Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.36907

Device-independent quantification of steerability in tripartite scenario

Xin-Hong Wang, Miao-Tzu Lin, Shin-Liang Chen

quant-phSubmitted Sep 29, 2026• Announced Sep 30, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.

Comments
22 pages, 4 figures

Related papers

Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations

Shin-Liang Chen, Costantino Budroni, Yeong-Cherng Liang +1 more

In a recent work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], a framework known by the name of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) has been introduced for the device-independent quantification of quantum steerability and measurement incompatibility. In other words, even with no assumption made on the preparation device nor the measurement devices, one can make use of this framework to certify, directly from the observed data, the aforementioned quantum features. Here, we further explore the framework of AMM and provide improved device-independent bounds on the generalized robustness of entanglement, the incompatibility robustness, and the incompatibility weight. We compare the tightness of our device-independent bounds against those obtained from other approaches. Along the way, we also provide an analytic form for the generalized robustness of entanglement for an arbitrary two-qudit isotropic state. When considering a Bell-type experiment in a tripartite or more-partite scenario, we further show that the framework of AMM provides a natural way to characterize a superset to the set of quantum correlations, namely, one which also allows post-quantum steering.

arXiv:1808.01300•Physical Review A•Oct 24, 2018•18 citations

Robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages and its applications on device-independent quantum certification

Shin-Liang Chen, Huan-Yu Ku, Wenbin Zhou +2 more

Given a Bell inequality, if its maximal quantum violation can be achieved only by a single set of measurements for each party or a single quantum state, up to local unitaries, one refers to such a phenomenon as self-testing. For instance, the maximal quantum violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality certifies that the underlying state contains the two-qubit maximally entangled state and the measurements of one party contains a pair of anti-commuting qubit observables. As a consequence, the other party automatically verifies the set of states remotely steered, namely the "assemblage", is in the eigenstates of a pair of anti-commuting observables. It is natural to ask if the quantum violation of the Bell inequality is not maximally achieved, or if one does not care about self-testing the state or measurements, are we capable of estimating how close the underlying assemblage is to the reference one? In this work, we provide a systematic device-independent estimation by proposing a framework called "robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages". In particular, we consider assemblages violating several paradigmatic Bell inequalities and obtain the robust self-testing statement for each scenario. Our result is device-independent (DI), i.e., no assumption is made on the shared state and the measurement devices involved. Our work thus not only paves a way for exploring the connection between the boundary of quantum set of correlations and steerable assemblages, but also provides a useful tool in the areas of DI quantum certification. As two explicit applications, we show 1) that it can be used for an alternative proof of the protocol of DI certification of all entangled two-qubit states proposed by Bowles et al., and 2) that it can be used to verify all non-entanglement-breaking qubit channels with fewer assumptions compared with the work of Rosset et al.

arXiv:2002.02823•Quantum•Sep 28, 2021•27 citations

Experimental demonstration of measurement-device-independent measure of quantum steering

Yuanyuan Zhao, Huan-Yu Ku, Shin-Liang Chen +6 more

Abstract Within the framework of quantum refereed steering games, quantum steerability can be certified without any assumption on the underlying state nor the measurements involved. Such a scheme is termed the measurement-device-independent (MDI) scenario. Here, we introduce a measure of steerability in an MDI scenario, i.e., the result merely depends on the observed statistics and the quantum inputs. We prove that such a measure satisfies the convex steering monotone. Moreover, it is robust against not only measurement biases but also losses. We also experimentally estimate the amount of the measure with an entangled photon source. As two by-products, our experimental results provide lower bounds on an entanglement measure of the underlying state and an incompatible measure of the involved measurement. Our research paves a way for exploring one-side device-independent quantum information processing within an MDI framework.

arXiv:1901.08298•npj Quantum Information•Sep 8, 2020•47 citations

Robust semi-device-independent certification of all pure bipartite maximally entangled states via quantum steering

Harshank Shrotriya, Kishor Bharti, L. C. Kwek

The idea of self-testing is to render guarantees concerning the inner workings of a device based on the measurement statistics. It is one of the most formidable quantum certification and benchmarking schemes. Recently it was shown [A. Coladangelo, K. T. Goh, and V. Scarani, Nat. Commun. 8, 15485 (2017)] that all pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested in the device-independent scenario by employing subspace methods introduced by Yang and Navascu\'es [Phys. Rev. A 87, 050102(R) (2013)]. Here, we have adapted their method to show that any bipartite pure entangled state can be certified in the semi-device-independent scenario through quantum steering. Analogous to the tilted Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality, we use a steering inequality called the tilted steering inequality for certifying any pure two-qubit entangled state. Furthermore, we use this inequality to certify any bipartite pure entangled state by certifying two-dimensional subspaces of the qudit state by observing the structure of the set of assemblages obtained on the trusted side after measurements are made on the untrusted side. As a feature of quantum state certification via steering, we use the notion of assemblage-based robust state certification to provide robustness bounds for the certification result in the case of pure maximally entangled states of any local dimension.

arXiv:2007.04020•Physical Review Research•Jul 27, 2021•17 citations

Measurement-device-independent verification of channel steering

InU Jeon, Hyunseok Jeong

Extending the concept of steerability for quantum states, channel steerability is an ability to remotely control the given channel from a coherently extended party. Verification of channel steering can be understood as certifying coherence of the channel in a one-sided device-independent manner with respect to a bystander. Here we propose a method to verify channel steering in a measurement-device-independent way. To do this, we first obtain Choi matrices from given channels and use the canonical method of measurement-device-independent verification of quantum steering. As a consequence, exploiting channel-state duality which interconverts steerability of channels and that of states, channel steering is verified. We further analyze the effect of imperfect preparation of entangled states used in the verification protocol, and find that the threshold of the undesired noise that we can tolerate is bounded from below by steering robustness.

arXiv:1905.07840•Physical Review A•Jan 21, 2020•3 citations

Imprecise quantum steering inequalities in tripartite systems

Yan Zhao, Li-Juan Li, Zheng-Peng Xu +2 more

Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements. Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.

quant-pharXiv:2603.22986•Physical Review A•Mar 25, 2026•1 citation
Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.
In a recent work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], a framework known by the name of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) has been introduced for the device-independent quantification of quantum steerability and measurement incompatibility. In other words, even with no assumption made on the preparation device nor the measurement devices, one can make use of this framework to certify, directly from the observed data, the aforementioned quantum features. Here, we further explore the framework of AMM and provide improved device-independent bounds on the generalized robustness of entanglement, the incompatibility robustness, and the incompatibility weight. We compare the tightness of our device-independent bounds against those obtained from other approaches. Along the way, we also provide an analytic form for the generalized robustness of entanglement for an arbitrary two-qudit isotropic state. When considering a Bell-type experiment in a tripartite or more-partite scenario, we further show that the framework of AMM provides a natural way to characterize a superset to the set of quantum correlations, namely, one which also allows post-quantum steering.
Given a Bell inequality, if its maximal quantum violation can be achieved only by a single set of measurements for each party or a single quantum state, up to local unitaries, one refers to such a phenomenon as self-testing. For instance, the maximal quantum violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality certifies that the underlying state contains the two-qubit maximally entangled state and the measurements of one party contains a pair of anti-commuting qubit observables. As a consequence, the other party automatically verifies the set of states remotely steered, namely the "assemblage", is in the eigenstates of a pair of anti-commuting observables. It is natural to ask if the quantum violation of the Bell inequality is not maximally achieved, or if one does not care about self-testing the state or measurements, are we capable of estimating how close the underlying assemblage is to the reference one? In this work, we provide a systematic device-independent estimation by proposing a framework called "robust self-testing of steerable quantum assemblages". In particular, we consider assemblages violating several paradigmatic Bell inequalities and obtain the robust self-testing statement for each scenario. Our result is device-independent (DI), i.e., no assumption is made on the shared state and the measurement devices involved. Our work thus not only paves a way for exploring the connection between the boundary of quantum set of correlations and steerable assemblages, but also provides a useful tool in the areas of DI quantum certification. As two explicit applications, we show 1) that it can be used for an alternative proof of the protocol of DI certification of all entangled two-qubit states proposed by Bowles et al., and 2) that it can be used to verify all non-entanglement-breaking qubit channels with fewer assumptions compared with the work of Rosset et al.
Abstract Within the framework of quantum refereed steering games, quantum steerability can be certified without any assumption on the underlying state nor the measurements involved. Such a scheme is termed the measurement-device-independent (MDI) scenario. Here, we introduce a measure of steerability in an MDI scenario, i.e., the result merely depends on the observed statistics and the quantum inputs. We prove that such a measure satisfies the convex steering monotone. Moreover, it is robust against not only measurement biases but also losses. We also experimentally estimate the amount of the measure with an entangled photon source. As two by-products, our experimental results provide lower bounds on an entanglement measure of the underlying state and an incompatible measure of the involved measurement. Our research paves a way for exploring one-side device-independent quantum information processing within an MDI framework.
The idea of self-testing is to render guarantees concerning the inner workings of a device based on the measurement statistics. It is one of the most formidable quantum certification and benchmarking schemes. Recently it was shown [A. Coladangelo, K. T. Goh, and V. Scarani, Nat. Commun. 8, 15485 (2017)] that all pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested in the device-independent scenario by employing subspace methods introduced by Yang and Navascu\'es [Phys. Rev. A 87, 050102(R) (2013)]. Here, we have adapted their method to show that any bipartite pure entangled state can be certified in the semi-device-independent scenario through quantum steering. Analogous to the tilted Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality, we use a steering inequality called the tilted steering inequality for certifying any pure two-qubit entangled state. Furthermore, we use this inequality to certify any bipartite pure entangled state by certifying two-dimensional subspaces of the qudit state by observing the structure of the set of assemblages obtained on the trusted side after measurements are made on the untrusted side. As a feature of quantum state certification via steering, we use the notion of assemblage-based robust state certification to provide robustness bounds for the certification result in the case of pure maximally entangled states of any local dimension.
Extending the concept of steerability for quantum states, channel steerability is an ability to remotely control the given channel from a coherently extended party. Verification of channel steering can be understood as certifying coherence of the channel in a one-sided device-independent manner with respect to a bystander. Here we propose a method to verify channel steering in a measurement-device-independent way. To do this, we first obtain Choi matrices from given channels and use the canonical method of measurement-device-independent verification of quantum steering. As a consequence, exploiting channel-state duality which interconverts steerability of channels and that of states, channel steering is verified. We further analyze the effect of imperfect preparation of entangled states used in the verification protocol, and find that the threshold of the undesired noise that we can tolerate is bounded from below by steering robustness.
Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements. Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.