Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2410.02354

Is a particle an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group?

Adam Caulton

Published Oct 3, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The claim that a particle is an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group -- what I call \emph{Wigner's identification} -- is now, decades on from Wigner's (1939) original paper, so much a part of particle physics folklore that it is often taken as, or claimed to be, a definition. My aims in this paper are to: (i) clarify, and partially defend, the guiding ideas behind this identification; (ii) raise objections to its being an adequate definition; and (iii) offer a rival characterisation of particles. My main objections to Wigner's identification appeal to the problem of interacting particles, and to alternative spacetimes. I argue that the link implied in Wigner's identification, between a spacetime's symmetries and the generator of a particle's space of states, is at best misleading, and that there is no good reason to link the generator of a particle's space of states to symmetries of any kind. I propose an alternative characterisation of particles, which captures both the relativistic and non-relativistic setting. I further defend this proposal by appeal to a theorem which links the decomposition of Poincaré generators into purely orbital and spin components with canonical algebraic relations between position, momentum and spin.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2410.02354

Related papers

Relativistic Particle Theories Without Canonical Quantization

Nisticò, Giuseppe

The diffculties of relativistic particle theories formulated my means of canonical quantization, such as Klein-Gordon and Dirac theories, ultimately led theoretical physicists to turn on quantum field theory to model elementary particle physics. The aim of the present work is to pursue a method alternative to canonical quantization that avoids these dfficulties. In order to guarantee this result, the present approach is constrained to be developed deductively from physical principles. The physical principles assumed for a free particle consist of the symmetry properties of the particle with respect to the Poincaré group and of the transformation properties of the position observable, expressed by means of a suitably conceived notion of quantum transformation. In so doing, the effectiveness of group theoretical methods is exploited. Our work has pointed out the necessity of new classes of irreducible representations of the Poincaré group the theory can be based on. For spin 0 particle, four inequivalent theories are completely determined, that differ from Klein-Gordon theory for the physical interpretation but also for the mathematical structures. In particular, two of these theories requires irreducible representations in the new classes. The present lack of the explicit transformation properties of position with respect to boosts forbids the complete determination of non zero spin particle theories. A particular form of these transformation properties was in past adopted by Jordan and Mukunda. We check its consistency within the present approach; it is found that for spin 1/2 particles there is only one consistent theory; it is unitarily related to Dirac theory, but, once again, it requires the new classes of irreducible representations.

arXiv:1811.01546•Nov 5, 2018•1 citation

On some representations of the Poincaré group on phase space. II

S. Twareque Ali

Representations of the proper Poincaré group on spaces of functions of the phase space variables q and p have been studied, by starting with the rotation subgroup SO(3), and carrying out an inducing procedure. A complete decomposition theory, for the physically interesting representations, have been developed. Explicit computations of the forms of the generators and certain systems of imprimitivity have been carried out. The role of the Newton–Wigner position and momentum operators, in the setting of phase space representations, has been discussed. The work is a continuation of an earlier paper on phase space representations, inspired ultimately by the possibility of developing a consistent relativistic quantum mechanics for single particles on phase space.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 1980•18 citations

Relativistic few-body physics

Wayne Nicholas Polyzou

I discuss different formulations of the relativistic few-body problem with an emphasis on how they are related. I first discuss the implications of some of the differences with non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Then I point out that the principle of special relativity in quantum mechanics implies that the quantum theory has a Poincar\'e symmetry, which is realized by a unitary representation of the Poincar\'e group. This representation can always be decomposed into direct integrals of irreducible representations and the different formulations differ only in how these irreducible representations are realized. I discuss how these representations appear in different formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics and discuss some applications in each of these frameworks.

•Aug 15, 2016•1 citation

The Wigner-Newton state localization and the commutativity of the configuration space

R. M. Mir‐Kasimov

The commutativity requirement of the components of the position operator is implicitly included in the set of the Wigner-Newton postulates defining the localized state of the relativistic particle. By omitting this constraint, we obtain a more general concept of localization based on the representation of the Poincare group.

Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters•Oct 1, 2006•5 citations

What Is a Particle? / ¿Qué es una partícula?

Juan Segurola

The word particle survives in physics with almost none of its original content. A classical particle is a small object with a definite position at each moment, following a trajectory. Quantum states and amplitudes can interfere, and their predictions are not captured by a classical-particle trajectory ontology. What replaces the classical picture is a classification: Wigner showed that the possible one-particle states of a relativistic quantum theory correspond to irreducible representations of spacetime symmetry, labelled by invariants such as mass and spin. This article follows what the word retains, including the surprising result that particle number is not an observer-independent quantity, and what it has to give up. What is left is discrete detection events, conserved quantum numbers and invariant labels, which is a different kind of answer from a picture. La palabra partícula sobrevive en física casi sin nada de su contenido original. Una partícula clásica es un objeto pequeño con posición definida en cada instante que sigue una trayectoria. Los estados y las amplitudes cuánticos pueden interferir, y sus predicciones no quedan recogidas por una ontología de trayectorias de partículas clásicas. Lo que sustituye a la imagen clásica es una clasificación: Wigner mostró que los posibles estados de una partícula en una teoría cuántica relativista corresponden a representaciones irreducibles de la simetría del espaciotiempo, etiquetadas por invariantes como la masa y el espín. Este artículo sigue qué conserva la palabra, incluido el resultado sorprendente de que el número de partículas no es una magnitud independiente del observador, y qué debe ceder. Lo que queda son sucesos discretos de detección, números cuánticos conservados y etiquetas invariantes, que es una respuesta de otro tipo que una imagen.

•Sep 19, 2026•0 citations

Quantum theory in real Hilbert space: How the complex Hilbert space structure emerges from Poincaré symmetry

Valter Moretti, Marco Oppio

As earlier conjectured by several authors and much later established by Solèr (relying on partial results by Piron, Maeda–Maeda and other authors), from the lattice theory point of view, Quantum Mechanics may be formulated in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces only. Stückelberg provided some physical, but not mathematically rigorous, reasons for ruling out the real Hilbert space formulation, assuming that any formulation should encompass a statement of Heisenberg principle. Focusing on this issue from another — in our opinion, deeper — viewpoint, we argue that there is a general fundamental reason why elementary quantum systems are not described in real Hilbert spaces. It is their basic symmetry group. In the first part of the paper, we consider an elementary relativistic system within Wigner’s approach defined as a locally-faithful irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representation of the Poincaré group in a real Hilbert space. We prove that, if the squared-mass operator is non-negative, the system admits a natural, Poincaré invariant and unique up to sign, complex structure which commutes with the whole algebra of observables generated by the representation itself. This complex structure leads to a physically equivalent reformulation of the theory in a complex Hilbert space. Within this complex formulation, differently from what happens in the real one, all selfadjoint operators represent observables in accordance with Solèr’s thesis, and the standard quantum version of Noether theorem may be formulated. In the second part of this work, we focus on the physical hypotheses adopted to define a quantum elementary relativistic system relaxing them on the one hand, and making our model physically more general on the other hand. We use a physically more accurate notion of irreducibility regarding the algebra of observables only, we describe the symmetries in terms of automorphisms of the restricted lattice of elementary propositions of the quantum system and we adopt a notion of continuity referred to the states viewed as probability measures on the elementary propositions. Also in this case, the final result proves that there exists a unique (up to sign) Poincaré invariant complex structure making the theory complex and completely fitting into Solèr’s picture. This complex structure reveals a nice interplay of Poincaré symmetry and the classification of the commutant of irreducible real von Neumann algebras.

arXiv:1611.09029•Reviews in Mathematical Physics•Jun 13, 2017•32 citations
The claim that a particle is an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group -- what I call \emph{Wigner's identification} -- is now, decades on from Wigner's (1939) original paper, so much a part of particle physics folklore that it is often taken as, or claimed to be, a definition. My aims in this paper are to: (i) clarify, and partially defend, the guiding ideas behind this identification; (ii) raise objections to its being an adequate definition; and (iii) offer a rival characterisation of particles. My main objections to Wigner's identification appeal to the problem of interacting particles, and to alternative spacetimes. I argue that the link implied in Wigner's identification, between a spacetime's symmetries and the generator of a particle's space of states, is at best misleading, and that there is no good reason to link the generator of a particle's space of states to symmetries of any kind. I propose an alternative characterisation of particles, which captures both the relativistic and non-relativistic setting. I further defend this proposal by appeal to a theorem which links the decomposition of Poincaré generators into purely orbital and spin components with canonical algebraic relations between position, momentum and spin.
The diffculties of relativistic particle theories formulated my means of canonical quantization, such as Klein-Gordon and Dirac theories, ultimately led theoretical physicists to turn on quantum field theory to model elementary particle physics. The aim of the present work is to pursue a method alternative to canonical quantization that avoids these dfficulties. In order to guarantee this result, the present approach is constrained to be developed deductively from physical principles. The physical principles assumed for a free particle consist of the symmetry properties of the particle with respect to the Poincaré group and of the transformation properties of the position observable, expressed by means of a suitably conceived notion of quantum transformation. In so doing, the effectiveness of group theoretical methods is exploited. Our work has pointed out the necessity of new classes of irreducible representations of the Poincaré group the theory can be based on. For spin 0 particle, four inequivalent theories are completely determined, that differ from Klein-Gordon theory for the physical interpretation but also for the mathematical structures. In particular, two of these theories requires irreducible representations in the new classes. The present lack of the explicit transformation properties of position with respect to boosts forbids the complete determination of non zero spin particle theories. A particular form of these transformation properties was in past adopted by Jordan and Mukunda. We check its consistency within the present approach; it is found that for spin 1/2 particles there is only one consistent theory; it is unitarily related to Dirac theory, but, once again, it requires the new classes of irreducible representations.
Representations of the proper Poincaré group on spaces of functions of the phase space variables q and p have been studied, by starting with the rotation subgroup SO(3), and carrying out an inducing procedure. A complete decomposition theory, for the physically interesting representations, have been developed. Explicit computations of the forms of the generators and certain systems of imprimitivity have been carried out. The role of the Newton–Wigner position and momentum operators, in the setting of phase space representations, has been discussed. The work is a continuation of an earlier paper on phase space representations, inspired ultimately by the possibility of developing a consistent relativistic quantum mechanics for single particles on phase space.
I discuss different formulations of the relativistic few-body problem with an emphasis on how they are related. I first discuss the implications of some of the differences with non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Then I point out that the principle of special relativity in quantum mechanics implies that the quantum theory has a Poincar\'e symmetry, which is realized by a unitary representation of the Poincar\'e group. This representation can always be decomposed into direct integrals of irreducible representations and the different formulations differ only in how these irreducible representations are realized. I discuss how these representations appear in different formulations of relativistic quantum mechanics and discuss some applications in each of these frameworks.
The word particle survives in physics with almost none of its original content. A classical particle is a small object with a definite position at each moment, following a trajectory. Quantum states and amplitudes can interfere, and their predictions are not captured by a classical-particle trajectory ontology. What replaces the classical picture is a classification: Wigner showed that the possible one-particle states of a relativistic quantum theory correspond to irreducible representations of spacetime symmetry, labelled by invariants such as mass and spin. This article follows what the word retains, including the surprising result that particle number is not an observer-independent quantity, and what it has to give up. What is left is discrete detection events, conserved quantum numbers and invariant labels, which is a different kind of answer from a picture. La palabra partícula sobrevive en física casi sin nada de su contenido original. Una partícula clásica es un objeto pequeño con posición definida en cada instante que sigue una trayectoria. Los estados y las amplitudes cuánticos pueden interferir, y sus predicciones no quedan recogidas por una ontología de trayectorias de partículas clásicas. Lo que sustituye a la imagen clásica es una clasificación: Wigner mostró que los posibles estados de una partícula en una teoría cuántica relativista corresponden a representaciones irreducibles de la simetría del espaciotiempo, etiquetadas por invariantes como la masa y el espín. Este artículo sigue qué conserva la palabra, incluido el resultado sorprendente de que el número de partículas no es una magnitud independiente del observador, y qué debe ceder. Lo que queda son sucesos discretos de detección, números cuánticos conservados y etiquetas invariantes, que es una respuesta de otro tipo que una imagen.
As earlier conjectured by several authors and much later established by Solèr (relying on partial results by Piron, Maeda–Maeda and other authors), from the lattice theory point of view, Quantum Mechanics may be formulated in real, complex or quaternionic Hilbert spaces only. Stückelberg provided some physical, but not mathematically rigorous, reasons for ruling out the real Hilbert space formulation, assuming that any formulation should encompass a statement of Heisenberg principle. Focusing on this issue from another — in our opinion, deeper — viewpoint, we argue that there is a general fundamental reason why elementary quantum systems are not described in real Hilbert spaces. It is their basic symmetry group. In the first part of the paper, we consider an elementary relativistic system within Wigner’s approach defined as a locally-faithful irreducible strongly-continuous unitary representation of the Poincaré group in a real Hilbert space. We prove that, if the squared-mass operator is non-negative, the system admits a natural, Poincaré invariant and unique up to sign, complex structure which commutes with the whole algebra of observables generated by the representation itself. This complex structure leads to a physically equivalent reformulation of the theory in a complex Hilbert space. Within this complex formulation, differently from what happens in the real one, all selfadjoint operators represent observables in accordance with Solèr’s thesis, and the standard quantum version of Noether theorem may be formulated. In the second part of this work, we focus on the physical hypotheses adopted to define a quantum elementary relativistic system relaxing them on the one hand, and making our model physically more general on the other hand. We use a physically more accurate notion of irreducibility regarding the algebra of observables only, we describe the symmetries in terms of automorphisms of the restricted lattice of elementary propositions of the quantum system and we adopt a notion of continuity referred to the states viewed as probability measures on the elementary propositions. Also in this case, the final result proves that there exists a unique (up to sign) Poincaré invariant complex structure making the theory complex and completely fitting into Solèr’s picture. This complex structure reveals a nice interplay of Poincaré symmetry and the classification of the commutant of irreducible real von Neumann algebras.