A quantum mechanical observer might be describable as having a reference system that is a superposition of classical inertial reference frames. The present paper suggests a possible weighting function in such superpositions, determined by the product of the observer's wavefunction and the Fourier transform of the wavefunction at each point in phase space. This suggestion is made because each of these factors has a simple interpretation as a probability density amplitude. Other forms for the weighting function may well be possible.
A quantum mechanical observer might be describable as having a reference system that is a superposition of classical inertial reference frames. The present paper suggests a possible weighting function in such superpositions, determined by the product of the observer's wavefunction and the Fourier transform of the wavefunction at each point in phase space. This suggestion is made because each of these factors has a simple interpretation as a probability density amplitude. Other forms for the weighting function may well be possible.
A ubiquitous feature of quantum mechanical theories is the existence of states of superposition. This is expected to be no different for a quantum gravity theory. Guided by this consideration and others we consider a framework in which classical reference frames may be in superposition relative to one another. Mirroring standard quantum mechanics we introduce a complex-valued wavefunctional, which takes as input the transformations between the coordinates, Ψ[x(x′)], with the interpretation that an interaction between the reference frames may select a particular transformation with probability distribution given by the Born rule — P[x(x′)] = probability distribution functional ≡ |Ψ[x(x′)]|2. The cases of two and three reference frames in superposition are considered explicitly. It is shown that the set of transformations is closed. A rule for transforming wavefunctions from one system to another system in superposition is proposed and consistency with the Schrodinger equation is demonstrated.
In physics, every observation is made with respect to a frame of reference. Although reference frames are usually not considered as degrees of freedom, in all practical situations it is a physical system which constitutes a reference frame. Can a quantum system be considered as a reference frame and, if so, which description would it give of the world? Here, we introduce a general method to quantise reference frame transformations, which generalises the usual reference frame transformation to a "superposition of coordinate transformations". We describe states, measurement, and dynamical evolution in different quantum reference frames, without appealing to an external, absolute reference frame, and find that entanglement and superposition are frame-dependent features. The transformation also leads to a generalisation of the notion of covariance of dynamical physical laws, to an extension of the weak equivalence principle, and to the possibility of defining the rest frame of a quantum system.
In their strongest usage, quantum reference frames have been described as referring to "the measurements performed by a superposed lab", "the perspective of a quantum particle", "the point of view of a superposed observer", etc. While exciting, these operational proposals have remained brief and ambiguous, leading to misinterpretations and criticism. Here, we provide a detailed specification and defense of the notion of a position-superposed lab or observer. We argue that this requires no exotic claims about quantum physics and raises no greater interpretive difficulty than ordinary quantum measurements. We then derive several consequences of taking this operational meaning seriously. We stress that the position-superposed observers that define quantum references frames are different from, and considerably less problematic than, the outcome-superposed observers considered in Wigners' friend scenarios. In particular, we show that outcomes obtained by a position-superposed observer may (without decohering the superposition) be broadcast to a well-localised one, in contrast with Wigner's friend scenarios, which require the outcomes to remain internal to the system at hand. Finally, we defend the possibility to roleplay a quantum reference frame from a classical reference frame.
A new type of representation of the wave function of quantum mechanics, and a new form of the statistical interpretation of the wave function, are presented. The variable in the new representation is a mapping of points of differential space, closely related to Hilbert space, but having an associated measure for suitably defined sets of points in it. In the new statistical interpretation, an eigenvalue of every observable defined in the system is associated with each point in differential space. This can be done in such a way that, for each observable, the measure (=probability) of the set of all differential-space points belonging to a given set of eigenvalues is equal to the quantum-mechanical probability, calculated in the usual way (Born statistical postulate), that an experiment will yield an eigenvalue in this set. Thus we obtain an interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of probability densities or probabilities instead of probability amplitudes.
We propose an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the wavefunction represents unresolved potential relative to an observer, measurement is deterministic resonance stabilisation, and Born-rule probability quantifies the observer’s incomplete access to the full entropic and phase-geometric state of the observer–system interaction. An observer is defined operationally as any bounded system capable of converting external entropy into internal coherence. On this view,superposition is not a set of co-existing realities but an unresolved field of possible coherence resolutions; collapse is not a stochastic discontinuity but a deterministic phase-lock between observer and system; and the classical world is the high-coherence limit in which environmental observation is dense enough to continuously stabilise macroscopic facts.The interpretation preserves the full predictive machinery of quantum mechanics while providing a unified account of the measurement problem, the Born rule, decoherence, entanglement, delayed choice, Wigner’s friend, and the quantum-to-classical transition. We formalise the framework through a resonance-selection rule, an observer equation of collapse, and a prime-modal state-space structure, and identify five classes of empirically accessible predictions.