Miquel Carrasco-Codina, Pau Escofet, Paul Hilaire, Ariane Soret, Sam Nerenberg, Victor Champain, Gerard Milburn, Klara Theophilo, Sophie H. Li, Irais Bautista, Andrés Gómez, Jose Miralles, Sergi Abadal, Carmen G. Almudéver, Eduard Alarcón, Raja Yehia
quant-phSubmitted May 14, 2026• Announced May 15, 2026• 0 citations
How much energy does a quantum computer consume? Are they more efficient than their classical counterparts? In this work, we make a step towards answering these questions. We define the energy efficiency of a quantum computer as the ratio of the number of algorithms it can perform during a given time over the energy consumed by the hardware during this time. We analyze the most representative physical platforms currently envisioned to be used as building blocks of quantum computers: superconducting qubits, silicon spin qubits, trapped ions, neutral atoms and photonic qubits. Including insights from experts in all these technologies and taking into account algorithm compilation constraints, we discuss the advantages and inconveniences of each platform from an energy standpoint. Beyond providing concrete values of the energy consumption of current quantum computers, we lay the foundation of a framework to benchmark the energy efficiency of any future quantum computing architecture.
How much energy does a quantum computer consume? Are they more efficient than their classical counterparts? In this work, we make a step towards answering these questions. We define the energy efficiency of a quantum computer as the ratio of the number of algorithms it can perform during a given time over the energy consumed by the hardware during this time. We analyze the most representative physical platforms currently envisioned to be used as building blocks of quantum computers: superconducting qubits, silicon spin qubits, trapped ions, neutral atoms and photonic qubits. Including insights from experts in all these technologies and taking into account algorithm compilation constraints, we discuss the advantages and inconveniences of each platform from an energy standpoint. Beyond providing concrete values of the energy consumption of current quantum computers, we lay the foundation of a framework to benchmark the energy efficiency of any future quantum computing architecture.
Quantum computing has the potential to outperform classical computing in specific problem domains, but current systems rely heavily on classical resources for tasks such as quantum circuit compilation. As quantum hardware scales, the energy consumption of these supporting classical processes becomes increasingly important. This thesis investigates the energy consumption of quantum circuit compilation by analyzing existing literature and benchmarking results for different quantum software frameworks. The study focuses on comparing the performance of widely used quantum compilers. Energy consumption is estimated based on processor power models and execution time. Benchmark data from multiplier and quantum Fourier transform circuits are used to evaluate how compiler performance scales with increasing qubit counts and different hardware connectivity constraints. The results show that no single compiler is optimal for all tasks, but significant differences exist in runtime and energy efficiency. Compilers with better scalability, such as Qiskit in many cases, tend to consume less energy for larger circuits, while others exhibit rapidly increasing costs. Additionally, restricted hardware connectivity increases compilation time and energy consumption across most frameworks. The thesis concludes that energy consumption is an important, but unexplored aspect of quantum circuit compilation. As quantum systems grow in size, the classical overhead of compilation may become a limiting factor. Future work should focus on direct measurement of energy consumption and the development of energy-aware compilation techniques.
While extensive research over the past decades has been dedicated to developing scalable quantum computers, the question of their energetic performance has only gained attention more recently, but its importance is now recognized. In fact, quantum computers can only be a viable alternative if their energy cost scales favorably, and some research has shown that there is even a potential quantum energy advantage. In parallel, Rydberg atoms have recently emerged as one of the most promising platforms to implement a large-scale quantum computer. This work aims at contributing first steps to understand the energy efficiency of this platform, by investigating the energy consumption of the different elements of a Rydberg atom quantum computer. First, an experimental implementation of the Quantum Phase Estimation algorithm is analyzed, and an estimation of the energetic cost of executing it is calculated. Then, we derive an estimate of how the energy cost of performing the Quantum Fourier Transform scales with the number of qubits in the Rydberg platform. This analysis facilitates a comparison of the energy consumption of different elements within a Rydberg atom quantum computer, from the preparation of the atoms to the execution of the algorithm, and the measurement of the final state, enabling the evaluation of the energy expenditure of the Rydberg platform and the identification of potential improvements. Finally, we use the Quantum Fourier Transform as an energetic benchmark, comparing the scaling we obtained to that of the execution of the Discrete Fourier Transform in two state-of-the-art classical supercomputers. This comparison indicates that, in an ideal error-free scenario, a quantum energy advantage is achieved in the Rydberg platform for the Fourier Transform, in a regime where classical algorithms are still faster.
Quantum computing is a revolutionary approach to computation that leverages the principles of quantum mechanics, enabling computers to process information in fundamentally different ways than classical computers. Unlike traditional bits, which represent data as either 0s or 1s, quantum bits, or qubits, can exist in multiple states simultaneously due to superposition. Additionally, qubits can be entangled, allowing them to be interconnected in ways that enhance computational power and efficiency. This unique behavior has the potential to run certain types of computation tasks much faster than classical computers can, marking a significant leap forward in technology. When building actual quantum computers to run practical quantum algorithms, one needs efficient ways to map the algorithms to the hardware components, similar to compiling classical algorithms onto CPU/GPU hardware. This thesis aims to tackle some of the important problems in the mapping process. First, can we address hardware errors and algorithm errors at the same time? Second, can we build a better circuit complexity metric to inspire better quantum architecture design, and can we design better quantum algorithms and compilation techniques using this improved metric? Lastly, can we use physics-level simulation results to inspire better circuit-level optimization techniques? We hope to provide positive answers to all three questions above through three separate architectural innovations.
Semiconductor spin qubits offer a promising route to compact and scalable quantum computers, combining long coherence times in isotopically purified silicon with compatibility with semiconductor manufacturing. Beyond computational speedup, their energy efficiency is an important consideration for future large-scale systems. We evaluate the power and energy requirements of a Loss-DiVincenzo spin-qubit quantum computer by analyzing the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) and benchmarking it against the classical Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). We develop a detailed energy budget, identifying cryogenic cooling as the dominant baseline contribution before quantum error correction (QEC). The comparison between the QFT and the classical FFT reveals that, for any quantum workload operating under a polynomially bounded sampling regime, the crossover in energy consumption occurs at smaller problem sizes than the crossover in execution time. Thus, quantum computing can become energetically competitive before achieving a speedup in execution time. We then incorporate surface-code QEC and analyze the energy costs of QEC cycles, gate synthesis, and decoding. At scale, instrumentation and decoding become dominant contributions, while cryogenic cooling imposes a constraint on scalability. We show that optimizing the control-signal demultiplexing ratio can reduce the overall energy cost by approximately two orders of magnitude. For a system with about one million physical qubits, we estimate a power consumption of approximately 100 kW, at least one order of magnitude below that of today's highest-performance classical computing systems.
This paper presents a comprehensive review of quantum computing and the technological foundations of quantum processors. Quantum computing represents a transformative computational paradigm that leverages the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics—such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference—to solve complex problems that are intractable for classical computers. At the core of this paradigm lies the quantum processor, a specialized hardware system designed to initialize, control, and measure quantum bits (qubits) through precise gate operations and coherent interactions. The survey examines the essential theoretical concepts underlying quantum computation and provides a structured comparison of leading quantum processor platforms. Prominent architectures, including superconducting circuits, trapped-ion systems, and photonic implementations, are analyzed in terms of their physical mechanisms, scalability, coherence properties, and engineering challenges. Each platform offers distinct advantages and faces specific technical limitations related to noise, error correction, and fabrication complexity. In addition to reviewing hardware developments, this study highlights key obstacles in advancing quantum processors toward large-scale, fault-tolerant systems. Issues such as qubit stability, error mitigation, thermal management, and system integration are discussed to present a realistic perspective on current progress. Performance indicators including gate fidelity, coherence time, connectivity, and scalability are used to compare architectural approaches. The objective of this paper is to provide a clear and organized synthesis of recent advancements in quantum computing hardware, thereby offering researchers and practitioners a foundational reference to support continued innovation and development in this rapidly evolving field.
Quantum computers are emerging as a promising new technology due to their ability to solve complex problems that exceed the capabilities of classical systems in terms of time. Among various implementations, superconducting qubits have become the leading technology due to their scalability and compatibility with quantum error correction mechanisms. Although time has traditionally been the primary focus, energetic efficiency is becoming an increasingly important consideration, especially with the possibility of a quantum energetic advantage. In this article, the energy consumption of the Semiclassical Quantum Fourier Transform was analyzed on a superconducting quantum computing platform based on cat qubits. Quantum error correction mechanisms were studied and considered in the energy estimations. The results show how the energy consumption scales with the number of qubits and how the most relevant parameters required for qubit stabilization, gate implementation, and error correction codes contribute to the overall energy usage. An optimization method was developed to tune these parameters with the goal of minimizing energy consumption while maintaining qubit fidelities above a given threshold. Additionally, a comparative study with state-of-the-art classical computers indicates a potential quantum energetic advantage for systems with more than 26 qubits, assuming cryogenic systems operating at Carnot efficiency, with this energetic advantage arising before any computational advantage. This behavior persists even when realistic cryogenic systems and control electronics are taken into account.