Error mitigation has enabled quantum computing applications with more than a hundred qubits and deep circuits. Many error mitigation methods are noise-aware, relying on a faithful characterization of the noise channels of the hardware. However, fundamental limitations lead to unlearnable degrees of freedom of the underlying noise models when considering qubits. Here, we show how to leverage noncomputational states as an additional resource to learn state-preparation errors in superconducting qubits. This allows one to fully constrain the noise models. We can thus independently and accurately mitigate state-preparation errors, gate errors, and measurement errors. Our proposed method is also applicable to dynamic circuits with midcircuit measurements. This work opens the door to improved error mitigation for measurements, both at the end of the circuit and midcircuit.
Error mitigation has enabled quantum computing applications with more than a hundred qubits and deep circuits. Many error mitigation methods are noise-aware, relying on a faithful characterization of the noise channels of the hardware. However, fundamental limitations lead to unlearnable degrees of freedom of the underlying noise models when considering qubits. Here, we show how to leverage noncomputational states as an additional resource to learn state-preparation errors in superconducting qubits. This allows one to fully constrain the noise models. We can thus independently and accurately mitigate state-preparation errors, gate errors, and measurement errors. Our proposed method is also applicable to dynamic circuits with midcircuit measurements. This work opens the door to improved error mitigation for measurements, both at the end of the circuit and midcircuit.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) for dynamic circuits, i.e., those incorporating mid-circuit measurements and feedforward, is important for two key reasons. First, quantum error correction (QEC) circuits are instances of dynamic circuits, and therefore a dynamic circuit-compatible QEM can extend circuit depth and address errors that QEC struggles with. Second, recent studies show that dynamic circuits can significantly outperform purely unitary ones. However, mid-circuit measurement errors remain a major bottleneck. Current solutions rely on readout noise characterization that is vulnerable to temporal noise drifts. To the best of our knowledge, no readout mitigation schemes are resilient to temporal noise drifts. By introducing parity-based noise amplification in repeated measurements, we derive and experimentally demonstrate a drift-resilient protocol for addressing preparation, mid-circuit, and terminating measurement errors without requiring calibration or characterization. Drift resilience increases the longest possible execution time (in terms of shots) and enables flexibility by combining data from non-consecutive times. For platforms such as trapped ions, where the measurements are highly disruptive, we provide an alternative reset-based mitigation scheme. We demonstrate our methods experimentally on IBMQ and Quantinuum hardware. Combined with the Layered-KIK gate error mitigation protocol, the presented readout mitigation approach enables "End-to-end" mitigation for dynamic circuits, that can improve the outcomes of QEC experiments, and that covers the widest range of errors to the best of our knowledge. Other applications of the presented methods include a faster alternative to gate-set tomography and diagnostics of defective qubits during the execution of the target algorithm.
Current noisy quantum computers have multiple types of errors, which can occur in the state preparation, measurement/readout, and gate operation, as well as intrinsic decoherence and relaxation. Partly motivated by the booming of intermediate-scale quantum processors, measurement and gate errors have been recently extensively studied, and several methods of mitigating them have been proposed and formulated in software packages (e.g., in IBM Qiskit). Despite this, the state preparation error and the procedure to quantify it have not yet been standardized, as state preparation and measurement errors are usually considered not directly separable. Inspired by a recent work of Laflamme, Lin, and Mor \cite{laflamme2022algorithmic}, we propose a simple and resource-efficient approach to quantify separately the state preparation and readout error rates. With these two errors separately quantified, we also propose methods to mitigate them separately, especially mitigating state preparation errors with linear (with the number of qubits) complexity. As a result of the separate mitigation, we show that the fidelity of the outcome can be improved by an order of magnitude compared to the standard measurement error mitigation scheme. We also show that the quantification and mitigation scheme is resilient against gate noise and can be immediately applied to current noisy quantum computers. To demonstrate this, we present results from cloud experiments on IBM's superconducting quantum computers. The results indicate that the state preparation error rate is also an important metric for qubit metrology that can be efficiently obtained.
Abstract Quantum computing devices are inevitably subject to errors. To leverage quantum technologies for computational benefits in practical applications, quantum algorithms and protocols must be implemented reliably under noise and imperfections. Since noise and imperfections limit the size of quantum circuits that can be realized on a quantum device, developing quantum error mitigation techniques that do not require extra qubits and gates is of critical importance. In this work, we present a deep learning-based protocol for reducing readout errors on quantum hardware. Our technique is based on training an artificial neural network (NN) with the measurement results obtained from experiments with simple quantum circuits consisting of singe-qubit gates only. With the NN and deep learning, non-linear noise can be corrected, which is not possible with the existing linear inversion methods. The advantage of our method against the existing methods is demonstrated through quantum readout error mitigation experiments performed on IBM five-qubit quantum devices.
We present a simple, malleable and low-overhead approach for improving generic biased quantum error mitigation (QEM) methods, achieving up to 15% fidelity improvements over standard QEM on 100-qubit circuits with up to 2000 entangling gates. We do so by constructing verifiable benchmark circuits which mirror the application circuit's native-gate structure and thus noise profile. These circuits can be used to benchmark and mitigate the bias of the underlying error mitigation method, requiring only the application circuit and hardware native gate set. We present two methods for generating benchmark circuits; one is agnostic to the target hardware at the expense of a small overhead of single-qubit gates, while the other is specific to the IBM superconducting hardware and has no gate overhead. As a corollary, we introduce benchmarked-noise zero-noise extrapolation (bnZNE) as a simple adaptation of zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), one of the most popular error mitigation methods. We consider as an example the bias-mitigated ZNE and bnZNE of Trotterized Hamiltonian simulations, observing that our approaches outperform standard ZNE using both small-scale classical simulations and 100-qubit utility-scale experiments on the IBM superconducting hardware. We consider the measurement of both single-site observables as well as two-site correlations along a one-dimensional qubit chain. We also provide a software package for implementing the error mitigation techniques used in this research.
Two schemes are presented that mitigate the effect of errors and decoherence in short-depth quantum circuits. The size of the circuits for which these techniques can be applied is limited by the rate at which the errors in the computation are introduced. Near-term applications of early quantum devices, such as quantum simulations, rely on accurate estimates of expectation values to become relevant. Decoherence and gate errors lead to wrong estimates of the expectation values of observables used to evaluate the noisy circuit. The two schemes we discuss are deliberately simple and do not require additional qubit resources, so to be as practically relevant in current experiments as possible. The first method, extrapolation to the zero noise limit, subsequently cancels powers of the noise perturbations by an application of Richardson's deferred approach to the limit. The second method cancels errors by resampling randomized circuits according to a quasiprobability distribution.
We experimentally study error mitigation and finite-shot sampling on superconducting quantum hardware under a constrained execution budget. The study combines calibration-aware qubit selection, circuit-depth scaling, zero-noise extrapolation, dynamical decoupling, readout-error mitigation, and repeated-shot estimation on an IBM Quantum processor. Experiments are organized across ideal simulation, noise-model simulation, and physical-device execution to separate sampling uncertainty from device-induced error. We investigate how mitigation performance changes with circuit depth, effective noise scale, qubit connectivity, and measurement budget, and quantify accuracy using expectation-value error, mean-squared error, statistical uncertainty, and mitigation gain. A fixed hardware-execution budget is used to evaluate shot allocation strategies and repeated measurements without relying on unlimited sampling. The resulting analysis provides a hardware-aware characterization of when mitigation improves expectation-value estimation and when finite-shot fluctuations offset the benefit of additional mitigation overhead. The implementation uses contemporary Qiskit and IBM Quantum Runtime workflows and is designed to provide reproducible experimental evidence for error-mitigation studies on current quantum processors.