In physical experiments, reference frames are standardly modeled through a specific choice of coordinates used to describe the physical systems, but they themselves are not considered as such. However, any reference frame is a physical system that ultimately behaves according to quantum mechanics. We develop a framework for rotational (i.e., spin) quantum reference frames, with respect to which quantum systems with spin degrees of freedom are described. We give an explicit model for such frames as systems composed of three spin coherent states of angular momentum
j and introduce the transformations between them by upgrading the Euler angles occurring in classical
SO(3) spin transformations to quantum mechanical operators acting on the states of the reference frames. To ensure that an arbitrary rotation can be applied on the spin we take the limit of infinitely large
j, in which case the angle operator possesses a continuous spectrum. We prove that rotationally invariant Hamiltonians (such as that of the Heisenberg model) are invariant under a larger group of quantum reference frame transformations. Our result is a development of the quantum reference frame formalism for a non-Abelian group.
The quantum states of a spin 12 (a qubit) are parametrized by the space CP1∼S2, the Bloch sphere. A spin j for a generic j (a 2j+1-state system) is represented instead by a point in a larger space, CP2j. Here we study the state of a single angular momentum/spin in the limit j→∞. A special class of states, |j,n⟩∈CP2j, with spin oriented towards definite spatial directions, n∈S2, i.e., (J^·n)|j,n⟩=j|j,n⟩, are found to behave as classical angular momenta, jn, in this limit. Vice versa, general spin states in CP2j do not become classical, even at a large j. We study these questions by analyzing the Stern–Gerlach processes, the angular momentum composition rule, and the rotation matrix. Our observations help to better clarify how classical mechanics emerges from quantum mechanics in this context (e.g., with the unique trajectories of a particle carrying a large spin in an inhomogeneous magnetic field) and to make the widespread idea that large spins somehow become classical more precise.
Spin-s systems Angular momentum is one of the fundamental quantities of Newtonian physics, and in quantum physics its importance is at least as great. In quantum mechanics we often distinguish between two types of angular momentum: orbital angular momentum , which a system of particles possesses due to particle motion through space; and spin angular momentum , which is an intrinsic property of a particle. The distinction will be important later, but for now we will ignore it. We will here refer to angular momentum of any sort as “spin” and develop general-purpose mathematical tools for its description. We have already dealt with spin systems, particularly the example of a spin-½ particle. Our approach began with the empirical observation that a measurement of any spin component of a spin-½ particle could yield only the results +ħ/2 or −ħ/2. We introduced the basis states | z ±〉 for the two-dimensional Hilbert space ℋ. We also gave other basis states such as {| x ±〉} and {| y ±〉} in terms of the | z ±〉 states. From basis states and measurement values we constructed operators for the spin components S x , S y , and S z . With the operators in hand, we could then examine the algebraic relations between them (such as the commutation relation in Exercise 3.56). Our job here is to generalize our analysis to systems of arbitrary spin. To do this, we will reverse our chain of logic.
Quantum states of a spin
21 (a qubit) are parametrized by the space
CP1∼S2, the Bloch sphere. A spin
j for a generic
j (a
2j+1-state system) is represented instead by a point of a larger space,
CP2j. Here we study the state of a single angular momentum/spin in the limit,
j→∞. The special class of states $ | j, {\mathbf n}\rangle \in {\mathbf {CP}}^{2j} $, with spin oriented towards definite spatial directions
n∈S2, i.e., $({\mathbf J}\cdot {\mathbf n} ) \, | j, {\mathbf n}\rangle = j\, |j, {\mathbf n}\rangle $, are found to behave as classical angular momenta,
jn, in this limit. Vice versa, general spin states in
CP2j do not become classical, even at large
j. We discuss these questions, by analysing the Stern-Gerlach processes, the angular-momentum composition rule, and the rotation matrix. Our observations help to clarify better how classical mechanics emerges from quantum mechanics in this context (e.g., with unique trajectories for a particle carrying a large spin), and to make the widespread idea that large spins somehow become classical, more precise.
In the literature on quantum reference frames, the internal (relative) properties of a system are defined as those which are preserved under an arbitrary change of reference frame. For a system of quantum spins, these are all properties preserved by proper spatial rotations of the laboratory. However, this approach does not account for the hypothetical possibility of the laboratory becoming entangled to the system, as described by a second laboratory (the `Wigner's friend' scenario), in which case the relationship between the two laboratories is not a rotation, but is fundamentally quantum. To overcome this limitation, we re-define the reference frame transformations to be those that preserve the fidelities between subsystems. This enables us to derive U(2) as the correct symmetry group for transformations of a system of N spin-half particles. Next, we propose that systems having the same internal properties should be regarded as physically equivalent in the absence of an external frame. Remarkably, this implies that a single spin in a superposition relative to a spin magnet is equivalent to a macroscopic superposition of the magnet relative to the spin. We discuss the implications of this result for the Wigner's friend paradox.
Abstract Conventional methods for teaching spin at a university level generally follow four main approaches. The first introduces spin into the Schrödinger equation artificially, leaving its physical meaning unclear. The second connects spin to the representation of the rotation group, which clarifies its nature but requires knowledge of group theory. The third approach derives from field theory, separating angular momentum into orbital and intrinsic parts, the latter corresponding to spin; however, this cannot be done within quantum mechanics alone. The fourth derives electron spin from Dirac’s 1928 relativistic equation, which, though correct, has led to the misconception that spin is a purely relativistic effect. A detailed analysis of Dirac’s 1928 papers shows that the concept of spin arises from the need to construct an equation linear in both energy and momentum to preserve Born’s probabilistic interpretation. This linearization of the Klein–Gordon equation reveals that spin is conceptually independent of relativity. Historical and pedagogical perspectives can together clarify conceptual difficulties and promote a deeper understanding of fundamental ideas in physics. Drawing on selected passages from Dirac’s original work, the present discussion offers broader conceptual and cultural considerations that introduce the notion of spin with limited mathematical requirements and can be applied independently of the didactic approach adopted.