Cambridge University Press eBooks

Basic Theory of Bose–Einstein Condensation of Excitons

S. A. Moskalenko, David W. Snoke

Published Feb 28, 2000• 0 citations

Abstract

The Bogoliubov Model of the Weakly Nonideal Bose Gas In this chapter we review the basic theory of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of excitons. To start, this means we must review the basic theory of BEC of any kind of particle, the theory known as the Bogoliubov model, after the foundational contributions made by N. N. Bogoliubov. This model introduces all the strange things associated with BEC: spontaneous symmetry breaking, off-diagonal long-range order (ODLRO), macroscopic occupation of a single quantum state, etc. It is often said that physicists who spend years studying quantum mechanics eventually warp their intuition so much that things like ODLRO seem normal. It is well worth stepping back every now and then to think about just how strange a Bose condensate is. First, consider the idea of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Many systems exist in which the underlying physics, expressed in the Hamiltonian, do not favor one state over another. The a priori probability of occupation of the different states by a particle is equal, i.e., symmetric. Nevertheless, in some cases, thermodynamics requires that a macroscopic number of particles must somehow “choose” one of the states preferentially. If they did not, the system would not be in equilibrium, i.e, could not have a definable temperature. If the particles preferentially choose one state, then the underlying symmetry has been broken. In the context of magnets, the breaking of the symmetry of the magnet (to have all its constituent dipoles lined up one way and not another) is energetically favored, since there are terms in the Hamiltonian that give lower energy for aligned dipoles, e.g., μS 1 · S 2 .

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511721687.003

Related papers

Spontaneous U(1) symmetry breaking and Bose–Einstein condensation

Qian Feng, HUANG HONG-BIN, Qi Guan-Xiao +1 more

Based on Bogoliubov's truncated Hamiltonian H B for a weakly interacting Bose system, and adding a U(1) symmetry breaking term V 1/2 (λ a 0 +λ * a 0 + ) to H B , we show by using the coherent state theory and the mean-field approximation rather than the c-number approximations, that the Bose–Einstein condensation(BEC) occurs if and only if the U(1) symmetry of the system is spontaneously broken. The real ground state energy and the justification of the Bogoliubov c-number substitution are given by solving the Schrödinger eigenvalue equation and using the self-consistent condition.

Chinese PhysicsJul 1, 20066 citations

Bose–Einstein Condensation

Tim Byrnes, Ebubechukwu O. Ilo-Okeke

This chapter introduces the basic physics of Bose--Einstein condensation. We first start with why there is a difference between distinguishable and indistinguishable particles in terms of the number of states that are available in a composite system. Then Bose and Einstein's argument of why one expects a high probability of occupation of the ground state is discussed. This is derived then more rigorously for the grand canonical ensemble, showing that at some critical temperature there should be a macroscopic occupation of the ground state. Next, the low-lying energy spectrum of an interacting Bose--Einstein condensate is derived, leading to the Bogoliubov dispersion. The significance of the Bogoliubov dispersion as the origin of superfluidity is then discussed, in terms of superfluditysuperfluidity. Laudau'sLandau's criterion for superfluidity is derived, by general principles of Galilean transformations of Schrodinger's equation.

Cambridge University Press eBooksJul 23, 20211 citation

Bose–Einstein condensation

P. van der Straten, Harold J. Metcalf

Introduction Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) is one of the most intriguing phenomena in physics. The basic idea goes back to the 1920s, when Einstein made predictions for the behavior of atoms at sufficiently low temperatures and high densities. However, it took seven decades for experimental physicists to realize this phase under the low-density conditions envisioned by Einstein. In the intermediate period there were many experiments in which aspects of BEC played important roles. Therefore, phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity were connected to BEC long before its 1995 realization in ultra-cold, low-density atomic vapors. Since BEC can be discussed with very many different backgrounds and applications in mind, the subject can sometimes be overwhelming for interested students. There is a very good reason why a chapter on BEC does not belong in this book. In all the other chapters here, the processes described involve one or at most two atoms, and the interactions that play a role are between the particles that constitute the atom, namely between the nucleus (or nuclei) and their electrons. The interactions are described quantum mechanically by their Hamiltonian that can always be written exactly in non-relativistic terms, and in some cases can even be solved exactly. This makes atoms and molecules a branch of physics where comparisons between theory and experiments become very meaningful since theoretical predictions are often confirmed to very high accuracy. In BEC, it is the interactions among many atoms that are the key for understanding the phenomenon. Although in principle one could write a Hamiltonian for a Bose condensed gas, its large number of particles makes this not very practical. The starting point for the description of a BEC is in the area of many-body physics that belongs to the expertise of condensed-matter physicists. The interactions between ~10 23 electrons in a solid state with a lattice formed by ~10 23 ions resemble the kind of interactions in a BEC much more closely than the simple fewbody interactions in an atom or molecule. Thus all the theoretical models that have been described up to now are not applicable for the contents of this chapter.

Cambridge University Press eBooksDec 31, 20158 citations

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION AND SPONTANEOUS SYMMETRY BREAKING 1

Élliott H. Lieb, Robert Seiringer, Jakob Yngvason

After recalling briefly the connection between spontaneous symmetry breaking and off-diagonal long range order for models of magnets a general proof of spontaneous breaking of gauge symmetry as a consequence of Bose-Einstein Condensation is presented. The proof is based on a rigorous validation of Bogoliubov’s c-number substitution for the k = 0 mode operator a 0.

Jan 1, 200712 citations

The Question of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Condensates

David W. Snoke, Andrew J. Daley

The question of whether Bose-Einstein condensation involves spontaneous symmetry breaking is surprisingly controversial. We review the theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking in ferromagnets, compare it with the theory of symmetry breaking in condensates, and discuss the different viewpoints on the correspondence to experiments. These viewpoints include alternative perspectives in which we can treat condensates with fixed particle numbers, and where coherence arises from measurements. This question relates to whether condensates of quasiparticles such as polaritons can be viewed as “real” condensates. Introduction Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a deep subject in physics with long historical roots. At the most basic level, it arises in the field of cosmology. Physicists have long had an aesthetic principle that leads us to expect symmetry in the all of the basic equations of physical law. Yet the universe is manifestly full of asymmetries. How does a symmetric system acquire asymmetry merely by evolving in time? Starting in the 1950s, cosmologists began to borrow the ideas of spontaneous symmetry breaking from condensed matter physics, which were originally developed to explain spontaneous magnetization in ferromagnetic systems. Spontaneous coherence in all its forms (e.g., Bose-Einstein condensation [BEC], superconductivity, and lasing) can be viewed as another type of symmetry breaking. The Hamiltonian of the system is symmetric, yet under some conditions, the energy of the system can be reduced by putting the system into a state with asymmetry, namely, a state with a common phase for a macroscopic number of particles. The symmetry of the system implies that it does not matter what the exact choice of that phase is, as long as it is the same for all the particles. It is not obvious, however, whether the symmetry breaking which occurs in spontaneous coherence of the type seen in lasers or in Bose-Einstein condensation is the same as that seen in ferromagnetic systems. There are similarities in the systems which encourage the same view of all types of symmetry breaking, but there are also differences. In fact, there is a substantial school of thought that symmetry breaking in Bose-Einstein condensates with ultracold atoms is a “convenient fiction” (a term applied to optical coherence by Mølmer [1]).

arXiv:1507.07456Cambridge University Press eBooksOct 4, 20183 citations

Formation of Bose-Einstein Condensates

Matthew J. Davis, Tod M. Wright, Thomas Gasenzer +2 more

The problem of understanding how a coherent, macroscopic Bose- Einstein condensate (BEC) emerges from the cooling of a thermal Bose gas has attracted significant theoretical and experimental interest over several decades. The pioneering achievement of BEC in weakly interacting dilute atomic gases in 1995 was followed by a number of experimental studies examining the growth of the BEC number, as well as the development of its coherence. More recently, there has been interest in connecting such experiments to universal aspects of nonequilibrium phase transitions, in terms of both static and dynamical critical exponents. Here, the spontaneous formation of topological structures such as vortices and solitons in quenched cold-atom experiments has enabled the verification of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism predicting the density of topological defects in continuous phase transitions, first proposed in the context of the evolution of the early universe. This chapter reviews progress in the understanding of BEC formation and discusses open questions and future research directions in the dynamics of phase transitions in quantum gases. Introduction The equilibrium phase diagram of the dilute Bose gas exhibits a continuous phase transition between condensed and noncondensed phases. The order parameter characteristic of the condensed phase vanishes above some critical temperature T c and grows continuously with decreasing temperature below this critical point. However, the dynamical process of condensate formation has proved to be a challenging phenomenon to address both theoretically and experimentally. This formation process is a crucial aspect of Bose systems and of direct relevance to all condensates discussed in this book, despite their evident system-specific properties. Important questions leading to intense discussions in the early literature include the time scale for condensate formation and the role of inhomogeneities and finite-size effects in “closed” systems. These issues are related to the concept of spontaneous symmetry breaking, its causes, and implications for physical systems (see, for example, Chapter 5 by Snoke and Daley). In this chapter, we give an overview of the dynamics of condensate formation and describe the present understanding provided by increasingly well-controlled cold-atom experiments and corresponding theoretical advances over the past twenty years. We focus on the growth of BECs in cooled Bose gases, which, from a theoretical standpoint, requires a suitable nonequilibrium formalism.

arXiv:1601.06197Cambridge University Press eBooksOct 4, 20185 citations