Aaronson and Ambainis (Theory of Computing, 2014) conjectured that quantum query algorithms admit efficient almost-everywhere classical simulation: for any $T$-query quantum algorithm, its acceptance probability can be approximated on a $(1-δ)$ fraction of inputs, up to $ε$ additive error, using $\mathrm{poly}(T, 1/ε, 1/δ)$ classical queries. At a high level, the conjecture suggests that exponential quantum speedups are possible only on sufficiently structured inputs.
In this work, we make progress on this conjecture by proving it for quantum algorithms that make massively parallel quantum queries. In contrast, Yamakawa and Zhandry (Journal of the ACM, 2024) showed that quantum algorithms restricted to parallel queries can still achieve exponential speedups over classical algorithms for sampling problems. We establish our simulation theorem by proving the stronger statement that parallel-query quantum algorithms cannot distinguish the uniform distribution over oracles from oracles drawn from so-called "dense distributions". Our main technical contribution is a coupling theorem that relates the uniform distribution over oracles to oracles drawn from dense distributions.
We further extend this approach beyond the purely parallel setting. We prove simulation theorems for quantum algorithms with constant rounds of adaptivity, and for quantum algorithms with a bounded quantum-query prefix followed by a massively parallel quantum-query stage.
Aaronson and Ambainis (Theory of Computing, 2014) conjectured that quantum query algorithms admit efficient almost-everywhere classical simulation: for any T-query quantum algorithm, its acceptance probability can be approximated on a (1−δ) fraction of inputs, up to ε additive error, using poly(T,1/ε,1/δ) classical queries. At a high level, the conjecture suggests that exponential quantum speedups are possible only on sufficiently structured inputs.
In this work, we make progress on this conjecture by proving it for quantum algorithms that make massively parallel quantum queries. In contrast, Yamakawa and Zhandry (Journal of the ACM, 2024) showed that quantum algorithms restricted to parallel queries can still achieve exponential speedups over classical algorithms for sampling problems. We establish our simulation theorem by proving the stronger statement that parallel-query quantum algorithms cannot distinguish the uniform distribution over oracles from oracles drawn from so-called "dense distributions". Our main technical contribution is a coupling theorem that relates the uniform distribution over oracles to oracles drawn from dense distributions.
We further extend this approach beyond the purely parallel setting. We prove simulation theorems for quantum algorithms with constant rounds of adaptivity, and for quantum algorithms with a bounded quantum-query prefix followed by a massively parallel quantum-query stage.
A longstanding conjecture in quantum complexity theory asserts that, under the uniform input distribution, quantum query algorithms can be polynomially simulated by classical query algorithms. More precisely, the acceptance probability of any quantum query algorithm can be approximated, on average over uniformly random inputs, by a classical query algorithm, with only polynomial query overhead. The conjecture is central to understanding whether exponential quantum advantages for decision problems necessarily rely on additional structure.
We study analogues of this conjecture under other natural input distributions and prove that they are all equivalent to the original uniform-distribution conjecture. We first consider the product distribution μp, where the input bits are independent Bernoulli variables with fixed bias p. We show that for every fixed p∈(0,1), quantum query algorithms under the μp distribution admit polynomial-overhead classical simulations if and only if the same holds under the uniform distribution. Second, we consider the distribution νp that is uniform over the slice of strings with Hamming weight ⌊pn⌋ and prove a similar equivalence for the νp distribution and the uniform distribution.
The Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture is a stronger statement that implies the above-mentioned conjecture and is formulated in terms of bounded low-degree polynomials on the Boolean hypercube. It asserts that under the uniform distribution, any such polynomial with nonnegligible variance must have an influential variable. We formulate analogues of this conjecture, where the underlying distribution is a biased product distribution or a uniform distribution over a slice, and prove that all these variants are equivalent to the original Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture.
One of the most basic conjectures in quantum complexity theory states that every t-query quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs by a poly(t)-query classical algorithm. If true, this would provide broad justification for the need for structure in quantum speedups.
We settle this conjecture for parallel quantum algorithms, showing that every t-query d-round quantum algorithm can be simulated on most inputs with tO(d2) classical queries. This suggests that for unstructured problems, superpolynomial speedups would require quantum circuits of superconstant depth, and exponential speedups would further require polynomial depth. In contrast, most known speedups for structured problems are achieved by highly parallel, low-depth algorithms.
Our techniques also carry new implications for the status of BPP vs. BQP relative to a random oracle, a similarly longstanding problem.
Motivated by limitations on the depth of near-term quantum devices, we study the depth-computation trade-off in the query model, where depth corresponds to the number of adaptive query rounds and the computation per layer corresponds to the number of parallel queries per round. We achieve the strongest known separation between quantum algorithms with r versus r−1 rounds of adaptivity. We do so by using the k-fold Forrelation problem introduced by Aaronson and Ambainis (SICOMP’18). For k=2r, this problem can be solved using an r round quantum algorithm with only one query per round, yet we show that any r−1 round quantum algorithm needs an exponential (in the number of qubits) number of parallel queries per round. Our results are proven following the Fourier analytic machinery developed in recent works on quantum-classical separations. The key new component in our result are bounds on the Fourier weights of quantum query algorithms with bounded number of rounds of adaptivity. These may be of independent interest as they distinguish the polynomials that arise from such algorithms from arbitrary bounded polynomials of the same degree.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most q oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model:
(i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ(qε21) queries;
(ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ(qε2p(1−p)) queries;
(iii) Search among N items requires Θ(qN) queries;
(iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of m ORs, with n inputs to each OR) requires Θ(qnm) queries.
All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all q from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor.
Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.
The unitary synthesis problem (Aaronson-Kuperberg, CCC 2007) asks whether every n-qubit unitary U is computable by efficient quantum circuits relative to some classical oracle f=fU depending on U. Recently, Lombardi-Ma-Wright (STOC 2024) proved that Haar-random unitaries cannot be efficiently synthesized by algorithms that make 1 query (or poly(n) parallel queries) to an arbitrary classical oracle. In this work, we prove several results about the hardness (and easiness!) of variants of unitary synthesis. Our results include: (1) 1-query vs. 2-query unitary synthesis: we prove 1-query lower bounds for synthesizing random permutation unitaries P∣x⟩=∣π(x)⟩, as well as random alternating-basis phase unitaries F2⋅H⊗n⋅F1. This gives 1-query lower bounds for "explicit" families of unitaries that have efficient (even 2-query) synthesis algorithms. (2) Upper bound for complex phase unitaries: we also consider complex phase unitaries ∣x⟩↦αx∣x⟩, which have a clean 2-query synthesis algorithm with no obvious 1-query algorithm. In this case, we prove an upper bound: there are 1-query algorithms (relative to binary phase oracles) that constant-approximate these unitaries in diamond distance. In order to prove our lower bounds, we introduce and analyze two new cryptographic games: the oracle state search game and the oracle Choi state game. Compared to prior work, our framework is mathematically simple, more flexible in what it can prove, and more accurately captures the hardness of synthesizing unitaries that are not "fully random". Finally, we also use the search game to prove a new hardness-of-approximation result for quantum programs (synthesizing unitaries relative to quantum advice) for phase unitaries, giving a sharper separation between 1-query unitary synthesis and quantum programs.
Quantum query complexity underpins much of our understanding of quantum speedups, yet nearly all existing lower and upper bounds are derived for simple Boolean oracles. Many practical tasks-noisy database search, stochastic optimization, adaptive learning, and time-varying systems-are best modeled by richer oracle classes. This paper systematically extends quantum query complexity theory to four non-standard oracle models: (1) stochastic oracles that return random outputs drawn from a distribution; (2) multi-solution oracles encoding a solution set of size k; (3) time-dependent oracles whose internal state evolves between queries; and (4) relational oracles encoding structured constraints rather than simple membership. Using generalized adversary methods, polynomial method techniques, and hybrid arguments, we derive tight (up to polylog factors) lower bounds for each model and construct matching algorithms where possible. For instance, we show that searching for any one of k marked items in an unstructured database still admits a Grover-like quadratic speedup, but with optimal complexity Θ(N/k), and that stochastic noise in oracle outputs degrades the advantage gracefully as a function of the noise parameter. For certain time-dependent and relational models, we prove that no better-than-classical speedup is possible, clarifying the limits of quantum advantage in adaptive settings. These results provide a more realistic foundation for quantum algorithms targeting noisy search, stochastic optimization, and constraint satisfaction, and they highlight the precise structural features that enable or preclude query-based quantum speedups.