© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:2603.05422

Interleaved Benchmarking with Single-Qubit References

Ilya A. Simakov, Arina V. Zotova, Tatyana A. Chudakova, Alena S. Kazmina, Artyom M. Polyanskiy, Nikolay N. Abramov, Mikhail A. Tarkhov, Alexander M. Mumlyakov, Igor V. Trofimov, Nikita Yu. Rudenko, Maxim V. Chichkov, Vladimir I. Chichkov, Grigoriy S. Mazhorin

quant-phSubmitted Mar 5, 2026• Announced Mar 6, 2026• 0 citations• Revised Aug 25, 2026 (v2)

v1 · Mar 5, 2026 v2 · Aug 25, 2026

Abstract

Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences, identify when interleaved circuits generate sufficient randomization for the standard depolarizing approximation, and obtain a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols employing single-qubit reference sequences and show that, with appropriate post-processing, they provide a simple and accurate alternative to multi-qubit Clifford reference circuits.

Comments: 8 pages, 5 figures

Related papers

Easier randomizing gates provide more accurate fidelity estimation

Debankan Sannamoth, Kristine Boone, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas +4 more

Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.

quant-pharXiv:2512.24744•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Linear cross-entropy benchmarking with Clifford circuits

Jianxin Chen, Dawei Ding, Cupjin Huang +1 more

With the advent of quantum processors exceeding 100 qubits and the high engineering complexities involved, there is a need for holistically benchmarking the processor to have quality assurance. Linear cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) has been used extensively for systems with 50 or more qubits but is fundamentally limited in scale due to the exponentially large computational resources required for classical simulation. In this work we propose conducting linear XEB with random Clifford circuits of constant to logarithmic depth, a scheme we call Clifford XEB. Since Clifford circuits can be simulated in polynomial time, Clifford XEB can be scaled to much larger systems. To validate this claim, we run numerical simulations for the classes of Clifford circuits we propose with noise and observe exponential decays. When noise levels are low, the decay rates are well correlated with the noise of each cycle assuming a multiplicative error accumulation, i.e., where the fidelities of individual gates multiply. We perform simulations of systems up to 1225 qubits, where the classical processing task can be easily dealt with by a workstation. Furthermore, using the theoretical guarantees in Chen et al. [PRX Quantum 3, 030320 (2022)], we prove that Clifford XEB with our proposed Clifford circuits must yield exponential decays under a general error model for sufficiently low errors. Our theoretical results explain some of the phenomena observed in the simulations and shed light on the behavior of general linear XEB experiments.

arXiv:2206.08293•Physical Review A•Nov 20, 2023•7 citations

Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking

Sarah Sheldon, Lev S. Bishop, Easwar Magesan +3 more

With improved gate calibrations reducing unitary errors, we achieve a benchmarked single-qubit gate fidelity of $0.9995\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0002$ with superconducting qubits in a circuit quantum electrodynamics system. We present a method for distinguishing between unitary and nonunitary errors in quantum gates by interleaving repetitions of a target gate within a randomized benchmarking sequence. The benchmarking fidelity decays quadratically with the number of interleaved gates for unitary errors but linearly for nonunitary errors, allowing us to separate systematic coherent errors from decoherent effects. With this protocol, we show that the fidelity of the gates is not limited by unitary errors.

arXiv:1504.06597•Physical Review A•Jan 4, 2016•152 citations

On the robustness of the hybrid qubit computational gates through simulated randomized benchmarking protocols

Elena Ferraro, Marco De Michielis

One of the main challenges in building a quantum processor is to characterize the environmental noise. Noise characterization can be achieved by exploiting different techniques, such as randomization where several sequences of random quantum gates are applied to the qubit under test to derive statistical characteristics about the affecting noises. A scalable and robust algorithm able to benchmark the full set of Clifford gates using randomization techniques is called randomized benchmarking. In this study, we simulated randomized benchmarking protocols in a semiconducting all-electrical three-electron double-quantum dot qubit, i.e. hybrid qubit, under different error models, that include quasi-static Gaussian and the more realistic 1/f noise model, for the input controls. The average error of specific quantum computational gates is extracted through interleaved randomized benchmarking obtained including Clifford gates between the gate of interest. It provides an estimate of the fidelity as well as theoretical bounds for the average error of the gate under test.

arXiv:2011.01585•Scientific Reports•Oct 20, 2020•6 citations

A sharp phase transition in linear cross-entropy benchmarking

Brayden Ware, Abhinav Deshpande, Dominik Hangleiter +4 more

Demonstrations of quantum computational advantage and benchmarks of quantum processors via quantum random circuit sampling are based on evaluating the linear cross-entropy benchmark (XEB). A key question in the theory of XEB is whether it approximates the fidelity of the quantum state preparation. Previous works have shown that the XEB generically approximates the fidelity in a regime where the noise rate per qudit $\varepsilon$ satisfies $\varepsilon N \ll 1$ for a system of $N$ qudits and that this approximation breaks down at large noise rates. Here, we show that the breakdown of XEB as a fidelity proxy occurs as a sharp phase transition at a critical value of $\varepsilon N$ that depends on the circuit architecture and properties of the two-qubit gates, including in particular their entangling power. We study the phase transition using a mapping of average two-copy quantities to statistical mechanics models in random quantum circuit architectures with full or one-dimensional connectivity. We explain the phase transition behavior in terms of spectral properties of the transfer matrix of the statistical mechanics model and identify two-qubit gate sets that exhibit the largest noise robustness.

arXiv:2305.04954•May 8, 2023•4 citations

Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors

Tobias Chasseur, Frank K. Wilhelm

Randomized benchmarking allows one to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of a unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group $\mathcal{C}$ on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no noncomputational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on randomized benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows us to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate-dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with interleaved randomized benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.

arXiv:1505.00580•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2015•38 citations

Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences, identify when interleaved circuits generate sufficient randomization for the standard depolarizing approximation, and obtain a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols employing single-qubit reference sequences and show that, with appropriate post-processing, they provide a simple and accurate alternative to multi-qubit Clifford reference circuits.

Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.

With the advent of quantum processors exceeding 100 qubits and the high engineering complexities involved, there is a need for holistically benchmarking the processor to have quality assurance. Linear cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) has been used extensively for systems with 50 or more qubits but is fundamentally limited in scale due to the exponentially large computational resources required for classical simulation. In this work we propose conducting linear XEB with random Clifford circuits of constant to logarithmic depth, a scheme we call Clifford XEB. Since Clifford circuits can be simulated in polynomial time, Clifford XEB can be scaled to much larger systems. To validate this claim, we run numerical simulations for the classes of Clifford circuits we propose with noise and observe exponential decays. When noise levels are low, the decay rates are well correlated with the noise of each cycle assuming a multiplicative error accumulation, i.e., where the fidelities of individual gates multiply. We perform simulations of systems up to 1225 qubits, where the classical processing task can be easily dealt with by a workstation. Furthermore, using the theoretical guarantees in Chen et al. [PRX Quantum 3, 030320 (2022)], we prove that Clifford XEB with our proposed Clifford circuits must yield exponential decays under a general error model for sufficiently low errors. Our theoretical results explain some of the phenomena observed in the simulations and shed light on the behavior of general linear XEB experiments.

With improved gate calibrations reducing unitary errors, we achieve a benchmarked single-qubit gate fidelity of $0.9995\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0002$ with superconducting qubits in a circuit quantum electrodynamics system. We present a method for distinguishing between unitary and nonunitary errors in quantum gates by interleaving repetitions of a target gate within a randomized benchmarking sequence. The benchmarking fidelity decays quadratically with the number of interleaved gates for unitary errors but linearly for nonunitary errors, allowing us to separate systematic coherent errors from decoherent effects. With this protocol, we show that the fidelity of the gates is not limited by unitary errors.

One of the main challenges in building a quantum processor is to characterize the environmental noise. Noise characterization can be achieved by exploiting different techniques, such as randomization where several sequences of random quantum gates are applied to the qubit under test to derive statistical characteristics about the affecting noises. A scalable and robust algorithm able to benchmark the full set of Clifford gates using randomization techniques is called randomized benchmarking. In this study, we simulated randomized benchmarking protocols in a semiconducting all-electrical three-electron double-quantum dot qubit, i.e. hybrid qubit, under different error models, that include quasi-static Gaussian and the more realistic 1/f noise model, for the input controls. The average error of specific quantum computational gates is extracted through interleaved randomized benchmarking obtained including Clifford gates between the gate of interest. It provides an estimate of the fidelity as well as theoretical bounds for the average error of the gate under test.

Demonstrations of quantum computational advantage and benchmarks of quantum processors via quantum random circuit sampling are based on evaluating the linear cross-entropy benchmark (XEB). A key question in the theory of XEB is whether it approximates the fidelity of the quantum state preparation. Previous works have shown that the XEB generically approximates the fidelity in a regime where the noise rate per qudit

\varepsilon

satisfies

\varepsilon N \ll 1

for a system of

N

qudits and that this approximation breaks down at large noise rates. Here, we show that the breakdown of XEB as a fidelity proxy occurs as a sharp phase transition at a critical value of

\varepsilon N

that depends on the circuit architecture and properties of the two-qubit gates, including in particular their entangling power. We study the phase transition using a mapping of average two-copy quantities to statistical mechanics models in random quantum circuit architectures with full or one-dimensional connectivity. We explain the phase transition behavior in terms of spectral properties of the transfer matrix of the statistical mechanics model and identify two-qubit gate sets that exhibit the largest noise robustness.

Randomized benchmarking allows one to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of a unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group

\mathcal{C}

on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no noncomputational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on randomized benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows us to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate-dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with interleaved randomized benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.