Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1504.06597 · Physical Review A

Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking

Sarah Sheldon, Lev S. Bishop, Easwar Magesan, Stefan Filipp, Jerry M. Chow, Jay Gambetta

Published Jan 4, 2016• 152 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

With improved gate calibrations reducing unitary errors, we achieve a benchmarked single-qubit gate fidelity of $0.9995\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0002$ with superconducting qubits in a circuit quantum electrodynamics system. We present a method for distinguishing between unitary and nonunitary errors in quantum gates by interleaving repetitions of a target gate within a randomized benchmarking sequence. The benchmarking fidelity decays quadratically with the number of interleaved gates for unitary errors but linearly for nonunitary errors, allowing us to separate systematic coherent errors from decoherent effects. With this protocol, we show that the fidelity of the gates is not limited by unitary errors.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.93.012301

Related papers

Easier randomizing gates provide more accurate fidelity estimation

Debankan Sannamoth, Kristine Boone, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas +4 more

Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.

quant-pharXiv:2512.24744•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Interleaved Benchmarking with Single-Qubit References

Ilya A. Simakov, Arina V. Zotova, Tatyana A. Chudakova +10 more

Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences, identify when interleaved circuits generate sufficient randomization for the standard depolarizing approximation, and obtain a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols employing single-qubit reference sequences and show that, with appropriate post-processing, they provide a simple and accurate alternative to multi-qubit Clifford reference circuits.

quant-pharXiv:2603.05422•Mar 6, 2026•0 citations

Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors

Tobias Chasseur, Frank K. Wilhelm

Randomized benchmarking allows one to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of a unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group $\mathcal{C}$ on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no noncomputational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on randomized benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows us to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate-dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with interleaved randomized benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.

arXiv:1505.00580•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2015•38 citations

From Randomized Benchmarking Experiments to Gateset Circuit Fidelity

Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Kristine Boone, Joel J. Wallman +1 more

Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB experiments provide direct estimates of the gateset circuit fidelity, a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gateset. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the difficulty introduced by gate-dependence reduces to a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these result hold for higher dimensions.

•Apr 3, 2018•0 citations

From randomized benchmarking experiments to gate-set circuit fidelity: how to interpret randomized benchmarking decay parameters

Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Kristine Boone, Joel J. Wallman +1 more

Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB decay parameter p coincides with the decay parameter of the gate-set circuit fidelity , a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gate-set. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the possible alarming disconnect between the average gate fidelity and RB experimental results is simply explained by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these results also hold for higher dimensions.

arXiv:1804.01122•New Journal of Physics•Aug 24, 2018•32 citations

Bounding the average gate fidelity of composite channels using the unitarity

Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Joel J. Wallman, Joseph Emerson

Abstract There is currently a significant need for robust and efficient methods for characterizing quantum devices. While there has been significant progress in this direction, there remains a crucial need to precisely determine the strength and type of errors on individual gate operations, in order to assess and improve control as well as reliably bound the total error in a quantum circuit given some partial information about the errors on the components. In this work, we first provide an optimal bound on the total fidelity of a circuit in terms of component fidelities, which can be efficiently experimentally estimated via randomized benchmarking (RB). We then derive a tighter bound that applies under additional information about the coherence of the error, namely, the unitarity, which can also be estimated via a related experimental protocol. This improved bound smoothly interpolates between the worst-case quadratic and best-case linear scaling for composite error channels. As an application we show how our analysis substantially improves the achievable precision on estimates of the infidelities of individual gates under interleaved RB, enabling greater precision for current experimental methods to assess and tune-up control over quantum gate operations.

arXiv:1610.05296•New Journal of Physics•Apr 10, 2019•44 citations
With improved gate calibrations reducing unitary errors, we achieve a benchmarked single-qubit gate fidelity of 0.9995\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.00020.9995\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.00020.9995\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.0002 with superconducting qubits in a circuit quantum electrodynamics system. We present a method for distinguishing between unitary and nonunitary errors in quantum gates by interleaving repetitions of a target gate within a randomized benchmarking sequence. The benchmarking fidelity decays quadratically with the number of interleaved gates for unitary errors but linearly for nonunitary errors, allowing us to separate systematic coherent errors from decoherent effects. With this protocol, we show that the fidelity of the gates is not limited by unitary errors.
Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.
Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences, identify when interleaved circuits generate sufficient randomization for the standard depolarizing approximation, and obtain a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols employing single-qubit reference sequences and show that, with appropriate post-processing, they provide a simple and accurate alternative to multi-qubit Clifford reference circuits.
Randomized benchmarking allows one to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of a unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group C\mathcal{C}C on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no noncomputational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on randomized benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows us to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate-dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with interleaved randomized benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB experiments provide direct estimates of the gateset circuit fidelity, a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gateset. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the difficulty introduced by gate-dependence reduces to a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these result hold for higher dimensions.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB decay parameter p coincides with the decay parameter of the gate-set circuit fidelity , a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gate-set. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the possible alarming disconnect between the average gate fidelity and RB experimental results is simply explained by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these results also hold for higher dimensions.
Abstract There is currently a significant need for robust and efficient methods for characterizing quantum devices. While there has been significant progress in this direction, there remains a crucial need to precisely determine the strength and type of errors on individual gate operations, in order to assess and improve control as well as reliably bound the total error in a quantum circuit given some partial information about the errors on the components. In this work, we first provide an optimal bound on the total fidelity of a circuit in terms of component fidelities, which can be efficiently experimentally estimated via randomized benchmarking (RB). We then derive a tighter bound that applies under additional information about the coherence of the error, namely, the unitarity, which can also be estimated via a related experimental protocol. This improved bound smoothly interpolates between the worst-case quadratic and best-case linear scaling for composite error channels. As an application we show how our analysis substantially improves the achievable precision on estimates of the infidelities of individual gates under interleaved RB, enabling greater precision for current experimental methods to assess and tune-up control over quantum gate operations.