Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Answer to Question #45 [“What (if anything) does the photoelectric effect teach us?,’’ R. Q. Stanley, Am. J. Phys. 64 (7), 839 (1996)]

Peter W. Milonni

Published Jan 1, 1997• 13 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The history of the photoelectric effect is described. An analysis that field quantization is not required for an explaination of the photoelectric effiect is also given. (AIP)
DOI
10.1119/1.18494

Related papers

THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT WITHOUT PHOTONS

Willis E. Lamb, Marlan O. Scully

Photoelectric effect without photons, discussing classical field falling on quantized atomic electron

•Feb 1, 1968•55 citations

Early Experiments in Quantum Physics

Don Shillady

We tried to introduce the idea of quantization in Chapter 9 as a completion of a one semester course. However, we skipped over some really interesting events in the history of Science between 1900 and 1913 when Bohr derived the quantized energy of the H atom. First we want to carry out the 1901 Planck derivation of the formula for blackbody radiation [1]. Many texts just show the curve, write e¼ hn, and move on. As a student, this author found that limited explanation very frustrating since energy quantization is a fundamental concept. Even among graduate texts in quantum mechanics, we are aware of only one that does the complete treatment which we will draw upon for the mathematics [2] but supplement with a narrative that we have found helpful to students over the years. Then in 1905, Albert Einstein (1879-1955), one of the most influential scientists of all time, gave an explanation of the photoelectric effect [3] for which he received the Nobel Prize in 1921. Even reducing our list to essential topics, we need to discuss the Davisson-Germer experiment [4]. The photoelectric effect introduces the idea that light waves can act as particles while the Davisson-Germer experiment showed that particles can act like waves and confirmed the De Broglie equation [5]. However, you can be assured that it will not be as difficult as you might have anticipated and if you can absorb the meaning of just these three key experiments you should be able to begin thinking in terms of quantum mechanics! Despite our slow historical development, this is 2010 and we have to get to the twenty-first century somehow!

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 27, 2011•0 citations

Non-Einsteinian interpretations of the photoelectric effect

Roger H. Stuewer

1 online resource (PDF, page 246-263)

•Jan 1, 1970•12 citations

Answers to a few questions regarding the BMV experiment

Chiara Marletto, Vlatko Vedral

We provide brief answers to a number of recurring questions about the BMV effect and the related experimental proposal (Bose et al., 2017; Marletto and Vedral, 2017). Some of these questions include alleged counter-examples to our result, stating that if gravity (or anything mediating the interaction) can create entanglement while complying with locality, then it must then be non-classical. Here we explain why these objections are not counter-examples and why our result still stands; we also explore a few other important subtleties often disregarded on a first read of our paper (Marletto and Vedral, 2017).

arXiv:1907.08994•Jul 21, 2019•5 citations

Comments on the one-dimensional hydrogen atom [Am. J. Phys. 2 7, 649 (1959); Am. J. Phys. 3 7, 1145 (1969); Am. J. Phys. 4 4, 1064 (1976)

C. L. Hammer, T. A. Weber

Extraneous solutions to the Schroedinger equation are discussed. (AIP)

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1988•18 citations

A relativistic explanation of the photoelectric effect

J. Perdijon

Annales de la fondation Louis de Broglie/Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie•Jan 1, 1986•0 citations
We tried to introduce the idea of quantization in Chapter 9 as a completion of a one semester course. However, we skipped over some really interesting events in the history of Science between 1900 and 1913 when Bohr derived the quantized energy of the H atom. First we want to carry out the 1901 Planck derivation of the formula for blackbody radiation [1]. Many texts just show the curve, write e¼ hn, and move on. As a student, this author found that limited explanation very frustrating since energy quantization is a fundamental concept. Even among graduate texts in quantum mechanics, we are aware of only one that does the complete treatment which we will draw upon for the mathematics [2] but supplement with a narrative that we have found helpful to students over the years. Then in 1905, Albert Einstein (1879-1955), one of the most influential scientists of all time, gave an explanation of the photoelectric effect [3] for which he received the Nobel Prize in 1921. Even reducing our list to essential topics, we need to discuss the Davisson-Germer experiment [4]. The photoelectric effect introduces the idea that light waves can act as particles while the Davisson-Germer experiment showed that particles can act like waves and confirmed the De Broglie equation [5]. However, you can be assured that it will not be as difficult as you might have anticipated and if you can absorb the meaning of just these three key experiments you should be able to begin thinking in terms of quantum mechanics! Despite our slow historical development, this is 2010 and we have to get to the twenty-first century somehow!
We provide brief answers to a number of recurring questions about the BMV effect and the related experimental proposal (Bose et al., 2017; Marletto and Vedral, 2017). Some of these questions include alleged counter-examples to our result, stating that if gravity (or anything mediating the interaction) can create entanglement while complying with locality, then it must then be non-classical. Here we explain why these objections are not counter-examples and why our result still stands; we also explore a few other important subtleties often disregarded on a first read of our paper (Marletto and Vedral, 2017).