Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.20297

Parallel Quantum Advantage with Limited Adaptivity Requires Structure

Qipeng Liu, Saachi Mutreja

quant-phSubmitted Aug 20, 2026• Announced Aug 21, 2026• 0 citations
v1 · Aug 20, 2026v2 · Oct 20, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Aaronson and Ambainis (Theory of Computing, 2014) conjectured that quantum query algorithms admit efficient almost-everywhere classical simulation: for any $T$-query quantum algorithm, its acceptance probability can be approximated on a $(1-δ)$ fraction of inputs, up to $ε$ additive error, using $\mathrm{poly}(T, 1/ε, 1/δ)$ classical queries. At a high level, the conjecture suggests that exponential quantum speedups are possible only on sufficiently structured inputs. In this work, we make progress on this conjecture by proving it for quantum algorithms that make massively parallel quantum queries. In contrast, Yamakawa and Zhandry (Journal of the ACM, 2024) showed that quantum algorithms restricted to parallel queries can still achieve exponential speedups over classical algorithms for sampling problems. We establish our simulation theorem by proving the stronger statement that parallel-query quantum algorithms cannot distinguish the uniform distribution over oracles from oracles drawn from so-called "dense distributions". Our main technical contribution is a coupling theorem that relates the uniform distribution over oracles to oracles drawn from dense distributions. We further extend this approach beyond the purely parallel setting, obtaining simulation theorems both for algorithms with a bounded quantum-query prefix followed by a massively parallel quantum-query stage, and for hybrid algorithms that make an arbitrary polynomial number of adaptive classical queries before the massively parallel quantum-query stage. Finally, using the parallel-query simulation theorem as a base case, we obtain simulation theorems for quantum algorithms with constant rounds of adaptivity.

Related papers

Distributional Variants of the Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture

Uma Girish, Kunal Mittal, Barak Nehoran +1 more

A longstanding conjecture in quantum complexity theory asserts that, under the uniform input distribution, quantum query algorithms can be polynomially simulated by classical query algorithms. More precisely, the acceptance probability of any quantum query algorithm can be approximated, on average over uniformly random inputs, by a classical query algorithm, with only polynomial query overhead. The conjecture is central to understanding whether exponential quantum advantages for decision problems necessarily rely on additional structure. We study analogues of this conjecture under other natural input distributions and prove that they are all equivalent to the original uniform-distribution conjecture. We first consider the product distribution $μ_p$, where the input bits are independent Bernoulli variables with fixed bias $p$. We show that for every fixed $p \in (0, 1)$, quantum query algorithms under the $μ_p$ distribution admit polynomial-overhead classical simulations if and only if the same holds under the uniform distribution. Second, we consider the distribution $ν_p$ that is uniform over the slice of strings with Hamming weight $\lfloor pn \rfloor$ and prove a similar equivalence for the $ν_p$ distribution and the uniform distribution. The Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture is a stronger statement that implies the above-mentioned conjecture and is formulated in terms of bounded low-degree polynomials on the Boolean hypercube. It asserts that under the uniform distribution, any such polynomial with nonnegligible variance must have an influential variable. We formulate analogues of this conjecture, where the underlying distribution is a biased product distribution or a uniform distribution over a slice, and prove that all these variants are equivalent to the original Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture.

quant-pharXiv:2609.35327•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Speedups Require Structure or Depth

Guy Blanc, Jordan Docter, Carmen Strassle +1 more

One of the most basic conjectures in quantum complexity theory states that every $t$-query quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs by a $\mathrm{poly}(t)$-query classical algorithm. If true, this would provide broad justification for the need for structure in quantum speedups. We settle this conjecture for parallel quantum algorithms, showing that every $t$-query $d$-round quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs with $t^{O(d^2)}$ classical queries. This suggests that for unstructured problems, superpolynomial speedups would require quantum circuits of superconstant depth, and exponential speedups would further require polynomial depth. In contrast, most known speedups for structured problems are achieved by highly parallel, low-depth algorithms. Our techniques also carry new implications for the status of $\mathsf{BPP}$ vs. $\mathsf{BQP}$ relative to a random oracle, a similarly longstanding problem.

quant-pharXiv:2608.19158•Aug 20, 2026•0 citations

How Much Structure Is Needed for Huge Quantum Speedups?

Scott Aaronson

I survey, for a general scientific audience, three decades of research into which sorts of problems admit exponential speedups via quantum computers -- from the classics (like the algorithms of Simon and Shor), to the breakthrough of Yamakawa and Zhandry from April 2022. I discuss both the quantum circuit model, which is what we ultimately care about in practice but where our knowledge is radically incomplete, and the so-called oracle or black-box or query complexity model, where we've managed to achieve a much more thorough understanding that then informs our conjectures about the circuit model. I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of switching attention to sampling tasks, as was done in the recent quantum supremacy experiments. I make some skeptical remarks about widely-repeated claims of exponential quantum speedups for practical machine learning and optimization problems. Through many examples, I try to convey the "law of conservation of weirdness," according to which every problem admitting an exponential quantum speedup must have some unusual property to allow the amplitude to be concentrated on the unknown right answer(s).

arXiv:2209.06930•Sep 14, 2022•11 citations

The Power of Adaptivity in Quantum Query Algorithms

Uma Girish, Makrand Sinha, Avishay Tal +1 more

Motivated by limitations on the depth of near-term quantum devices, we study the depth-computation trade-off in the query model, where depth corresponds to the number of adaptive query rounds and the computation per layer corresponds to the number of parallel queries per round. We achieve the strongest known separation between quantum algorithms with r versus r−1 rounds of adaptivity. We do so by using the k-fold Forrelation problem introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis (SICOMP’18). For k=2r, this problem can be solved using an r round quantum algorithm with only one query per round, yet we show that any r−1 round quantum algorithm needs an exponential (in the number of qubits) number of parallel queries per round. Our results are proven following the Fourier analytic machinery developed in recent works on quantum-classical separations. The key new component in our result are bounds on the Fourier weights of quantum query algorithms with bounded number of rounds of adaptivity. These may be of independent interest as they distinguish the polynomials that arise from such algorithms from arbitrary bounded polynomials of the same degree.

arXiv:2311.16057•ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•Jun 10, 2024•3 citations

Certified Randomness without Structure Against Shallow-Query Adversaries

Dakshita Khurana, Bhaskar Roberts, Avishay Tal

In a recent breakthrough, Yamakawa and Zhandry (J. ACM 2024) constructed a proof of quantumness in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) in which the quantum prover samples a codeword preimage of a publicly computable function H. They conjectured that given any H, a successful prover must sample their preimage from a high-entropy distribution over possible answers. If true, this would give a certifiable randomness protocol in the quantum random oracle model. As partial evidence for their conjecture, Yamakawa and Zhandry proved the security of their certifiable randomness protocol assuming the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture. We prove the security of the certifiable randomness protocol of Yamakawa-Zhandry unconditionally, without relying on the unproven Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, against low query-depth quantum adversaries: specifically, adversaries that make up to o(\log λ) adaptive quantum queries to the random oracle.

quant-pharXiv:2608.24832•Aug 26, 2026•0 citations

Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms

Andris Ambainis, András Gilyén, Martins Kokainis

We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most $q$ oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})$ queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})$ queries; (iii) Search among $N$ items requires $Θ(\frac{N}{q})$ queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of $m$ ORs, with $n$ inputs to each OR) requires $Θ(\frac{nm}{q})$ queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all $q$ from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to $Q(f)$, the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06803•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations
Aaronson and Ambainis (Theory of Computing, 2014) conjectured that quantum query algorithms admit efficient almost-everywhere classical simulation: for any TTT-query quantum algorithm, its acceptance probability can be approximated on a (1−δ)(1-δ)(1−δ) fraction of inputs, up to εεε additive error, using poly(T,1/ε,1/δ)\mathrm{poly}(T, 1/ε, 1/δ)poly(T,1/ε,1/δ) classical queries. At a high level, the conjecture suggests that exponential quantum speedups are possible only on sufficiently structured inputs.
In this work, we make progress on this conjecture by proving it for quantum algorithms that make massively parallel quantum queries. In contrast, Yamakawa and Zhandry (Journal of the ACM, 2024) showed that quantum algorithms restricted to parallel queries can still achieve exponential speedups over classical algorithms for sampling problems. We establish our simulation theorem by proving the stronger statement that parallel-query quantum algorithms cannot distinguish the uniform distribution over oracles from oracles drawn from so-called "dense distributions". Our main technical contribution is a coupling theorem that relates the uniform distribution over oracles to oracles drawn from dense distributions.
We further extend this approach beyond the purely parallel setting, obtaining simulation theorems both for algorithms with a bounded quantum-query prefix followed by a massively parallel quantum-query stage, and for hybrid algorithms that make an arbitrary polynomial number of adaptive classical queries before the massively parallel quantum-query stage. Finally, using the parallel-query simulation theorem as a base case, we obtain simulation theorems for quantum algorithms with constant rounds of adaptivity.
A longstanding conjecture in quantum complexity theory asserts that, under the uniform input distribution, quantum query algorithms can be polynomially simulated by classical query algorithms. More precisely, the acceptance probability of any quantum query algorithm can be approximated, on average over uniformly random inputs, by a classical query algorithm, with only polynomial query overhead. The conjecture is central to understanding whether exponential quantum advantages for decision problems necessarily rely on additional structure. We study analogues of this conjecture under other natural input distributions and prove that they are all equivalent to the original uniform-distribution conjecture. We first consider the product distribution μpμ_pμp​, where the input bits are independent Bernoulli variables with fixed bias ppp. We show that for every fixed p∈(0,1)p \in (0, 1)p∈(0,1), quantum query algorithms under the μpμ_pμp​ distribution admit polynomial-overhead classical simulations if and only if the same holds under the uniform distribution. Second, we consider the distribution νpν_pνp​ that is uniform over the slice of strings with Hamming weight ⌊pn⌋\lfloor pn \rfloor⌊pn⌋ and prove a similar equivalence for the νpν_pνp​ distribution and the uniform distribution. The Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture is a stronger statement that implies the above-mentioned conjecture and is formulated in terms of bounded low-degree polynomials on the Boolean hypercube. It asserts that under the uniform distribution, any such polynomial with nonnegligible variance must have an influential variable. We formulate analogues of this conjecture, where the underlying distribution is a biased product distribution or a uniform distribution over a slice, and prove that all these variants are equivalent to the original Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture.
One of the most basic conjectures in quantum complexity theory states that every ttt-query quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs by a poly(t)\mathrm{poly}(t)poly(t)-query classical algorithm. If true, this would provide broad justification for the need for structure in quantum speedups. We settle this conjecture for parallel quantum algorithms, showing that every ttt-query ddd-round quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs with tO(d2)t^{O(d^2)}tO(d2) classical queries. This suggests that for unstructured problems, superpolynomial speedups would require quantum circuits of superconstant depth, and exponential speedups would further require polynomial depth. In contrast, most known speedups for structured problems are achieved by highly parallel, low-depth algorithms. Our techniques also carry new implications for the status of BPP\mathsf{BPP}BPP vs. BQP\mathsf{BQP}BQP relative to a random oracle, a similarly longstanding problem.
I survey, for a general scientific audience, three decades of research into which sorts of problems admit exponential speedups via quantum computers -- from the classics (like the algorithms of Simon and Shor), to the breakthrough of Yamakawa and Zhandry from April 2022. I discuss both the quantum circuit model, which is what we ultimately care about in practice but where our knowledge is radically incomplete, and the so-called oracle or black-box or query complexity model, where we've managed to achieve a much more thorough understanding that then informs our conjectures about the circuit model. I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of switching attention to sampling tasks, as was done in the recent quantum supremacy experiments. I make some skeptical remarks about widely-repeated claims of exponential quantum speedups for practical machine learning and optimization problems. Through many examples, I try to convey the "law of conservation of weirdness," according to which every problem admitting an exponential quantum speedup must have some unusual property to allow the amplitude to be concentrated on the unknown right answer(s).
Motivated by limitations on the depth of near-term quantum devices, we study the depth-computation trade-off in the query model, where depth corresponds to the number of adaptive query rounds and the computation per layer corresponds to the number of parallel queries per round. We achieve the strongest known separation between quantum algorithms with r versus r−1 rounds of adaptivity. We do so by using the k-fold Forrelation problem introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis (SICOMP’18). For k=2r, this problem can be solved using an r round quantum algorithm with only one query per round, yet we show that any r−1 round quantum algorithm needs an exponential (in the number of qubits) number of parallel queries per round. Our results are proven following the Fourier analytic machinery developed in recent works on quantum-classical separations. The key new component in our result are bounds on the Fourier weights of quantum query algorithms with bounded number of rounds of adaptivity. These may be of independent interest as they distinguish the polynomials that arise from such algorithms from arbitrary bounded polynomials of the same degree.
In a recent breakthrough, Yamakawa and Zhandry (J. ACM 2024) constructed a proof of quantumness in the quantum random oracle model (QROM) in which the quantum prover samples a codeword preimage of a publicly computable function H. They conjectured that given any H, a successful prover must sample their preimage from a high-entropy distribution over possible answers. If true, this would give a certifiable randomness protocol in the quantum random oracle model. As partial evidence for their conjecture, Yamakawa and Zhandry proved the security of their certifiable randomness protocol assuming the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture. We prove the security of the certifiable randomness protocol of Yamakawa-Zhandry unconditionally, without relying on the unproven Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, against low query-depth quantum adversaries: specifically, adversaries that make up to o(\log λ) adaptive quantum queries to the random oracle.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most qqq oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(1qε2)Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})Θ(qε21​) queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(p(1−p)qε2)Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})Θ(qε2p(1−p)​) queries; (iii) Search among NNN items requires Θ(Nq)Θ(\frac{N}{q})Θ(qN​) queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of mmm ORs, with nnn inputs to each OR) requires Θ(nmq)Θ(\frac{nm}{q})Θ(qnm​) queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all qqq from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f)Q(f)Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.