Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

G-Dimensional Theory & the Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes: Comparative Logic and Modern Quantum Theory

Lola Young

Published Mar 1, 2010• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

The Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes [Nature, Vol. 413, No. 6854] and Smarandache Hypothesis (FTL) are defined as a formal set of (anti-logic) statements inclusive in modern quantum theory. To determine whether they constitute theoretical artifacts or can be considered true physical paradoxes, G Dimensional Theory, a unique, logical and physically congruent system of physics, at significant variance with modern and classical theory, is presented in Sections 3-4. A comparative analysis of the Smarandache quantum paradoxes within context of the two theories follows in Section 5.

Related papers

Quantum Smarandache Quasi-Paradoxes And Quantum Smarandache Sorites Paradoxes

Amalia Grigorescu

There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.

•May 1, 2000•0 citations

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings supporting Smarandache’s Quantum Sorites Paradoxes, Superluminal Hypothesis, and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor .., Robert N. Boyd

Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Beyond the Light Speed Barrier: A Path from Smarandache’s “No Speed Limit” Hypothesis to Macro Quantum Soliton in the Solar System

Florentín Smarandache, Victor Christianto

Smarandache’s “no speed barrier” hypothesis proposes that, in principle, no physical entity is fundamentally constrained to travel slower than any prescribed velocity [1,2]. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Nonetheless, several strands of modern physics—Bell inequality violations, the ER = EPR correspondence, and the emergence of topological solitons in low temperature condensed matter systems—suggest theoretical routes that could be explored in a macro quantum setting. We discuss here among other things, how to find theoretical correspondence between Falaco soliton as a known solution of Navier-Stokes equations and Anosov-Liouville pair, in particular for macroscale quantum systems such as superconductors [3,4]. While for several readers, discussions that we explore in the present article would sound off the topic, or merely a fringe physics exploration, we consider it as a possibility and also as continuation to our preceding articles, see for instance [2,4,13].

Journal of Physics & Optics Sciences•Sep 29, 2025•0 citations

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings Supporting SmarandacheâÂÂs Hypothesis and Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and Sub Quantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor Christianto, Robert N. Boyd, Florentin Smar +1 more

Smarandache Hypothesis states that there’s no regulation of something, together with lightweight and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on a known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by the majority of physicists.Here we have a tendency to review some experiments to support superluminal physics and additionally findings to elucidate Smarandache Quantum contradictions and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on a new experiment on magneton, supporting the SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron, and as well as discussing its implications on virus modelling and RNA/DNA.

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes Italian Studies in the Foundations and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Gino Tarozzi, Alwyn van der Merwe

The Italian Debate on Quantum Paradoxes.- 1. The Epistemological Roots of Quantum Paradoxes.- Waves, Particles and Complementarity.- Chance: Chaos or Logic?.- Some Critical Considerations on the Present Epistemological and Scientific Debate on Quantum Mechanics.- 2. Einstein Locauty, Separable Reality, and Quantum Correlations.- Physical Consequences of Reality Criteria for Quantum Phenomena.- Possible Link Between EPR Paradox and Waves.- A Criticism of Some Recently Proposed Models that Violate the Bell Inequality.- A Phenomenological Analysis of the EPR Argument.- 3. Causal and Deterministic Interpretations of Quantum Formausm.- Causal versus Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.- Perspectives of Physical Determinism.- Determinism, Separability, and Quantum Mechanics.- 4. Quantum Theory and Gravitation.- Can Singularities and Multidimensional Spaces Influence the Evolution of Quantum Mechanical Systems?.- Subquantum Mechanics and Graviton Blas.- 5. Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics.- Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. A Quantum Probabilistic Approach.- On the Adequacy of a Nonclassical Logic for Quantum Theory.- Remarks on the Hypothesis of Hidden Variables.- 6. Historical Developments of the Einstein-Bohr Controversy.- Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen.- Continuity and Discontinuity: The Einstein-Bohr Conflict of Ideas and the Bohr-Fock Discussion.- How Italian Philosophy Reacted to the Advent of Quantum Mechanics in the Thirties.- Italian Studies in the Foundations of Quantum Physics. A Bibliography (1965-1985).

Kluwer Academic Pub. eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•4 citations

Quantum Smarandache Paradoxes

Niculescu, George

In this paper one presents four of the smarandacheian paradoxes in physics found in various physics sites or printed material.

Smarandache Notions Journal archive•Sep 5, 2001•0 citations
The Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes [Nature, Vol. 413, No. 6854] and Smarandache Hypothesis (FTL) are defined as a formal set of (anti-logic) statements inclusive in modern quantum theory. To determine whether they constitute theoretical artifacts or can be considered true physical paradoxes, G Dimensional Theory, a unique, logical and physically congruent system of physics, at significant variance with modern and classical theory, is presented in Sections 3-4. A comparative analysis of the Smarandache quantum paradoxes within context of the two theories follows in Section 5.
There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.
Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.
Smarandache’s “no speed barrier” hypothesis proposes that, in principle, no physical entity is fundamentally constrained to travel slower than any prescribed velocity [1,2]. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Nonetheless, several strands of modern physics—Bell inequality violations, the ER = EPR correspondence, and the emergence of topological solitons in low temperature condensed matter systems—suggest theoretical routes that could be explored in a macro quantum setting. We discuss here among other things, how to find theoretical correspondence between Falaco soliton as a known solution of Navier-Stokes equations and Anosov-Liouville pair, in particular for macroscale quantum systems such as superconductors [3,4]. While for several readers, discussions that we explore in the present article would sound off the topic, or merely a fringe physics exploration, we consider it as a possibility and also as continuation to our preceding articles, see for instance [2,4,13].
Smarandache Hypothesis states that there’s no regulation of something, together with lightweight and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on a known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by the majority of physicists.Here we have a tendency to review some experiments to support superluminal physics and additionally findings to elucidate Smarandache Quantum contradictions and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on a new experiment on magneton, supporting the SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron, and as well as discussing its implications on virus modelling and RNA/DNA.
The Italian Debate on Quantum Paradoxes.- 1. The Epistemological Roots of Quantum Paradoxes.- Waves, Particles and Complementarity.- Chance: Chaos or Logic?.- Some Critical Considerations on the Present Epistemological and Scientific Debate on Quantum Mechanics.- 2. Einstein Locauty, Separable Reality, and Quantum Correlations.- Physical Consequences of Reality Criteria for Quantum Phenomena.- Possible Link Between EPR Paradox and Waves.- A Criticism of Some Recently Proposed Models that Violate the Bell Inequality.- A Phenomenological Analysis of the EPR Argument.- 3. Causal and Deterministic Interpretations of Quantum Formausm.- Causal versus Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.- Perspectives of Physical Determinism.- Determinism, Separability, and Quantum Mechanics.- 4. Quantum Theory and Gravitation.- Can Singularities and Multidimensional Spaces Influence the Evolution of Quantum Mechanical Systems?.- Subquantum Mechanics and Graviton Blas.- 5. Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics.- Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. A Quantum Probabilistic Approach.- On the Adequacy of a Nonclassical Logic for Quantum Theory.- Remarks on the Hypothesis of Hidden Variables.- 6. Historical Developments of the Einstein-Bohr Controversy.- Historical Considerations on the Conceptual Experiment by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen.- Continuity and Discontinuity: The Einstein-Bohr Conflict of Ideas and the Bohr-Fock Discussion.- How Italian Philosophy Reacted to the Advent of Quantum Mechanics in the Thirties.- Italian Studies in the Foundations of Quantum Physics. A Bibliography (1965-1985).