The no-cloning theorem, the no-deleting theorem, and other no-go theorems play a crucial role in quantum mechanics and quantum information. In this paper, we show that it is impossible to conjugate or reflect an unknown quantum state or conjugate or reflect the bit-flip (the phase-flip) of an unknown state via a universally unitary evolution. We also indicate that the partial conjugating operations are not anti-unitary and it is impossible to universally partially conjugate an unknown state via a unitary evolution. We compute the fidelities of the optimal physical approximations to conjugating and conjugating the bit-flip and phase-flip operations.
Pati and Braunstein defined a deleting machine and showed the impossibility of deleting one of two identical copies of an unknown quantum state. So far, no one has defined two non-identical copies of a quantum state, of course no one has discussed the impossibility of deleting one of two non-identical copies of an unknown quantum state. In this paper, we define
u∣ψ> and
U∣ψ>, where
u and
U are any unitary operators, as two unitary copies of a quantum state
∣ψ>, and show that it is impossible to delete one of two unitary copies of an unknown state.
Perfect cloning of an unknown quantum state is impossible. Approximate cloning, which is optimal in various senses, has been found in many cases. Paradigmatic examples are Wootters-Zurek cloning and universal cloning. These cloning machines aim at optimal cloning of the full quantum states. However, in practice, what is important and relevant may only involve partial information in quantum states, rather than quantum states themselves. For example, signals are often encoded as parameters in quantum states, whose information content is well synthesized by quantum Fisher information. This raises the basic issue of evaluating the information transferring capability (e.g., distributing quantum Fisher information) of quantum cloning. We assess and compare Wootters-Zurek cloning and universal cloning from this perspective and show that, on average, Wootters-Zurek cloning performs better than universal cloning for the phase (as well as amplitude) parameter, although they are incomparable individually, and universal cloning has many advantages over Wootters-Zurek cloning in other contexts. Physical insights and related issues are further discussed.
The celebrated quantum no-cloning theorem establishes the impossibility of making a perfect copy of an unknown quantum state. The discovery of this important theorem for the field of quantum information is currently dated 1982. I show here that an article published in 1970 [J. L. Park, Found. Phys. 1, 23–33 (1970)] contained an explicit mathematical proof of the impossibility of cloning quantum states. I analyze Park's demonstration in the light of published explanations concerning the genesis of the better-known papers on no-cloning.
The no-cloning theorem is a cornerstone result in quantum mechanics that forbids copying of general quantum information. More quantitatively, even given
N copies of an unknown state, any channel producing an
(N+1)-copy state incurs a nonzero trace-distance error on some inputs. Turning this around, one can ask about the sample complexity of approximate
N→N+1 cloning: for a desired small error
ε, what
N suffices? For arbitrary pure states on a Hilbert space
H, the answer is
N≃dimH/ε - astronomically large for most
H of interest. What if the input is promised to lie in a structured family? We examine a range of families fundamental to many-body physics and quantum information:
n-mode fermionic Gaussian and Slater states,
n-mode bosonic Gaussian states, and qudit phase states. For fermions, we construct optimal cloning channels, reducing the complexity from exponential to polynomial in
n. For bosonic Gaussian states, we construct an explicit cloner that certifies polynomial complexity, without any constraint on the energy of the state; this channel, however, is not optimal in general. The fermionic and bosonic results follow from a single representation-theoretic framework, which generalizes previous work by Werner and by Chiribella and Yang; it also yields the cloners' unitary implementation. Furthermore, we explain why for many families the cloning complexity is linear in the dimension of the family manifold, via a controlled saddle-point evaluation of the frame potential at high
N. The same calculation accounts for the analogous scaling of tomography complexity. The above framework does not cover phase states; for these we give an independent construction of a channel with optimal cloning fidelity. Our work complements recent results on cloning stabilizer states.