Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

manuscripta mathematica

A pseudo-algebra of observables for the dirac equation

Heinz Otto Cordes

Published Feb 1, 1983• 13 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01168582

Related papers

On the construction of the Feynman path integral for the Dirac equation (Introductory Workshop on Path Integrals and Pseudo-Differential Operators)

Wataru Ichinose

•Jul 1, 2015•0 citations

A spin observable for a Dirac particle

Paweł Caban, Jakub Rembieliński, Marta Włodarczyk

Annals of Physics•Dec 11, 2012•17 citations

$(1+1)$ dimensional Dirac equation with non Hermitian interaction

Anjana Sinha, Pinaki Roy

We study $(1+1)$ dimensional Dirac equation with non Hermitian interactions, but real energies. In particular, we analyze the pseudoscalar and scalar interactions in detail, illustrating our observations with some examples. We also show that the relevant hidden symmetry of the Dirac equation with such an interaction is pseudo supersymmetry.

•Jan 1, 2005•33 citations

(1+1)-DIMENSIONAL DIRAC EQUATION WITH NON-HERMITIAN INTERACTION

A. SINHA, P. ROY

We study (1+1)-dimensional Dirac equation with non-Hermitian interactions, but real energies. In particular, we analyze the pseudoscalar and scalar interactions in detail, illustrating our observations with some examples. We also show that the relevant hidden symmetry of the Dirac equation with such an interaction is pseudo-supersymmetry.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511252•Modern Physics Letters A•Sep 21, 2005•40 citations

On the Mathematical Basis of the Dirac Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

Manuel Gadella, F. Gómez-Cubillo

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 2003•49 citations

On Dirac Observables

Heinz Otto Cordes

The Dirac equation admits a natural time-invariant algebra Q of unbounded operators of the Hilbert space H = L 2(ℝ3, ℂ4). Time-invariance means that $${{e}^{{iHt}}}Q{{e}^{ - }}^{{iHt}} = Q, $$ with the unitary $${e^{iHt}}:{\mathbf{H}} \to {\mathbf{H}}. $$ This is not a specific feature of the Dirac equation; any 1-st order strictly hyperbolic system (under mild additional assumptions) admits such an algebra. We propose to introduce Q as algebra of “really predictable observables” into v. Neumann’s theory of physical states and observables: Only the self-adjoint operators A ∈ Q can be really predicted. For other observables — especially for most dynamical observables — one must find an observable A0 ∈ Q “close” to A, perhaps only for a given physical state ψ. Energy H belongs to Q, but location (angular) momentum, spin,…, do not. This seems to explain at a glance the triumphs and difficulties Dirac’s theory encountered.

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•3 citations
(1+1)(1+1)(1+1) dimensional Dirac equation with non Hermitian interaction
We study (1+1)(1+1)(1+1) dimensional Dirac equation with non Hermitian interactions, but real energies. In particular, we analyze the pseudoscalar and scalar interactions in detail, illustrating our observations with some examples. We also show that the relevant hidden symmetry of the Dirac equation with such an interaction is pseudo supersymmetry.
The Dirac equation admits a natural time-invariant algebra Q of unbounded operators of the Hilbert space H = L 2(ℝ3, ℂ4). Time-invariance means that eiHtQe−iHt=Q,{{e}^{{iHt}}}Q{{e}^{ - }}^{{iHt}} = Q, eiHtQe−iHt=Q, with the unitary eiHt:H→H.{e^{iHt}}:{\mathbf{H}} \to {\mathbf{H}}. eiHt:H→H. This is not a specific feature of the Dirac equation; any 1-st order strictly hyperbolic system (under mild additional assumptions) admits such an algebra. We propose to introduce Q as algebra of “really predictable observables” into v. Neumann’s theory of physical states and observables: Only the self-adjoint operators A ∈ Q can be really predicted. For other observables — especially for most dynamical observables — one must find an observable A0 ∈ Q “close” to A, perhaps only for a given physical state ψ. Energy H belongs to Q, but location (angular) momentum, spin,…, do not. This seems to explain at a glance the triumphs and difficulties Dirac’s theory encountered.