Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

Reply to Blümel's comment on ‘Quantum chaos in elementary quantum mechanics’

Yuri A. Dabaghian, Roderick V. Jensen

Published Dec 22, 2005• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We provide a short response to Blumel's comment on our paper (Dabaghian and Jensen 2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 423), concerning the periodic orbit summation techniques in the tunnelling regime.
DOI
10.1088/0143-0807/27/1/l02

Related papers

Comment on ‘Quantum chaos in elementary quantum mechanics’ by Yu Dabaghian and R Jensen

R. Blümel

Algebraic, numerical and conceptual problems in a recently published paper by Dabaghian and Jensen ( 2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 423–439 ) are discussed. A convergent scheme for summing periodic orbits in the tunnelling regime is suggested.

European Journal of Physics•Dec 22, 2005•7 citations

Comment on “Quantum Chaos in the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation”

Paolo Allegrini, Luca Bonci, Paolo Grigolini A +3 more

A Comment on the Letter by R. Blümel and B. Esser Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3658 (1994).

Physical Review Letters•Feb 20, 1995•6 citations

Comment on “Exponential Sensitivity and Chaos in Quantum Systems”

Rüdiger Schack

A Comment on the Letter by R. Blümel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 428 (1994). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 August 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.581©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jul 17, 1995•12 citations

Reply to Comment on "Non-monotonicity in the Quantum-Classical Transition: Chaos Induced by Quantum Effects"

Kyle Kingsbury, Chris Amey, Arie Kapulkin +1 more

Response to comment by Finn et al.

arXiv:0903.3931•Mar 23, 2009•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Entanglement and chaos in the kicked top' ”

M. Lombardi, A. Matzkin

We reply to the preceding Comment that attempts to clarify the connection between chaos and entanglement exposed in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 83, 016207 (2011)PRESCM1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.83.016207]. We present additional computations that show the argument exposed in the Comment to explain the entangling power of some regular states is not important in the present case. More fundamentally we argue that the example chosen in the Comment is not the most significant in order to understand why specific regular dynamics can entangle as efficiently as when the corresponding classical dynamics is chaotic.

Physical Review E•Sep 23, 2015•7 citations

Reply to the Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Anthony J. Horsewill

Chemical Physics Letters•Nov 29, 2006•4 citations
We reply to the preceding Comment that attempts to clarify the connection between chaos and entanglement exposed in our previous paper [Phys. Rev. E 83, 016207 (2011)PRESCM1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.83.016207]. We present additional computations that show the argument exposed in the Comment to explain the entangling power of some regular states is not important in the present case. More fundamentally we argue that the example chosen in the Comment is not the most significant in order to understand why specific regular dynamics can entangle as efficiently as when the corresponding classical dynamics is chaotic.