The Journal of Chemical Physics

Response to “Comment on ‘Equivalence of two approaches for quantum-classical hybrid systems’ ” [J. Chem. Phys. 131, 127101 (2009)]

Fei Zhan, Yuan Lin, Biao Wu

Published Sep 28, 2009• 0 citations

DOI: 10.1063/1.3240754

Related papers

Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Lidia Latanowicz, Eduard C. Reynhardt

Chemical Physics LettersNov 29, 20069 citations

Comment on “Equivalence of two approaches for quantum-classical hybrid systems” [J. Chem. Phys. 128, 204104 (2008)]

V. I. Gerasimenko

We discuss the links between consistent and approximate descriptions of the quantum-classical systems, i.e., systems composed of two interacting subsystems, one of which behaves almost classically while the other requires a quantum description.

arXiv:0909.4942The Journal of Chemical PhysicsSep 28, 20091 citation

Reply to the Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Anthony J. Horsewill

Chemical Physics LettersNov 29, 20064 citations

Response to “Comment on ‘Adiabatically implementing quantum gates’” [J. Appl. Phys. 117, 156101 (2015)]

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu, Fang Liu

Journal of Applied PhysicsApr 20, 20150 citations

Addendum to “Note on the Inequivalence of Classical and Quantum Hamiltonians”

Frederick James Kennedy, Edward H. Kerner

American Journal of PhysicsMar 1, 19664 citations

Comment on “A quantum-classical bracket that satisfies the Jacobi identity” [J. Chem. Phys. 124, 201104 (2006)]

L. L. Salcedo

It shown that the quantum-classical dynamical bracket recently proposed in J. Chem. Phys. 124, 201104 (2006) fails to satisfy the Jacobi identity.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701054The Journal of Chemical PhysicsFeb 6, 200714 citations