A ubiquitous feature of quantum mechanical theories is the existence of states of superposition. This is expected to be no different for a quantum gravity theory. Guided by this consideration and others we consider a framework in which classical reference frames may be in superposition relative to one another. Mirroring standard quantum mechanics we introduce a complex-valued wavefunctional, which takes as input the transformations between the coordinates, Ψ[x(x′)], with the interpretation that an interaction between the reference frames may select a particular transformation with probability distribution given by the Born rule — P[x(x′)] = probability distribution functional ≡ |Ψ[x(x′)]|2. The cases of two and three reference frames in superposition are considered explicitly. It is shown that the set of transformations is closed. A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated.
A ubiquitous feature of quantum mechanical theories is the existence of states of superposition. This is expected to be no different for a quantum gravity theory. Guided by this consideration and others we consider a framework in which classical reference frames may be in superposition relative to one another. Mirroring standard quantum mechanics we introduce a complex-valued wavefunctional, which takes as input the transformations between the coordinates, Ψ[x(x′)], with the interpretation that an interaction between the reference frames may select a particular transformation with probability distribution given by the Born rule — P[x(x′)] = probability distribution functional ≡ |Ψ[x(x′)]|2. The cases of two and three reference frames in superposition are considered explicitly. It is shown that the set of transformations is closed. A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated.
A quantum mechanical observer might be describable as having a reference system that is a superposition of classical inertial reference frames. The present paper suggests a possible weighting function in such superpositions, determined by the product of the observer's wavefunction and the Fourier transform of the wavefunction at each point in phase space. This suggestion is made because each of these factors has a simple interpretation as a probability density amplitude. Other forms for the weighting function may well be possible.
In physics, every observation is made with respect to a frame of reference. Although reference frames are usually not considered as degrees of freedom, in all practical situations it is a physical system which constitutes a reference frame. Can a quantum system be considered as a reference frame and, if so, which description would it give of the world? Here, we introduce a general method to quantise reference frame transformations, which generalises the usual reference frame transformation to a "superposition of coordinate transformations". We describe states, measurement, and dynamical evolution in different quantum reference frames, without appealing to an external, absolute reference frame, and find that entanglement and superposition are frame-dependent features. The transformation also leads to a generalisation of the notion of covariance of dynamical physical laws, to an extension of the weak equivalence principle, and to the possibility of defining the rest frame of a quantum system.
The standard formalism of quantum mechanics is extended to describe a total system including the reference system (RS), with respect to which the total system is described. The RS is assumed to be able to act as a measuring apparatus, with measurement records given by the values of some reference properties of the RS. In order to describe the total system, we define a frame of reference (FR) as a set of states that can be used to express all other states of the total system. The theory is based on four basic postulates, which have, loosely speaking, the following contents. (i) A reference property of a RS has a definite value and is sufficiently stable in the FR directly related to the reference property. (ii) States of the total system are associated with vectors in the Hilbert space. (iii) Schrodinger equation is the dynamical law in each valid FR. (iv) Under certain condition a property of a system can be regarded as a reference property; vector descriptions of the total system given in different FRs of the same RS may have a probabilistic relationship like in Born's rule.
The standard formalism of quantum mechanics is extended to describe a total system including the reference system (RS), with respect to which the total system is described. The RS is assumed to be able to act as a measuring apparatus, with measurement records given by the values of some reference properties of the RS. In order to describe the total system, we define a frame of reference (FR) as a set of states that can be used to express all other states of the total system. The theory is based on four basic postulates, which have, loosely speaking, the following contents. (i) A reference property of a RS has a definite value and is sufficiently stable in the FR directly related to the reference property. (ii) States of the total system are associated with vectors in the Hilbert space. (iii) Schrödinger equation is the dynamical law in each valid FR. (iv) Under certain condition a property of a system can be regarded as a reference property; vector descriptions of the total system given in different FRs of the same RS may have a probabilistic relationship like in Born's rule.
The superposition rule for probability amplitudes ψ is not a separate ad hoc assumption of a physical character but is a formal consequence of the arrangement of the states of a system in sets of mutually orthogonal states linked by probabilities of transition. Nor do the quantum prescriptions of Born and Schrödinger have to be introduced as ad hoc assumptions; they can be deduced as consequences of (a) the superposition rule, and (b) the definition of conjugates q and p as leading to a constant probability density in qp-space, a quality known from classical statistical mechanics. Quantum theory can thus be deduced from a nonquantal background.
Quantum permutations, or magic unitaries, have in recent years been explored in the context of identifying `genuinely quantum' isometries of graphs. Here, we import this tool in physics, showing that quantum permutations yield a generalisation of quantum reference frames in a discrete setting that is reminiscent of the passage from special to general relativity. We show that the typical quantum reference frames framework corresponds to quantum permutations classified as `classical' in the mathematical literature, and which we demonstrate are quantum controlled transformations (superpositions of classical coordinate maps). Genuinely quantum permutations (i) allow to construct \emph{non--commuting} quantum reference frames (ii) correspond to \emph{local}, as opposed to global, superpositions of transformations. Strikingly, we find that the non-commutativity of quantum fields, when used as reference systems, is exactly what implies that the change of frame is achieved through a genuine quantum permutation. We illustrate the above with several examples in both first and second quantization formalism, which demonstrate (a) simultaneous control on non--commuting variables, (b) the existence of bipartite states that can be localized with a genuine quantum permutation and cannot be localized with the usual quantum reference frame transformations (without introducing additional degrees of freedom), (c) extension of the Ising model symmetries to genuinely quantum permutations, and (d) extension of the symmetries of a scalar field action on curved spacetime to genuinely quantum permutations. While we have in mind applications in quantum gravity, we expect our formalism to be of interest in a wide range of topics in quantum information.