arXiv:0903.3931

Reply to Comment on "Non-monotonicity in the Quantum-Classical Transition: Chaos Induced by Quantum Effects"

Kyle Kingsbury, Chris Amey, Arie Kapulkin, Arjendu K. Pattanayak

Published Mar 23, 2009• 0 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

Response to comment by Finn et al.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0903.3931

Related papers

Non-monotonicity in the quantum-classical transition: Chaos induced by quantum effects

Arjendu K. Pattanayak, Arie Kapulkin

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyJun 6, 20070 citations

Reply to comments on “Objectification of classical properties induced by quantum vacuum fluctuations”

Emilio Santos

Physics Letters AJan 1, 19953 citations

Reply to the Comment on ‘The correspondence between quantum and classical mechanics: An experimental demonstration of the smooth transition between the two regimes’ [Chem. Phys. Lett. 402 (2005) 519]

Anthony J. Horsewill

Chemical Physics LettersNov 29, 20064 citations

Reply to comment on ‘non-monotonic projection probabilities as a function of distinguishability’

Gunnar G. Bjork, Saroosh Shabbir

We reiterate that a non-monotonic behavior of projection probabilities can occur for most states irrespective of the number of particles involved, based solely on the choice of the projectors chosen for measurement. We further clarify that, contrary to the claim in the comment, our analysis is not intended to demonstrate quantum to classical transition. However, our results show that a non-monotonic behavior is not a necessarily a signature of such a transition.

New Journal of PhysicsNov 28, 20140 citations

Non-monotonicity in the quantum-classical transition for the harmonic oscillator

Andrew McClung, Tyler Keating, Adam T. C. Steege +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMay 28, 20100 citations

Comment on “new representation of quantum chaos”

Michael Berry

Physics Letters ASep 1, 198410 citations