In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.
In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.
We consider the classical dynamics of bosonic and fermionic matrix variables in complex Hilbert space, defined by a trace action, assuming cyclic invariance under the trace and the presence of a global unitary invariance. With plausible and explicitly stated assumptions, including the existence of a large hierarchy of scale between the underlying dynamics and observed physics, we show that (1) the equilibrium statistical mechanics of this matrix dynamics, in the canonical ensemble, gives rise to an emergent quantum mechanics for many degrees of freedom, including the standard canonical commutation/anticommutation relations and the usual unitary Heisenberg and Schrödinger picture time evolutions of operators and states, and (2) the fluctuation or Brownian motion corrections to this thermodyamics lead to an energy-driven stochastic modification of the Schrödinger equation, which is known to imply state vector reduction with Born rule probabilities. Thus, quantum mechanics and its probabilistic interpretation both arise as emergent phenomena in the underlying trace dynamics.
Abstract We have recently proposed a new matrix dynamics at the Planck scale, building on the theory of trace dynamics. This is a Lagrangian dynamics in which the matrix degrees of freedom are made from Grassmann numbers, and the Lagrangian is trace of a matrix polynomial. Matrices made from even grade elements of the Grassmann algebra are called bosonic, and those made from odd grade elements are called fermionic. In the present article, we provide a basic definition of spin angular momentum in this matrix dynamics, and introduce a bosonic(fermionic) configuration variable conjugate to the spin of a boson(fermion). We then show that at energies below Planck scale, where the matrix dynamics reduces to quantum theory, fermions have half-integer spin (in multiples of Planck’s constant), and bosons have integral spin. We also show that this definition of spin agrees with the conventional understanding of spin in relativistic quantum mechanics. Consequently, we obtain an elementary proof for the spin-statistics connection.
We begin with a presentation of the Schwinger variational principle in quantum mechanics. In the second part, after a re-assessment of the problem of motion in quantum mechanics, it is shown that the Green kernel, which represents the probability amplitude of finding a particle in space at a given time, once its location at another time is known, can be represented by a sum over ‘space–time paths’. According to this interpretation, one integrates the exponential of i times the classical action divided by ħ, with a (formal) measure over all space–time paths matching the initial location x i at time t i and the final location x f at time t f . Such a way of evaluating the Green kernel is applied to any quadratic Lagrangian for a generic quantum system including, in particular, the harmonic oscillator and the free particle. Lastly, we outline a formalism which involves ordinary functions of commuting variables, and exactly reproduces ordinary quantum mechanics. It works with a phase space endowed with commuting coordinates, so that one is dealing with quantum mechanics in phase space. The Schwinger formulation of quantum dynamics In both the Schrödinger formulation in terms of wave functions (with associated state vectors) and the Heisenberg formulation in terms of noncommuting matrices (with corresponding linear operators) the dynamical evolution is specified in terms of the Hamiltonian. This has motivated our presentation of classical dynamics, but is in marked contrast with the view according to which the Lagrangian and the action specify the dynamics. Hamilton's principle is formulated in terms of the action, the time integral of the Lagrangian.
Path integrals are by and large defined directly in terms of the configuration space representation of the quantum entity's degrees of freedom and employ the Lagrangian description of the quantum entity; most of the path integrals in this book follow this approach. The Hamiltonian provides another independent approach for defining path integrals and is discussed in this chapter. Two important path integrals, which are directly based on the Hamiltonian, are the following: (a) one that is defined on the degree of freedom's phase space , defined as the tensor product of the degree of freedom space and its canonical conjugate momentum space; and (b) path integrals using the coherent state basis instead of the coordinate basis. Path integrals defined on phase space, or for coherent states, are both based on the Hamiltonian. To put in the foreground the role of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics, the canonical equations connecting the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian are discussed. A brief review of Hamiltonian mechanics, also called the canonical equations, is given in Section 5.1 and the connection of symmetries with conservation laws is discussed in Section 5.2. The Hamiltonian is derived from the Lagrangian in Section 5.3, for both Minkowski and Euclidean time. Phase space path integrals are defined in Section 5.4. Canonical quantization based on the Poisson brackets is discussed in Section 5.5, and Dirac brackets required for quantizing constrained systems are derived in Section 5.7. Coherent states and their path integrals are discussed in Sections 5.10 to 5.14.
In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.
Trace dynamics is a matrix-valued Lagrangian/Hamiltonian dynamics whose equilibrium statistical mechanics yields quantum theory via the Adler--Millard conserved charge. A persistent conceptual gap is a canonical (Noether--Hamiltonian) definition of spin: since trace dynamics is fundamentally pre-spacetime (in the sense that classical spacetime geometry is emergent), the conventional interpretation of spin as an ``internal'' angular momentum requires a precise identification of the relevant configuration ``angle'' variable and the space in which it lives. Building on earlier phase-amplitude constructions of complexified trace-dynamical variables, we propose a mathematically sharpened definition: \emph{spin is the canonical momentum conjugate to an orientation variable valued in an appropriate spin group} (e.g.\ $\Spin(3,1)$ on an emergent Lorentzian leaf, or $\Spin(3,3)$ at the 6D pre-localisation stage). This reformulation upgrades the abelian phase θ to a nonabelian group element U(τ), with angular velocity Ω=U−1U˙ and intrinsic spin tensor $S=\delta\,\Tr L/\delta\Omega\in\mathfrak{spin}(p,q)$. We show (i) how the earlier θ-momentum definition arises as a restriction to a one-parameter subgroup; (ii) how quantisation of spin follows from the emergent canonical (anti)commutators induced by equipartition of the Adler--Millard charge together with the topology of the true orientation manifold ($\SU(2)$ double cover); (iii) how the Pauli--Lubanski invariant is recovered and how a 6D (3,3)-signature generalisation naturally appears as a 3-form; and (iv) how division-algebra geometry (octonions, split bioctonions) provides a concrete scaffolding for the relevant spin groups, including the $\SO(3,3)\to \SO(3,1)\times \SO(2)$ leaf selection and the $\SU(3)_{\mathrm{geom}}$-induced internal Spinc structure on CP2-type fibres. We also clarify the relation between Poincar\'e-mass as the translation Casimir and ``square-root mass'' charges that can arise from geometric U(1) factors.