Learning properties of quantum states and channels is known to benefit from resources such as entangled operations, auxiliary qubits, and adaptivity, whereas the resource structure of measurement learning, namely, learning properties of quantum measurement operators, remains poorly understood. In this work, we identify a measurement learning task for which access limited to classical measurement outcomes leads to an exponential lower bound on the query complexity, established via a distinguishing task between a genuine quantum projective measurement and a purely classical random number generator. Remarkably, this hardness persists even when arbitrary entangled operations, auxiliary systems, and fully adaptive strategies are allowed, indicating that conventional resources for state and channel learning are ineffective in this task. In contrast, when access to the post-measurement quantum state is available, the same task can be solved with constant query complexity using a simple measuring-twice protocol, without requiring resources that are useful for state and channel learning. Our results reveal post-measurement states as a qualitatively new and decisive resource for measurement learning, suggesting potential implications for the design of practical quantum certification protocols.
Learning properties of quantum states and channels is known to benefit from resources such as entangled operations, auxiliary qubits, and adaptivity, whereas the resource structure of measurement learning, namely, learning properties of quantum measurement operators, remains poorly understood. In this work, we identify a measurement learning task for which access limited to classical measurement outcomes leads to an exponential lower bound on the query complexity, established via a distinguishing task between a genuine quantum projective measurement and a purely classical random number generator. Remarkably, this hardness persists even when arbitrary entangled operations, auxiliary systems, and fully adaptive strategies are allowed, indicating that conventional resources for state and channel learning are ineffective in this task. In contrast, when access to the post-measurement quantum state is available, the same task can be solved with constant query complexity using a simple measuring-twice protocol, without requiring resources that are useful for state and channel learning. Our results reveal post-measurement states as a qualitatively new and decisive resource for measurement learning, suggesting potential implications for the design of practical quantum certification protocols.
Can measurements chosen adaptively, in response to earlier outcomes, be exponentially more informative than measurements fixed in advance? In many quantum settings, adaptivity helps at most polynomially; known exponential advantages require coherent measurements across copies or restricted measurements. We show an exponential advantage measuring one copy at a time, with no quantum memory kept between state copies, even when the nonadaptive learner may perform arbitrary global measurements on each copy. We construct explicit families of multi-qubit states in which a scalar parameter is encoded in one of exponentially many candidate observables, with an auxiliary marker indicating which one. An adaptive protocol identifies the relevant observable and then measures it using only single-qubit measurements and one round of adaptation. At fixed accuracy, it needs logarithmically many copies as the qubit count grows, whereas every nonadaptive protocol needs exponentially many. The same mechanism yields an exponential gap in local asymptotic minimax mean squared error constants, tight up to the exponential base. The states are separable and classical in label-dependent product bases; no entanglement or other nonclassical correlations are required. The gap comes from measurement incompatibility: the candidate observables cannot be measured jointly, so a fixed measurement must divide its information budget among them, while adaptivity selects the informative one. Accordingly, the separation disappears when the candidate observables commute, and cannot occur with fully observed classical samples. Measurement incompatibility thus emerges as a resource for quantum learning, distinct from entanglement and quantum memory, that classical feedback alone can exploit.
While entanglement is known to enable exponential improvements in the sample complexity of quantum learning, it remains unclear which properties of entangled resources are responsible for such improvements. We address this question through the reduction criterion, a condition obeyed by all bound-entangled states. In n-qubit Pauli-channel learning, we show that restricting either the input states or the measurement effects to satisfy this criterion rules out an exponential advantage for incoherent adaptive protocols. An exponential lower bound persists for the one-sided coherent adaptive protocols considered here, even when the unrestricted side retains quantum correlations across channel uses. Using conditional min-entropy, we further quantify how the sample-complexity lower bounds weaken as larger violations of the reduction criterion are allowed. Finally, we show that the same obstruction appears in conjugate-state learning: restricted joint measurements cannot reproduce the logarithmic-sample advantage of unrestricted joint measurements on ρ⊗ρ∗. These results identify violation of the reduction criterion as a necessary condition for an exponential advantage in the learning tasks considered here.
The standard approach to quantum measurement discrimination is to perform the given unknown measurement on a probe state, possibly entangled with an auxiliary system, and make a decision based on the measurement outcome obtained. In this work, we go beyond the standard aforementioned scenarios by consider not only the classical measurement outcome of a measurement, but also its the post-measurement quantum state. More specifically, instead of considering only the positive-operator valued measure (POVM) operators, we consider their associated Lüders' instrument associated with them. We prove that, when the post-measurement quantum states are available, the task of discriminating two qubit projective measurements is equivalent to discriminating two copies of quantum states associated to each projector pair, extending previous results known for the case where probe states are separable. Then, we proceed by showing that the advantage of considering post-measurement states in measurement discrimination can be large. We formalise this claim by presenting a family of pairs of measurements where the ratio between the discrimination bias of the measurement discrimination task with and without post-measurement states can be arbitrarily large. This shows that, while the post-measurement state was neglected in most of the previous literature, its use can significantly improve the performance of quantum measurement discrimination.
Quantum resources can dramatically reduce the data required to learn physical systems, with exponential improvements in sample complexity demonstrated in several quantum learning tasks. However, these advantages have typically relied on quantum resources that scale with problem complexity, most notably increasing system dimension or entanglement. This raises a fundamental question: can exponential quantum learning advantages arise within a fixed, unentangled quantum system? In this paper, we address this question by considering the learning of an unknown random-displacement distribution whose complexity is determined not by the dimensionality of the physical system, but by the Fourier resolution of its features. We show that the quantum-limited noise of vacuum probes progressively obscures high-frequency features, leading to an exponential growth in sample complexity. We establish an information-theoretic lower bound for arbitrary classical-state probes and show that squeezing overcomes this classical limit by extending the accessible Fourier bandwidth. Experimentally, we demonstrate an exponential reduction in sample complexity using squeezed vacuum probes for both binary hypothesis testing and characteristic-function reconstruction. Our results show that a single bosonic mode can exhibit exponential quantum learning advantages without entanglement or an increase in system size, identifying accessible Fourier bandwidth as a fundamentally distinct resource for quantum-enhanced learning.
In recent works, much progress has been made with regards to so-called randomized measurement strategies, which include the famous methods of classical shadows and shadow tomography. In such strategies, unknown quantum states are first measured (or ``learned''), to obtain classical data that can be used to later infer (or ``predict'') some desired properties of the quantum states. Even if the used measurement procedure is fixed, surprisingly, estimations of an exponential number of vastly different quantities can be obtained from a polynomial amount of measurement data. This raises the question of just how powerful ``measure-first'' strategies are, and in particular, if all quantum machine learning problems can be solved with a measure-first, analyze-later scheme. This paper explores the potential and limitations of these measure-first protocols in learning from quantum data. We study a natural supervised learning setting where quantum states constitute data points, and the labels stem from an unknown measurement. We examine two types of machine learning protocols: ``measure-first'' protocols, where all the quantum data is first measured using a fixed measurement strategy, and ``fully-quantum'' protocols where the measurements are adapted during the training process. Our main result is a proof of separation. We prove that there exist learning problems that can be efficiently learned by fully-quantum protocols but which require exponential resources for measure-first protocols. Moreover, we show that this separation persists even for quantum data that can be prepared by a polynomial-time quantum process, such as a polynomially-sized quantum circuit. Our proofs combine methods from one-way communication complexity and pseudorandom quantum states. Our result underscores the role of quantum data processing in machine learning and highlights scenarios where quantum advantages appear.
Quantum resources enable us to achieve an exponential advantage in learning the properties of unknown physical systems by employing quantum memory. While entanglement with quantum memory is recognized as a necessary qualitative resource, its quantitative role remains less understood. In this work, we distinguish between two fundamental resources provided by quantum memory—entanglement and ancilla qubits—and analyze their separate contributions to the sampling complexity of quantum learning. Focusing on the task of Pauli channel learning, a prototypical example of quantum channel learning, remarkably, we prove that vanishingly small entanglement in the input state already suffices to accomplish the learning task with only a polynomial number of channel queries in the number of qubits. In contrast, we show that without a sufficient number of ancilla qubits, even learning partial information about the channel demands an exponentially large sample complexity. Thus, our findings reveal that while a large amount of entanglement is not necessary, the dimension of the quantum memory is a crucial resource. Hence, by identifying how the two resources contribute differently, our work offers deeper insight into the nature of the quantum learning advantage. While it is known that entanglement plays a role in learning the properties of unknown physical systems, the detailed quantitative dependence is unclear. Here, the authors investigate the fundamental resources behind quantum advantage in channel learning, revealing that while extensive entanglement is unnecessary, the number of ancilla qubits is crucial.