Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2310.10885 · Physical Review A

Calibrating the role of entanglement in variational quantum circuits

Azar C. Nakhl, Thomas Quella, Muhammad Usman

Published Mar 13, 2024• 22 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Entanglement is a key property of quantum computing that separates it from its classical counterpart; however, its exact role in the performance of quantum algorithms, especially variational quantum algorithms, is not well understood. In this work, we utilize tensor network methods to systematically probe the role of entanglement in the working of two variational quantum algorithms, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) and quantum neural networks (QNNs), on prototypical problems under controlled entanglement environments. We find that for the max-cut problem solved using QAOA, the fidelity as a function of entanglement is highly dependent on the number of layers, layout of edges in the graph, and edge density, generally exhibiting that a high number of layers indicates a higher resilience to truncation of entanglement. This is in contrast to previous studies based on no more than four QAOA layers which show that the fidelity of QAOA follows a scaling law for circuits. Contrarily, in the case of QNNs, trained circuits with high test accuracies are underpinned by higher entanglement, with any enforced limitation in entanglement resulting in a sharp decline in test accuracy. This is corroborated by the entanglement entropy of these circuits which is consistently high suggesting that, unlike QAOA, QNNs may require quantum devices capable of generating highly entangled states. Overall, our work provides a deeper understanding of the role of entanglement in the working of variational quantum algorithms which may help to implement these algorithms on NISQ-era quantum hardware in a way that maximizes their accuracies.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.109.032413

Related papers

How Much Entanglement Do Quantum Optimization Algorithms Require?

Yanzhu Chen, Zhu, Linghua, Chenxu Liu +3 more

Many classical optimization problems can be mapped to finding the ground states of diagonal Ising Hamiltonians, for which variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) provide heuristic methods. Because the solutions of such classical optimization problems are necessarily product states, it is unclear how entanglement affects their performance. An Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Problem-Tailored (ADAPT) variation of QAOA improves the convergence rate by allowing entangling operations in the mixer layers whereas it requires fewer CNOT gates in the entire circuit. In this work, we study the entanglement generated during the execution of ADAPT-QAOA. Through simulations of the weighted Max-Cut problem, we show that ADAPT-QAOA exhibits substantial flexibility in entangling and disentangling qubits. By incrementally restricting this flexibility, we find that a larger amount of entanglement entropy at earlier stages coincides with faster convergence at later stages. In contrast, while the standard QAOA quickly generates entanglement within a few layers, it cannot remove excess entanglement efficiently. Our results demonstrate that the role of entanglement in quantum optimization is subtle and provide guidance for building favorable features into quantum optimization algorithms.

arXiv:2205.12283•May 24, 2022•1 citation

Role of overparametrization in quantum approximate optimization

Daniil Rabinovich, Andrey Kardashin, Soumik Adhikary

Variational quantum algorithms have emerged as a cornerstone of contemporary quantum algorithms research. While they have demonstrated considerable promise in solving problems of practical interest, efficiently determining the minimal quantum resources necessary to obtain such a solution remains an open question. In this work, inspired by concepts from classical machine learning, we investigate the impact of overparameterization on the performance of variational algorithms. Our study focuses on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) -- a prominent variational quantum algorithm designed to solve combinatorial optimization problems. We investigate if circuit overparametrization is necessary and sufficient to solve such problems in QAOA, considering two representative problems -- MAX-CUT and MAX-2-SAT. For MAX-CUT we observe that overparametriation is both sufficient and (statistically) necessary for attaining exact solutions, as confirmed numerically for up to $20$ qubits. In fact, for MAX-CUT on 2-regular graphs we show the necessity to be exact, based on the analytically found optimal depth. In sharp contrast, for MAX-2-SAT, underparametrized circuits suffice to solve most instances. This result highlights the potential of QAOA in the underparametrized regime, supporting its utility for current noisy devices.

arXiv:2508.10086•Physical Review A•May 26, 2026•0 citations

Detrimental Agnostic Entanglement: The Case Against Hardware-Efficient Ansätze for Combinatorial Optimization

Tobias Rohe, Markus Baumann, Federico Harjes Ruiloba +3 more

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) for combinatorial optimization routinely employ entangling gates as a default design choice, yet the role of entanglement, in its amount and structure, remains poorly understood. This gap is particularly consequential for problems governed by diagonal Hamiltonians, whose ground states are classical product states and therefore require no entanglement in principle, raising the fundamental question of whether and how entangling gates help or hinder the variational search. We investigate this question for MaxCut by introducing two complementary control mechanisms that provide smooth, monotonic control over hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) entanglement as quantified by the Meyer-Wallach measure $Q$, and by benchmarking against QAOA as a problem-structured reference. Tracking the entanglement trajectory $Q(t)$ throughout VQA training reveals that when the ansatz grants the optimizer indirect control over entanglement through its parameters, it consistently drives entanglement down. In line with this tendency, a fully separable ansatz outperforms all entangled hardware-efficient configurations, establishing a monotonic relationship: less problem-agnostic entanglement yields better performance. In contrast, QAOA, whose entanglement is structurally derived from the problem Hamiltonian, maintains high entanglement yet achieves competitive solution quality, demonstrating that entanglement structure, not merely quantity, determines its utility. These findings suggest that HEAs for diagonal Hamiltonians are inappropriate and that variational approaches to combinatorial optimization should prioritize problem-structured circuit designs.

quant-pharXiv:2605.19827•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW)•May 20, 2026•0 citations

Classical variational simulation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Matija Medvidović, Giuseppe Carleo

Abstract A key open question in quantum computing is whether quantum algorithms can potentially offer a significant advantage over classical algorithms for tasks of practical interest. Understanding the limits of classical computing in simulating quantum systems is an important component of addressing this question. We introduce a method to simulate layered quantum circuits consisting of parametrized gates, an architecture behind many variational quantum algorithms suitable for near-term quantum computers. A neural-network parametrization of the many-qubit wavefunction is used, focusing on states relevant for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). For the largest circuits simulated, we reach 54 qubits at 4 QAOA layers, approximately implementing 324 RZZ gates and 216 RX gates without requiring large-scale computational resources. For larger systems, our approach can be used to provide accurate QAOA simulations at previously unexplored parameter values and to benchmark the next generation of experiments in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era.

arXiv:2009.01760•npj Quantum Information•Jun 18, 2021•79 citations

Resource Analysis of Quantum Optimization Algorithms via Variational Methods

Vitor Dallabona, Lucas Friedrich, Jonas Maziero

Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are promising approaches for solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. However, the role played by quantum resources such as entanglement and coherence during the optimization process remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the evolution of these resources in two VQAs--the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the Feedback-based Algorithm for Quantum Optimization (FALQON)--applied to the Minimum Vertex Cover problem. We employ a variational resource-quantification framework based on the Bures metric and Uhlmann's theorem, in which an auxiliary quantum circuit is optimized to identify the closest resource-free states. This approach allows us to quantify Bures entanglement and Bures coherence of the algorithmic states without requiring full quantum state tomography. For the considered problem instance, QAOA exhibits a pronounced accumulation of entanglement in its initial layers, followed by a progressive reduction as the algorithm converges toward the optimal solution. Its coherence likewise decreases overall with increasing circuit depth, although a finite residual value persists due to the degeneracy of the optimal-solution subspace. In contrast, FALQON exhibits a substantially lower entanglement peak, reached at larger circuit depth, followed by a decay as convergence proceeds. Its coherence decreases smoothly and monotonically together with the optimization error. These results reveal distinct quantum-resource trajectories associated with the two optimization strategies and illustrate how entanglement and coherence evolve as variational quantum states approach solutions of a classical combinatorial optimization problem.

quant-pharXiv:2610.29919•Oct 22, 2026•0 citations

Entanglement perspective on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Maxime Dupont, Nicolas Didier, Mark J. Hodson +2 more

Many quantum algorithms seek to output a specific bitstring solving the problem of interest---or a few if the solution is degenerate. It is the case for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) in the limit of large circuit depth, which aims to solve quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Hence, the expected final state for these algorithms is either a product state or a low-entangled superposition involving a few bitstrings. What happens in between the initial $N$-qubit product state ${|0\ensuremath{\rangle}}^{\ensuremath{\bigotimes}N}$ and the final one regarding entanglement? Here, we consider the QAOA algorithm for solving the paradigmatic MaxCut problem on different types of graphs. We study the entanglement growth and spread resulting from randomized and optimized QAOA circuits and find that there is a volume-law entanglement barrier between the initial and final states. We also investigate the entanglement spectrum in connection with random matrix theory. In addition, we compare the entanglement production with a quantum annealing protocol aiming to solve the same MaxCut problems. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for the simulation of QAOA circuits with tensor network-based methods relying on low-entanglement for efficiency, such as matrix product states.

arXiv:2206.07024•Physical Review A•Aug 22, 2022•39 citations
Entanglement is a key property of quantum computing that separates it from its classical counterpart; however, its exact role in the performance of quantum algorithms, especially variational quantum algorithms, is not well understood. In this work, we utilize tensor network methods to systematically probe the role of entanglement in the working of two variational quantum algorithms, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) and quantum neural networks (QNNs), on prototypical problems under controlled entanglement environments. We find that for the max-cut problem solved using QAOA, the fidelity as a function of entanglement is highly dependent on the number of layers, layout of edges in the graph, and edge density, generally exhibiting that a high number of layers indicates a higher resilience to truncation of entanglement. This is in contrast to previous studies based on no more than four QAOA layers which show that the fidelity of QAOA follows a scaling law for circuits. Contrarily, in the case of QNNs, trained circuits with high test accuracies are underpinned by higher entanglement, with any enforced limitation in entanglement resulting in a sharp decline in test accuracy. This is corroborated by the entanglement entropy of these circuits which is consistently high suggesting that, unlike QAOA, QNNs may require quantum devices capable of generating highly entangled states. Overall, our work provides a deeper understanding of the role of entanglement in the working of variational quantum algorithms which may help to implement these algorithms on NISQ-era quantum hardware in a way that maximizes their accuracies.
Many classical optimization problems can be mapped to finding the ground states of diagonal Ising Hamiltonians, for which variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) provide heuristic methods. Because the solutions of such classical optimization problems are necessarily product states, it is unclear how entanglement affects their performance. An Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Problem-Tailored (ADAPT) variation of QAOA improves the convergence rate by allowing entangling operations in the mixer layers whereas it requires fewer CNOT gates in the entire circuit. In this work, we study the entanglement generated during the execution of ADAPT-QAOA. Through simulations of the weighted Max-Cut problem, we show that ADAPT-QAOA exhibits substantial flexibility in entangling and disentangling qubits. By incrementally restricting this flexibility, we find that a larger amount of entanglement entropy at earlier stages coincides with faster convergence at later stages. In contrast, while the standard QAOA quickly generates entanglement within a few layers, it cannot remove excess entanglement efficiently. Our results demonstrate that the role of entanglement in quantum optimization is subtle and provide guidance for building favorable features into quantum optimization algorithms.
Variational quantum algorithms have emerged as a cornerstone of contemporary quantum algorithms research. While they have demonstrated considerable promise in solving problems of practical interest, efficiently determining the minimal quantum resources necessary to obtain such a solution remains an open question. In this work, inspired by concepts from classical machine learning, we investigate the impact of overparameterization on the performance of variational algorithms. Our study focuses on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) -- a prominent variational quantum algorithm designed to solve combinatorial optimization problems. We investigate if circuit overparametrization is necessary and sufficient to solve such problems in QAOA, considering two representative problems -- MAX-CUT and MAX-2-SAT. For MAX-CUT we observe that overparametriation is both sufficient and (statistically) necessary for attaining exact solutions, as confirmed numerically for up to 202020 qubits. In fact, for MAX-CUT on 2-regular graphs we show the necessity to be exact, based on the analytically found optimal depth. In sharp contrast, for MAX-2-SAT, underparametrized circuits suffice to solve most instances. This result highlights the potential of QAOA in the underparametrized regime, supporting its utility for current noisy devices.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) for combinatorial optimization routinely employ entangling gates as a default design choice, yet the role of entanglement, in its amount and structure, remains poorly understood. This gap is particularly consequential for problems governed by diagonal Hamiltonians, whose ground states are classical product states and therefore require no entanglement in principle, raising the fundamental question of whether and how entangling gates help or hinder the variational search. We investigate this question for MaxCut by introducing two complementary control mechanisms that provide smooth, monotonic control over hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) entanglement as quantified by the Meyer-Wallach measure QQQ, and by benchmarking against QAOA as a problem-structured reference. Tracking the entanglement trajectory Q(t)Q(t)Q(t) throughout VQA training reveals that when the ansatz grants the optimizer indirect control over entanglement through its parameters, it consistently drives entanglement down. In line with this tendency, a fully separable ansatz outperforms all entangled hardware-efficient configurations, establishing a monotonic relationship: less problem-agnostic entanglement yields better performance. In contrast, QAOA, whose entanglement is structurally derived from the problem Hamiltonian, maintains high entanglement yet achieves competitive solution quality, demonstrating that entanglement structure, not merely quantity, determines its utility. These findings suggest that HEAs for diagonal Hamiltonians are inappropriate and that variational approaches to combinatorial optimization should prioritize problem-structured circuit designs.
Abstract A key open question in quantum computing is whether quantum algorithms can potentially offer a significant advantage over classical algorithms for tasks of practical interest. Understanding the limits of classical computing in simulating quantum systems is an important component of addressing this question. We introduce a method to simulate layered quantum circuits consisting of parametrized gates, an architecture behind many variational quantum algorithms suitable for near-term quantum computers. A neural-network parametrization of the many-qubit wavefunction is used, focusing on states relevant for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). For the largest circuits simulated, we reach 54 qubits at 4 QAOA layers, approximately implementing 324 RZZ gates and 216 RX gates without requiring large-scale computational resources. For larger systems, our approach can be used to provide accurate QAOA simulations at previously unexplored parameter values and to benchmark the next generation of experiments in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era.
Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are promising approaches for solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. However, the role played by quantum resources such as entanglement and coherence during the optimization process remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the evolution of these resources in two VQAs--the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the Feedback-based Algorithm for Quantum Optimization (FALQON)--applied to the Minimum Vertex Cover problem. We employ a variational resource-quantification framework based on the Bures metric and Uhlmann's theorem, in which an auxiliary quantum circuit is optimized to identify the closest resource-free states. This approach allows us to quantify Bures entanglement and Bures coherence of the algorithmic states without requiring full quantum state tomography. For the considered problem instance, QAOA exhibits a pronounced accumulation of entanglement in its initial layers, followed by a progressive reduction as the algorithm converges toward the optimal solution. Its coherence likewise decreases overall with increasing circuit depth, although a finite residual value persists due to the degeneracy of the optimal-solution subspace. In contrast, FALQON exhibits a substantially lower entanglement peak, reached at larger circuit depth, followed by a decay as convergence proceeds. Its coherence decreases smoothly and monotonically together with the optimization error. These results reveal distinct quantum-resource trajectories associated with the two optimization strategies and illustrate how entanglement and coherence evolve as variational quantum states approach solutions of a classical combinatorial optimization problem.
Many quantum algorithms seek to output a specific bitstring solving the problem of interest---or a few if the solution is degenerate. It is the case for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) in the limit of large circuit depth, which aims to solve quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Hence, the expected final state for these algorithms is either a product state or a low-entangled superposition involving a few bitstrings. What happens in between the initial NNN-qubit product state ${|0\ensuremath{\rangle}}^{\ensuremath{\bigotimes}N}$ and the final one regarding entanglement? Here, we consider the QAOA algorithm for solving the paradigmatic MaxCut problem on different types of graphs. We study the entanglement growth and spread resulting from randomized and optimized QAOA circuits and find that there is a volume-law entanglement barrier between the initial and final states. We also investigate the entanglement spectrum in connection with random matrix theory. In addition, we compare the entanglement production with a quantum annealing protocol aiming to solve the same MaxCut problems. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for the simulation of QAOA circuits with tensor network-based methods relying on low-entanglement for efficiency, such as matrix product states.