Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Adiabatic and Non-Adiabatic Berry Phases in Generalized J-C Model of Multi-Photon Process

Ni Liu, Yue-Ming Wang, Liang Jiu-Qing

Published Aug 1, 2012• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

We derive the adiabatic and non-adiabatic Berry phases in the generalized Jaynes—Cummings model of multi-photon process. The results show that the adiabatic Berry phase is kept a constant π independent of all the parameters, while the non-adiabatic approximate Berry phase is parameter-dependent, proportional to the average photon number m, and tends to be constant with the increasing detuning. In the case of exact n-photon resonance and an integer ratio of m/n, the two results coincide with each other, otherwise there appears an additional non-trivial phase factor.

DOI
10.1088/0253-6102/58/2/17

Related papers

On the rotating wave approximation in the adiabatic limit

Jonas Larson

I revisit a longstanding question in quantum optics; when is the rotating wave approximation justified? In terms of the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi models I demonstrate that the approximation in general breaks down in the adiabatic limit regardless of system parameters. This is explicitly shown by comparing Berry phases of the two models, where it is found that this geometrical phase is strictly zero in the Rabi model contrary to the non-trivial Berry phase of the Jaynes–Cummings model. The source of this surprising result is traced back to different topologies in the two models.

arXiv:1208.1891•Physica Scripta•Mar 1, 2013•7 citations

The Berry Phase of J-C Model

Qingguo Zhang

The time-dependent gauge transformation can be applyed to the J-C model which is a full quantumized model to describe a two-level atom interact with single model elecromagnetic field.The results indicate that the non-adiabatic approximation berry-phase of this system is linear with the average of photon number operator.

Journal of Shanxi University•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Non-adiabatic Non-cyclic Generalization of the Berry Phase for a Spin-1/2 Particle in a Rotating Magnetic Field

Siamak Sadat Gousheh, Azadeh Mohammadi, Leila Shahkarami

In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo $2π$, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1212.2104•Dec 10, 2012•1 citation

Adiabatic and nonadiabatic Berry phases for two-level atoms

D J Moore, G E Stedman

A formalism for calculating Berry phases for nonadiabatic systems containing an additional adiabatic time dependence is developed. This is then applied to a two-level atom in a strong resonant polarized laser, where the laser polarization provides the adiabatic parameter. It is found that, when the laser polarization is kept constant, judicious polarization choices allow one to eliminate either the rotating-wave or non-rotating-wave part of the interaction. Furthermore, the adiabatic Berry phasor obtained when the laser polarization is varied is found to be complex. This can be compared to the case of purely adiabatic time-reversal even systems, which can only have real Berry phasors.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1992•16 citations

Adiabatic and Non-Adiabatic Berry Phases in Generalized J-C Model of Multi-Photon Process

刘妮, 王月明, 梁九卿

理论物理通讯：英文版•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Berry's phases for arbitrary spins nonlinearly coupled to external fields: application to the entanglement ofN> 2 non-correlated 1/2-spins

Marie-Anne Bouchiat, Claude C. Bouchiat

We derive the general formula giving Berry's phase for an arbitrary spin, having both magnetic-dipole and electric-quadrupole couplings with external time-dependent fields. We assume that the 'effective' electric and magnetic fields remain orthogonal during the quantum cycles. This mild restriction has many advantages. It provides simple symmetries leading to useful selection rules. Furthermore, the Hamiltonian parameter space coincides with the density matrix space for a spin S = 1. This implies a mathematical identity between Berry's phase and the Aharonov–Anandan phase, which is lost for S > 1. We have found that new physical features of Berry's phases emerge for integer spins ⩾2. We provide explicit numerical results of Berry's phases for S = 2, 3, 4. For any spin, one easily finds well-defined regions of the parameter space where instantaneous eigenstates remain widely separated. We have decided to stay within them and not deal with non-Abelian Berry's phases. We present a thorough and precise analysis of the non-adiabatic corrections with separate treatment for periodic and non-periodic Hamiltonian parameters. In both cases, the accuracy for satisfying the adiabatic approximation within a definite time interval is considerably improved if one chooses for the time derivatives of the parameters a time-dependence having a Blackman pulse shape. This has the effect of taming the non-adiabatic oscillation corrections which could be generated by a linear ramping. For realistic experimental conditions, the non-adibatic corrections can be kept below the 0.1% level. For a class of quantum cycles, involving as a sole periodic parameter the precession angle of the electric field around the magnetic field, the corrections odd upon the reversal of the associated rotation velocity can be canceled exactly if the quadrupole to dipole coupling is chosen appropriately ('magic values'). The even ones are eliminated by taking the difference of the Berry phases generated by two 'mirror' cycles. We end by indicating a possible application of the theoretical tools developed in this paper. We propose a way to perform a holonomic entanglement of N non-correlated 1/2-spins by performing adiabatic cycles governed by a Hamiltonian given as a nonlinear function of the total spin operator S , defined as the sum of the N individual spin operators. The basic idea behind this proposal is the mathematical fact that any non-correlated states can be expanded into eigenstates of S 2 and S z . The same eigenvalues appear several times in the decomposition when N > 2 but all these states differ by their symmetry properties under the N -spin permutations. The case N = 4 and S z = 1 is treated explicitly and a maximum entanglement is achieved.

arXiv:1006.2528•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 28, 2010•1 citation
We derive the adiabatic and non-adiabatic Berry phases in the generalized Jaynes—Cummings model of multi-photon process. The results show that the adiabatic Berry phase is kept a constant π independent of all the parameters, while the non-adiabatic approximate Berry phase is parameter-dependent, proportional to the average photon number m, and tends to be constant with the increasing detuning. In the case of exact n-photon resonance and an integer ratio of m/n, the two results coincide with each other, otherwise there appears an additional non-trivial phase factor.
I revisit a longstanding question in quantum optics; when is the rotating wave approximation justified? In terms of the Jaynes–Cummings and Rabi models I demonstrate that the approximation in general breaks down in the adiabatic limit regardless of system parameters. This is explicitly shown by comparing Berry phases of the two models, where it is found that this geometrical phase is strictly zero in the Rabi model contrary to the non-trivial Berry phase of the Jaynes–Cummings model. The source of this surprising result is traced back to different topologies in the two models.
In this paper we define a non-dynamical phase for a spin-1/2 particle in a rotating magnetic field in the non-adiabatic non-cyclic case, and this phase can be considered as a generalized Berry phase. We show that this phase reduces to the geometric Berry phase, in the adiabatic limit, up to a factor independent of the parameters of the system. We could add an arbitrary phase to the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian due to the gauge freedom. Then, we fix this arbitrary phase by comparing our Berry phase in the adiabatic limit with the Berry's result for the same system. Also, in the extreme non-adiabatic limit our Berry phase vanishes, modulo 2π2π2π, as expected. Although, our Berry phase is in general complex, it becomes real in the expected cases: the adiabatic limit, the extreme non-adiabatic limit, and the points at which the state of the system returns to its initial form, up to a phase factor. Therefore, this phase can be considered as a generalization of the Berry phase. Moreover, we investigate the relation between the value of the generalized Berry phase, the period of the states and the period of the Hamiltonian.
A formalism for calculating Berry phases for nonadiabatic systems containing an additional adiabatic time dependence is developed. This is then applied to a two-level atom in a strong resonant polarized laser, where the laser polarization provides the adiabatic parameter. It is found that, when the laser polarization is kept constant, judicious polarization choices allow one to eliminate either the rotating-wave or non-rotating-wave part of the interaction. Furthermore, the adiabatic Berry phasor obtained when the laser polarization is varied is found to be complex. This can be compared to the case of purely adiabatic time-reversal even systems, which can only have real Berry phasors.
We derive the general formula giving Berry's phase for an arbitrary spin, having both magnetic-dipole and electric-quadrupole couplings with external time-dependent fields. We assume that the 'effective' electric and magnetic fields remain orthogonal during the quantum cycles. This mild restriction has many advantages. It provides simple symmetries leading to useful selection rules. Furthermore, the Hamiltonian parameter space coincides with the density matrix space for a spin S = 1. This implies a mathematical identity between Berry's phase and the Aharonov–Anandan phase, which is lost for S > 1. We have found that new physical features of Berry's phases emerge for integer spins ⩾2. We provide explicit numerical results of Berry's phases for S = 2, 3, 4. For any spin, one easily finds well-defined regions of the parameter space where instantaneous eigenstates remain widely separated. We have decided to stay within them and not deal with non-Abelian Berry's phases. We present a thorough and precise analysis of the non-adiabatic corrections with separate treatment for periodic and non-periodic Hamiltonian parameters. In both cases, the accuracy for satisfying the adiabatic approximation within a definite time interval is considerably improved if one chooses for the time derivatives of the parameters a time-dependence having a Blackman pulse shape. This has the effect of taming the non-adiabatic oscillation corrections which could be generated by a linear ramping. For realistic experimental conditions, the non-adibatic corrections can be kept below the 0.1% level. For a class of quantum cycles, involving as a sole periodic parameter the precession angle of the electric field around the magnetic field, the corrections odd upon the reversal of the associated rotation velocity can be canceled exactly if the quadrupole to dipole coupling is chosen appropriately ('magic values'). The even ones are eliminated by taking the difference of the Berry phases generated by two 'mirror' cycles. We end by indicating a possible application of the theoretical tools developed in this paper. We propose a way to perform a holonomic entanglement of N non-correlated 1/2-spins by performing adiabatic cycles governed by a Hamiltonian given as a nonlinear function of the total spin operator S , defined as the sum of the N individual spin operators. The basic idea behind this proposal is the mathematical fact that any non-correlated states can be expanded into eigenstates of S 2 and S z . The same eigenvalues appear several times in the decomposition when N > 2 but all these states differ by their symmetry properties under the N -spin permutations. The case N = 4 and S z = 1 is treated explicitly and a maximum entanglement is achieved.