Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Pseudo-Hermitian Euclidean Hamiltonian

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

Published Mar 27, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

There is no conservation of probability in the Euclidean formulation of the acceleration Lagrangian. A narrow definition of a Hamiltonian, and the one that holds in quantum mechanics but is not suitable for our case, is that the Hamiltonian defines a probability conserving unitary evolution. A broader definition of the Hamiltonian is adopted that is consistent with both statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics. Namely, the Hamiltonian – which is equivalent to the transfer matrix in statistical mechanics – is the generator of infinitesimal translations in time for both the Minkowski and Euclidean cases. The Hamiltonian derived for the acceleration Lagrangian in Chapter 13 is studied in this chapter using the concepts of the state space and operators. The Hamiltonian for unequal and real frequencies ω 1 ,ω 2 is pseudo-Hermitian and is explicitly mapped to a Hermitian Hamiltonian using a nontrivial differential operator. An explicit expression is obtained for the matrix element of the differential operator. The mapping fails for a critical value of the coupling constants. The Hamiltonian and state space are shown to have real and complex branches that are separated by the critical point. At the critical point, the Hamiltonian is inequivalent to any Hermitian operator, and is shown in Chapter 15 as being equal to an infinite-dimensional block diagonal matrix, with each block being a Jordan matrix.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511842450.016

Related papers

ACTION WITH ACCELERATION II: EUCLIDEAN HAMILTONIAN AND JORDAN BLOCKS

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

The Euclidean action with acceleration has been analyzed in Ref. 1, and referred to henceforth as Paper I, for its Hamiltonian and path integral. In this paper, the state space of the Hamiltonian is analyzed for the case when it is pseudo-Hermitian (equivalent to a Hermitian Hamiltonian), as well as the case when it is inequivalent. The propagator is computed using both creation and destruction operators as well as the path integral. A state space calculation of the propagator shows the crucial role played by the dual state vectors that yields a result impossible to obtain from a Hermitian Hamiltonian. When it is not pseudo-Hermitian, the Hamiltonian is shown to be a direct sum of Jordan blocks.

arXiv:1211.7166•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Oct 30, 2013•5 citations

ACTION WITH ACCELERATION I: EUCLIDEAN HAMILTONIAN AND PATH INTEGRAL

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

An action having an acceleration term in addition to the usual velocity term is analyzed. The quantum mechanical system is directly defined for Euclidean time using the path integral. The Euclidean Hamiltonian is shown to yield the acceleration Lagrangian and the path integral with the correct boundary conditions. Due to the acceleration term, the state space depends on both position and velocity — and hence the Euclidean Hamiltonian depends on two degrees of freedom. The Hamiltonian for the acceleration system is non-Hermitian and can be mapped to a Hermitian Hamiltonian using a similarity transformation; the matrix elements of the similarity transformation are explicitly evaluated.

arXiv:1211.7168•International Journal of Modern Physics A•Oct 28, 2013•8 citations

Time Evolution

Tilak Sinha

In this chapter, we finally introduce time evolution. The development is carried out for finite, enumerable systems (i.e., systems whose states live in a finite dimensional, inner product space) which, of course, allows a straight forward extension to the continuum and infinite dimensional state spaces. The necessary mathematical background of unitary operators, and their properties relevant to quantum mechanics are first introduced. In particular, the fact that preservation of norm under the action of an operator implies unitarity, and that every unitary operator can be expressed as the exponential of i timesa Hermitian operator are introduced. Time evolution is then introduced in its integral form through the time evolution operator, and the Hamiltonian operator is introduced in this context. This approach, however, necessitates the restriction to conservative systems. Next, the differential form of the law of time evolution, i.e., Schrodinger equation, is derived from the time evolution operator, and this is postulated to be the general law of time evolution. We then demonstrate how, for conservative systems, the solution of the Schrodinger equation essentially reduces to solving the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian. Constants of motion and Heisenberg picture have been relegated to the problem section.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Jun 18, 2021•0 citations

Trace dynamics: the classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics of matrix models

Stephen L. Adler

In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 26, 2004•0 citations

PSEUDO-HERMITIAN REPRESENTATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

ALI MOSTAFAZADEH

A diagonalizable non-Hermitian Hamiltonian having a real spectrum may be used to define a unitary quantum system, if one modifies the inner product of the Hilbert space properly. We give a comprehensive and essentially self-contained review of the basic ideas and techniques responsible for the recent developments in this subject. We provide a critical assessment of the role of the geometry of the Hilbert space in conventional quantum mechanics to reveal the basic physical principle motivating our study. We then offer a survey of the necessary mathematical tools, present their utility in establishing a lucid and precise formulation of a unitary quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, and elaborate on a number of relevant issues of fundamental importance. In particular, we discuss the role of the antilinear symmetries such as [Formula: see text], the true meaning and significance of the so-called charge operators [Formula: see text] and the [Formula: see text]-inner products, the nature of the physical observables, the equivalent description of such models using ordinary Hermitian quantum mechanics, the pertaining duality between local-non-Hermitian versus nonlocal-Hermitian descriptions of their dynamics, the corresponding classical systems, the pseudo-Hermitian canonical quantization scheme, various methods of calculating the (pseudo-) metric operators, subtleties of dealing with time-dependent quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians and the path-integral formulation of the theory, and the structure of the state space and its ramifications for the quantum Brachistochrone problem. We also explore some concrete physical applications and manifestations of the abstract concepts and tools that have been developed in the course of this investigation. These include applications in nuclear physics, condensed matter physics, relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, quantum cosmology, electromagnetic wave propagation, open quantum systems, magnetohydrodynamics, quantum chaos and biophysics.

arXiv:0810.5643•International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Nov 1, 2010•941 citations

Pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics with unbounded metric operators

Ali Mostafazadeh

I extend the formulation of pseudo-Hermitian quantum mechanics to η(+)-pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators H with an unbounded metric operator η(+). In particular, I give the details of the construction of the physical Hilbert space, observables and equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian for the case that H has a real and discrete spectrum and its eigenvectors belong to the domain of η(+) and consequently √η(+).

arXiv:1203.6241•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Mar 19, 2013•41 citations
There is no conservation of probability in the Euclidean formulation of the acceleration Lagrangian. A narrow definition of a Hamiltonian, and the one that holds in quantum mechanics but is not suitable for our case, is that the Hamiltonian defines a probability conserving unitary evolution. A broader definition of the Hamiltonian is adopted that is consistent with both statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics. Namely, the Hamiltonian – which is equivalent to the transfer matrix in statistical mechanics – is the generator of infinitesimal translations in time for both the Minkowski and Euclidean cases. The Hamiltonian derived for the acceleration Lagrangian in Chapter 13 is studied in this chapter using the concepts of the state space and operators. The Hamiltonian for unequal and real frequencies ω 1 ,ω 2 is pseudo-Hermitian and is explicitly mapped to a Hermitian Hamiltonian using a nontrivial differential operator. An explicit expression is obtained for the matrix element of the differential operator. The mapping fails for a critical value of the coupling constants. The Hamiltonian and state space are shown to have real and complex branches that are separated by the critical point. At the critical point, the Hamiltonian is inequivalent to any Hermitian operator, and is shown in Chapter 15 as being equal to an infinite-dimensional block diagonal matrix, with each block being a Jordan matrix.
The Euclidean action with acceleration has been analyzed in Ref. 1, and referred to henceforth as Paper I, for its Hamiltonian and path integral. In this paper, the state space of the Hamiltonian is analyzed for the case when it is pseudo-Hermitian (equivalent to a Hermitian Hamiltonian), as well as the case when it is inequivalent. The propagator is computed using both creation and destruction operators as well as the path integral. A state space calculation of the propagator shows the crucial role played by the dual state vectors that yields a result impossible to obtain from a Hermitian Hamiltonian. When it is not pseudo-Hermitian, the Hamiltonian is shown to be a direct sum of Jordan blocks.
An action having an acceleration term in addition to the usual velocity term is analyzed. The quantum mechanical system is directly defined for Euclidean time using the path integral. The Euclidean Hamiltonian is shown to yield the acceleration Lagrangian and the path integral with the correct boundary conditions. Due to the acceleration term, the state space depends on both position and velocity — and hence the Euclidean Hamiltonian depends on two degrees of freedom. The Hamiltonian for the acceleration system is non-Hermitian and can be mapped to a Hermitian Hamiltonian using a similarity transformation; the matrix elements of the similarity transformation are explicitly evaluated.
In this chapter, we finally introduce time evolution. The development is carried out for finite, enumerable systems (i.e., systems whose states live in a finite dimensional, inner product space) which, of course, allows a straight forward extension to the continuum and infinite dimensional state spaces. The necessary mathematical background of unitary operators, and their properties relevant to quantum mechanics are first introduced. In particular, the fact that preservation of norm under the action of an operator implies unitarity, and that every unitary operator can be expressed as the exponential of i timesa Hermitian operator are introduced. Time evolution is then introduced in its integral form through the time evolution operator, and the Hamiltonian operator is introduced in this context. This approach, however, necessitates the restriction to conservative systems. Next, the differential form of the law of time evolution, i.e., Schrodinger equation, is derived from the time evolution operator, and this is postulated to be the general law of time evolution. We then demonstrate how, for conservative systems, the solution of the Schrodinger equation essentially reduces to solving the eigenvalue problem of the Hamiltonian. Constants of motion and Heisenberg picture have been relegated to the problem section.
In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.
A diagonalizable non-Hermitian Hamiltonian having a real spectrum may be used to define a unitary quantum system, if one modifies the inner product of the Hilbert space properly. We give a comprehensive and essentially self-contained review of the basic ideas and techniques responsible for the recent developments in this subject. We provide a critical assessment of the role of the geometry of the Hilbert space in conventional quantum mechanics to reveal the basic physical principle motivating our study. We then offer a survey of the necessary mathematical tools, present their utility in establishing a lucid and precise formulation of a unitary quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, and elaborate on a number of relevant issues of fundamental importance. In particular, we discuss the role of the antilinear symmetries such as [Formula: see text], the true meaning and significance of the so-called charge operators [Formula: see text] and the [Formula: see text]-inner products, the nature of the physical observables, the equivalent description of such models using ordinary Hermitian quantum mechanics, the pertaining duality between local-non-Hermitian versus nonlocal-Hermitian descriptions of their dynamics, the corresponding classical systems, the pseudo-Hermitian canonical quantization scheme, various methods of calculating the (pseudo-) metric operators, subtleties of dealing with time-dependent quasi-Hermitian Hamiltonians and the path-integral formulation of the theory, and the structure of the state space and its ramifications for the quantum Brachistochrone problem. We also explore some concrete physical applications and manifestations of the abstract concepts and tools that have been developed in the course of this investigation. These include applications in nuclear physics, condensed matter physics, relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, quantum cosmology, electromagnetic wave propagation, open quantum systems, magnetohydrodynamics, quantum chaos and biophysics.