Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2607.12996

Expressibility and trainability of a two-dimensional pairwise quantum-circuit ansatz

Shuai Zhang, Wei Liu, Ji-Chong Yang

quant-phSubmitted Jul 14, 2026• Announced Jul 15, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Parameterized quantum circuits~(PQCs) constitute a central building block of variational quantum algorithms~(VQAs) and quantum machine learning~(QML) methods. Existing ansatz designs often adopt hardware-agnostic or simplified 1D chain/ring entanglement patterns. However, as quantum hardware continues to develop, native 2D connectivity patterns, such as planar superconducting-qubit architectures, are becoming increasingly important. Inspired by this hardware structure, we construct a native 2D pairwise ansatz and compare its expressibility and trainability with representative 1D ansatze at identical layer depths, despite their different circuit depths. For the fixed 16-qubit system, the 2D ansatz has the smallest KL divergence at $L=1$ and $2$, and its second-order frame potential approaches the theoretical lower bound more rapidly at shallow layer counts than the frame potentials of the three 1D ansatze. We also evaluate the gradient variance of the Pauli-$Z$-string expectation value $\langle Z_0\otimes\cdots\otimes Z_{15}\rangle$ with respect to the first $R_y$ angle. For this Pauli-$Z$ string and fixed parameter, the gradient variance is smaller for the 2D circuit at $L=1$--$4$. The differences narrow at $L=5$, and the four ansatze yield statistically compatible variances at $L=6$.

Comments
25 pages, 10 figures

Related papers

Beyond Logical Circuits: Hardware-Aware Analysis of Expressibility and Trainability in Variational Quantum Algorithms

Muhammad Kashif, Muhammad Shafique

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) rely on parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs), whose performance is governed by expressibility and trainability. Existing studies typically evaluate these properties at the logical circuit level, implicitly assuming that designed PQCs remain unchanged during hardware execution. In practice, however, hardware-aware transpilation modifies circuit structure through qubit mapping, routing, and basis decomposition, potentially altering PQC behavior. In this paper, we perform a systematic hardware-aware analysis of expressibility and trainability by comparing logical and transpiled PQCs across multiple ansatz families, qubit counts, and circuit depths. Expressibility is measured using fidelity-based KL divergence, while trainability is quantified through gradient variance. Our results show that transpilation acts as an implicit architectural perturbation, producing strongly ansatz-dependent effects. Expressibility deviations exceed upto 125% in some cases, while trainability variations reach up to 25%. Structured ansatzes are generally more robust, whereas highly entangled architectures are more sensitive to transpilation-induced transformations. We further show that transpilation can alter the commonly assumed expressibility-trainability trade-off, demonstrating that logical-level analyses may not reliably predict hardware-level behavior. These findings highlight the importance of hardware-aware evaluation for accurate characterization of VQAs.

quant-pharXiv:2605.25552•May 26, 2026•0 citations

Benchmarking PQC Ansatze in Realistic Device Topologies

Oleksa Hryniv, Vladyslav Los, Yuriy Pryyma +3 more

Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) serve as a flexible framework for implementing various quantum algorithms, particularly in quantum machine learning and optimization tasks. However, their training is challenging due to both theoretical constraints and the inherent limitations in current quantum hardware. A judicious choice of PQC architecture is crucial for accurately representing the solution space, and for ensuring convergence in training. Several works introduced measures of expressibility and entangling capability for PQCs, and compared these metrics across different circuit structures, providing insights into how they impact performance and efficiency. However, these investigations often assumed idealized all-to-all qubit connectivity, which is not applicable to most hardware architectures. In practice, additional transpilation steps are performed prior to execution on hardware. The potential impact of better alignment of the PQC structure with the underlying native topology has in fact motivated introduction of hardware-efficient ansatze. In our work, we extend the methodology of measuring PQC efficiency to include more realistic quantum hardware models. We examine several popular hardware topologies, including hexagonal, square, circular, linear, and all-to-all. We evaluate the expressibility and entangling capability of circuits with different connectivity types and various arrangements of rotation gates. We assess the training performance of these PQC types in the context of a variational compiling procedure and identify the preferred gate patterns. This approach provides a more realistic evaluation of PQC performance, thus offering practical insights into their applications on existing quantum devices.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 15, 2024•0 citations

Analysis of Parameterized Quantum Circuits: On the Connection Between Expressibility and Types of Quantum Gates

Yu Liu, Kazuya Kaneko, Kentaro Baba +3 more

Expressibility is a crucial factor of a Parameterized Quantum Circuit (PQC). In the context of Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQA) based Quantum Machine Learning (QML), a QML model composed of highly expressible PQC and sufficient number of qubits is theoretically capable of approximating any arbitrary continuous function. While much research has explored the relationship between expressibility and learning performance, as well as the number of layers in PQCs, the connection between expressibility and PQC structure has received comparatively less attention. In this paper, we analyze the connection between expressibility and the types of quantum gates within PQCs using a Gradient Boosting Tree model and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Our analysis is performed on 1,615 instances of PQC derived from 19 PQC topologies, each with 2-18 qubits and 1-5 layers. The findings of our analysis provide guidance for designing highly expressible PQCs, suggesting the integration of more RX or RY gates while maintaining a careful balance with the number of CNOT gates. Furthermore, our evaluation offers an additional evidence of expressibility saturation, as observed by previous studies.

arXiv:2408.01036•IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering•Jan 1, 2025•10 citations

Efficiently architecting VQAs: Expressibility--Trainability--Resources Pareto-Optimality

Rodrigo M. Sanz, Andreu Angles-Castillo, Eduard Alarcon +1 more

Ansatz selection is a key factor in the performance of variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). While much of the state-of-the-art still relies on heuristic choices, an inadequate circuit structure can compromise both the expressive power and the trainability of the resulting model. Recent results have also established theoretical connections between expressibility and the onset of barren plateaus, highlighting the need for systematic criteria for ansatz selection. In this work, the ansatz is treated as a design feature to be optimized rather than a fixed block, and a design space exploration (DSE) is performed over a diverse set of parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs). Three complementary metrics -- expressibility, trainability, and resource cost -- are evaluated and used to analyze the trade-offs that emerge across different PQCs. Beyond identifying Pareto-optimal candidates, this multi-objective perspective helps clarify the interplay between these metrics and contributes quantitative evidence toward understanding the expressibility--trainability tension in variational circuits.

quant-pharXiv:2603.22142•IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

Expressibility and Entangling Capability of Parameterized Quantum Circuits for Hybrid Quantum‐Classical Algorithms

Sukin Sim, Peter D. Johnson, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik

Abstract Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) play an essential role in the performance of many variational quantum algorithms. One challenge in implementing such algorithms is choosing an effective circuit that well represents the solution space while maintaining a low circuit depth and parameter count. To characterize and identify expressible, yet compact, circuits, several descriptors are proposed, including expressibility and entangling capability, that are statistically estimated from classical simulations. These descriptors are computed for different circuit structures, varying the qubit connectivity and selection of gates. From these simulations, circuit fragments that perform well with respect to the descriptors are identified. In particular, a substantial improvement in performance of two‐qubit gates in a ring or all‐to‐all connected arrangement, compared to that of those on a line, is observed. Furthermore, improvement in both descriptors is achieved by sequences of controlled X‐rotation gates compared to sequences of controlled Z‐rotation gates. In addition, it is investigated how expressibility “saturates” with increased circuit depth, finding that the rate and saturated value appear to be distinguishing features of a PQC. While the correlation between each descriptor and algorithm performance remains to be investigated, methods and results from this study can be useful for algorithm development and design of experiments.

arXiv:1905.10876•Advanced Quantum Technologies•Oct 14, 2019•970 citations

How to find expressible and trainable parameterized quantum circuits?

Peter Röseler, Dennis Willsch, Kristel Michielsen

Whether parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) can be systematically constructed to be both trainable and expressive remains an open question. Highly expressive PQCs often exhibit barren plateaus, while several trainable alternatives admit efficient classical simulation. We address this question by deriving a finite-sample, dimension-independent concentration bound for estimating the variance of a PQC cost function, yielding explicit trainability guarantees. Across commonly used ansätze, we observe an anticorrelation between trainability and expressibility, consistent with theoretical insights. Building on this observation, we propose a property-based ansatz-search framework for identifying circuits that combine trainability and expressibility. We demonstrate its practical viability on a real quantum computer and apply it to variational quantum algorithms. We identify quantum neural network ansätze with improved effective dimension using over $6 \times$ fewer parameters, and for VQE on $\mathrm{H}_2$ we achieve UCCSD-like accuracy at substantially reduced circuit complexity.

quant-pharXiv:2603.14451•Mar 17, 2026•0 citations
Parameterized quantum circuits~(PQCs) constitute a central building block of variational quantum algorithms~(VQAs) and quantum machine learning~(QML) methods. Existing ansatz designs often adopt hardware-agnostic or simplified 1D chain/ring entanglement patterns. However, as quantum hardware continues to develop, native 2D connectivity patterns, such as planar superconducting-qubit architectures, are becoming increasingly important. Inspired by this hardware structure, we construct a native 2D pairwise ansatz and compare its expressibility and trainability with representative 1D ansatze at identical layer depths, despite their different circuit depths. For the fixed 16-qubit system, the 2D ansatz has the smallest KL divergence at L=1L=1L=1 and 222, and its second-order frame potential approaches the theoretical lower bound more rapidly at shallow layer counts than the frame potentials of the three 1D ansatze. We also evaluate the gradient variance of the Pauli-ZZZ-string expectation value ⟨Z0⊗⋯⊗Z15⟩\langle Z_0\otimes\cdots\otimes Z_{15}\rangle⟨Z0​⊗⋯⊗Z15​⟩ with respect to the first RyR_yRy​ angle. For this Pauli-ZZZ string and fixed parameter, the gradient variance is smaller for the 2D circuit at L=1L=1L=1--444. The differences narrow at L=5L=5L=5, and the four ansatze yield statistically compatible variances at L=6L=6L=6.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) rely on parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs), whose performance is governed by expressibility and trainability. Existing studies typically evaluate these properties at the logical circuit level, implicitly assuming that designed PQCs remain unchanged during hardware execution. In practice, however, hardware-aware transpilation modifies circuit structure through qubit mapping, routing, and basis decomposition, potentially altering PQC behavior. In this paper, we perform a systematic hardware-aware analysis of expressibility and trainability by comparing logical and transpiled PQCs across multiple ansatz families, qubit counts, and circuit depths. Expressibility is measured using fidelity-based KL divergence, while trainability is quantified through gradient variance. Our results show that transpilation acts as an implicit architectural perturbation, producing strongly ansatz-dependent effects. Expressibility deviations exceed upto 125% in some cases, while trainability variations reach up to 25%. Structured ansatzes are generally more robust, whereas highly entangled architectures are more sensitive to transpilation-induced transformations. We further show that transpilation can alter the commonly assumed expressibility-trainability trade-off, demonstrating that logical-level analyses may not reliably predict hardware-level behavior. These findings highlight the importance of hardware-aware evaluation for accurate characterization of VQAs.
Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) serve as a flexible framework for implementing various quantum algorithms, particularly in quantum machine learning and optimization tasks. However, their training is challenging due to both theoretical constraints and the inherent limitations in current quantum hardware. A judicious choice of PQC architecture is crucial for accurately representing the solution space, and for ensuring convergence in training. Several works introduced measures of expressibility and entangling capability for PQCs, and compared these metrics across different circuit structures, providing insights into how they impact performance and efficiency. However, these investigations often assumed idealized all-to-all qubit connectivity, which is not applicable to most hardware architectures. In practice, additional transpilation steps are performed prior to execution on hardware. The potential impact of better alignment of the PQC structure with the underlying native topology has in fact motivated introduction of hardware-efficient ansatze. In our work, we extend the methodology of measuring PQC efficiency to include more realistic quantum hardware models. We examine several popular hardware topologies, including hexagonal, square, circular, linear, and all-to-all. We evaluate the expressibility and entangling capability of circuits with different connectivity types and various arrangements of rotation gates. We assess the training performance of these PQC types in the context of a variational compiling procedure and identify the preferred gate patterns. This approach provides a more realistic evaluation of PQC performance, thus offering practical insights into their applications on existing quantum devices.
Expressibility is a crucial factor of a Parameterized Quantum Circuit (PQC). In the context of Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQA) based Quantum Machine Learning (QML), a QML model composed of highly expressible PQC and sufficient number of qubits is theoretically capable of approximating any arbitrary continuous function. While much research has explored the relationship between expressibility and learning performance, as well as the number of layers in PQCs, the connection between expressibility and PQC structure has received comparatively less attention. In this paper, we analyze the connection between expressibility and the types of quantum gates within PQCs using a Gradient Boosting Tree model and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. Our analysis is performed on 1,615 instances of PQC derived from 19 PQC topologies, each with 2-18 qubits and 1-5 layers. The findings of our analysis provide guidance for designing highly expressible PQCs, suggesting the integration of more RX or RY gates while maintaining a careful balance with the number of CNOT gates. Furthermore, our evaluation offers an additional evidence of expressibility saturation, as observed by previous studies.
Ansatz selection is a key factor in the performance of variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). While much of the state-of-the-art still relies on heuristic choices, an inadequate circuit structure can compromise both the expressive power and the trainability of the resulting model. Recent results have also established theoretical connections between expressibility and the onset of barren plateaus, highlighting the need for systematic criteria for ansatz selection. In this work, the ansatz is treated as a design feature to be optimized rather than a fixed block, and a design space exploration (DSE) is performed over a diverse set of parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs). Three complementary metrics -- expressibility, trainability, and resource cost -- are evaluated and used to analyze the trade-offs that emerge across different PQCs. Beyond identifying Pareto-optimal candidates, this multi-objective perspective helps clarify the interplay between these metrics and contributes quantitative evidence toward understanding the expressibility--trainability tension in variational circuits.
Abstract Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) play an essential role in the performance of many variational quantum algorithms. One challenge in implementing such algorithms is choosing an effective circuit that well represents the solution space while maintaining a low circuit depth and parameter count. To characterize and identify expressible, yet compact, circuits, several descriptors are proposed, including expressibility and entangling capability, that are statistically estimated from classical simulations. These descriptors are computed for different circuit structures, varying the qubit connectivity and selection of gates. From these simulations, circuit fragments that perform well with respect to the descriptors are identified. In particular, a substantial improvement in performance of two‐qubit gates in a ring or all‐to‐all connected arrangement, compared to that of those on a line, is observed. Furthermore, improvement in both descriptors is achieved by sequences of controlled X‐rotation gates compared to sequences of controlled Z‐rotation gates. In addition, it is investigated how expressibility “saturates” with increased circuit depth, finding that the rate and saturated value appear to be distinguishing features of a PQC. While the correlation between each descriptor and algorithm performance remains to be investigated, methods and results from this study can be useful for algorithm development and design of experiments.
Whether parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) can be systematically constructed to be both trainable and expressive remains an open question. Highly expressive PQCs often exhibit barren plateaus, while several trainable alternatives admit efficient classical simulation. We address this question by deriving a finite-sample, dimension-independent concentration bound for estimating the variance of a PQC cost function, yielding explicit trainability guarantees. Across commonly used ansätze, we observe an anticorrelation between trainability and expressibility, consistent with theoretical insights. Building on this observation, we propose a property-based ansatz-search framework for identifying circuits that combine trainability and expressibility. We demonstrate its practical viability on a real quantum computer and apply it to variational quantum algorithms. We identify quantum neural network ansätze with improved effective dimension using over 6×6 \times6× fewer parameters, and for VQE on H2\mathrm{H}_2H2​ we achieve UCCSD-like accuracy at substantially reduced circuit complexity.