Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2605.16249

The Collapse of Unentangled Stoquastic Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems

William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo

quant-phcs.CCSubmitted May 15, 2026• Announced May 18, 2026• 0 citations• Revised Sep 30, 2026 (v2)
v1 · May 15, 2026v2 · Sep 30, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Interference and entanglement are among the most fundamental properties of quantum mechanics. In this work, we investigate the power of interference in the role of detecting entanglement in the context of quantum Merlin-Arthur verification. In particular, we show that unentanglement gives no additional power to stoquastic Merlin-Arthur proof systems, whose restriction to a classical gate set results in entrywise non-negative acceptance operators and non-negative optimal witnesses, therein removing destructive interference from the verification process. Our results show that for any polynomial number of unentangled witnesses $k = k(n)$, \[ \mathsf{StoqMA}(k) = \mathsf{StoqMA}. \] The analytic core of this result is a new non-negative de Finetti theorem for separately bosonic states. If a mixed state $ρ$ is supported on the tensor product of symmetric subspaces of $\mathcal{H}_1^{\otimes R} \otimes \mathcal{H}_2^{\otimes R} \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k^{\otimes R}$ then there exists a separable state $τ$ on $\mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k$ such that \[ \mathrm{Tr}\big(M(ρ_{\mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k} - τ)\big) \le 2 \sqrt{\frac{k\, \log_2\dim(\mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k)}{R-1}}, \] simultaneously for all non-negative effects $M$. For any such operator $M$, one can define the separately symmetric lift $\mathrm{SS}_R(M)$ whose largest eigenvalue approximates the maximum acceptance probability of $M$ over product states within the same error bound. Such a lift can be approximated by a stoquastic verifier, giving that product-state constraint of $\mathsf{StoqMA}(k)$ verifiers can be absorbed into a polynomially larger one-witness $\mathsf{StoqMA}$ verification, while preserving an inverse polynomial completeness-soundness gap.

Related papers

The power of unentanglement without destructive interference

Yupan Liu, Pei Wu

Stoquasticity, originating in sign-problem-free physical systems, gives rise to $\sf StoqMA$, introduced by Bravyi, Bessen, and Terhal (2006), a quantum-inspired intermediate class between $\sf MA$ and $\sf AM$. Unentanglement similarly gives rise to ${\sf QMA}(2)$, introduced by Kobayashi, Matsumoto, and Yamakami (CJTCS 2009), which generalizes $\sf QMA$ to two unentangled proofs and still has only the trivial $\sf NEXP$ upper bound. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the power of unentanglement without destructive interference via ${\sf StoqMA}(2)$, the class of unentangled stoquastic Merlin--Arthur proof systems. Beyond its complexity-theoretic interest, ${\sf StoqMA}(2)$ is connected to the optimality of non-negative tensor optimization algorithms. We highlight: 1. ${\sf NP} \subseteq {\sf StoqMA}(2)$ with $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$-qubit proofs and completenes $1-2^{-{\rm polylog}(n)}$. Conversely, the Sum-of-Squares algorithm of Barak, Kelner, and Steurer (STOC 2014) gives an exponential-time upper bound for ${\sf StoqMA}(2)$. Our tightened analysis shows the optimality of our protocol and the BKS algorithm under ETH. 2. For logarithmic-size proofs, ${\sf NP} \subseteq {\sf StoqMA}(2)_{\log}$ with completeness $1-O(n^{-2})$ and vanishing gap, while ${\sf StoqMA}(2)_{\log} \subseteq {\sf MA}$. Consequently, quantum-inspired randomness enables exponentially shorter unentangled proofs even under the assumption ${\sf MA}={\sf NP}$. 3. For ${\sf StoqMA}(2)_1$, the parameter dependence in the general ETH-optimal time bound can be exponentially improved, or the bound achieved simultaneously with polynomial space. Our lower bounds are obtained by stoquastizing the short-proof ${\sf QMA}(2)$ protocols using distribution testing techniques. Our upper bounds for the nearly perfect completeness case are proved via our rectangular closure testing framework.

quant-pharXiv:2604.27886•May 1, 2026•0 citations

Testing Product States, Quantum Merlin-Arthur Games and Tensor Optimization

Aram W. Harrow, Ashley Montanaro

We give a test that can distinguish efficiently between product states of n quantum systems and states that are far from product. If applied to a state | ψ 〉 whose maximum overlap with a product state is 1 − ε , the test passes with probability 1 − Θ ( ε ), regardless of n or the local dimensions of the individual systems. The test uses two copies of | ψ 〉. We prove correctness of this test as a special case of a more general result regarding stability of maximum output purity of the depolarizing channel. A key application of the test is to quantum Merlin-Arthur games with multiple Merlins, where we obtain several structural results that had been previously conjectured, including the fact that efficient soundness amplification is possible and that two Merlins can simulate many Merlins: QMA( k ) = QMA(2) for k ≥ 2. Building on a previous result of Aaronson et al., this implies that there is an efficient quantum algorithm to verify 3-SAT with constant soundness, given two unentangled proofs of Õ (√ n ) qubits. We also show how QMA(2) with log-sized proofs is equivalent to a large number of problems, some related to quantum information (such as testing separability of mixed states) as well as problems without any apparent connection to quantum mechanics (such as computing injective tensor norms of 3-index tensors). As a consequence, we obtain many hardness-of-approximation results, as well as potential algorithmic applications of methods for approximating QMA(2) acceptance probabilities. Finally, our test can also be used to construct an efficient test for determining whether a unitary operator is a tensor product, which is a generalization of classical linearity testing.

Journal of the ACM•Feb 1, 2013•102 citations

Multi-Prover Quantum Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems with Small Gap

Attila Pereszlényi

This paper studies multiple-proof quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) proof systems in the setting when the completeness-soundness gap is small. Small means that we only lower-bound the gap with an inverse-exponential function of the input length, or with an even smaller function. Using the protocol of Blier and Tapp [arXiv:0709.0738], we show that in this case the proof system has the same expressive power as non-deterministic exponential time (NEXP). Since single-proof QMA proof systems, with the same bound on the gap, have expressive power at most exponential time (EXP), we get a separation between single and multi-prover proof systems in the 'small-gap setting', under the assumption that EXP is not equal to NEXP. This implies, among others, the nonexistence of certain operators called disentanglers (defined by Aaronson et al. [arXiv:0804.0802]), with good approximation parameters. We also show that in this setting the proof system has the same expressive power if we restrict the verifier to be able to perform only Bell-measurements, i.e., using a BellQMA verifier. This is not known to hold in the usual setting, when the gap is bounded by an inverse-polynomial function of the input length. To show this we use the protocol of Chen and Drucker [arXiv:1011.0716]. The only caveat here is that we need at least a linear amount of proofs to achieve the power of NEXP, while in the previous setting two proofs were enough. We also study the case when the proof-lengths are only logarithmic in the input length and observe that in some cases the expressive power decreases. However, we show that it doesn't decrease further if we make the proof lengths to be even shorter.

arXiv:1205.2761•May 12, 2012•13 citations

Quantum Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems: Are Multiple Merlins More Helpful to Arthur?

Hirotada Kobayashi, Keiji Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Yamakami

This paper introduces quantum ``multiple-Merlin''-Arthur proof systems in which Arthur receives multiple quantum proofs that are unentangled with each other. Although classical multi-proof systems are obviously equivalent to classical single-proof systems (i.e., usual Merlin-Arthur proof systems), it is unclear whether or not quantum multi-proof systems collapse to quantum single-proof systems (i.e., usual quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems). This paper presents a necessary and sufficient condition under which the number of quantum proofs is reducible to two. It is also proved that, in the case of perfect soundness, using multiple quantum proofs does not increase the power of quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems.

arXiv:quant-ph/0306051•Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science•Jun 6, 2003•53 citations

QMA variants with polynomially many provers

Sevag Gharibian, Jamie Sikora, Sarvagya Upadhyay

We study three variants of multi-prover quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems. We first show that the class of problems that can be efficiently verified using polynomially many quantum proofs, each of logarithmic-size, is exactly \class{MQA} (also known as QCMA), the class of problems which can be efficiently verified via a classical proof and a quantum verifier. We then study the class $\class{BellQMA}(\poly)$, characterized by a verifier who first applies unentangled, nonadaptive measurements to each of the polynomially many proofs, followed by an arbitrary but efficient quantum verification circuit on the resulting measurement outcomes. We show that if the number of outcomes per nonadaptive measurement is a polynomially-bounded function, then the expressive power of the proof system is exactly \class{QMA}. Finally, we study a class equivalent to \class{QMA}($m$), denoted $\class{SepQMA}(m)$, where the verifier's measurement operator corresponding to outcome {\it accept} is a fully separable operator across the $m$ quantum proofs. Using cone programming duality, we give an alternate proof of a result of Harrow and Montanaro [FOCS, pp. 633--642 (2010)] that shows a perfect parallel repetition theorem for $\class{SepQMA}(m)$ for any $m$.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jan 1, 2013•17 citations

An Efficient Test for Product States with Applications to Quantum Merlin-Arthur Games

Aram W. Harrow, Ashley Montanaro

We give a test that can distinguish efficiently between product states of n quantum systems and states which are far from product. If applied to a state |φ) whose maximum overlap with a product state is 1- ε, the test passes with probability 1-Θ(ε), regardless of n or the local dimensions of the individual systems. The test uses two copies of |φ). We prove correctness of this test as a special case of a more general result regarding stability of maximum output purity of the depolarising channel. A key application of the test is to quantum Merlin-Arthur games with multiple Merlins, where we obtain several structural results that had been previously conjectured, including the fact that soundness amplification is possible and that two Merlins can simulate many Merlins: QMA(k)=QMA(2) for k ≥ 2. Building on a previous result of Aaronson et al, this implies that there is an efficient quantum algorithm to verify 3-SAT with constant soundness, given two unentangled proofs of Õ(√n) qubits. Among other consequences, this result implies complexity-theoretic obstructions to finding a polynomial-time algorithm to determine separability of mixed quantum states, even up to constant error, and also to proving "weak" variants of the additivity conjecture for quantum channels. Finally, our test can also be used to construct an efficient test for determining whether a unitary operator is a tensor product, which is a generalisation of classical linearity testing.

arXiv:1001.0017•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2010•37 citations
Interference and entanglement are among the most fundamental properties of quantum mechanics. In this work, we investigate the power of interference in the role of detecting entanglement in the context of quantum Merlin-Arthur verification. In particular, we show that unentanglement gives no additional power to stoquastic Merlin-Arthur proof systems, whose restriction to a classical gate set results in entrywise non-negative acceptance operators and non-negative optimal witnesses, therein removing destructive interference from the verification process. Our results show that for any polynomial number of unentangled witnesses k=k(n)k = k(n)k=k(n), [ \mathsf{StoqMA}(k) = \mathsf{StoqMA}. ] The analytic core of this result is a new non-negative de Finetti theorem for separately bosonic states. If a mixed state ρρρ is supported on the tensor product of symmetric subspaces of H1⊗R⊗H2⊗R⊗⋯⊗Hk⊗R\mathcal{H}_1^{\otimes R} \otimes \mathcal{H}_2^{\otimes R} \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k^{\otimes R}H1⊗R​⊗H2⊗R​⊗⋯⊗Hk⊗R​ then there exists a separable state τττ on H1⊗⋯⊗Hk\mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_kH1​⊗⋯⊗Hk​ such that [ \mathrm{Tr}\big(M(ρ_{\mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k} - τ)\big) \le 2 \sqrt{\frac{k, \log_2\dim(\mathcal{H}_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \mathcal{H}_k)}{R-1}}, ] simultaneously for all non-negative effects MMM. For any such operator MMM, one can define the separately symmetric lift SSR(M)\mathrm{SS}_R(M)SSR​(M) whose largest eigenvalue approximates the maximum acceptance probability of MMM over product states within the same error bound. Such a lift can be approximated by a stoquastic verifier, giving that product-state constraint of StoqMA(k)\mathsf{StoqMA}(k)StoqMA(k) verifiers can be absorbed into a polynomially larger one-witness StoqMA\mathsf{StoqMA}StoqMA verification, while preserving an inverse polynomial completeness-soundness gap.
Stoquasticity, originating in sign-problem-free physical systems, gives rise to StoqMA\sf StoqMAStoqMA, introduced by Bravyi, Bessen, and Terhal (2006), a quantum-inspired intermediate class between MA\sf MAMA and AM\sf AMAM. Unentanglement similarly gives rise to QMA(2){\sf QMA}(2)QMA(2), introduced by Kobayashi, Matsumoto, and Yamakami (CJTCS 2009), which generalizes QMA\sf QMAQMA to two unentangled proofs and still has only the trivial NEXP\sf NEXPNEXP upper bound. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the power of unentanglement without destructive interference via StoqMA(2){\sf StoqMA}(2)StoqMA(2), the class of unentangled stoquastic Merlin--Arthur proof systems. Beyond its complexity-theoretic interest, StoqMA(2){\sf StoqMA}(2)StoqMA(2) is connected to the optimality of non-negative tensor optimization algorithms. We highlight: 1. NP⊆StoqMA(2){\sf NP} \subseteq {\sf StoqMA}(2)NP⊆StoqMA(2) with O~(n)\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{n})O(n​)-qubit proofs and completenes 1−2−polylog(n)1-2^{-{\rm polylog}(n)}1−2−polylog(n). Conversely, the Sum-of-Squares algorithm of Barak, Kelner, and Steurer (STOC 2014) gives an exponential-time upper bound for StoqMA(2){\sf StoqMA}(2)StoqMA(2). Our tightened analysis shows the optimality of our protocol and the BKS algorithm under ETH. 2. For logarithmic-size proofs, NP⊆StoqMA(2)log⁡{\sf NP} \subseteq {\sf StoqMA}(2)_{\log}NP⊆StoqMA(2)log​ with completeness 1−O(n−2)1-O(n^{-2})1−O(n−2) and vanishing gap, while StoqMA(2)log⁡⊆MA{\sf StoqMA}(2)_{\log} \subseteq {\sf MA}StoqMA(2)log​⊆MA. Consequently, quantum-inspired randomness enables exponentially shorter unentangled proofs even under the assumption MA=NP{\sf MA}={\sf NP}MA=NP. 3. For StoqMA(2)1{\sf StoqMA}(2)_1StoqMA(2)1​, the parameter dependence in the general ETH-optimal time bound can be exponentially improved, or the bound achieved simultaneously with polynomial space. Our lower bounds are obtained by stoquastizing the short-proof QMA(2){\sf QMA}(2)QMA(2) protocols using distribution testing techniques. Our upper bounds for the nearly perfect completeness case are proved via our rectangular closure testing framework.
We give a test that can distinguish efficiently between product states of n quantum systems and states that are far from product. If applied to a state | ψ 〉 whose maximum overlap with a product state is 1 − ε , the test passes with probability 1 − Θ ( ε ), regardless of n or the local dimensions of the individual systems. The test uses two copies of | ψ 〉. We prove correctness of this test as a special case of a more general result regarding stability of maximum output purity of the depolarizing channel. A key application of the test is to quantum Merlin-Arthur games with multiple Merlins, where we obtain several structural results that had been previously conjectured, including the fact that efficient soundness amplification is possible and that two Merlins can simulate many Merlins: QMA( k ) = QMA(2) for k ≥ 2. Building on a previous result of Aaronson et al., this implies that there is an efficient quantum algorithm to verify 3-SAT with constant soundness, given two unentangled proofs of Õ (√ n ) qubits. We also show how QMA(2) with log-sized proofs is equivalent to a large number of problems, some related to quantum information (such as testing separability of mixed states) as well as problems without any apparent connection to quantum mechanics (such as computing injective tensor norms of 3-index tensors). As a consequence, we obtain many hardness-of-approximation results, as well as potential algorithmic applications of methods for approximating QMA(2) acceptance probabilities. Finally, our test can also be used to construct an efficient test for determining whether a unitary operator is a tensor product, which is a generalization of classical linearity testing.
This paper studies multiple-proof quantum Merlin-Arthur (QMA) proof systems in the setting when the completeness-soundness gap is small. Small means that we only lower-bound the gap with an inverse-exponential function of the input length, or with an even smaller function. Using the protocol of Blier and Tapp [arXiv:0709.0738], we show that in this case the proof system has the same expressive power as non-deterministic exponential time (NEXP). Since single-proof QMA proof systems, with the same bound on the gap, have expressive power at most exponential time (EXP), we get a separation between single and multi-prover proof systems in the 'small-gap setting', under the assumption that EXP is not equal to NEXP. This implies, among others, the nonexistence of certain operators called disentanglers (defined by Aaronson et al. [arXiv:0804.0802]), with good approximation parameters. We also show that in this setting the proof system has the same expressive power if we restrict the verifier to be able to perform only Bell-measurements, i.e., using a BellQMA verifier. This is not known to hold in the usual setting, when the gap is bounded by an inverse-polynomial function of the input length. To show this we use the protocol of Chen and Drucker [arXiv:1011.0716]. The only caveat here is that we need at least a linear amount of proofs to achieve the power of NEXP, while in the previous setting two proofs were enough. We also study the case when the proof-lengths are only logarithmic in the input length and observe that in some cases the expressive power decreases. However, we show that it doesn't decrease further if we make the proof lengths to be even shorter.
This paper introduces quantum ``multiple-Merlin''-Arthur proof systems in which Arthur receives multiple quantum proofs that are unentangled with each other. Although classical multi-proof systems are obviously equivalent to classical single-proof systems (i.e., usual Merlin-Arthur proof systems), it is unclear whether or not quantum multi-proof systems collapse to quantum single-proof systems (i.e., usual quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems). This paper presents a necessary and sufficient condition under which the number of quantum proofs is reducible to two. It is also proved that, in the case of perfect soundness, using multiple quantum proofs does not increase the power of quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems.
We study three variants of multi-prover quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems. We first show that the class of problems that can be efficiently verified using polynomially many quantum proofs, each of logarithmic-size, is exactly \class{MQA} (also known as QCMA), the class of problems which can be efficiently verified via a classical proof and a quantum verifier. We then study the class $\class{BellQMA}(\poly)$, characterized by a verifier who first applies unentangled, nonadaptive measurements to each of the polynomially many proofs, followed by an arbitrary but efficient quantum verification circuit on the resulting measurement outcomes. We show that if the number of outcomes per nonadaptive measurement is a polynomially-bounded function, then the expressive power of the proof system is exactly \class{QMA}. Finally, we study a class equivalent to \class{QMA}(mmm), denoted $\class{SepQMA}(m)$, where the verifier's measurement operator corresponding to outcome {\it accept} is a fully separable operator across the mmm quantum proofs. Using cone programming duality, we give an alternate proof of a result of Harrow and Montanaro [FOCS, pp. 633--642 (2010)] that shows a perfect parallel repetition theorem for $\class{SepQMA}(m)$ for any mmm.
We give a test that can distinguish efficiently between product states of n quantum systems and states which are far from product. If applied to a state |φ) whose maximum overlap with a product state is 1- ε, the test passes with probability 1-Θ(ε), regardless of n or the local dimensions of the individual systems. The test uses two copies of |φ). We prove correctness of this test as a special case of a more general result regarding stability of maximum output purity of the depolarising channel. A key application of the test is to quantum Merlin-Arthur games with multiple Merlins, where we obtain several structural results that had been previously conjectured, including the fact that soundness amplification is possible and that two Merlins can simulate many Merlins: QMA(k)=QMA(2) for k ≥ 2. Building on a previous result of Aaronson et al, this implies that there is an efficient quantum algorithm to verify 3-SAT with constant soundness, given two unentangled proofs of Õ(√n) qubits. Among other consequences, this result implies complexity-theoretic obstructions to finding a polynomial-time algorithm to determine separability of mixed quantum states, even up to constant error, and also to proving "weak" variants of the additivity conjecture for quantum channels. Finally, our test can also be used to construct an efficient test for determining whether a unitary operator is a tensor product, which is a generalisation of classical linearity testing.