Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings Supporting SmarandacheâÂÂs Hypothesis and Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and Sub Quantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor Christianto, Robert N. Boyd, Florentin Smar, ache

Published Jan 1, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Smarandache Hypothesis states that there’s no regulation of something, together with lightweight and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on a known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by the majority of physicists.Here we have a tendency to review some experiments to support superluminal physics and additionally findings to elucidate Smarandache Quantum contradictions and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on a new experiment on magneton, supporting the SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron, and as well as discussing its implications on virus modelling and RNA/DNA.

Related papers

Remark on Recent Experimental Findings supporting Smarandache’s Quantum Sorites Paradoxes, Superluminal Hypothesis, and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron

Victor .., Robert N. Boyd

Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.

•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Beyond the Light Speed Barrier: A Path from Smarandache’s “No Speed Limit” Hypothesis to Macro Quantum Soliton in the Solar System

Florentín Smarandache, Victor Christianto

Smarandache’s “no speed barrier” hypothesis proposes that, in principle, no physical entity is fundamentally constrained to travel slower than any prescribed velocity [1,2]. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Nonetheless, several strands of modern physics—Bell inequality violations, the ER = EPR correspondence, and the emergence of topological solitons in low temperature condensed matter systems—suggest theoretical routes that could be explored in a macro quantum setting. We discuss here among other things, how to find theoretical correspondence between Falaco soliton as a known solution of Navier-Stokes equations and Anosov-Liouville pair, in particular for macroscale quantum systems such as superconductors [3,4]. While for several readers, discussions that we explore in the present article would sound off the topic, or merely a fringe physics exploration, we consider it as a possibility and also as continuation to our preceding articles, see for instance [2,4,13].

Journal of Physics & Optics Sciences•Sep 29, 2025•0 citations

Smarandache Hypothesis: Evidences, Implications And Applications

Leonardo F. D. da Motta

In 1972 Smarandache proposed that there is not a limit speed on the Illlture, based on the EPR-Bell (Einstein, PodoLsky, Rosen, BeII) paradox. Although it appears that this paradox was solved recently, there are many other evidences that guide us to believe that Smarandache Hypothesis is right on quanrum mechanics and even on the new unification theories. If Srnarnndache Hypothesis turns to be right under any circumstance, some concepts of modern physics would have to be "refit" to agree with Smarandache Hypothesis. Moreover, when the meaning of Smarandache Hypothesis become completely understood, a revolution on technology, specially in communication, will arise.

Smarandache Notions Journal archive•Jun 1, 2010•6 citations

Quantum Smarandache Quasi-Paradoxes And Quantum Smarandache Sorites Paradoxes

Amalia Grigorescu

There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.

•May 1, 2000•0 citations

Research on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

Oreste Piccioni, Werner A. W. Mehlhop, Brian C. Wright

This report discusses the following: The analysis of the singlet state of separate fermions proves that the EPR contradicts QM. The violation of special relativity. The Schroedinger equation and the EPR. The conservation of angular momentum. The proposal of collapse. The factorization of the spin states. The superposition principle. No paradox exists within the theory. The original state of Einstein et al is not a valid example of the EPR, and it seems impossible to construct a valid linear momentum example. This is another indication that the EPR contradicts QM. Actions at a distance, the model of Einstein et al for particles with mass, and Bell's inequalities and their physical meaning.

•Jun 1, 1989•0 citations

Research on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Final report

Oreste Piccioni, Werner A. W. Mehlhop, Brian C. Wright

This report discusses the following: The analysis of the singlet state of separate fermions proves that the EPR contradicts QM. The violation of special relativity. The Schroedinger equation and the EPR. The conservation of angular momentum. The proposal of collapse. The factorization of the spin states. The superposition principle. No paradox exists within the theory. The original state of Einstein et al is not a valid example of the EPR, and it seems impossible to construct a valid linear momentum example. This is another indication that the EPR contradicts QM. Actions at a distance, the model of Einstein et al for particles with mass, and Bell`s inequalities and their physical meaning.

•Jun 1, 1989•0 citations
Smarandache Hypothesis states that there’s no regulation of something, together with lightweight and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on a known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by the majority of physicists.Here we have a tendency to review some experiments to support superluminal physics and additionally findings to elucidate Smarandache Quantum contradictions and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on a new experiment on magneton, supporting the SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron, and as well as discussing its implications on virus modelling and RNA/DNA.
Statement of the Problem: Smarandache Hypothesis states that there is no speed limit of anything, including light and particles. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Here we review some experiments to support superluminal physics and also findings to explain Smarandache Quantum Paradoxes and Quantum Sorites Paradox. We also touch briefly on new experiment on magneton, supporting SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron. Aim of this paper: We discuss some experimental results which will likely open new directions of research toward evidence-based physics.Conclusion Significance: Multiexperimental findings assessment allows one to verify conjectures by Florentin Smarandache RNB, namely: Smarandache Hypothesis, Smarandache Quantum Sorites Paradoxes and SubQuantum Kinetic Model of Electron.
Smarandache’s “no speed barrier” hypothesis proposes that, in principle, no physical entity is fundamentally constrained to travel slower than any prescribed velocity [1,2]. While the idea is quite simple and based on known hypothesis of quantum mechanics, called Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox, in reality such a superluminal physics seems still hard to accept by majority of physicists. Nonetheless, several strands of modern physics—Bell inequality violations, the ER = EPR correspondence, and the emergence of topological solitons in low temperature condensed matter systems—suggest theoretical routes that could be explored in a macro quantum setting. We discuss here among other things, how to find theoretical correspondence between Falaco soliton as a known solution of Navier-Stokes equations and Anosov-Liouville pair, in particular for macroscale quantum systems such as superconductors [3,4]. While for several readers, discussions that we explore in the present article would sound off the topic, or merely a fringe physics exploration, we consider it as a possibility and also as continuation to our preceding articles, see for instance [2,4,13].
In 1972 Smarandache proposed that there is not a limit speed on the Illlture, based on the EPR-Bell (Einstein, PodoLsky, Rosen, BeII) paradox. Although it appears that this paradox was solved recently, there are many other evidences that guide us to believe that Smarandache Hypothesis is right on quanrum mechanics and even on the new unification theories. If Srnarnndache Hypothesis turns to be right under any circumstance, some concepts of modern physics would have to be "refit" to agree with Smarandache Hypothesis. Moreover, when the meaning of Smarandache Hypothesis become completely understood, a revolution on technology, specially in communication, will arise.
There can be generated many paradoxes or quasi-paradoxes that may occur from the combination of quantum and non-quantum worlds in physics. Even the passage from the micro-cosmos to the macro-cosmos, and reciprocally, can generate unsolved questions or counter-intuitive ideas. We define a quasi-paradox as a statement which has a prima facie self-contradictory support or an explicit contradiction, but which is not completely proven as a paradox. We present herein four elementary quantum quasi-paradoxes and their corresponding quantum Sorites paradoxes, which form a class of quantum quasi-paradoxes.
This report discusses the following: The analysis of the singlet state of separate fermions proves that the EPR contradicts QM. The violation of special relativity. The Schroedinger equation and the EPR. The conservation of angular momentum. The proposal of collapse. The factorization of the spin states. The superposition principle. No paradox exists within the theory. The original state of Einstein et al is not a valid example of the EPR, and it seems impossible to construct a valid linear momentum example. This is another indication that the EPR contradicts QM. Actions at a distance, the model of Einstein et al for particles with mass, and Bell's inequalities and their physical meaning.
This report discusses the following: The analysis of the singlet state of separate fermions proves that the EPR contradicts QM. The violation of special relativity. The Schroedinger equation and the EPR. The conservation of angular momentum. The proposal of collapse. The factorization of the spin states. The superposition principle. No paradox exists within the theory. The original state of Einstein et al is not a valid example of the EPR, and it seems impossible to construct a valid linear momentum example. This is another indication that the EPR contradicts QM. Actions at a distance, the model of Einstein et al for particles with mass, and Bell`s inequalities and their physical meaning.