arXiv:2601.13278

Quantum eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of an electron confined between conducting planes

Don MacMillen

quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallSubmitted Jan 19, 2026• Announced Jan 20, 2026• 0 citations• Revised Aug 9, 2026 (v3)

Abstract

Two of the most iconic systems of quantum physics are the particle in a box and the Coulomb potential (the third is, of course, the harmonic oscillator). In this expository paper, we consider the quantum solution to the problem of an electron confined between the grounded planes of an infinite capacitor. The potential arises from the image charges that form in the grounded planes, along with the added condition that at x = 0, L, where L is the distance between the planes, the wavefunction must be zero. This effectively couples a hydrogen like system to a particle-in-a-box (PIB) based on L, the distance between the planes. The problem of finding the electrostatic potential of this infinite series of image charges is an old one, going back to at least 1929. Here, we give a short derivation for one of the limiting cases that yields a compact expression and show how the Kellogg infinite summation formula converges to that value. We note here that this potential is a symmetric double well potential, so there will be many familiar properties of its solutions. Then using that potential, we solve Schrödinger's equation using a spectral technique. The limiting forms of a particle in a box for small L (and high E), and that of a (degenerate) bound image charge at large L and small energy are recovered. We also discuss the tunneling level splitting that occurs in the transition from the large L to the small L regime.

Comments: 10 pages, 8 figures

Related papers

The solutions and tunneling properties for a linear potential and an inverted harmonic oscillator in an infinite well

Tuomas Riihimäki

In this work we look at two different 1-dimensional quantum systems. The potentials for these systems are a linear potential in an infinite well and an inverted harmonic oscillator in an infinite well. We will solve the Schrödinger equation for both of these systems and get the energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions. The solutions are obtained by using the boundary conditions and numerical methods. The motivation for our study comes from experimental background. For the linear potential we have two different boundary conditions. The first one is the so called normal boundary condition in which the wave function goes to zero on the edge of the well. The second condition is called derivative boundary condition in which the derivative of the wave function goes to zero on the edge of the well. The actual solutions are Airy functions. In the case of the inverted oscillator the solutions are parabolic cylinder functions and they are solved only using the normal boundary condition. Both of the potentials are compared with the particle in a box solutions. We will also present figures and tables from which we can see how the solutions look like. The similarities and differences with the particle in a box solution are also shown visually. The figures and calculations are done using mathematical software. We will also compare the linear potential to a case where the infinite wall is only on the left side. For this case we will also show graphical information of the different properties. With the inverted harmonic oscillator we will take a closer look at the quantum mechanical tunneling. We present some of the history of the quantum tunneling theory, its developers and finally we show the Feynman path integral theory. This theory enables us to get the instanton solutions. The instanton solutions are a way to look at the tunneling properties of the quantum system. The results are compared with the solutions of the double-well potential which is very similar to our case as a quantum system. The solutions are obtained using the same methods which makes the comparison relatively easy. All in all we consider and go through some of the stages of the quantum theory. We also look at the different ways to interpret the theory. We also present the special functions that are needed in our solutions, and look at the properties and different relations to other special functions. It is essential to notice that it is possible to use different mathematical formalisms to get the desired result. The quantum theory has been built for over one hundred years and it has different approaches. Different aspects make it possible to look at different things.

Nov 10, 20150 citations

Solving Numerically Schrödinger Equation for Confined Particle in the Finite Potential Well

B. Bounthong

The quantum model of finite potential well is a most subject in the book of quantum mechanics. The solutions maybe derive from one dimension Schrödinger’s equation for describe a bound state energy of confined particle in the finite potential well. Sometime, the problem of confined particle in the finite potential well does not have an exact solution yet, but there are in fact exact solution.In this work a numerical technique is adopted to find the exact solution for the quantum model of finite potential well. To achieve this numerical solution, I use Fortran code computer program by the Newton-Raphson method for calculating the Eigen state energy for a particle (electron) confined in the finite potential well. Five values of potential width and depth have studied, the results showed that large potential width and large potential depth led me to more bound states, while smaller potential width and depth led me to fewer bound states.A comparison between infinite potential and finite potential has been presented. The results bound state energy and penetration. The results of comparison showed that the wave function of particle confined in the infinite potential cannot penetrate in the well, while the wave function of particle in the finite potential was penetrate in the well; the energy levels of an infinite well are much higher than that the corresponding energy levels for finite potential well. For confined particle in 2 or 3-dimension, we can reduce from result of 1-dimension.

Vālasān vithanyāsāt mahāvithanyālai Suphānuvong.Jun 20, 20220 citations

Energy eigenvalues of a bounded centrally located harmonic oscillator

Richard Vawter

In the study of the effects of finite boundaries on the magnetic properties of a solid, one encounters the problem of finding the energy eigenvalues of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator located in a potential enclosure. Series expansion techniques are applied to solve this problem for a harmonic oscillator located at the center of an infinitely high potential well. An analytical expression for the energy eigenvalues is found as a function of the size potential enclosure L, the quantum state n, oscillator frequency ω, and the mass of the particle m. The first order approximation of this expression is given by E = Eosccoth(Eosc/Ebox) where Eosc = ℏ ω(n + 1/2) is the energy eigenvalues of an unbound harmonic oscillator and Ebox = (2m/ℏ2) (n + 1)2π2/L2 is the energy eigenvalues of a free particle in an infinitely high well. For the ground state this approximation is better than 1% for all values of L, ω, and m.

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsDec 1, 197325 citations

Numerical Calculations of Energies for an Infinite Potential Well with Sinusoidal Bottom

Abstract: We present an investigation for a particle confined in an infinite well with sinusoidal bottom, using the perturbation theory and numerical solution for the Schrödinger equation to obtain the eigen energies and wavefunctions. Potential strength and potential oscillation dependence of the state are examined and analyzed. It is shown that the particle in a box with sinusoidal bottom does not show up the Klauder phenomenon when the perturbations are gradually reduced to zero. The research results show that the potential oscillation significantly affects certain quantum states and, therefore, the ability to manipulate the energy difference between the states. In addition, our results for the present system converge to their corresponding values for the unperturbed one in the high-potential oscillation limit. Keywords: Infinite well, Perturbation theory, Sinusoidal potential, Numerical calculations, Klauder phenomenon.

Jordan Journal of PhysicsDec 31, 20220 citations

Stationary states for a particle in a box with slanted walls

Nivaldo A. Lemos

The quantum mechanical problem of a particle in a infinite potential well with slanted walls is studied. The energy eigenvalues are determined by a transcendental equation involving the Airy function of the first kind. Two limiting cases are discussed. Next, the allowed energies are found by graphical and numerical methods. The graphical analysis hints that for large quantum numbers the consecutive energy levels get arbitrarily close together. This asymptotic behavior of the energy spectrum actually holds, as shown by means of an intuitive argument and confirmed by resorting to basic properties of Airy functions. In a sense, Bohr's correspondence principle is more accurately fulfilled than in the cases of the standard particle in a box or the harmonic oscillator. A state is regarded the more confined the less the probability of finding the particle in the classically forbidden region. For some stationary states the confinement degree is calculated and a comparison is made with the harmonic oscillator, for which the ground state is the least confined of all stationary states. In the symmetric case --- right and left walls of equal slope --- something unexpected happens: beyond a certain critical slope the ground state is no longer the least confined eigenstate. Over and above its interesting physical features, this problem provides students with the opportunity to get acquainted with Airy functions, which do not belong to the standard mathematical repertoire of physics undergraduates.

quant-pharXiv:2609.07505Sep 8, 20260 citations

Momentum Wavefunction of a Particle in a Box

Francesco R. Ruggeri

The momentum wavefunction fp of a particle in a box (with infinite potential walls) has been described (1) (2) in terms of many plane waves (i.e. many fp’s) even though the energy E=(hbar k)/2/2m expresses only one k. Thus, the energy E appears to be an average. It seems one may have a plane wave exp(ipx) which collides inelastically with the wall and changes to exp(-ip1x) etc.; on average energy is conserved. In (1) and (2), the spatial wavefunction W(x)= Sum over p fp exp(ipx) is obtained by solving the time-independent Schrodinger equation, and fp from taking the Fourier transform of W(x). These are strictly math procedures it seems. In a previous note (3), the time independent Schrodinger equation is written with V(x) and W(x) both expressed in terms of Fourier transforms. This lead to an equation for each p of the form: Sum j+k=p Vk fk = (E-p*p/2m) fp ((1)). In such a case, V(x) exists throughout x. For the case of an infinite wall, there is still a potential, but only at the end walls. In this note, we suggest ((1)) may be used to obtain fp without taking the Fourier transform of W(x) or solving for Vk. This approach also shows cycling is involved, even for a particle in a box. The cycling occurs at the walls.

May 2, 20190 citations