Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2403.18050

Double well ground state energy splitting (or instanton flipping rate); rendering the implicit explicit

J H Hannay

Published Mar 26, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A prime example of quantum tunnelling is the semiclassical 'energy splitting' of the levels of a symmetrical double well potential, or equivalently the flipping rate of an instanton. Curiously the accepted expression for the ground state energy splitting in terms of the (smooth) potential function has not been pursued to the full explicitness available from classical mechanics. This implicitness is rectified here.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2403.18050

Related papers

Tunneling and energy splitting in an asymmetric double-well potential

Dae-Yup Song

An asymmetric double-well potential is considered, assuming that the minima of the wells are quadratic with a frequency ω and the difference of the minima is close to a multiple of �ω. A WKB wave function is constructed on both sides of the local maximum between the wells, by matching the WKB function to the exact wave functions near the classical turning points. The continuities of the wave function and its first derivative at the local maximum then give the energy-level splitting formula, which not only reproduces the instanton result for a symmetric potential, but also elucidates the appearance of resonances of tunneling in the asymmetric potential. Key words: quantum tunneling, energy splitting, double-well potential PACS: 03.65.Sq, 03.65.Ge, 82.20.Xr 1

•Aug 4, 2013•22 citations

Tunnel splittings for one-dimensional potential wells revisited

Anupam Garg

The Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin and instanton answers for the tunnel splitting of the ground state in a symmetric double-well potential are both reduced to an expression involving only functionals of the potential, without the need for solving any auxilliary problems. This formula is applied to simple model problems. The prefactor for the splitting in the textbook by Landau and Lifshitz is amended so as to apply to the ground and low lying excited states.

arXiv:cond-mat/0003115•American Journal of Physics•May 1, 2000•120 citations

Tunneling in asymmetric double well: instanton calculus

Alejandro Rivero

The level splitting formula of an asymmetric double well potential is calculated taking into account the multi-instanton contributions (dilute gas approximation). Results can be related with known semiclassical ones obtained with a truncated hamiltonian, and the symmetric case is easily recovered.

arXiv:quant-ph/0209072•Sep 11, 2002•0 citations

Tunnel splittings for one dimensional potential wells revisited

Anupam Garg

The WKB and instanton answers for the tunnel splitting of the ground state in a symmetric double well potential are both reduced to an expression involving only the functionals of the potential, without the need for solving any auxilliary problems. This formula is applied to simple model problems. The prefactor for the splitting in the text book by Landau and Lifshitz is amended so as to apply to the ground and low lying excited states. Typeset using REVTEX 1 I.

•Jan 1, 2000•72 citations

Alternative perspective on quantum tunneling and instantons

Frédérik Paradis, H. Kröger, G. Melkonyan +1 more

We present an alternative way to compute and interpret quantum tunneling in a one-dimensional double-well potential. For large transition time we show that the quantum action functional gives an analytical expression for tunneling amplitudes. This has been confirmed by numerical simulations giving relative errors in the order of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$. In contrast to the classical potential, the quantum potential has a triple well if the classical wells are deep enough. Its minima are located at the positions of extrema of the ground state wave function. The striking feature is that a single trajectory with a double instanton reproduces the tunneling amplitude. This is in contrast to the standard instanton approach, where infinitely many instantons and anti-instantons have to be taken into account. The quantum action functional is valid in the deep quantum regime in contrast to the semiclassical regime where the standard instanton approach holds. We compare both approaches via numerical simulations. While the standard instanton picture describes only the transition between potential minima of equal depth, the quantum action may give rise to instantons also for asymmetric potential minima. Such a case is illustrated by an example.

arXiv:quant-ph/0408051•Physical Review A•Feb 16, 2005•1 citation

Multidimensional tunneling in terms of complex classical mechanics: Wave functions, energy splittings, and decay rates in nonintegrable systems

Shoji Takada

A semiclassical theory of multidimensional tunneling is formulated to calculate the tunneling wave function, energy splitting in a double well and decay rate constant from a metastable state. First, the tunneling wave function is calculated by analytic continuation of a quantized torus prepared in analytic forms using either the Chapman–Garrett–Miller method or the Birkhoff–Gustavson normal form method. For a weakly nonintegrable system, tunnelings are confirmed to be classified into two qualitatively different domains; pure tunneling in the I region and mixed tunneling in the C region. Semiclassical wave functions agree with quantum mechanical ones within a few percent both in classically allowed and tunneling regions. Breakdown of this simple picture is exemplified for cases of relatively strong couplings. Second, expressions of the tunneling energy splitting in a double well potential and the decay rate from a metastable state are derived. The wave function near a well formulated above is connected with the semiclassical Green’s function in the deep tunneling region. The latter is expressed by complex trajectories which start from the complex quantized torus. A preliminary numerical comparison with the quantum mechanical value is also done for the energy splitting.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Mar 8, 1996•28 citations
A prime example of quantum tunnelling is the semiclassical 'energy splitting' of the levels of a symmetrical double well potential, or equivalently the flipping rate of an instanton. Curiously the accepted expression for the ground state energy splitting in terms of the (smooth) potential function has not been pursued to the full explicitness available from classical mechanics. This implicitness is rectified here.
An asymmetric double-well potential is considered, assuming that the minima of the wells are quadratic with a frequency ω and the difference of the minima is close to a multiple of �ω. A WKB wave function is constructed on both sides of the local maximum between the wells, by matching the WKB function to the exact wave functions near the classical turning points. The continuities of the wave function and its first derivative at the local maximum then give the energy-level splitting formula, which not only reproduces the instanton result for a symmetric potential, but also elucidates the appearance of resonances of tunneling in the asymmetric potential. Key words: quantum tunneling, energy splitting, double-well potential PACS: 03.65.Sq, 03.65.Ge, 82.20.Xr 1
We present an alternative way to compute and interpret quantum tunneling in a one-dimensional double-well potential. For large transition time we show that the quantum action functional gives an analytical expression for tunneling amplitudes. This has been confirmed by numerical simulations giving relative errors in the order of ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}$. In contrast to the classical potential, the quantum potential has a triple well if the classical wells are deep enough. Its minima are located at the positions of extrema of the ground state wave function. The striking feature is that a single trajectory with a double instanton reproduces the tunneling amplitude. This is in contrast to the standard instanton approach, where infinitely many instantons and anti-instantons have to be taken into account. The quantum action functional is valid in the deep quantum regime in contrast to the semiclassical regime where the standard instanton approach holds. We compare both approaches via numerical simulations. While the standard instanton picture describes only the transition between potential minima of equal depth, the quantum action may give rise to instantons also for asymmetric potential minima. Such a case is illustrated by an example.
A semiclassical theory of multidimensional tunneling is formulated to calculate the tunneling wave function, energy splitting in a double well and decay rate constant from a metastable state. First, the tunneling wave function is calculated by analytic continuation of a quantized torus prepared in analytic forms using either the Chapman–Garrett–Miller method or the Birkhoff–Gustavson normal form method. For a weakly nonintegrable system, tunnelings are confirmed to be classified into two qualitatively different domains; pure tunneling in the I region and mixed tunneling in the C region. Semiclassical wave functions agree with quantum mechanical ones within a few percent both in classically allowed and tunneling regions. Breakdown of this simple picture is exemplified for cases of relatively strong couplings. Second, expressions of the tunneling energy splitting in a double well potential and the decay rate from a metastable state are derived. The wave function near a well formulated above is connected with the semiclassical Green’s function in the deep tunneling region. The latter is expressed by complex trajectories which start from the complex quantized torus. A preliminary numerical comparison with the quantum mechanical value is also done for the energy splitting.