We study the fundamental limitations of implementing time-dependent Hamiltonian protocols when ''time'' is provided by a quantum clock rather than an external classical parameter. For a parametric harmonic oscillator controlled through a shortcut-to-adiabaticity (STA) schedule and coupled to a minimal clock degree of freedom, tracing out the clock yields an effective reduced dynamics that is a mixture of unitary Gaussian trajectories. Within a noise-dominated regime, we compute the energetic deviation from the target STA outcome and its fluctuations, together with the fidelity to the target evolution and the purity loss of the reduced state, for vacuum and coherent initial states. Combining these observables produces a thermodynamic-uncertainty-type tradeoff that links achievable precision to an irreducible loss of purity set by the clock precision and the protocol sensitivity.
We study the fundamental limitations of implementing time-dependent Hamiltonian protocols when ''time'' is provided by a quantum clock rather than an external classical parameter. For a parametric harmonic oscillator controlled through a shortcut-to-adiabaticity (STA) schedule and coupled to a minimal clock degree of freedom, tracing out the clock yields an effective reduced dynamics that is a mixture of unitary Gaussian trajectories. Within a noise-dominated regime, we compute the energetic deviation from the target STA outcome and its fluctuations, together with the fidelity to the target evolution and the purity loss of the reduced state, for vacuum and coherent initial states. Combining these observables produces a thermodynamic-uncertainty-type tradeoff that links achievable precision to an irreducible loss of purity set by the clock precision and the protocol sensitivity.
Given the increasing use of shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA) to optimize the power and efficiency of quantum heat engines, it becomes a relevant question if there are any theoretical limits to their application. We argue that quantum fluctuations in the control device which implements the shortcut deflect the system from the adiabatic path. This not only induces transitions to unwanted final states but also changes the system energy, so that using the STA has a definite cost in terms of conventional work definitions. This may be the ultimate cost of an adiabatic shortcut, in the sense that it is present even for a frictionless, zero-temperature driving. We estimate the effect, to lowest nontrivial order in the derivatives of the time-dependent frequency, on a parametric harmonic oscillator, thus providing a consistency condition for the validity of the classical approximation.
Quantum metrology makes use of quantum mechanics to improve precision measurements and measurement sensitivities. It is usually formulated for time-independent Hamiltonians, but time-dependent Hamiltonians may offer advantages, such as a T4\n\t\t\t\t time dependence of the Fisher information which cannot be reached with a time-independent Hamiltonian. In Optimal adaptive control for quantum metrology with time-dependent Hamiltonians (Nature Communications 8, 2017), Shengshi Pang and Andrew N. Jordan put forward a Shortcut-to-adiabaticity (STA)-like method, specifically an approach formally similar to the “counterdiabatic approach”, adding a control term to the original Hamiltonian to reach the upper bound of the Fisher information. We revisit this work from the point of view of STA to set the relations and differences between STA-like methods in metrology and ordinary STA. This analysis paves the way for the application of other STA-like techniques in parameter estimation. In particular we explore the use of physical unitary transformations to propose alternative time-dependent Hamiltonians which may be easier to implement in the laboratory.
Quantum metrology makes use of quantum mechanics to improve precision measurements and measurement sensitivities. It is usually formulated for time-independent Hamiltonians, but time-dependent Hamiltonians may offer advantages, such as a T4 time dependence of the Fisher information which cannot be reached with a time-independent Hamiltonian. In Optimal adaptive control for quantum metrology with time-dependent Hamiltonians (Nature Communications 8, 2017), Shengshi Pang and Andrew N. Jordan put forward a Shortcut-to-adiabaticity (STA)-like method, specifically an approach formally similar to the “counterdiabatic approach”, adding a control term to the original Hamiltonian to reach the upper bound of the Fisher information. We revisit this work from the point of view of STA to set the relations and differences between STA-like methods in metrology and ordinary STA. This analysis paves the way for the application of other STA-like techniques in parameter estimation. In particular we explore the use of physical unitary transformations to propose alternative time-dependent Hamiltonians which may be easier to implement in the laboratory.
Fluctuations are intrinsic to microscopic systems and impose fundamental limits on nonequilibrium precision, as captured by the thermodynamic uncertainty relation (TUR), which links current fluctuations to entropy production. While feedback control is expected to further suppress fluctuations, its role within the TUR framework has remained unclear, particularly in quantum systems where control is inherently information-driven. In this Letter, we consider open quantum systems weakly coupled to a thermal environment, in which quantum jumps are continuously monitored, and Markovian feedback is applied. Using quantum mutual information to quantify the information contribution induced by feedback, we derive a finite-time TUR for arbitrary time-integrated currents in terms of entropy production and mutual information. Our results uncover how feedback control suppresses fluctuations together with thermodynamic cost and establish a fundamental precision bound imposed by information-based control. As an application, we analyze a quantum clock model and demonstrate that the clock precision can be enhanced by feedback control in the presence of a single thermal reservoir.
Even though our microscopic physical theories, such as classical or quantum mechanics, are time-reversal invariant, time appears to march forward irreversibly. It is widely believed that effective entropy increase due to the second law of thermodynamics is at the origin of this emergent arrow of time. Any system that is out of thermal equilibrium and produces entropy can thus be used as a clock, be it a melting ice cube or a sophisticated atomic clock. The understanding of entropy in physics has significantly advanced with the advent of information theory in the last century. It has also led to the insight that the amount of entropy a clock produces is linked to how precisely the clock works, and thereby, how much information the clock reveals about the passage of time. In this thesis, we ask: what fundamental limits does the underlying physical theory impose on the precision of clocks within that theory? To rigorously answer this question, we devise a minimal clock model within quantum theory. By consistently modeling all clock constituents as quantum systems, we can ensure we account for all the resources used by the clock. This includes, in particular, the readout. Classically, one can obtain this for free, but quantum mechanically, this has a resource cost associated with it. To this end, we consolidate existing frameworks that describe clocks in both classical and quantum theory. Revising fluctuation theorems from quantum thermodynamics, we demonstrate how such theorems impose limits on the attainable precision of clocks. These precision bounds turn out to be more stringent for classical systems than for quantum ones. Quantum clocks can harness coherence and correlations to suppress fluctuations, allowing them to exponentially surpass precision bounds that hold for classical clocks. We show this separation between classical and quantum clocks by constructing an explicit example that uses quantum dynamics to saturate the quantum precision bounds. Finally, we close the thesis by exploring implications of these timekeeping bounds beyond fundamental science in quantum technologies. We show how quantum clocks can be used to quantify the energetic cost of quantum computation by linking computational fidelity to thermodynamic entropy production.
The expansion of a harmonic potential that holds a quantum particle may be realized without any final particle excitation but much faster than adiabatically via "shortcuts to adiabaticity" (STA). While ideally the process time can be reduced to zero, practical limitations and constraints impose minimal finite times for the externally controlled time-dependent frequency protocols. We examine the role of different time-averaged energies (total, kinetic, potential, nonadiabatic) and of the instantaneous power in characterizing or selecting different protocols. Specifically, we prove a virial theorem for STA processes, set minimal energies (or times) for given times (or energies), and discuss their realizability by means of Dirac impulses or otherwise.