Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Magnus Force, Aharonov-Bohm Effect, and Berry Phase in Superfluids

Edouard B Sonin

Published Sep 12, 2007• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-45542-6_11

Related papers

Magnus Force and Aharonov—Bohm Effect in Superfluids

Edouard B Sonin

arXiv:cond-mat/0104221•Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 2002•7 citations

Aharonov-Bohm oscillations with spin: evidence for Berry's phase

MANSOUR SHAYEGAN

APS•Mar 1, 2003•0 citations

Geometric Phases in Mesoscopic Systems — From the Aharonov-Bohm Effect to Berry Phases

Ady Stern

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•0 citations

The Adiabatic Approximation, Aharonov–Bohm, and Berry Phases

T. Banks

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 7, 2018•0 citations

Vortex dynamics in superfluids and the Berry phase

D. J. Thouless, Ping Ao, Q. Niu

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Nov 1, 1993•17 citations

Canonical force and electromagnetic geometrical phase in particle interference

S. A. R. Horsley, M. Babiker

We provide arguments which demonstrate that the Berry phase effects involving particle interference in the presence of external electric and magnetic fields—namely the Aharonov–Bohm (AB), Aharonov–Casher (AC) and the Röntgen (R) effects—cannot be unambiguously explained (as has been controversially argued) through the use of any classical mechanical force. In fact, in the three scenarios which we consider, the only means to reclaim the standard quantum mechanical results is to use the expressions for the force that fail to satisfy the necessary conditions of gauge invariance. Our arguments explain the foundation of the controversy and confirm the standard idea that the Berry phase effects in question are non-local phenomena which only arise in the application of quantum theory. We lay special emphasis on the use of the concept of a canonical force, this being the quantity which ensures the agreement between the classical and quantum formulations. It is shown that if the Aharonov–Bohm effect is interpreted as being due to a force, through the use of the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics, then this force is equal in magnitude to the canonical force.

Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•May 18, 2007•3 citations
We provide arguments which demonstrate that the Berry phase effects involving particle interference in the presence of external electric and magnetic fields—namely the Aharonov–Bohm (AB), Aharonov–Casher (AC) and the Röntgen (R) effects—cannot be unambiguously explained (as has been controversially argued) through the use of any classical mechanical force. In fact, in the three scenarios which we consider, the only means to reclaim the standard quantum mechanical results is to use the expressions for the force that fail to satisfy the necessary conditions of gauge invariance. Our arguments explain the foundation of the controversy and confirm the standard idea that the Berry phase effects in question are non-local phenomena which only arise in the application of quantum theory. We lay special emphasis on the use of the concept of a canonical force, this being the quantity which ensures the agreement between the classical and quantum formulations. It is shown that if the Aharonov–Bohm effect is interpreted as being due to a force, through the use of the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics, then this force is equal in magnitude to the canonical force.