Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2603.22986 · Physical Review A

Imprecise quantum steering inequalities in tripartite systems

Yan Zhao, Li-Juan Li, Zheng-Peng Xu, Liu Ye, Dong Wang

quant-phSubmitted Mar 24, 2026• Announced Mar 25, 2026• 1 citation
v1 · Mar 24, 2026v2 · Apr 8, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements. Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.

Journal reference
Physical Review A 113, 042417 (2026)
DOI
10.1103/g7zk-9w9j
Comments
10 pages, 3 figures. Comments are welcomed. Accepted by Physical Review A

Related papers

Quantum Steering with Imprecise Measurements

Armin Tavakoli

We study quantum steering experiments without assuming that the trusted party can perfectly control their measurement device. Instead, we introduce a scenario in which these measurements are subject to small imprecision. We show that small measurement imprecision can have a large detrimental influence in terms of false positives for steering inequalities, and that this effect can become even more relevant for high-dimensional systems. We then introduce a method for taking generic measurement imprecision into account in tests of bipartite steering inequalities. The revised steering bounds returned by this method are analytical, easily computable, and are even optimal for well-known families of arbitrary-dimensional steering tests. Furthermore, it applies equally well to generalized quantum steering scenarios, where the shared quantum state does not need to be separable, but is instead limited by some other entanglement property.

arXiv:2308.15356•Physical Review Letters•Feb 16, 2024•22 citations

Device-independent quantification of steerability in tripartite scenario

Xin-Hong Wang, Miao-Tzu Lin, Shin-Liang Chen

Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.

quant-pharXiv:2609.36907•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Reliable Quantum Steering Detection under Imperfect Measurement

Ting Zhang, Wenhao Zhang, Jing-Tao Qiu +3 more

Quantum steering, a fundamental manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a vital role in quantum key distribution, quantum randomness generation, and quantum metrology. Reliable experimental detection of quantum steering is therefore a key task in quantum information science, but it is often hindered by measurement imperfections. Here, we introduce a randomized measurement protocol designed to mitigate the effects of imperfect measurements and enhance detection reliability. We theoretically prove that this approach effectively suppresses measurement errors by requiring only local operations on the trusted party; moreover, its dimension-independent nature ensures ready adaptability to quantum systems of arbitrary finite size. We experimentally validate the method using polarization-entangled photons, demonstrating consistent performance under controlled misalignments for both 2- and 3-setting configurations. Our results provide a practical and reliable framework for steering detection in realistic experimental conditions, paving the way for its integration into quantum certification and communication protocols.

Physical Review Letters•Feb 4, 2026•1 citation

Multipartite steering verification with imprecise measurements

Zeyang Lu, Chan Li, Gang Wang +1 more

Quantum steering is a fundamental quantum correlation that plays a pivotal role in quantum technologies, but its verification crucially relies on precise measurements -- an assumption often undermined by practical imperfections. Here, we investigate multipartite steering verification under imprecise measurements and develop a quantitative method that effectively eliminates false positives induced by measurement imprecision. A comparison with a device-independent approach demonstrates that our method accurately delineates the scope of valid verification. In a special case, our method also enables the verification of multipartite entanglement under nonideal conditions. These results substantially enhance the robustness of multipartite steering and entanglement verification against measurement imprecision, thereby promoting their applicability in realistic quantum technologies.

quant-pharXiv:2511.07708•Physical Review A•Nov 12, 2025•0 citations

Tripartite-entanglement detection through tripartite quantum steering in one-sided and two-sided device-independent scenarios

Chellasamy Jebarathinam, Debarshi Das, Arup Roy +5 more

In the present work we study tripartite quantum steering of quantum correlations arising from two local dichotomic measurements on each side in the two types of partially device-independent scenarios: the one-sided device-independent scenario where one of the parties performs untrusted measurements while the other two parties perform trusted measurements and the two-sided device-independent scenario where one of the parties performs trusted measurements while the other two parties perform untrusted measurements. We demonstrate that tripartite steering in the two-sided device-independent scenario is weaker than tripartite steering in the one-sided device-independent scenario by using two families of quantum correlations. That is, these two families of quantum correlations in the two-sided device-independent framework detect tripartite entanglement through tripartite steering for a larger region than that in the one-sided device-independent framework. It is shown that tripartite steering in the two-sided device-independent scenario implies the presence of genuine tripartite entanglement of $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ quantum system, even if the correlation does not exhibit genuine nonlocality or genuine steering.

arXiv:1704.08162•Physical Review A•Aug 1, 2018•22 citations

Quantum Steering Inequality with Tolerance for Measurement-Setting Errors: Experimentally Feasible Signature of Unbounded Violation

A. Rutkowski, Adam Buraczewski, Paweł Horodecki +1 more

Quantum steering is a relatively simple test for proving that the values of quantum-mechanical measurement outcomes come into being only in the act of measurement. By exploiting quantum correlations, Alice can influence-steer-Bob's physical system in a way that is impossible in classical mechanics, as shown by the violation of steering inequalities. Demonstrating this and similar quantum effects for systems of increasing size, approaching even the classical limit, is a long-standing challenging problem. Here, we prove an experimentally feasible unbounded violation of a steering inequality. We derive its universal form where tolerance for measurement-setting errors is explicitly built in by means of the Deutsch-Maassen-Uffink entropic uncertainty relation. Then, generalizing the mutual unbiasedness, we apply the inequality to the multisinglet and multiparticle bipartite Bell state. However, the method is general and opens the possibility of employing multiparticle bipartite steering for randomness certification and development of quantum technologies, e.g., random access codes.

arXiv:1603.07861•Physical Review Letters•Jan 9, 2017•30 citations
Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements.
Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.
We study quantum steering experiments without assuming that the trusted party can perfectly control their measurement device. Instead, we introduce a scenario in which these measurements are subject to small imprecision. We show that small measurement imprecision can have a large detrimental influence in terms of false positives for steering inequalities, and that this effect can become even more relevant for high-dimensional systems. We then introduce a method for taking generic measurement imprecision into account in tests of bipartite steering inequalities. The revised steering bounds returned by this method are analytical, easily computable, and are even optimal for well-known families of arbitrary-dimensional steering tests. Furthermore, it applies equally well to generalized quantum steering scenarios, where the shared quantum state does not need to be separable, but is instead limited by some other entanglement property.
Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.
Quantum steering, a fundamental manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a vital role in quantum key distribution, quantum randomness generation, and quantum metrology. Reliable experimental detection of quantum steering is therefore a key task in quantum information science, but it is often hindered by measurement imperfections. Here, we introduce a randomized measurement protocol designed to mitigate the effects of imperfect measurements and enhance detection reliability. We theoretically prove that this approach effectively suppresses measurement errors by requiring only local operations on the trusted party; moreover, its dimension-independent nature ensures ready adaptability to quantum systems of arbitrary finite size. We experimentally validate the method using polarization-entangled photons, demonstrating consistent performance under controlled misalignments for both 2- and 3-setting configurations. Our results provide a practical and reliable framework for steering detection in realistic experimental conditions, paving the way for its integration into quantum certification and communication protocols.
Quantum steering is a fundamental quantum correlation that plays a pivotal role in quantum technologies, but its verification crucially relies on precise measurements -- an assumption often undermined by practical imperfections. Here, we investigate multipartite steering verification under imprecise measurements and develop a quantitative method that effectively eliminates false positives induced by measurement imprecision. A comparison with a device-independent approach demonstrates that our method accurately delineates the scope of valid verification. In a special case, our method also enables the verification of multipartite entanglement under nonideal conditions. These results substantially enhance the robustness of multipartite steering and entanglement verification against measurement imprecision, thereby promoting their applicability in realistic quantum technologies.
In the present work we study tripartite quantum steering of quantum correlations arising from two local dichotomic measurements on each side in the two types of partially device-independent scenarios: the one-sided device-independent scenario where one of the parties performs untrusted measurements while the other two parties perform trusted measurements and the two-sided device-independent scenario where one of the parties performs trusted measurements while the other two parties perform untrusted measurements. We demonstrate that tripartite steering in the two-sided device-independent scenario is weaker than tripartite steering in the one-sided device-independent scenario by using two families of quantum correlations. That is, these two families of quantum correlations in the two-sided device-independent framework detect tripartite entanglement through tripartite steering for a larger region than that in the one-sided device-independent framework. It is shown that tripartite steering in the two-sided device-independent scenario implies the presence of genuine tripartite entanglement of $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2$ quantum system, even if the correlation does not exhibit genuine nonlocality or genuine steering.
Quantum steering is a relatively simple test for proving that the values of quantum-mechanical measurement outcomes come into being only in the act of measurement. By exploiting quantum correlations, Alice can influence-steer-Bob's physical system in a way that is impossible in classical mechanics, as shown by the violation of steering inequalities. Demonstrating this and similar quantum effects for systems of increasing size, approaching even the classical limit, is a long-standing challenging problem. Here, we prove an experimentally feasible unbounded violation of a steering inequality. We derive its universal form where tolerance for measurement-setting errors is explicitly built in by means of the Deutsch-Maassen-Uffink entropic uncertainty relation. Then, generalizing the mutual unbiasedness, we apply the inequality to the multisinglet and multiparticle bipartite Bell state. However, the method is general and opens the possibility of employing multiparticle bipartite steering for randomness certification and development of quantum technologies, e.g., random access codes.