Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Smarandache Quasi-Paradoxes And Quantum Smarandache Sorites Paradoxes

Amalia Grigorescu

Published May 1, 2000• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.9596

Related papers

Quantum Quasi-Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradoxes

Florentín Smarandache

There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.

Progress in physics•Jan 1, 2005•5 citations

Quantum Smarandache Paradoxes

Niculescu, George

In this paper one presents four of the smarandacheian paradoxes in physics found in various physics sites or printed material.

Smarandache Notions Journal archive•Sep 5, 2001•0 citations

Quantum logic: what it can and can't do

Peter Gibbins

What do we expect of a quantum logical interpretation of quantum mechanics worthy of the name? In what sense should it resolve the paradoxes? What scope should it have? Should quantum logic, if it is successful in the micro world, replace classical logic in the macro world and in mathematics? We distinguish between two kinds of quantum logical interpretations of quantum mechanics. An example of the first kind, the activist kind, will do much more than simply rewrite the assertions that quantum mechanics makes about the quantum world in an unfamiliar notation - in the elementary language of quantum mechanics. It will offer a solution to the major puzzles of quantum mechanics. It will show that the paradoxes of quantum mechanics can be resolved if we do away with classical logic and replace it with quantum logic, at least in our descriptions of quantum phenomena. It may defend a form of quantum-mechanical realism, a sort of quantum logical particle view of quantum systems, protecting it from the paradoxes that classical logic would impose on it. The second kind of quantum logical interpretation, the passive or quietist kind, is less ambitious. A quietist interpretation offers a solution to the paradoxes only in the following sense. It will assert that quantum mechanics, when it describes quantum phenomena in the elementary language, need not generate paradox, that the so-called paradoxes are not even formulable in quantum logic.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 25, 1987•0 citations

On the ontological ambiguity of physics facing reality

J. E. Horvath, Rodrigo Rosas Fernandes, Thais E. P. Idiart

Abstract We discuss in this work, the contradictory position in modern Physics between the existence of a microphysical quantum reality and macrophysical classical one. After discussing some basic concepts in Philosophy, we revisit the situation of Quantum Mechanics results, particularly after the confirmation of violations of Bell's theorem, and its significance to create a tension between the micro and the macro world, which is very fundamental and unsolved.

arXiv:2301.07297•Astronomische Nachrichten•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings supporting Smarandache’s Quantum Sorites Paradoxes, Superluminal Hypothesis, and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor .., Robert N. Boyd

Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings Supporting SmarandacheâÂÂs Hypothesis and Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and Sub Quantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor Christianto, Robert N. Boyd, Florentin Smar +1 more

Smarandache Hypothesis states that there’s no regulation of something, together with lightweight and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on a known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by the majority of physicists.Here we have a tendency to review some experiments to support superluminal physics and additionally findings to elucidate Smarandache Quantum contradictions and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on a new experiment on magneton, supporting the SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron, and as well as discussing its implications on virus modelling and RNA/DNA.

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations
There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.
There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.
What do we expect of a quantum logical interpretation of quantum mechanics worthy of the name? In what sense should it resolve the paradoxes? What scope should it have? Should quantum logic, if it is successful in the micro world, replace classical logic in the macro world and in mathematics? We distinguish between two kinds of quantum logical interpretations of quantum mechanics. An example of the first kind, the activist kind, will do much more than simply rewrite the assertions that quantum mechanics makes about the quantum world in an unfamiliar notation - in the elementary language of quantum mechanics. It will offer a solution to the major puzzles of quantum mechanics. It will show that the paradoxes of quantum mechanics can be resolved if we do away with classical logic and replace it with quantum logic, at least in our descriptions of quantum phenomena. It may defend a form of quantum-mechanical realism, a sort of quantum logical particle view of quantum systems, protecting it from the paradoxes that classical logic would impose on it. The second kind of quantum logical interpretation, the passive or quietist kind, is less ambitious. A quietist interpretation offers a solution to the paradoxes only in the following sense. It will assert that quantum mechanics, when it describes quantum phenomena in the elementary language, need not generate paradox, that the so-called paradoxes are not even formulable in quantum logic.
Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.
Smarandache Hypothesis states that there’s no regulation of something, together with lightweight and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on a known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by the majority of physicists.Here we have a tendency to review some experiments to support superluminal physics and additionally findings to elucidate Smarandache Quantum contradictions and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on a new experiment on magneton, supporting the SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron, and as well as discussing its implications on virus modelling and RNA/DNA.