole Steuernagel

Comment on ``Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator''

arXiv:1612.00772•Dec 2, 2016•0 citations

Response to “Comment on ‘Equivalence of two approaches for quantum-classical hybrid systems’ ” [J. Chem. Phys. 131, 127101 (2009)]

Fei Zhan, Yuan Lin, Biao Wu

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Sep 28, 2009•0 citations

Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Lidia Latanowicz, Eduard C. Reynhardt

Chemical Physics Letters•Nov 29, 2006•9 citations

Reply to the Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Anthony J. Horsewill

Chemical Physics Letters•Nov 29, 2006•4 citations

Comment on “A quantum-classical bracket that satisfies the Jacobi identity” [J. Chem. Phys. 124, 201104 (2006)]

L. L. Salcedo

It shown that the quantum-classical dynamical bracket recently proposed in J. Chem. Phys. 124, 201104 (2006) fails to satisfy the Jacobi identity.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701054•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 6, 2007•14 citations

Comment on “Revisiting the phase transitions of the Dicke model”

Ángel L. Corps, Armando Relaño

In the work of Das and Sharma [Phys. Rev. A 105, 033716 (2022)] the phase transitions of the Dicke model are studied. Its main result is that, besides the well-known quantum phase transition, excited-state quantum phase transition, and thermal phase transition exhibited by the model, there exists an upper bound energy ${E}_{*}$ beyond which the model ceases to exhibit quantum chaotic behavior and the structure of the eigenfunctions changes. Based on this finding, a number of well-established results about the Dicke model are called into question. We argue that this result and all its consequences are spurious numerical effects resulting from an improper truncation of the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space necessary for numerical diagonalization.

arXiv:2209.14660•Physical Review A•Oct 13, 2022•3 citations
In the work of Das and Sharma [Phys. Rev. A 105, 033716 (2022)] the phase transitions of the Dicke model are studied. Its main result is that, besides the well-known quantum phase transition, excited-state quantum phase transition, and thermal phase transition exhibited by the model, there exists an upper bound energy E∗{E}_{*}E∗​ beyond which the model ceases to exhibit quantum chaotic behavior and the structure of the eigenfunctions changes. Based on this finding, a number of well-established results about the Dicke model are called into question. We argue that this result and all its consequences are spurious numerical effects resulting from an improper truncation of the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space necessary for numerical diagonalization.