Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

A Comment on Bell's Inequality; Mental Activity and Physical Reality

Douglas Snyder

Published Dec 1, 1986• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12477.x

Related papers

The Relevance of Bell-Type Inequalities for Mental Systems

Harald Atmanspacher A, Thomas Filk A

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•6 citations

Einstein's Reality Arising from Physical Flaws of Bell Inequalities

Andre Vatarescu

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Bell’s Inequalities: Testing the Limits of Reality

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

Options for Testing Temporal Bell Inequalities for Mental Systems

Harald Atmanspacher A, Thomas Filk A

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•5 citations

A Preliminary Experimental Verification On the Possibility of Bell Inequality Violation in Mental States

Elio Conte, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Orlando Todarello +2 more

For the first time we perform an experiment to test the possibility of Bell's inequality violation in mental states, during perception-cognition in humans. We study under a theoretical and experimental framework, a Bell-type test for human perception-cognition of ambiguous figures. It is performed a detailed analysis which demonstrates that, although we have not yet been able to violate Bell's inequality in the present performed experiment, there are strong theoretical arguments supporting our expectation to violate it by a simple articulation of the same experiment. In this framework we introduce for the first time what we retain to represent quantum cognitive observables. We consider that our analysis provides a solid ground for further investigations on quantum behaviour of cognitive systems. Therefore we reaffirm that quantum mechanics is a Giano Bifronte theory (two-faced Giano, a mythological God of the past), looking from one hand to physical reality and from the other hand to the sphere of mental reality and cognitive dynamics.

NeuroQuantology•Sep 3, 2008•85 citations

Comments on a paper by B. Schulz about Bell's inequalities

I. Schmelzer

Abstract Schulz claims to have constructed an actively local stochastic theory which violates Bell's inequality. This is false.

arXiv:0910.4740•Annalen der Physik•Nov 16, 2010•1 citation
For the first time we perform an experiment to test the possibility of Bell's inequality violation in mental states, during perception-cognition in humans. We study under a theoretical and experimental framework, a Bell-type test for human perception-cognition of ambiguous figures. It is performed a detailed analysis which demonstrates that, although we have not yet been able to violate Bell's inequality in the present performed experiment, there are strong theoretical arguments supporting our expectation to violate it by a simple articulation of the same experiment. In this framework we introduce for the first time what we retain to represent quantum cognitive observables. We consider that our analysis provides a solid ground for further investigations on quantum behaviour of cognitive systems. Therefore we reaffirm that quantum mechanics is a Giano Bifronte theory (two-faced Giano, a mythological God of the past), looking from one hand to physical reality and from the other hand to the sphere of mental reality and cognitive dynamics.