Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Options for Testing Temporal Bell Inequalities for Mental Systems

Harald Atmanspacher A, Thomas Filk A

Published Jan 1, 2011• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-24971-6_13

Related papers

The Relevance of Bell-Type Inequalities for Mental Systems

Harald Atmanspacher A, Thomas Filk A

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2014•6 citations

Experimental Test of Temporal Bell Inequalities at the Mesoscopic Level

Susana F. Huelga, Trevor W. Marshall, Emilio Santos

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•1 citation

Testing temporal Bell inequalities through repeated measurements in rf-SQUIDs

Roberto Onofrio, Tommaso Calarco

arXiv:quant-ph/9512008•Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 1995•15 citations

Contra Classical Causality Violating Temporal Bell Inequalities in Mental Systems

Harald Atmanspacher A, Thomas Filk A

Temporally non-local measurements – single measurements yielding information about the state of a system at different instances – may provide a way to observe non-classical behavior in mental systems. The signature for such behavior is a violation of temporal Bell inequalities. We present such inequalities applicable to scenarios with two alternating mental states, such as in the perception of ambiguous figures. We indicate empirical options for testing temporal Bell inequalities, and speculate about possible explanations in case these inequalities are indeed violated.

Journal of Consciousness Studies•Jan 1, 2012•18 citations

Do neural activities of binocular rivalry follow a quantum probability model? A test of temporal Bell inequalities

Hirao Takahiro, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Emmanuel Pothos +3 more

Binocular rivalry refers to a phenomenon in which the perceived image changes spontaneously over time when the two eyes are presented with different images. The purpose of this study is to test whether the violation of temporal Bell inequality can be experimentally observed in binocular rivalry. If the temporal Bell inequality is violated (under no-signaling in time: NSIT), it implies that the perception of the rival stimuli cannot be assumed to be definite at each point in time (i.e., “realism” in the corresponding mental representations is violated), which is a key indication of non-classical behavior (as in, for example, quantum-like systems). Here, to test the violation of the inequality, we used binocular rivalry and measured both subjective reports and electroencephalogram (EEG). With EEG, we used frequency-tagging technique to track the cortical signal driven by each eye’s stimulus, known as the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP). We present the conceptual and methodological approaches to test the temporal Bell inequality.

•Dec 8, 2021•0 citations

Temporal Bell Inequalities and the Uncertainty Principle

Tommaso Calarco

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations
Temporally non-local measurements – single measurements yielding information about the state of a system at different instances – may provide a way to observe non-classical behavior in mental systems. The signature for such behavior is a violation of temporal Bell inequalities. We present such inequalities applicable to scenarios with two alternating mental states, such as in the perception of ambiguous figures. We indicate empirical options for testing temporal Bell inequalities, and speculate about possible explanations in case these inequalities are indeed violated.
Binocular rivalry refers to a phenomenon in which the perceived image changes spontaneously over time when the two eyes are presented with different images. The purpose of this study is to test whether the violation of temporal Bell inequality can be experimentally observed in binocular rivalry. If the temporal Bell inequality is violated (under no-signaling in time: NSIT), it implies that the perception of the rival stimuli cannot be assumed to be definite at each point in time (i.e., “realism” in the corresponding mental representations is violated), which is a key indication of non-classical behavior (as in, for example, quantum-like systems). Here, to test the violation of the inequality, we used binocular rivalry and measured both subjective reports and electroencephalogram (EEG). With EEG, we used frequency-tagging technique to track the cortical signal driven by each eye’s stimulus, known as the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP). We present the conceptual and methodological approaches to test the temporal Bell inequality.