Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.40810

Beyond the Kubo formula: unification of adiabatic and isothermal response in quantum systems

Giuliano Chiriacò, Vasco Cavina

quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elSubmitted Oct 29, 2026• Announced Nov 2, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The static limit of the Kubo susceptibility describes the adiabatic response of an isolated quantum system, in which energy-level occupations remain unchanged, and generally differs from the isothermal susceptibility, where these occupations readjust to thermal equilibrium. In this work, we introduce a single dynamical framework in which the adiabatic and isothermal responses arise naturally as two distinct limiting regimes. This can be done by considering explicitly an open system version of the Kubo approach in which the dissipation is governed by a typical thermalization rate of the system. By exchanging the order of the static limit and of the vanishing thermalization rate limit, the protocol yields either the adiabatic or isothermal response. This protocol has a solid physical motivation in terms of the thermalization dynamics and is valid for generic systems. We apply it to the case of the magnetic response of the electron gas and reproduce the expected results.

AI Summary

The paper addresses the difference between the zero-frequency Kubo susceptibility of an isolated quantum system, where instantaneous energy-level populations remain fixed, and the isothermal susceptibility, where populations readjust to equilibrium. It introduces an explicit thermalization rate $\kappa$ alongside the probe frequency $\omega$, interpreting the two static responses as different orders of limits of an open-system susceptibility $\chi_{AB}(\omega,\kappa)$. Using thermal-state expressions and a Lehmann representation, it obtains $\chi_{AB}^{T}=\chi_{AB}^{S}-\beta\operatorname{Cov}(A_0,B_0)$, where $A_0,B_0$ are energy-basis diagonal components. For self-response under the convention $H=H_0+\lambda A$, this gives $\chi_{AA}^{T}\leq\chi_{AA}^{S}\leq0$. Taking $\kappa\to0$ before $\omega\to0$ yields the isolated response; reversing the order yields the isothermal response. The explicit application is a free electron gas coupled by particle exchange to a thermal fermionic bath. Keldysh Green-function calculations give $\chi_M(\omega,\kappa)\simeq\chi_P\,2\kappa/(2\kappa-i\omega)$ at low temperature and $\omega,\kappa\ll\varepsilon_F$, recovering zero uniform isolated spin susceptibility and the Pauli isothermal susceptibility. At nonzero momentum, the two static limits coincide in this example; subsequently taking momentum to zero recovers the Pauli result. The bath calculation assumes a flat, effectively momentum-independent bath spectrum and constant broadening. Extensions to other relaxation mechanisms require their corresponding self-energies and consistency with conservation laws. Isolated many-body thermalization at conserved entropy, distinct from fixed-population quantum adiabatic evolution, is explicitly left for future investigation.

Little sign of AI-generated textAI use disclosedOverclaimsUnclear noveltyStrong assumptionsPossible error
This image was AI generated with Claude-Opus5.5.

Central claim may not hold: The paper advertises a generic open-system dynamical framework but supplies neither a general susceptibility formula nor conditions guaranteeing its order-of-limits prescription beyond the explicit particle-exchange reservoir example. A nonzero imaginary single-particle self-energy does not suffice to relax uniform total spin: spin-conserving scattering leaves its exact retarded response zero, despite a finite quasiparticle lifetime. The purportedly generic static susceptibility formulas are undefined or basis-dependent for degenerate Hamiltonians because they use individual eigenstate diagonals and unqualified energy-difference denominators. The displayed zero-temperature crossover formula additionally requires a low-frequency, weak-broadening, approximately constant-density-of-states regime that is stated only in its appendix derivation.

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Comments
7+6 pages, 2+1 figures

Related papers

The Kubo-Thermalization Correspondence

Songtao Huang, Xingyu Li, Jianyi Chen +5 more

Quantum thermalization describes how interacting quantum systems relax toward thermal equilibrium, a central problem in modern physics. Yet most experimental information on many-body systems comes from short-time transition spectroscopy, typically interpreted within Kubo's linear-response framework. These perspectives-long-time equilibration versus short-time response-seem fundamentally disconnected. Here we establish an exact link between them: the \emph{Kubo-Thermalization correspondence}, which connects long-time thermalized magnetization under weak driving to short-time linear-response spectra for a spin coupled to a thermal bath. The correspondence holds even when the steady state differs substantially from the initial state and when each regime is individually difficult to describe theoretically. We experimentally confirm the correspondence using effective spin-$1/2$ impurities realized with ultracold fermions in two internal states coupled to a Fermi sea. Our results provide a rare exact statement about quantum thermalization and offer a novel route to infer thermalization dynamics from equilibrium response measurements in strongly interacting quantum systems, independent of microscopic details of the system--bath coupling.

cond-mat.quant-gasCross-listedarXiv:2605.06666•May 8, 2026•0 citations

Quantum response theory for nonequilibrium steady states

Michael Konopik, Eric Lutz

Quantum response theory is a cornerstone of statistical physics.However, the standard Kubo formalism is restricted to isolated equilibrium systems.We here generalize Kubo's results to open quantum systems in nonequilibrium steady states.We derive three different, but equivalent, forms of the quantum response function.We discuss for each of them the role of the noncommutativity of quantum operators and introduce a steady-state extension of the Kubo transformation.We show in particular that the equilibrium response vanishes for perturbations that commute with the unperturbed Hamiltonian, while the steady-state response does not, highlighting the profound difference between the two linear response theories.

arXiv:1811.12277•Physical Review Research•Dec 6, 2019•17 citations

Quantum response of dephasing open systems

J. E. Avron, Martin Fraas, Gian Michele Graf +1 more

We develop a theory of adiabatic response for open systems gov-erned by Lindblad evolutions. The theory determines the dependence of the response coefficients on the dephasing rates and allows for resid-ual dissipation even when the ground state is protected by a spectral gap. We give quantum response a geometric interpretation in terms of Hilbert space projections: For a two level system and, more generally, for systems with suitable functional form of the dephasing, the dissi-pative and non-dissipative parts of the response are linked to a metric and to a symplectic form. The metric is the Fubini-Study metric and the symplectic form is the adiabatic curvature. When the metric and symplectic structures are compatible the non-dissipative part of the inverse matrix of response coefficients turns out to be immune to de-phasing. We give three examples of physical systems whose quantum states induce compatible metric and symplectic structures on control space: The qubit, coherent states and a model of the integer quantum Hall effect. Two frameworks that provide insight and understanding of transport coef-ficients are Kubo’s theory of linear response [1, 2] and the theory of adiabatic response [3, 4, 5]. Both have a quantum version and a classical version, agree when there is overlap, and endow the non-dissipative transport coefficients with the geometric meaning of the adiabatic (Berry’s) curvature [6]. A notable success of this approach to “geometrization of quantum re-sponse ” has been its application to the integer quantum Hall effect where 1 ar

•May 1, 2011•57 citations

Calculation of the isothermal susceptibility by the Kubo formula

T. Morita, T. Horiguchi

The relation between the zero frequency limit of the frequency-dependent susceptibility and the isothermal susceptibility is made clearer by expressing them in terms of the spectral density function. The general formulas are illustrated for the perpendicular susceptibilities of the Ising model.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jul 15, 1976•1 citation

Quantum adiabatic cycles and their breakdown

Nicolò Defenu

The assumption that quasi-static transformations do not quantitatively alter the equilibrium expectation of observables is at the heart of thermodynamics and, in the quantum realm, its validity may be confirmed by the application of adiabatic perturbation theory. Yet, this scenario does not straightforwardly apply to Bosonic systems whose excitation energy is slowly driven through the zero. Here, we prove that the universal slow dynamics of such systems is always non-adiabatic and the quantum corrections to the equilibrium observables become rate independent for any dynamical protocol in the slow drive limit. These findings overturn the common expectation for quasi-static processes as they demonstrate that a system as simple and general as the quantum harmonic oscillator, does not allow for a slow-drive limit, but it always displays sudden quench dynamics.

•Jan 1, 2021•8 citations

Justifying Kubo’s formula for gapped systems at zero temperature: A brief review and some new results

Joscha Henheik, Stefan Teufel

We first review the problem of a rigorous justification of Kubo’s formula for transport coefficients in gapped extended Hamiltonian quantum systems at zero temperature. In particular, the theoretical understanding of the quantum Hall effect rests on the validity of Kubo’s formula for such systems, a connection that we review briefly as well. We then highlight an approach to linear response theory based on non-equilibrium almost-stationary states (NEASS) and on a corresponding adiabatic theorem for such systems that was recently proposed and worked out by one of us in [51] for interacting fermionic systems on finite lattices. In the second part of our paper, we show how to lift the results of [51] to infinite systems by taking a thermodynamic limit.

arXiv:2002.08669•Reviews in Mathematical Physics•Feb 21, 2020•18 citations
The static limit of the Kubo susceptibility describes the adiabatic response of an isolated quantum system, in which energy-level occupations remain unchanged, and generally differs from the isothermal susceptibility, where these occupations readjust to thermal equilibrium. In this work, we introduce a single dynamical framework in which the adiabatic and isothermal responses arise naturally as two distinct limiting regimes. This can be done by considering explicitly an open system version of the Kubo approach in which the dissipation is governed by a typical thermalization rate of the system. By exchanging the order of the static limit and of the vanishing thermalization rate limit, the protocol yields either the adiabatic or isothermal response. This protocol has a solid physical motivation in terms of the thermalization dynamics and is valid for generic systems. We apply it to the case of the magnetic response of the electron gas and reproduce the expected results.
The paper addresses the difference between the zero-frequency Kubo susceptibility of an isolated quantum system, where instantaneous energy-level populations remain fixed, and the isothermal susceptibility, where populations readjust to equilibrium. It introduces an explicit thermalization rate κ\kappaκ alongside the probe frequency ω\omegaω, interpreting the two static responses as different orders of limits of an open-system susceptibility χAB(ω,κ)\chi_{AB}(\omega,\kappa)χAB​(ω,κ).
Using thermal-state expressions and a Lehmann representation, it obtains χABT=χABS−βCov⁡(A0,B0)\chi_{AB}^{T}=\chi_{AB}^{S}-\beta\operatorname{Cov}(A_0,B_0)χABT​=χABS​−βCov(A0​,B0​), where A0,B0A_0,B_0A0​,B0​ are energy-basis diagonal components. For self-response under the convention H=H0+λAH=H_0+\lambda AH=H0​+λA, this gives χAAT≤χAAS≤0\chi_{AA}^{T}\leq\chi_{AA}^{S}\leq0χAAT​≤χAAS​≤0. Taking κ→0\kappa\to0κ→0 before ω→0\omega\to0ω→0 yields the isolated response; reversing the order yields the isothermal response.
The explicit application is a free electron gas coupled by particle exchange to a thermal fermionic bath. Keldysh Green-function calculations give χM(ω,κ)≃χP 2κ/(2κ−iω)\chi_M(\omega,\kappa)\simeq\chi_P\,2\kappa/(2\kappa-i\omega)χM​(ω,κ)≃χP​2κ/(2κ−iω) at low temperature and ω,κ≪εF\omega,\kappa\ll\varepsilon_Fω,κ≪εF​, recovering zero uniform isolated spin susceptibility and the Pauli isothermal susceptibility. At nonzero momentum, the two static limits coincide in this example; subsequently taking momentum to zero recovers the Pauli result.
The bath calculation assumes a flat, effectively momentum-independent bath spectrum and constant broadening. Extensions to other relaxation mechanisms require their corresponding self-energies and consistency with conservation laws. Isolated many-body thermalization at conserved entropy, distinct from fixed-population quantum adiabatic evolution, is explicitly left for future investigation.
Quantum thermalization describes how interacting quantum systems relax toward thermal equilibrium, a central problem in modern physics. Yet most experimental information on many-body systems comes from short-time transition spectroscopy, typically interpreted within Kubo's linear-response framework. These perspectives-long-time equilibration versus short-time response-seem fundamentally disconnected. Here we establish an exact link between them: the \emph{Kubo-Thermalization correspondence}, which connects long-time thermalized magnetization under weak driving to short-time linear-response spectra for a spin coupled to a thermal bath. The correspondence holds even when the steady state differs substantially from the initial state and when each regime is individually difficult to describe theoretically. We experimentally confirm the correspondence using effective spin-1/21/21/2 impurities realized with ultracold fermions in two internal states coupled to a Fermi sea. Our results provide a rare exact statement about quantum thermalization and offer a novel route to infer thermalization dynamics from equilibrium response measurements in strongly interacting quantum systems, independent of microscopic details of the system--bath coupling.
Quantum response theory is a cornerstone of statistical physics.However, the standard Kubo formalism is restricted to isolated equilibrium systems.We here generalize Kubo's results to open quantum systems in nonequilibrium steady states.We derive three different, but equivalent, forms of the quantum response function.We discuss for each of them the role of the noncommutativity of quantum operators and introduce a steady-state extension of the Kubo transformation.We show in particular that the equilibrium response vanishes for perturbations that commute with the unperturbed Hamiltonian, while the steady-state response does not, highlighting the profound difference between the two linear response theories.
We develop a theory of adiabatic response for open systems gov-erned by Lindblad evolutions. The theory determines the dependence of the response coefficients on the dephasing rates and allows for resid-ual dissipation even when the ground state is protected by a spectral gap. We give quantum response a geometric interpretation in terms of Hilbert space projections: For a two level system and, more generally, for systems with suitable functional form of the dephasing, the dissi-pative and non-dissipative parts of the response are linked to a metric and to a symplectic form. The metric is the Fubini-Study metric and the symplectic form is the adiabatic curvature. When the metric and symplectic structures are compatible the non-dissipative part of the inverse matrix of response coefficients turns out to be immune to de-phasing. We give three examples of physical systems whose quantum states induce compatible metric and symplectic structures on control space: The qubit, coherent states and a model of the integer quantum Hall effect. Two frameworks that provide insight and understanding of transport coef-ficients are Kubo’s theory of linear response [1, 2] and the theory of adiabatic response [3, 4, 5]. Both have a quantum version and a classical version, agree when there is overlap, and endow the non-dissipative transport coefficients with the geometric meaning of the adiabatic (Berry’s) curvature [6]. A notable success of this approach to “geometrization of quantum re-sponse ” has been its application to the integer quantum Hall effect where 1 ar
The assumption that quasi-static transformations do not quantitatively alter the equilibrium expectation of observables is at the heart of thermodynamics and, in the quantum realm, its validity may be confirmed by the application of adiabatic perturbation theory. Yet, this scenario does not straightforwardly apply to Bosonic systems whose excitation energy is slowly driven through the zero. Here, we prove that the universal slow dynamics of such systems is always non-adiabatic and the quantum corrections to the equilibrium observables become rate independent for any dynamical protocol in the slow drive limit. These findings overturn the common expectation for quasi-static processes as they demonstrate that a system as simple and general as the quantum harmonic oscillator, does not allow for a slow-drive limit, but it always displays sudden quench dynamics.
We first review the problem of a rigorous justification of Kubo’s formula for transport coefficients in gapped extended Hamiltonian quantum systems at zero temperature. In particular, the theoretical understanding of the quantum Hall effect rests on the validity of Kubo’s formula for such systems, a connection that we review briefly as well. We then highlight an approach to linear response theory based on non-equilibrium almost-stationary states (NEASS) and on a corresponding adiabatic theorem for such systems that was recently proposed and worked out by one of us in [51] for interacting fermionic systems on finite lattices. In the second part of our paper, we show how to lift the results of [51] to infinite systems by taking a thermodynamic limit.