Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics Express

Single-photon propagation through dielectric bandgaps

Natalia Borjemscaia, Sergey V. Polyakov, Paul D. Lett, Alan L. Migdall

Published Jan 21, 2010• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Theoretical models of photon traversal through quarter-wave dielectric stack barriers that arise due to Bragg reflection predict the saturation of the propagation time with the barrier length, known as the Hartman effect. This saturation is sensitive to the addition of single dielectric layers, varying significantly from sub-luminal to apparently super-luminal and vice versa. Our research tests the suitability of photonic bandgaps as an optical model for the tunneling process. Of particular importance is our observation of subtle structural changes in dielectric stacks drastically affecting photon traversal times, allowing for apparent sub- and super-luminal effects. We also introduce a simple model to link HOM visibility to wavepacket distortion that allows us to exclude this as a possible cause of the loss of contrast in the barrier penetration process.

DOI
10.1364/oe.18.002279

Related papers

Single-Photon Traversal of Dielectric Stacks

Natalia B. Rutter, Sergey V. Polyakov, Paul D. Lett +1 more

We examine single-photon bandgap traversal times. We see significant change in traversal times due to subtle differences in stack structures. We also analyze how propagation through inhomogeneous media affects Hong-Ou-Mandel visibility.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Physical mechanism for apparent superluminality in barrier tunneling

Herbert G. Winful

Tunneling without distortion is not a propagation phenomenon but a quasistatic process in which the slowly varying envelope of the input pulse modulates the amplitude of a standing wave in the barrier. Because the envelope has a bandwidth that is small compared to the cutoff frequency of the barrier it does not propagate; it merely stands and waves. The envelope of the reflected and transmitted fields can adiabatically follow the envelope of the input pulse with only a small delay proportional to the energy stored in the barrier. The Hartman effect, in which the delay becomes independent of barrier length, is explained on the basis of saturation of stored energy with increasing length. Because the delay is not a propagation delay, it should not be linked to a velocity of propagation. True evanescent waves have zero speed and not infinite velocity as often asserted.

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics•Jan 1, 2003•22 citations

Apparent superluminality and the generalized Hartman effect in double-barrier tunneling

Herbert G. Winful

Recent papers suggest that tunneling wave packets traverse the region of allowed propagation between two potential barriers with superluminal group velocity and in a time independent of barrier separation. This phenomenon has been termed the "generalized Hartman effect" and extended to multiple barriers. Here we show that this delay time is not a transit time but a cavity lifetime. It does not imply superluminal velocity. Reported experimental verifications of this effect are reinterpreted.

Physical Review E•Oct 18, 2005•33 citations

Tunnelling times and the Hartman effect

V. S. Olkhovsky, Erasmo Recami, Aleksandr K. Zaichenko

In a recent review paper [Phys. Rpeorts 214 (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions fot the subarrier tunnelling and reflection times. Aims of the present paper are: (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $\\left \\langle tau_P_e_n \\right \\rangle $ , $\\left \\langle tau_R_e_t\\right \\rangle $ during tunnelling inside a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths $x_f$ ; (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions. Besides of the mean values, also of the variances (or dispersions)$D\\tau_T\\ $ and $ D\\tau_R\\ $ for the tima durations of trasmission and reflection processes; (iii) mentioning that our definition $\\left \\langle tau_T \\right \\rangle $ for the average transmission time results to constituite an improvemente of the ordinary dwell-time $ \\bar tau^D^W\\ $ formula: (iv) commenting upon some recent criticism by C.R. Leavens, on the basis of our new numerical results. We stress that our numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the Hartman effect: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent-wave propagation) is receiving - at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Wien - indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. At last we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.

•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Do single photons tunnel faster than light?

Herbert G. Winful

Experiments done with single photons in the early 1990's produced a surprising result: that single photons pass through a photonic tunnel barrier with a group velocity faster than the vacuum speed of light. This result has stimulated intense discussions related to causality, the speed of information transfer, the nature of barrier tunneling and the meaning of group velocity. The superluminality of tunneling photons is now textbook material, although the authors note that controversy still remains. Another paradoxical result, known as the Hartman effect, is that the tunneling time of the photons becomes independent of barrier length in the limit of opaque barriers. In this paper we examine the meaning of group velocity in the context of barrier tunneling. We ask whether a single tunneling photon can be described by a group velocity and whether the short group delays imply superluminal group velocity. We resolve the paradox of the Hartman effect and show that the predicted and measured group delays are not transit times but photon lifetimes.

arXiv:0708.3889•Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 26, 2007•4 citations

Sub-barrier quantum tunneling: eliminating the MacColl-Hartman paradox

Atom Zh. Muradyan

I show that the MacColl-Hartman effect, namely, the saturation of the group delay time of sub-barrier quantum tunneling as a function of the barrier width, comes from the saturating behavior of a more fundamental concept - the phase of the stationary wave function. The explanation of saturation is given based on the decomposition of the stationary wave function into the spectrum of wave numbers and formulation of the initial condition for the direction of propagation of the incident matter wave. It is also shown that the saturation plateau of MacColl and Hartman actually doesn't continue indefinitely, but has a finite length. After the plateau, the sub-barrier tunneling time monotonically increases with increasing width of the potential, and this applies both to the maximum's of the wave packet and to the average tunneling time.

arXiv:2108.03054•Aug 6, 2021•0 citations
Theoretical models of photon traversal through quarter-wave dielectric stack barriers that arise due to Bragg reflection predict the saturation of the propagation time with the barrier length, known as the Hartman effect. This saturation is sensitive to the addition of single dielectric layers, varying significantly from sub-luminal to apparently super-luminal and vice versa. Our research tests the suitability of photonic bandgaps as an optical model for the tunneling process. Of particular importance is our observation of subtle structural changes in dielectric stacks drastically affecting photon traversal times, allowing for apparent sub- and super-luminal effects. We also introduce a simple model to link HOM visibility to wavepacket distortion that allows us to exclude this as a possible cause of the loss of contrast in the barrier penetration process.
Tunneling without distortion is not a propagation phenomenon but a quasistatic process in which the slowly varying envelope of the input pulse modulates the amplitude of a standing wave in the barrier. Because the envelope has a bandwidth that is small compared to the cutoff frequency of the barrier it does not propagate; it merely stands and waves. The envelope of the reflected and transmitted fields can adiabatically follow the envelope of the input pulse with only a small delay proportional to the energy stored in the barrier. The Hartman effect, in which the delay becomes independent of barrier length, is explained on the basis of saturation of stored energy with increasing length. Because the delay is not a propagation delay, it should not be linked to a velocity of propagation. True evanescent waves have zero speed and not infinite velocity as often asserted.
Recent papers suggest that tunneling wave packets traverse the region of allowed propagation between two potential barriers with superluminal group velocity and in a time independent of barrier separation. This phenomenon has been termed the "generalized Hartman effect" and extended to multiple barriers. Here we show that this delay time is not a transit time but a cavity lifetime. It does not imply superluminal velocity. Reported experimental verifications of this effect are reinterpreted.
In a recent review paper [Phys. Rpeorts 214 (1992) 339] we proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions fot the subarrier tunnelling and reflection times. Aims of the present paper are: (i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations (based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $\\left \\langle tau_P_e_n \\right \\rangle $ , $\\left \\langle tau_R_e_t\\right \\rangle $ during tunnelling inside a rectangular potential barrier, for various penetration depths xfx_fxf​ ; (ii) putting forth and discussing suitable definitions. Besides of the mean values, also of the variances (or dispersions)$D\\tau_T\\ $ and $ D\\tau_R\\ $ for the tima durations of trasmission and reflection processes; (iii) mentioning that our definition $\\left \\langle tau_T \\right \\rangle $ for the average transmission time results to constituite an improvemente of the ordinary dwell-time $ \\bar tau^D^W\\ $ formula: (iv) commenting upon some recent criticism by C.R. Leavens, on the basis of our new numerical results. We stress that our numerical evaluations confirm that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the Hartman effect: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical connections between tunnelling and evanescent-wave propagation) is receiving - at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Wien - indirect, but quite interesting, experimental verifications. At last we briefly analyze some other definitions of tunnelling times.
Experiments done with single photons in the early 1990's produced a surprising result: that single photons pass through a photonic tunnel barrier with a group velocity faster than the vacuum speed of light. This result has stimulated intense discussions related to causality, the speed of information transfer, the nature of barrier tunneling and the meaning of group velocity. The superluminality of tunneling photons is now textbook material, although the authors note that controversy still remains. Another paradoxical result, known as the Hartman effect, is that the tunneling time of the photons becomes independent of barrier length in the limit of opaque barriers. In this paper we examine the meaning of group velocity in the context of barrier tunneling. We ask whether a single tunneling photon can be described by a group velocity and whether the short group delays imply superluminal group velocity. We resolve the paradox of the Hartman effect and show that the predicted and measured group delays are not transit times but photon lifetimes.
I show that the MacColl-Hartman effect, namely, the saturation of the group delay time of sub-barrier quantum tunneling as a function of the barrier width, comes from the saturating behavior of a more fundamental concept - the phase of the stationary wave function. The explanation of saturation is given based on the decomposition of the stationary wave function into the spectrum of wave numbers and formulation of the initial condition for the direction of propagation of the incident matter wave. It is also shown that the saturation plateau of MacColl and Hartman actually doesn't continue indefinitely, but has a finite length. After the plateau, the sub-barrier tunneling time monotonically increases with increasing width of the potential, and this applies both to the maximum's of the wave packet and to the average tunneling time.