arXiv:2610.40595
Optimal detuning and gate time for strongly driven single-qubit gates beyond the rotating-wave approximation
Alejandro D. Bendersky, Sergio S. Gomez, Rodolfo H. Romero
Abstract
Single-qubit quantum gates are implemented as the time-controlled unitary evolution of a two-level system under harmonic driving. The rotating-wave approximation (RWA) provides closed-form gate parameters for weak coupling. Larger amplitudes, desirable to speed up the dynamics, make the RWA-designed gates inaccurate because of the neglected counter-rotating term, which also shifts the resonance (Bloch-Siegert shift). Here we study theoretically the infidelity of gates beyond the RWA, using the effective Magnus-Taylor Hamiltonian through second order in the inverse of the driving frequency. By detuning the driving frequency by an amplitude-dependent shift of Bloch-Siegert type and rescaling the operation time, the RWA gate conditions are recovered with corrected parameters. Numerical solutions of the Schrodinger equation show that these corrections lower the gate infidelity by several orders of magnitude, extending the range of usable amplitudes
AI Summary
The paper asks how to correct single-qubit gates implemented by harmonic driving when counter-rotating terms invalidate rotating-wave-approximation (RWA) gate parameters. It studies the ideal two-level Hamiltonian $H(t)=\omega_0\sigma_z/2+A\sin(\omega t)\sigma_x$, using an existing second-order Magnus–Taylor effective Hamiltonian to derive corrected parameters for $Z$, $X$ and Hadamard gates. For a fixed drive phase and stroboscopic gate endpoints, the prescription is an amplitude-dependent detuning $\Delta=\omega_0-\omega\simeq-3A^2/(4\omega)$ and a gate-time rescaling $t_g\simeq\tau_g[1-A^2/(16\omega^2)]$, together with corresponding discrete amplitude conditions. These restore the RWA gate conditions through second order in $\lambda=A/\omega$. The gate-optimal detuning is distinguished from the conventional spectral Bloch–Siegert shift, whose leading coefficient is $1/4$ rather than $3/4$. Analytical average-gate-infidelity calculations explain why uncorrected RWA gates have leading errors proportional to $\lambda^4$ for $Z$ but $\lambda^2$ for $X$ and Hadamard: the latter are sensitive to a tilt of the effective rotation axis. Direct Schrödinger-equation simulations for $Z$ and Hadamard show orders-of-magnitude reductions in infidelity, including at least three orders for Hadamard near $\lambda=1/14$. Numerical optimal detunings follow approximately $\Delta/\omega=-0.7\lambda^{2.0}$. The reported numerical exploration extends to $\lambda\lesssim1$, beyond a strictly weak-drive regime. However, the derivation remains perturbative, with residual effective-Hamiltonian terms of order $A\lambda^3$. The protocol depends on drive phase and stroboscopic timing; robustness to calibration errors and noise remains unanalysed.
Error found: The discussion after the corrected gate conditions misleadingly says the corrected amplitude decreases: A/omega decreases, but A/omega_0—and therefore the physical drive amplitude at fixed qubit gap—increases to the stated perturbative order.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 7 pages, 2 figures