Quantum memory is a scarce and costly resource, yet little is known about which learning tasks remain feasible under severe memory constraints. We study the problem of computing global properties of quantum sequences when quantum systems must be measured individually, without storing or jointly processing them. In our setting, a bit string $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ is encoded into an $n$-qubit product state $|ψ_{x_1}\rangle \otimes \cdots \otimes |ψ_{x_n}\rangle$, and the goal is to infer $f(x) \in \{0,1\}$ from measurements of this quantum encoding. We consider a simple local strategy, which we call the greedy strategy, that applies the same optimal single-system measurement independently to each subsystem and then infers $f(x)$ from the outcomes. Our main result gives a complete characterization of when the greedy strategy is optimal: it achieves the same maximum success probability as an unrestricted global measurement if and only if the target Boolean function is affine (in all but finitely many cases). We establish a universal performance guarantee for general Boolean functions, showing that the success probability of the greedy strategy is always at least the square of the optimal global success probability, in direct analogy with the Barnum-Knill bound for the pretty good measurement. These results demonstrate that even under extreme memory constraints, simple local measurement strategies can remain provably competitive for learning global properties of quantum sequences.
Quantum memory is a scarce and costly resource, yet little is known about which learning tasks remain feasible under severe memory constraints. We study the problem of computing global properties of quantum sequences when quantum systems must be measured individually, without storing or jointly processing them. In our setting, a bit string x∈{0,1}n is encoded into an n-qubit product state ∣ψx1⟩⊗⋯⊗∣ψxn⟩, and the goal is to infer f(x)∈{0,1} from measurements of this quantum encoding. We consider a simple local strategy, which we call the greedy strategy, that applies the same optimal single-system measurement independently to each subsystem and then infers f(x) from the outcomes. Our main result gives a complete characterization of when the greedy strategy is optimal: it achieves the same maximum success probability as an unrestricted global measurement if and only if the target Boolean function is affine (in all but finitely many cases). We establish a universal performance guarantee for general Boolean functions, showing that the success probability of the greedy strategy is always at least the square of the optimal global success probability, in direct analogy with the Barnum-Knill bound for the pretty good measurement. These results demonstrate that even under extreme memory constraints, simple local measurement strategies can remain provably competitive for learning global properties of quantum sequences.
Reinforcement learning with neural networks (RLNN) has recently demonstrated great promise for many problems, including some problems in quantum information theory. In this work, we apply RLNN to quantum hypothesis testing and determine the optimal measurement strategy for distinguishing between multiple quantum states {ρj} while minimizing the error probability. In the case where the candidate states correspond to a quantum system with many qubit subsystems, implementing the optimal measurement on the entire system is experimentally infeasible. We use RLNN to find locally-adaptive measurement strategies that are experimentally feasible, where only one quantum subsystem is measured in each round. We provide numerical results which demonstrate that RLNN successfully finds the optimal local approach, even for candidate states up to 20 subsystems. We additionally demonstrate that the RLNN strategy meets or exceeds the success probability for a modified locally greedy approach in each random trial.While the use of RLNN is highly successful for designing adaptive local measurement strategies, in general a significant gap can exist between the success probability of the optimal locally-adaptive measurement strategy and the optimal collective measurement. We build on previous work to provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for collective protocols to strictly outperform locally adaptive protocols. We also provide a new example which, to our knowledge, is the simplest known state set exhibiting a significant gap between local and collective protocols. This result raises interesting new questions about the gap between theoretically optimal measurement strategies and practically implementable measurement strategies.
We introduce a new state discrimination problem in which we are given additional information about the state after the measurement, or more generally, after a quantum memory bound applies. In particular, the following special case plays an important role in quantum cryptographic protocols in the bounded storage model: Given a string x encoded in an unknown basis chosen from a set of mutually unbiased bases, you may perform any measurement, but then store at most q qubits of quantum information. Later on, you learn which basis was used. How well can you compute a function f(x) of x, given the initial measurement outcome, the q qubits and the additional basis information? We first show a lower bound on the success probability for any balanced function, and any number of mutually unbiased bases, beating the naive strategy of simply guessing the basis. We then show that for two bases, any Boolean function f(x) can be computed perfectly if you are allowed to store just a single qubit, independent of the number of possible input strings x. We then investigate how much advantage the additional basis information can give for a Boolean function. To this end, we prove optimal bounds for the success probability for the AND and the XOR function for up to three mutually unbiased bases. Our result shows that the gap in success probability can be maximal: without the basis information, you can never do better than guessing the basis, but with this information, you can compute f(x) perfectly. We also exhibit an example where the extra information does not give any advantage at all. Interestingly, choosing the string x uniformly at random is not always the hardest distribution, even when f is balanced.
Quantum metrology offers the possibility of quantum enhancements of the precision of various sensing tasks. In this manuscript, we tackle two open problems in the theory of single-shot quantum parameter learning, going beyond the usual setting of local parameter estimation via repeated measurements. The first concerns the construction of global upper bounds on the learning precision. The second concerns rigorous guarantees on the success probability of parameter learning, namely, lower bounds on the probability of learning a parameter with a certain precision, given the constraints on the resources used for the quantum metrology task. We provide rigorous, practical, and global upper bounds and success-probability guarantees for quantum parameter learning. Most importantly, we establish a fidelity-based learning guarantee for generic mixed-state models that can be viewed as the achievability-side analogue of the quantum Cramer-Rao bound. Whereas the latter provides a no-go constraint, based on the local curvature of the fidelities, our bound uses only pairwise fidelities between parameter-encoded states to certify that a prescribed precision is attainable with a guaranteed success probability. We demonstrate the versatility of the new bounds in a Rabi-frequency-learning example involving a driven qubit coupled to a bosonic environment and a collective-spin Hamiltonian learning problem. Together, the new global bounds and success-probability guarantees allow us to rule out unattainable precision and to certify attainable precision beyond what is possible via standard Fisher-information analysis or binary hypothesis testing bounds. They also allow one to tractably characterize the performance of various learning schemes, without the overhead of an explicit simulation.
We introduce a new state discrimination problem in which we are given additional information about the state after the measurement, or more generally, after a quantum memory bound applies. The following special case plays an important role in quantum cryptographic protocols in the bounded storage model: Given a string x encoded in an unknown basis chosen from a set of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs), you may perform any measurement, but then store at mostqqubits of quantum information, and an unlimited amount of classical information. Later on, you learn which basis was used. How well can you compute a function f(x) of x, given the initial measurement outcome, the q qubits, and the additional basis information? We first show a lower bound on the success probability for any balanced function, and any number of mutually unbiased bases, beating the naive strategy of simply guessing the basis. We then show that for two bases, any Boolean function f(x) can be computed perfectly if you are allowed to store just a single qubit, independent of the number of possible input strings x. However, we show how to construct three bases, such that you need to store all qubits in order to compute f(x) perfectly. We then investigate how much advantage the additional basis information can give for a Boolean function. To this end, we prove optimal bounds for the success probability for the AND and the XOR function for up to three mutually unbiased bases. Our result shows that the gap in success probability can be maximal: without the basis information, you can never do better than guessing the basis, but with this information, you can compute f(x) perfectly. We also give an example where the extra information does not give any advantage at all.
Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental information processing task that serves as a key component in many applications while also carrying foundational significance. In this work, we consider minimum error discrimination of multi-copy states, where instead of preparing a single system we assume that multiple instances of the same state are prepared. Now the discrimination allows for measurements from multiple parties with different measurement strategies varying from global measurement strategy to ones restricted to different forms of local operations and classical communication strategies. By comparing the average success probabilities in quantum and classical cases, we find a qubit strategy that outperforms all the bit strategies. On the other hand, we show that the classical measurement strategy does not give benefit in qubit over bit. However, we find that there are other (qu)bit-like operational theories which can outperform the best qubit strategies even with a classical measurement strategy and we are able to identify instances of different theories where different measurement strategies are optimal. In this way, we are able to find instances of nonlocality without entanglement as well as provide general bounds for bit-like operational theories.
A key concept of quantum information theory is that accessing information encoded in a quantum system requires us to discriminate between several possible states the system could be in. A natural generalization of this problem, namely, quantum sequence discrimination, appears in various quantum information processing tasks, the objective being to determine the state of a finite sequence of quantum states. Since such a sequence is a composite quantum system, the fundamental question is whether an optimal measurement is local, i.e., comprising measurements on the individual members, or collective, i.e., requiring joint measurement(s). In some known instances of this problem, the optimal measurement is local, whereas in others, it is collective. But, so far, a definite prescription based solely on the problem description has been lacking. In this paper, we prove that if the members of a given sequence are secretly and independently drawn from an ensemble or even from different ensembles, the optimum success probability is achievable by fixed local measurements on the individual members of the sequence, and no collective measurement is necessary. This holds for both minimum-error and unambiguous state discrimination paradigms.