Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2507.00995 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Charge pumps, pivot Hamiltonians, and symmetry-protected topological phases

Nick G. Jones, Ryan Thorngren, Ruben Verresen, Abhishodh Prakash

Published Sep 25, 2025• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Generalized charge pumps are topological obstructions to trivializing loops in the space of symmetric gapped Hamiltonians. We show that given mild conditions on such pumps, the associated loop has high-symmetry points that must be in distinct symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases. To further elucidate the connection between pumps and SPTs, we focus on closed paths, “pivot loops”, defined by two Hamiltonians, where the first is unitarily evolved by the second “pivot” Hamiltonian. While such pivot loops have been studied as entanglers for SPTs, here we explore their connection to pumps. We construct families of pivot loops that pump charge for various symmetry groups, often leading to SPT phases—including dipole SPTs. Intriguingly, we find examples where nontrivial pumps do not lead to genuine SPTs but still entangle representation-SPTs (RSPTs). We use the anomaly associated with the nontrivial pump to explain the “unnecessary” criticality between these RSPTs. We also find that particularly nice pivot families form circles in Hamiltonian space, which we show are equivalent to the Hamiltonians satisfying the Dolan-Grady relation—known from the study of integrable models. This additional structure allows us to derive more powerful constraints on the phase diagram. Natural examples of such circular loops arise from pivoting with the Onsager-integrable chiral clock models, containing the aforementioned RSPT example. In fact, we show that these Onsager pivots underlie general group cohomology-based pumps in one spatial dimension. Finally, we recast the above in the language of equivariant families of Hamiltonians and relate the invariants of the pump to the candidate SPTs. We also highlight how certain SPTs arise in cases where the equivariant family is labeled by spaces that are not manifolds.

DOI
10.1103/rtq1-pplf

Related papers

Pivoting through the chiral-clock family

Nick G. Jones, Abhishodh Prakash, Paul Fendley

The Onsager algebra, invented to solve the two-dimensional Ising model, can be used to construct conserved charges for a family of integrable N N -state chiral clock models. We show how it naturally gives rise to a “pivot” procedure for this family of chiral Hamiltonians. These Hamiltonians have an anti-unitary CPT symmetry that when combined with the usual \mathbb{Z}_N ℤ N clock symmetry gives a non-Abelian dihedral symmetry group D_{2N} D 2 N . We show that this symmetry gives rise to symmetry-protected topological (SPT) order in this family for all even N N , and representation-SPT (RSPT) physics for all odd N N . The simplest such example is a next-nearest-neighbour chain generalising the spin-1/2 cluster model, an SPT phase of matter. We derive a matrix-product state representation of its fixed-point ground state along with the ensuing entanglement spectrum and symmetry fractionalisation. We analyse a rich phase diagram combining this model with the Onsager-integrable chiral Potts chain, and find trivial, symmetry-breaking and (R)SPT orders, as well as extended gapless regions. For odd N N , the phase transitions are “unnecessarily” critical from the SPT point of view.

arXiv:2406.01680•SciPost Physics•Mar 14, 2025•7 citations

Pivot Hamiltonians as generators of symmetry and entanglement

Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ryan Thorngren, Ashvin Vishwanath +1 more

It is well-known that symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases can be obtained from the trivial phase by an entangler, a finite-depth unitary operator U U . Here, we consider obtaining the entangler from a local ‘pivot’ Hamiltonian H_\text{pivot} H pivot such that U = e^{i\pi H_\text{pivot}} U = e i π H pivot . This perspective of Hamiltonians pivoting between the trivial and SPT phase opens up two new directions: (i) Since SPT Hamiltonians and entanglers are now on the same footing, can we iterate this process to create other interesting states? (ii) Since entanglers are known to arise as discrete symmetries at SPT transitions, under what conditions can this be enhanced to U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry generated by H_\text{pivot} H pivot ? In this work we explore both of these questions. With regard to the first, we give examples of a rich web of dualities obtained by iteratively using an SPT model as a pivot to generate the next one. For the second question, we derive a simple criterion for when the direct interpolation between the trivial and SPT Hamiltonian has a U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry. We illustrate this in a variety of examples, assuming various forms for H_\text{pivot} H pivot , including the Ising chain, and the toric code Hamiltonian. A remarkable property of such a U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry is that it shares a mutual anomaly with the symmetry protecting the nearby SPT phase. We discuss how such anomalous and non-onsite U(1) U ( 1 ) symmetries explain the exotic phase diagrams that can appear, including an SPT multicritical point where the gapless ground state is given by the fixed-point toric code state.

arXiv:2110.07599•SciPost Physics•Feb 2, 2023•50 citations

Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group

Xie Chen, Zheng‐Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu +1 more

Symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped short-range-entangled quantum phases with a symmetry $G$. They can all be smoothly connected to the same trivial product state if we break the symmetry. The Haldane phase of spin-1 chain is the first example of SPT phases which is protected by $\mathit{SO}(3)$ spin rotation symmetry. The topological insulator is another example of SPT phases which are protected by $U(1)$ and time-reversal symmetries. In this paper, we show that interacting bosonic SPT phases can be systematically described by group cohomology theory: Distinct $d$-dimensional bosonic SPT phases with on-site symmetry $G$ (which may contain antiunitary time-reversal symmetry) can be labeled by the elements in ${\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[G,{U}_{T}(1)]$, the Borel $(1+d)$-group-cohomology classes of $G$ over the $G$ module ${U}_{T}(1)$. Our theory, which leads to explicit ground-state wave functions and commuting projector Hamiltonians, is based on a new type of topological term that generalizes the topological $\ensuremath{\theta}$ term in continuous nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models to lattice nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models. The boundary excitations of the nontrivial SPT phases are described by lattice nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models with a nonlocal Lagrangian term that generalizes the Wess-Zumino-Witten term for continuous nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models. As a result, the symmetry $G$ must be realized as a non-on-site symmetry for the low-energy boundary excitations, and those boundary states must be gapless or degenerate. As an application of our result, we can use ${\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[U(1)\ensuremath{\rtimes}{Z}_{2}^{T},{U}_{T}(1)]$ to obtain interacting bosonic topological insulators (protected by time reversal ${Z}_{2}^{T}$ and boson number conservation), which contain one nontrivial phase in one-dimensional (1D) or 2D and three in 3D. We also obtain interacting bosonic topological superconductors (protected by time-reversal symmetry only), in term of ${\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[{Z}_{2}^{T},{U}_{T}(1)]$, which contain one nontrivial phase in odd spatial dimensions and none for even dimensions. Our result is much more general than the above two examples, since it is for any symmetry group. For example, we can use ${\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[U(1)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{Z}_{2}^{T},{U}_{T}(1)]$ to construct the SPT phases of integer spin systems with time-reversal and $U(1)$ spin rotation symmetry, which contain three nontrivial SPT phases in 1D, none in 2D, and seven in 3D. Even more generally, we find that the different bosonic symmetry breaking short-range-entangled phases are labeled by the following three mathematical objects: $({G}_{H},{G}_{\ensuremath{\Psi}},{\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[{G}_{\ensuremath{\Psi}},{U}_{T}(1)])$, where ${G}_{H}$ is the symmetry group of the Hamiltonian and ${G}_{\ensuremath{\Psi}}$ the symmetry group of the ground states.

arXiv:1106.4772•Physical Review B•Apr 4, 2013•1,308 citations

Boundary-obstructed topological phases

Eslam Khalaf, Wladimir A. Benalcazar, Taylor L. Hughes +1 more

Symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped phases of matter that cannot be deformed to a trivial phase without breaking the symmetry or closing the bulk gap.Here we introduce a notion of a topological obstruction that is not captured by bulk energy gap closings in periodic boundary conditions.More specifically, given a symmetric boundary termination we say two bulk Hamiltonians belong to distinct boundary obstructed topological phases (BOTPs) if they can be deformed to each other on a system with periodic boundaries, but cannot be deformed to each other in the open system without closing the gap at at least one high-symmetry surface.BOTPs are not topological phases of matter in the standard sense since they are adiabatically deformable to each other on a torus, but, similar to SPTs, they are associated with boundary signatures in open systems such as surface states or fractional corner charges.In contrast to SPTs, these boundary signatures are not anomalous and can be removed by symmetrically adding lower-dimensional SPTs on the boundary, but they are stable as long as the spectral gap at high-symmetry edges/surfaces remains open.We show that the double-mirror quadrupole model of [W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Science 357, 61 (2017)] is a prototypical example of such phases, and present a detailed analysis of several aspects of boundary obstructions in this model.In addition, we introduce several three-dimensional models having boundary obstructions, which are characterized either by surface states or fractional corner charges.Furthermore, we provide a complete characterization of boundary obstructed phases in terms of symmetry representations.Namely, two distinct BOTP phases correspond to equivalent band representations in the periodic system which become inequivalent upon restricting the symmetry group to that of the open system.This is used to shown that for a given open boundary, there is only one class of BOTPs which corresponds to a local representation of the symmetry of the open system and thus can be designated as the trivial phase.All other BOTP classes do not correspond to local representation of the open system and as a result necessarily exhibit a filling anomaly or gapless surface states.

arXiv:1908.00011•Physical Review Research•Mar 15, 2021•170 citations

Building models of topological quantum criticality from pivot Hamiltonians

Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ryan Thorngren, Ashvin Vishwanath +1 more

Progress in understanding symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases has been greatly aided by our ability to construct lattice models realizing these states. In contrast, a systematic approach to constructing models that realize quantum critical points between SPT phases is lacking, particularly in dimension d>1 d > 1 . Here, we show how the recently introduced notion of the pivot Hamiltonian—generating rotations between SPT phases—facilitates such a construction. We demonstrate this approach by constructing a spin model on the triangular lattice, which is midway between a trivial and SPT phase. The pivot Hamiltonian generates a U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry which helps to stabilize a direct SPT transition. The sign-problem free nature of the model—with an additional Ising interaction preserving the pivot symmetry—allows us to obtain the phase diagram using quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We find evidence for a direct transition between trivial and SPT phases that is consistent with a deconfined quantum critical point with emergent SO(5) S O ( 5 ) symmetry. The known anomaly of the latter is made possible by the non-local nature of the U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry. Interestingly, the pivot Hamiltonian generating this symmetry is nothing other than the staggered Baxter-Wu three-spin interaction. This work illustrates the importance of U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetries and proposes how to generally construct sign-problem-free lattice models of SPT transitions with such anomalous symmetry groups for other lattices and dimensions.

arXiv:2110.09512•SciPost Physics•Feb 2, 2023•32 citations

Symmetry protected topological orders and the cohomology class of their symmetry group

Xie Chen, Zheng‐Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu +1 more

Symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped short-range-entangled quantum phases with a symmetry G. They can all be smoothly connected to the same trivial product state if we break the symmetry. The Haldane phase of spin-1 chain is the first example of SPT phase which is protected by SO(3) spin rotation symmetry. The topological insulator is another exam- ple of SPT phase which is protected by U(1) and time reversal symmetries. It has been shown that free fermion SPT phases can be systematically described by the K-theory. In this paper, we show that interacting bosonic SPT phases can be systematically described by group cohomology theory: distinct d-dimensional bosonic SPT phases with on-site symmetry G (which may contain anti-unitary time reversal symmetry) can be labeled by the elements in H^{1+d}[G, U_T(1)] - the Borel (1 + d)-group-cohomology classes of G over the G-module U_T(1). The boundary excitations of the non-trivial SPT phases are gapless or degenerate. Even more generally, we find that the different bosonic symmetry breaking short-range-entangled phases are labeled by the following three mathematical objects: (G_H, G_{\Psi}, H^{1+d}[G_{\Psi}, U_T(1)], where G_H is the symmetry group of the Hamiltonian and G_{\Psi} the symmetry group of the ground states.

•Jun 23, 2011•13 citations
Generalized charge pumps are topological obstructions to trivializing loops in the space of symmetric gapped Hamiltonians. We show that given mild conditions on such pumps, the associated loop has high-symmetry points that must be in distinct symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases. To further elucidate the connection between pumps and SPTs, we focus on closed paths, “pivot loops”, defined by two Hamiltonians, where the first is unitarily evolved by the second “pivot” Hamiltonian. While such pivot loops have been studied as entanglers for SPTs, here we explore their connection to pumps. We construct families of pivot loops that pump charge for various symmetry groups, often leading to SPT phases—including dipole SPTs. Intriguingly, we find examples where nontrivial pumps do not lead to genuine SPTs but still entangle representation-SPTs (RSPTs). We use the anomaly associated with the nontrivial pump to explain the “unnecessary” criticality between these RSPTs. We also find that particularly nice pivot families form circles in Hamiltonian space, which we show are equivalent to the Hamiltonians satisfying the Dolan-Grady relation—known from the study of integrable models. This additional structure allows us to derive more powerful constraints on the phase diagram. Natural examples of such circular loops arise from pivoting with the Onsager-integrable chiral clock models, containing the aforementioned RSPT example. In fact, we show that these Onsager pivots underlie general group cohomology-based pumps in one spatial dimension. Finally, we recast the above in the language of equivariant families of Hamiltonians and relate the invariants of the pump to the candidate SPTs. We also highlight how certain SPTs arise in cases where the equivariant family is labeled by spaces that are not manifolds.
The Onsager algebra, invented to solve the two-dimensional Ising model, can be used to construct conserved charges for a family of integrable N N -state chiral clock models. We show how it naturally gives rise to a “pivot” procedure for this family of chiral Hamiltonians. These Hamiltonians have an anti-unitary CPT symmetry that when combined with the usual \mathbb{Z}_N ℤ N clock symmetry gives a non-Abelian dihedral symmetry group D_{2N} D 2 N . We show that this symmetry gives rise to symmetry-protected topological (SPT) order in this family for all even N N , and representation-SPT (RSPT) physics for all odd N N . The simplest such example is a next-nearest-neighbour chain generalising the spin-1/2 cluster model, an SPT phase of matter. We derive a matrix-product state representation of its fixed-point ground state along with the ensuing entanglement spectrum and symmetry fractionalisation. We analyse a rich phase diagram combining this model with the Onsager-integrable chiral Potts chain, and find trivial, symmetry-breaking and (R)SPT orders, as well as extended gapless regions. For odd N N , the phase transitions are “unnecessarily” critical from the SPT point of view.
It is well-known that symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases can be obtained from the trivial phase by an entangler, a finite-depth unitary operator U U . Here, we consider obtaining the entangler from a local ‘pivot’ Hamiltonian H_\text{pivot} H pivot such that U = e^{i\pi H_\text{pivot}} U = e i π H pivot . This perspective of Hamiltonians pivoting between the trivial and SPT phase opens up two new directions: (i) Since SPT Hamiltonians and entanglers are now on the same footing, can we iterate this process to create other interesting states? (ii) Since entanglers are known to arise as discrete symmetries at SPT transitions, under what conditions can this be enhanced to U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry generated by H_\text{pivot} H pivot ? In this work we explore both of these questions. With regard to the first, we give examples of a rich web of dualities obtained by iteratively using an SPT model as a pivot to generate the next one. For the second question, we derive a simple criterion for when the direct interpolation between the trivial and SPT Hamiltonian has a U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry. We illustrate this in a variety of examples, assuming various forms for H_\text{pivot} H pivot , including the Ising chain, and the toric code Hamiltonian. A remarkable property of such a U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry is that it shares a mutual anomaly with the symmetry protecting the nearby SPT phase. We discuss how such anomalous and non-onsite U(1) U ( 1 ) symmetries explain the exotic phase diagrams that can appear, including an SPT multicritical point where the gapless ground state is given by the fixed-point toric code state.
Symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped short-range-entangled quantum phases with a symmetry GGG. They can all be smoothly connected to the same trivial product state if we break the symmetry. The Haldane phase of spin-1 chain is the first example of SPT phases which is protected by SO(3)\mathit{SO}(3)SO(3) spin rotation symmetry. The topological insulator is another example of SPT phases which are protected by U(1)U(1)U(1) and time-reversal symmetries. In this paper, we show that interacting bosonic SPT phases can be systematically described by group cohomology theory: Distinct ddd-dimensional bosonic SPT phases with on-site symmetry GGG (which may contain antiunitary time-reversal symmetry) can be labeled by the elements in H1+d[G,UT(1)]{\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[G,{U}_{T}(1)]H1+d[G,UT​(1)], the Borel (1+d)(1+d)(1+d)-group-cohomology classes of GGG over the GGG module UT(1){U}_{T}(1)UT​(1). Our theory, which leads to explicit ground-state wave functions and commuting projector Hamiltonians, is based on a new type of topological term that generalizes the topological $\ensuremath{\theta}$ term in continuous nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models to lattice nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models. The boundary excitations of the nontrivial SPT phases are described by lattice nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models with a nonlocal Lagrangian term that generalizes the Wess-Zumino-Witten term for continuous nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ models. As a result, the symmetry GGG must be realized as a non-on-site symmetry for the low-energy boundary excitations, and those boundary states must be gapless or degenerate. As an application of our result, we can use ${\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[U(1)\ensuremath{\rtimes}{Z}_{2}^{T},{U}_{T}(1)]$ to obtain interacting bosonic topological insulators (protected by time reversal Z2T{Z}_{2}^{T}Z2T​ and boson number conservation), which contain one nontrivial phase in one-dimensional (1D) or 2D and three in 3D. We also obtain interacting bosonic topological superconductors (protected by time-reversal symmetry only), in term of H1+d[Z2T,UT(1)]{\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[{Z}_{2}^{T},{U}_{T}(1)]H1+d[Z2T​,UT​(1)], which contain one nontrivial phase in odd spatial dimensions and none for even dimensions. Our result is much more general than the above two examples, since it is for any symmetry group. For example, we can use ${\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[U(1)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{Z}_{2}^{T},{U}_{T}(1)]$ to construct the SPT phases of integer spin systems with time-reversal and U(1)U(1)U(1) spin rotation symmetry, which contain three nontrivial SPT phases in 1D, none in 2D, and seven in 3D. Even more generally, we find that the different bosonic symmetry breaking short-range-entangled phases are labeled by the following three mathematical objects: $({G}_{H},{G}_{\ensuremath{\Psi}},{\mathcal{H}}^{1+d}[{G}_{\ensuremath{\Psi}},{U}_{T}(1)])$, where GH{G}_{H}GH​ is the symmetry group of the Hamiltonian and ${G}_{\ensuremath{\Psi}}$ the symmetry group of the ground states.
Symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped phases of matter that cannot be deformed to a trivial phase without breaking the symmetry or closing the bulk gap.Here we introduce a notion of a topological obstruction that is not captured by bulk energy gap closings in periodic boundary conditions.More specifically, given a symmetric boundary termination we say two bulk Hamiltonians belong to distinct boundary obstructed topological phases (BOTPs) if they can be deformed to each other on a system with periodic boundaries, but cannot be deformed to each other in the open system without closing the gap at at least one high-symmetry surface.BOTPs are not topological phases of matter in the standard sense since they are adiabatically deformable to each other on a torus, but, similar to SPTs, they are associated with boundary signatures in open systems such as surface states or fractional corner charges.In contrast to SPTs, these boundary signatures are not anomalous and can be removed by symmetrically adding lower-dimensional SPTs on the boundary, but they are stable as long as the spectral gap at high-symmetry edges/surfaces remains open.We show that the double-mirror quadrupole model of [W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Science 357, 61 (2017)] is a prototypical example of such phases, and present a detailed analysis of several aspects of boundary obstructions in this model.In addition, we introduce several three-dimensional models having boundary obstructions, which are characterized either by surface states or fractional corner charges.Furthermore, we provide a complete characterization of boundary obstructed phases in terms of symmetry representations.Namely, two distinct BOTP phases correspond to equivalent band representations in the periodic system which become inequivalent upon restricting the symmetry group to that of the open system.This is used to shown that for a given open boundary, there is only one class of BOTPs which corresponds to a local representation of the symmetry of the open system and thus can be designated as the trivial phase.All other BOTP classes do not correspond to local representation of the open system and as a result necessarily exhibit a filling anomaly or gapless surface states.
Progress in understanding symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases has been greatly aided by our ability to construct lattice models realizing these states. In contrast, a systematic approach to constructing models that realize quantum critical points between SPT phases is lacking, particularly in dimension d>1 d > 1 . Here, we show how the recently introduced notion of the pivot Hamiltonian—generating rotations between SPT phases—facilitates such a construction. We demonstrate this approach by constructing a spin model on the triangular lattice, which is midway between a trivial and SPT phase. The pivot Hamiltonian generates a U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry which helps to stabilize a direct SPT transition. The sign-problem free nature of the model—with an additional Ising interaction preserving the pivot symmetry—allows us to obtain the phase diagram using quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We find evidence for a direct transition between trivial and SPT phases that is consistent with a deconfined quantum critical point with emergent SO(5) S O ( 5 ) symmetry. The known anomaly of the latter is made possible by the non-local nature of the U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetry. Interestingly, the pivot Hamiltonian generating this symmetry is nothing other than the staggered Baxter-Wu three-spin interaction. This work illustrates the importance of U(1) U ( 1 ) pivot symmetries and proposes how to generally construct sign-problem-free lattice models of SPT transitions with such anomalous symmetry groups for other lattices and dimensions.
Symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped short-range-entangled quantum phases with a symmetry G. They can all be smoothly connected to the same trivial product state if we break the symmetry. The Haldane phase of spin-1 chain is the first example of SPT phase which is protected by SO(3) spin rotation symmetry. The topological insulator is another exam- ple of SPT phase which is protected by U(1) and time reversal symmetries. It has been shown that free fermion SPT phases can be systematically described by the K-theory. In this paper, we show that interacting bosonic SPT phases can be systematically described by group cohomology theory: distinct d-dimensional bosonic SPT phases with on-site symmetry G (which may contain anti-unitary time reversal symmetry) can be labeled by the elements in H^{1+d}[G, U_T(1)] - the Borel (1 + d)-group-cohomology classes of G over the G-module U_T(1). The boundary excitations of the non-trivial SPT phases are gapless or degenerate. Even more generally, we find that the different bosonic symmetry breaking short-range-entangled phases are labeled by the following three mathematical objects: (G_H, G_{\Psi}, H^{1+d}[G_{\Psi}, U_T(1)], where G_H is the symmetry group of the Hamiltonian and G_{\Psi} the symmetry group of the ground states.