Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2504.12068

Time Advance and Probability Conservation in PT-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics

Philip D. Mannheim

Published Apr 16, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

When excited states decay the time evolution operator $U(t)=e^{-iHt}$ does not obey $U^{\dagger}(t)U(t)=I$. Nonetheless, probability conservation is not lost if one includes both excitation and decay, though it takes a different form. Specifically, if the eigenspectrum of a Hamiltonian is complete, then due to $CPT$ symmetry, a symmetry that holds for all physical systems, there must exist an operator $V$ that effects $VHV^{-1}=H^{\dagger}$, so that $V^{-1}U^{\dagger}(t)VU(t)=I$. In consequence, the time delay associated with decay must be accompanied by an equal and opposite time advance for excitation. Thus when a photon excites an atom the spontaneous emission of a photon from the excited state must occur without any decay time delay at all. An effect of this form together with an associated negative time delay appear to have recently been reported by Sinclair et. al., PRX Quantum \textbf{3}, 010314 (2022) and Angulo et. al., arXiv:2409.03680 [quant-ph].

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2504.12068

Related papers

Time advance and probability conservation in P T -symmetric quantum mechanics

Philip D. Mannheim

When excited states decay with energy ${E}_{0}\ensuremath{-}i\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$ the time evolution operator $U(t)={e}^{\ensuremath{-}iHt}$ does not obey ${U}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}(t)U(t)=I$. Nonetheless, probability conservation is not lost if one includes both decay and excitation with energy ${E}_{0}+i\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$, though it takes a different form. Specifically, if the eigenspectrum of a Hamiltonian is complete, then due to $CPT$ symmetry, a symmetry that holds for all physical systems, there must exist an operator $V$ that effects $VH{V}^{\ensuremath{-}1}={H}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}$, so that ${V}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{U}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}(t)VU(t)=I$. In consequence, because of probability conservation the time delay associated with decay must be accompanied by an equal and opposite time advance for excitation. Thus when a photon excites an atom the spontaneous emission of a photon from the excited state must occur without any decay time delay at all. An effect of this form together with an associated negative time delay has recently been reported by Sinclair et al. [PRX Quantum 3, 010314 (2022)] and Angulo et al. [arXiv:2409.03680].

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Jul 25, 2025•2 citations

PT symmetry as a necessary and sufficient condition for unitary time evolution

Philip D. Mannheim

While Hermiticity of a time-independent Hamiltonian leads to unitary time evolution, in and of itself, the requirement of Hermiticity is only sufficient for unitary time evolution. In this paper, we provide conditions that are both necessary and sufficient. We show that PT symmetry of a time-independent Hamiltonian, or equivalently, reality of the secular equation that determines its eigenvalues, is both necessary and sufficient for unitary time evolution. For any PT-symmetric Hamiltonian H, there always exists an operator V that relates H to its Hermitian adjoint according to VHV(-1)=H(†). When the energy spectrum of H is complete, Hilbert space norms <ψ(1)|V|ψ(2)> constructed with this V are always preserved in time. With the energy eigenvalues of a real secular equation being either real or appearing in complex conjugate pairs, we thus establish the unitarity of time evolution in both cases. We also establish the unitarity of time evolution for Hamiltonians whose energy spectra are not complete. We show that when the energy eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian are real and complete, the operator V is a positive Hermitian operator, which has an associated square root operator that can be used to bring the Hamiltonian to a Hermitian form. We show that systems with PT-symmetric Hamiltonians obey causality. We note that Hermitian theories are ordinarily associated with a path integral quantization prescription in which the path integral measure is real, while in contrast, non-Hermitian but PT-symmetric theories are ordinarily associated with path integrals in which the measure needs to be complex, but in which the Euclidean time continuation of the path integral is nonetheless real. Just as the second-order Klein-Gordon theory is stabilized against transitions to negative frequencies because its Hamiltonian is positive-definite, through PT symmetry, the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck theory can equally be stabilized.

arXiv:0912.2635•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Mar 18, 2013•55 citations

Can PT-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics be a Viable Alternative Quantum Theory?

Sungwook Lee, Lawrence R. Mead

Update: A time-independent $n\times n$ PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonian is diagonalizable since it has all distinct real eigenvalues and the resulting diagonal matrix is a real symmetric matrix. The diagonalization results an isometry so there shouldn't be any issue with unitarity and unfortunately this very elementary mathematical fact somehow did not draw the authors' attention. However, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is not out of trouble. For time-dependent PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonians (even $2\times 2$ ones) the authors observed that there is a violation of unitarity. Moreover, the first named author showed in his recent article arXiv:1312.7738 that PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed a certain kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics and that in order for time-evolution to be unitary with respect to $J$-inner product (one that gives rise to a Hilbert space structure on the space of state functions), the potential energy operator $V(x)$ must be real. This means that those complex PT-symmetric Hamiltonians that have been studied by physicists are unfortunately unphysical. The first named author discussed in a subsequent article arXiv:1401.5149 that while finite-state PT-symmetric quantum mechanics with time-independent Hamiltonians is not physically any different from Hermitian quantum mechanics, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics exhibits a distinctive symmetry from that of Hermitian quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1303.6339•Mar 25, 2013•0 citations

Open-quantum-system formulation of particle decay

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Walter Grimus, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr

We consider an open quantum system which contains unstable states. The time evolution of the system can be described by an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian ${H}_{\mathrm{eff}}$, in accord with the Wigner-Weisskopf approximation, and an additional term of the Lindblad form, the so-called dissipator. We show that, after enlarging the original Hilbert space by states which represent the decay products of the unstable states, the non-Hermitian part of ${H}_{\mathrm{eff}}$---the ``particle decay''---can be incorporated into the dissipator of the enlarged space via a specific Lindblad operator. Thus the formulation of the time evolution on the enlarged space has a Hermitian Hamiltonian and is probability conserving. The equivalence of the formulation with the original one demonstrates that the time evolution which is governed by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and a dissipator of the Lindblad form is nevertheless completely positive, just as systems with Hermitian Hamiltonians.

arXiv:quant-ph/0602116•Physical Review A•May 1, 2006•95 citations

Consistency of PT-symmetric quantum mechanics

Dorje C. Brody

Abstract In recent reports, suggestions have been put forward to the effect that parity and time-reversal (PT) symmetry in quantum mechanics is incompatible with causality. It is shown here, in contrast, that PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is fully consistent with standard quantum mechanics. This follows from the surprising fact that the much-discussed metric operator on Hilbert space is not physically observable. In particular, for closed quantum systems in finite dimensions there is no statistical test that one can perform on the outcomes of measurements to determine whether the Hamiltonian is Hermitian in the conventional sense, or PT-symmetric—the two theories are indistinguishable. Nontrivial physical effects arising as a consequence of PT symmetry are expected to be observed, nevertheless, for open quantum systems with balanced gain and loss.

arXiv:1508.02190•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 29, 2016•76 citations

The dynamics of spontaneous emission

M. Baldo

The spontaneous decay of an excited atom by photon emission is one of the most common and elementary physical process present in nature and in laboratories. The decay is random in time with constant probability density, as it can be inferred by the exponential law observed experimentally. Despite the simplicity of the process, in Quantum Mechanics the decay itself is considered a law of nature which is not further analyzed or explained. However it is legitimate to ask for the reason of its randomness and for the dynamics of the atom around the decay. The decay process of an isolated atom is usually assumed to be instantaneous, the so called Quantum jumps. Particular experimental arrangements can widen the duration of the transition from an excited state to the ground state to a finite time. In general this is due to the quantum back action of the detector. The development of Quantum Optics has enormously enriched the possibilities to study in detail the process, and new illuminating insights have been obtained, but the question is still valid and its answer is still elusive. In this paper we analyze the spontaneous decay within the new prospect introduced by a recent model that complete standard Quantum Mechanics in a formalism which is able to describe the dynamics of measurement and of spontaneous decay. Comparison is made with more phenomenological theories, the Quantum Mechanics of open system and the Stochastic wave function model. In the new model the stochastic photon emission by an excited atom is triggered by the vacuum fluctuations. It is suggested how to re-analyze three types of experiments, already realized in many laboratories, in order to reveal the presence and the effect of these fluctuations.

arXiv:2505.22164•May 28, 2025•0 citations
When excited states decay the time evolution operator U(t)=e−iHtU(t)=e^{-iHt}U(t)=e−iHt does not obey U†(t)U(t)=IU^{\dagger}(t)U(t)=IU†(t)U(t)=I. Nonetheless, probability conservation is not lost if one includes both excitation and decay, though it takes a different form. Specifically, if the eigenspectrum of a Hamiltonian is complete, then due to CPTCPTCPT symmetry, a symmetry that holds for all physical systems, there must exist an operator VVV that effects VHV−1=H†VHV^{-1}=H^{\dagger}VHV−1=H†, so that V−1U†(t)VU(t)=IV^{-1}U^{\dagger}(t)VU(t)=IV−1U†(t)VU(t)=I. In consequence, the time delay associated with decay must be accompanied by an equal and opposite time advance for excitation. Thus when a photon excites an atom the spontaneous emission of a photon from the excited state must occur without any decay time delay at all. An effect of this form together with an associated negative time delay appear to have recently been reported by Sinclair et. al., PRX Quantum \textbf{3}, 010314 (2022) and Angulo et. al., arXiv:2409.03680 [quant-ph].
When excited states decay with energy ${E}_{0}\ensuremath{-}i\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$ the time evolution operator $U(t)={e}^{\ensuremath{-}iHt}$ does not obey ${U}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}(t)U(t)=I$. Nonetheless, probability conservation is not lost if one includes both decay and excitation with energy ${E}_{0}+i\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}$, though it takes a different form. Specifically, if the eigenspectrum of a Hamiltonian is complete, then due to CPTCPTCPT symmetry, a symmetry that holds for all physical systems, there must exist an operator VVV that effects $VH{V}^{\ensuremath{-}1}={H}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}$, so that ${V}^{\ensuremath{-}1}{U}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}(t)VU(t)=I$. In consequence, because of probability conservation the time delay associated with decay must be accompanied by an equal and opposite time advance for excitation. Thus when a photon excites an atom the spontaneous emission of a photon from the excited state must occur without any decay time delay at all. An effect of this form together with an associated negative time delay has recently been reported by Sinclair et al. [PRX Quantum 3, 010314 (2022)] and Angulo et al. [arXiv:2409.03680].
While Hermiticity of a time-independent Hamiltonian leads to unitary time evolution, in and of itself, the requirement of Hermiticity is only sufficient for unitary time evolution. In this paper, we provide conditions that are both necessary and sufficient. We show that PT symmetry of a time-independent Hamiltonian, or equivalently, reality of the secular equation that determines its eigenvalues, is both necessary and sufficient for unitary time evolution. For any PT-symmetric Hamiltonian H, there always exists an operator V that relates H to its Hermitian adjoint according to VHV(-1)=H(†). When the energy spectrum of H is complete, Hilbert space norms <ψ(1)|V|ψ(2)> constructed with this V are always preserved in time. With the energy eigenvalues of a real secular equation being either real or appearing in complex conjugate pairs, we thus establish the unitarity of time evolution in both cases. We also establish the unitarity of time evolution for Hamiltonians whose energy spectra are not complete. We show that when the energy eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian are real and complete, the operator V is a positive Hermitian operator, which has an associated square root operator that can be used to bring the Hamiltonian to a Hermitian form. We show that systems with PT-symmetric Hamiltonians obey causality. We note that Hermitian theories are ordinarily associated with a path integral quantization prescription in which the path integral measure is real, while in contrast, non-Hermitian but PT-symmetric theories are ordinarily associated with path integrals in which the measure needs to be complex, but in which the Euclidean time continuation of the path integral is nonetheless real. Just as the second-order Klein-Gordon theory is stabilized against transitions to negative frequencies because its Hamiltonian is positive-definite, through PT symmetry, the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck theory can equally be stabilized.
Update: A time-independent n×nn\times nn×n PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonian is diagonalizable since it has all distinct real eigenvalues and the resulting diagonal matrix is a real symmetric matrix. The diagonalization results an isometry so there shouldn't be any issue with unitarity and unfortunately this very elementary mathematical fact somehow did not draw the authors' attention. However, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is not out of trouble. For time-dependent PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonians (even 2×22\times 22×2 ones) the authors observed that there is a violation of unitarity. Moreover, the first named author showed in his recent article arXiv:1312.7738 that PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed a certain kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics and that in order for time-evolution to be unitary with respect to JJJ-inner product (one that gives rise to a Hilbert space structure on the space of state functions), the potential energy operator V(x)V(x)V(x) must be real. This means that those complex PT-symmetric Hamiltonians that have been studied by physicists are unfortunately unphysical. The first named author discussed in a subsequent article arXiv:1401.5149 that while finite-state PT-symmetric quantum mechanics with time-independent Hamiltonians is not physically any different from Hermitian quantum mechanics, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics exhibits a distinctive symmetry from that of Hermitian quantum mechanics.
We consider an open quantum system which contains unstable states. The time evolution of the system can be described by an effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian Heff{H}_{\mathrm{eff}}Heff​, in accord with the Wigner-Weisskopf approximation, and an additional term of the Lindblad form, the so-called dissipator. We show that, after enlarging the original Hilbert space by states which represent the decay products of the unstable states, the non-Hermitian part of Heff{H}_{\mathrm{eff}}Heff​---the ``particle decay''---can be incorporated into the dissipator of the enlarged space via a specific Lindblad operator. Thus the formulation of the time evolution on the enlarged space has a Hermitian Hamiltonian and is probability conserving. The equivalence of the formulation with the original one demonstrates that the time evolution which is governed by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and a dissipator of the Lindblad form is nevertheless completely positive, just as systems with Hermitian Hamiltonians.
Abstract In recent reports, suggestions have been put forward to the effect that parity and time-reversal (PT) symmetry in quantum mechanics is incompatible with causality. It is shown here, in contrast, that PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is fully consistent with standard quantum mechanics. This follows from the surprising fact that the much-discussed metric operator on Hilbert space is not physically observable. In particular, for closed quantum systems in finite dimensions there is no statistical test that one can perform on the outcomes of measurements to determine whether the Hamiltonian is Hermitian in the conventional sense, or PT-symmetric—the two theories are indistinguishable. Nontrivial physical effects arising as a consequence of PT symmetry are expected to be observed, nevertheless, for open quantum systems with balanced gain and loss.
The spontaneous decay of an excited atom by photon emission is one of the most common and elementary physical process present in nature and in laboratories. The decay is random in time with constant probability density, as it can be inferred by the exponential law observed experimentally. Despite the simplicity of the process, in Quantum Mechanics the decay itself is considered a law of nature which is not further analyzed or explained. However it is legitimate to ask for the reason of its randomness and for the dynamics of the atom around the decay. The decay process of an isolated atom is usually assumed to be instantaneous, the so called Quantum jumps. Particular experimental arrangements can widen the duration of the transition from an excited state to the ground state to a finite time. In general this is due to the quantum back action of the detector. The development of Quantum Optics has enormously enriched the possibilities to study in detail the process, and new illuminating insights have been obtained, but the question is still valid and its answer is still elusive. In this paper we analyze the spontaneous decay within the new prospect introduced by a recent model that complete standard Quantum Mechanics in a formalism which is able to describe the dynamics of measurement and of spontaneous decay. Comparison is made with more phenomenological theories, the Quantum Mechanics of open system and the Stochastic wave function model. In the new model the stochastic photon emission by an excited atom is triggered by the vacuum fluctuations. It is suggested how to re-analyze three types of experiments, already realized in many laboratories, in order to reveal the presence and the effect of these fluctuations.