A fundamental problem which arises in determining whether two quantum mechanical systems are essentially identical is whether a unitary or antiunitary transformation exists which maps one set of dynamical variables into another. Since an elementary dynamical system is specified by giving an irreducible set of dynamical variables, we are led to investigate the following problem: Given two irreducible sets of operators with a one-to-one correspondence between them, find the algebraic properties of the two sets which make it possible to infer the existence of a unitary or antiunitary operator relating them. A series of theorems is obtained from such considerations for finite dimensional spaces. It is shown that if the second set of operators contains some of the algebraic properties of the first set, the two sets are related by a similarity transformation. By altering the requirements, this transformation is a unitary transformation. Indications are also given to show how the theorems can be extended to Hilbert spaces. The rigorous statements of the theorems and the proofs will be given in a second paper. Finally, in the Appendix there is given a definition of invariance of elementary quantum-mechanical systems based on the above theorems, giving the same results as Wigner's definition in terms of transition probabilities.
A fundamental problem which arises in determining whether two quantum mechanical systems are essentially identical is whether a unitary or antiunitary transformation exists which maps one set of dynamical variables into another. Since an elementary dynamical system is specified by giving an irreducible set of dynamical variables, we are led to investigate the following problem: Given two irreducible sets of operators with a one-to-one correspondence between them, find the algebraic properties of the two sets which make it possible to infer the existence of a unitary or antiunitary operator relating them. A series of theorems is obtained from such considerations for finite dimensional spaces. It is shown that if the second set of operators contains some of the algebraic properties of the first set, the two sets are related by a similarity transformation. By altering the requirements, this transformation is a unitary transformation. Indications are also given to show how the theorems can be extended to Hilbert spaces. The rigorous statements of the theorems and the proofs will be given in a second paper. Finally, in the Appendix there is given a definition of invariance of elementary quantum-mechanical systems based on the above theorems, giving the same results as Wigner's definition in terms of transition probabilities.
It is well known that one always can find as many orthogonal states (i.e., states between which the transition probability is zero) as the Hilbert space has dimensions which are invariant under a given unitary transformation. The corresponding vectors are characteristic vectors of the unitary operator. In contrast, most antiunitary operators leave not more than one state invariant. However, if there are two orthogonal invariant states, a consideration of the states for which the transition probability is ½ into both invariant states surely provides a distinction. In the antiunitary case, one of these states is also invariant, another one is transformed into an orthogonal state, the rest are in between. In the unitary case, the transition probability between original state and transformed state is the same for all states for which the transition probability is ½ into two orthogonal states. This provides a ``directly observable'' distinction between unitary and antiunitary transformations.
A cornerstone of quantum mechanics is the characterisation of symmetries provided by Wigner's theorem. Wigner's theorem shows that every symmetry of the quantum state space must be either a unitary transformation, or a antiunitary transformation. Here we extend Wigner's theorem from quantum states to quantum evolutions, including both the deterministic evolution associated to the dynamics of closed systems, and the stochastic evolution associated to quantum measurements. We prove that every symmetry of the space of quantum evolutions can be decomposed into two state space symmetries that are either both unitary or both antiunitary. Building on this result, we show that it is impossible to extend the time reversal symmetry of unitary quantum dynamics to a symmetry of the full set of quantum evolutions. Our no-go theorem implies that any time symmetric formulation of quantum theory must either restrict the set of the allowed evolutions, or modify the operational interpretation of quantum states and processes. We propose one such modification, wherein the evolutions are restricted to a suitable set of time symmetric operations, including both unitary evolution and the state reductions associated to projective measurements.
A cornerstone of quantum mechanics is the characterization of symmetries provided by Wigner's theorem. Wigner's theorem establishes that every symmetry of the quantum state space must be either a unitary transformation or an antiunitary transformation. Here we extend Wigner's theorem from quantum states to quantum evolutions, including both the deterministic evolution associated with the dynamics of closed systems and the stochastic evolutions associated with the outcomes of quantum measurements. We prove that every symmetry of the space of quantum evolutions can be decomposed into two state space symmetries that are either both unitary or both antiunitary. Building on this result, we show that it is impossible to extend the time-reversal symmetry of unitary quantum dynamics to a symmetry of the full set of quantum evolutions. Our no-go theorem implies that any time-symmetric formulation of quantum theory must either restrict the set of the allowed evolutions or modify the operational interpretation of quantum states and processes. Here we propose a time-symmetric formulation of quantum theory where the allowed quantum evolutions are restricted to a suitable set, which includes both unitary evolution and projective measurements but excludes the deterministic preparation of pure states. The standard operational formulation of quantum theory can be retrieved from this time-symmetric version by introducing an operation of conditioning on the outcomes of past experiments.
The idea that symmetries simplify or reduce the complexity of a system has been remarkably fruitful in physics, and especially in quantum mechanics. On a mathematical level, symmetry groups single out a certain structure in the Hilbert space that leads to a reduction. This structure is given by the irreducible representations of the group, and in general it can be identified with an operator algebra (a.k.a. C*-algebra or von Neumann algebra). The primary focus of this thesis is the extension of the framework of reductions from symmetries to operator algebras, and its applications in finite-dimensional quantum mechanics. Finding the irreducible representations structure is the principal problem when working with operator algebras. We will therefore review the representation theory of finite-dimensional operator algebras and elucidate this problem with the help of two novel concepts: minimal isometries and bipartition tables. One of the main technical results that we present is the Scattering Algorithm for analytical derivations of the irreducible representations structure of operator algebras. For applications, we will introduce a symmetry-agnostic approach to the reduction of dynamics where we circumvent the non-trivial task of identifying symmetries, and directly reduce the dynamics generated by a Hamiltonian. We will also consider quantum state reductions that arise from operational constraints, such as the partial trace or the twirl map, and study how operational constraints lead to decoherence. Apart from that, we will extend the idea of reduction beyond operator algebras to operator systems, and formulate a quantum notion of coarse-graining that so far only existed in classical probability theory. We will also characterize how the uncertainty principle transitions to the classical regime under coarse-grained measurements and discuss the implications in a finite-dimensional setting.
Symmetry in quantum mechanicsRoughly speaking, a symmetry of some mathematical object is an invertible transformation that leaves all relevant structure as it is.Thus a symmetry of a set is just a bijection (as sets have no further structure, whence invertibility is the only demand on a symmetry), a symmetry of a topological space is a homeomorphism, a symmetry of a Banach space is a linear isometric isomorphism, and, crucially important for this chapter, a symmetry of a Hilbert space H is a unitary operator, i.e., a linear map u : H → H satisfying one and hence all of the following equivalent conditions:• u is invertible and preserves the inner product, i.e., uϕ, uψ = ϕ, ψ (ϕ, ψ ∈ H).The discussion of symmetries in quantum physics is based on the above idea, but the mathematically obvious choices need not be the physically relevant ones.Even in elementary quantum mechanics, where A = B(H), i.e., the C*-algebra of all bounded operators on some Hilbert space H, the concept of a symmetry is already diverse.The main structures whose symmetries we shall study in this chapter are:1.The normal pure state space P 1 (H), i.e., the set of one-dimensional projections on H, with transition probability τ : P 1 (H) × P 1 (H) → [0, 1] defined by (2.44).2. The normal state space D(H), i.e. the convex set of density operators ρ on H. The self-adjoint operators B(H)sa on H, seen as a Jordan algebra (see below).4. The effects E (H) = [0, 1] B(H) , seen as a convex partially ordered set (poset). 5.The projections P(H) on H, seen as an orthocomplemented lattice.6.The unital commutative C*-subalgebras C (B(H)) of B(H), seen as a poset.Each of these structures comes with its own notion of a symmetry, but the main point of this chapter will be to show these notions are equivalent, corresponding in all cases to either unitary or-surprisingly-anti-unitary operators, both merely defined up to a phase.The latter subtlety will open the world of projective unitary group representation to quantum mechanics (without which the existence of spin-1 2 particles such as electrons, and therewith also of ourselves, would be impossible).
We analyze the issue of unitary equivalence within Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) theories in the one-dimensional case. For a deformed Heisenberg algebra, its representation in terms of Hilbert space and conjugate operators is not uniquely determined, raising the question of whether different realizations of the same algebra are equivalent and describe the same physics. After proposing a definition of a quantum GUP theory, we establish conditions for unitary equivalence. Using this framework, we rigorously prove that two commonly used representations are unitarily equivalent, specifying the conditions under which this equivalence holds. We demonstrate this equivalence explicitly by providing a unitary map and showing how both GUP formulations yield the same physical results in two examples: the quantum harmonic oscillator and a free-falling particle. Finally, we discuss a case where equivalence fails, suggesting that a generalization of the Stone-von Neumann theorem may not be possible within the GUP framework under our definition of unitary equivalence.