Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2605.19827 · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW)

Detrimental Agnostic Entanglement: The Case Against Hardware-Efficient Ansätze for Combinatorial Optimization

Tobias Rohe, Markus Baumann, Federico Harjes Ruiloba, Philipp Altmann, Gerhard Stenzel, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien

quant-phSubmitted May 19, 2026• Announced May 20, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) for combinatorial optimization routinely employ entangling gates as a default design choice, yet the role of entanglement, in its amount and structure, remains poorly understood. This gap is particularly consequential for problems governed by diagonal Hamiltonians, whose ground states are classical product states and therefore require no entanglement in principle, raising the fundamental question of whether and how entangling gates help or hinder the variational search. We investigate this question for MaxCut by introducing two complementary control mechanisms that provide smooth, monotonic control over hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) entanglement as quantified by the Meyer-Wallach measure $Q$, and by benchmarking against QAOA as a problem-structured reference. Tracking the entanglement trajectory $Q(t)$ throughout VQA training reveals that when the ansatz grants the optimizer indirect control over entanglement through its parameters, it consistently drives entanglement down. In line with this tendency, a fully separable ansatz outperforms all entangled hardware-efficient configurations, establishing a monotonic relationship: less problem-agnostic entanglement yields better performance. In contrast, QAOA, whose entanglement is structurally derived from the problem Hamiltonian, maintains high entanglement yet achieves competitive solution quality, demonstrating that entanglement structure, not merely quantity, determines its utility. These findings suggest that HEAs for diagonal Hamiltonians are inappropriate and that variational approaches to combinatorial optimization should prioritize problem-structured circuit designs.

Related papers

Entanglement-variational hardware-efficient ansatz for eigensolvers

Xin Wang, Bo Qi, Yabo Wang +1 more

Variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs) are one of the most important and effective applications of quantum computing, especially in the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. There are two main approaches for VQEs: problem-agnostic and problem-specific. For problem-agnostic methods, they often suffer from trainability issues. For problem-specific methods, their performance usually relies upon the choice of initial reference states, which are often hard to determine. In this paper, we propose an entanglement-variational hardware-efficient ansatz (EHA), and numerically compare it with some widely used ansatzes by solving benchmark problems in quantum many-body systems and quantum chemistry. Our EHA is problem-agnostic and hardware-efficient, is especially suitable for NISQ devices, and has potential for wide applications. Our EHA can achieve a higher level of accuracy in finding ground states and their energies in most cases, even compared with problem-specific methods. The performance of the EHA is robust to the choice of initial states and to parameter initialization, and it has the ability to quickly adjust the entanglement to the required amount, which is also the fundamental reason for its superiority.

arXiv:2311.01120•Physical Review Applied•Mar 27, 2024•14 citations

Calibrating the Role of Entanglement in Variational Quantum Algorithms from a Geometric Perspective

Chunxiao Du, Yang Zhou, Zhichen Huang +4 more

Calibrating the role of entanglement in quantum algorithms is a crucial task in the development of quantum computing. Most existing studies have primarily focused on how the static properties of entanglement-such as its magnitude and phase-affect key performance metrics. In this work, we instead explore the relationship between the dynamical behaviors of entanglement and the execution of variational quantum algorithms from a geometric perspective. We find that, in contrast to conventional Hamiltonian dynamics where the evolution process is dominated by the dynamical phase, quantum state evolution in quantum algorithms is primarily governed by the geometric phase with the trajectory determined by the parameter-dependent Hilbert space geometry. In the problem-agnostic Hardware-Efficient Ansatz (HEA), entanglement dynamics and state evolution are decoupled. Conversely, in the problem-inspired Hamiltonian Variational Ansatz (HVA), the dynamical phase contribution is enhanced, allowing entanglement to function as a dynamical resource: more entanglement consumption correlates directly with faster quantum state evolution.

quant-pharXiv:2604.23555•Apr 28, 2026•0 citations

From Problem-Structured QAOA to Problem-Agnostic Variational MaxCut Solvers: Representation, Redundancy, and Optimization Landscapes

Leonardo Lavagna, Massimo Panella

Variational quantum optimization provides a useful setting for examining how circuit structure, parameterization, and trainability interact in practice. Objectives: Among the most promising variational quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) depends critically on circuit architecture, but greater circuit complexity does not necessarily lead to easier optimization or better solutions. Using the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on graphs as a controlled setting, we investigate how variational behavior changes as problem-specific QAOA structure is progressively removed, with particular attention to representational capacity, optimization geometry, and finite-budget trainability. Methods: We analytically characterize a graph-agnostic product-state formulation of MaxCut and derive exact equivalences, redundancies, and local-landscape properties. These results motivate a controlled comparison among separable product ansätze, a representative graphagnostic entangling circuit, and graph-structured QAOA at several depths, including a parameter-count-matched control. The numerical benchmark comprises 95 small unweighted graph instances optimized under a common objective-evaluation budget. Results: The product-state formulation preserves the exact discrete MaxCut optimum, while its strict local maxima correspond to classical cuts that are stable under singlevertex flips. Redundant phase parameters increase optimization effort without enlarging the objective-relevant family. Under the prescribed optimization budget, the productstate ansatz attains higher average solution quality than the tested QAOA depths while requiring substantially fewer objective evaluations. The graph-agnostic entangling comparator provides no consistent advantage over the separable baseline, and a simple classical local-search method remains highly competitive. Conclusion: In the regime considered here, objective-relevant parameterization and optimization geometry can be as important as circuit richness.

Applied Mathematics and Statistics•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations

Performant near-term quantum combinatorial optimization

Titus Morris, Kaushik, Ananth, Roetteler, Martin +1 more

Combinatorial optimization is a promising application for near-term quantum computers, however, identifying performant algorithms suited to noisy quantum hardware remains as an important goal to potentially realizing quantum computational advantages. To address this we present a variational quantum algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems with linear-depth circuits. Our algorithm uses an ansatz composed of Hamiltonian generators designed to control each term in the target combinatorial function, along with parameter updates following a modified version of quantum imaginary time evolution. We evaluate this ansatz in numerical simulations that target solutions to the MAXCUT problem. The state evolution is shown to closely mimic imaginary time evolution, and its optimal-solution convergence is further improved using adaptive transformations of the classical Hamiltonian spectrum. With these innovations, the algorithm consistently converges to optimal solutions, with interesting highly-entangled dynamics along the way. We further demonstrate the success of this approach by performing optimization of a truncated version of our ansatz with up to 32 qubits in a trapped-ion quantum computer, using measurements from the quantum computer to train the ansatz and prepare optimal solutions with high fidelity in the majority of cases we consider. The success of these large-scale quantum circuit optimizations, in the presence of realistic hardware constraints and without error mitigation, mark significant progress on the path towards solving combinatorial problems using quantum computers. We conclude our performant and resource-minimal approach is a promising candidate for potential quantum computational advantages.

arXiv:2404.16135•Apr 24, 2024•1 citation

How Much Entanglement Do Quantum Optimization Algorithms Require?

Yanzhu Chen, Zhu, Linghua, Chenxu Liu +3 more

Many classical optimization problems can be mapped to finding the ground states of diagonal Ising Hamiltonians, for which variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) provide heuristic methods. Because the solutions of such classical optimization problems are necessarily product states, it is unclear how entanglement affects their performance. An Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Problem-Tailored (ADAPT) variation of QAOA improves the convergence rate by allowing entangling operations in the mixer layers whereas it requires fewer CNOT gates in the entire circuit. In this work, we study the entanglement generated during the execution of ADAPT-QAOA. Through simulations of the weighted Max-Cut problem, we show that ADAPT-QAOA exhibits substantial flexibility in entangling and disentangling qubits. By incrementally restricting this flexibility, we find that a larger amount of entanglement entropy at earlier stages coincides with faster convergence at later stages. In contrast, while the standard QAOA quickly generates entanglement within a few layers, it cannot remove excess entanglement efficiently. Our results demonstrate that the role of entanglement in quantum optimization is subtle and provide guidance for building favorable features into quantum optimization algorithms.

arXiv:2205.12283•May 24, 2022•1 citation

Resource Analysis of Quantum Optimization Algorithms via Variational Methods

Vitor Dallabona, Lucas Friedrich, Jonas Maziero

Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are promising approaches for solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. However, the role played by quantum resources such as entanglement and coherence during the optimization process remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the evolution of these resources in two VQAs--the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the Feedback-based Algorithm for Quantum Optimization (FALQON)--applied to the Minimum Vertex Cover problem. We employ a variational resource-quantification framework based on the Bures metric and Uhlmann's theorem, in which an auxiliary quantum circuit is optimized to identify the closest resource-free states. This approach allows us to quantify Bures entanglement and Bures coherence of the algorithmic states without requiring full quantum state tomography. For the considered problem instance, QAOA exhibits a pronounced accumulation of entanglement in its initial layers, followed by a progressive reduction as the algorithm converges toward the optimal solution. Its coherence likewise decreases overall with increasing circuit depth, although a finite residual value persists due to the degeneracy of the optimal-solution subspace. In contrast, FALQON exhibits a substantially lower entanglement peak, reached at larger circuit depth, followed by a decay as convergence proceeds. Its coherence decreases smoothly and monotonically together with the optimization error. These results reveal distinct quantum-resource trajectories associated with the two optimization strategies and illustrate how entanglement and coherence evolve as variational quantum states approach solutions of a classical combinatorial optimization problem.

quant-pharXiv:2610.29919•Oct 22, 2026•0 citations
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) for combinatorial optimization routinely employ entangling gates as a default design choice, yet the role of entanglement, in its amount and structure, remains poorly understood. This gap is particularly consequential for problems governed by diagonal Hamiltonians, whose ground states are classical product states and therefore require no entanglement in principle, raising the fundamental question of whether and how entangling gates help or hinder the variational search. We investigate this question for MaxCut by introducing two complementary control mechanisms that provide smooth, monotonic control over hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) entanglement as quantified by the Meyer-Wallach measure QQQ, and by benchmarking against QAOA as a problem-structured reference. Tracking the entanglement trajectory Q(t)Q(t)Q(t) throughout VQA training reveals that when the ansatz grants the optimizer indirect control over entanglement through its parameters, it consistently drives entanglement down. In line with this tendency, a fully separable ansatz outperforms all entangled hardware-efficient configurations, establishing a monotonic relationship: less problem-agnostic entanglement yields better performance. In contrast, QAOA, whose entanglement is structurally derived from the problem Hamiltonian, maintains high entanglement yet achieves competitive solution quality, demonstrating that entanglement structure, not merely quantity, determines its utility. These findings suggest that HEAs for diagonal Hamiltonians are inappropriate and that variational approaches to combinatorial optimization should prioritize problem-structured circuit designs.
Variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs) are one of the most important and effective applications of quantum computing, especially in the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. There are two main approaches for VQEs: problem-agnostic and problem-specific. For problem-agnostic methods, they often suffer from trainability issues. For problem-specific methods, their performance usually relies upon the choice of initial reference states, which are often hard to determine. In this paper, we propose an entanglement-variational hardware-efficient ansatz (EHA), and numerically compare it with some widely used ansatzes by solving benchmark problems in quantum many-body systems and quantum chemistry. Our EHA is problem-agnostic and hardware-efficient, is especially suitable for NISQ devices, and has potential for wide applications. Our EHA can achieve a higher level of accuracy in finding ground states and their energies in most cases, even compared with problem-specific methods. The performance of the EHA is robust to the choice of initial states and to parameter initialization, and it has the ability to quickly adjust the entanglement to the required amount, which is also the fundamental reason for its superiority.
Calibrating the role of entanglement in quantum algorithms is a crucial task in the development of quantum computing. Most existing studies have primarily focused on how the static properties of entanglement-such as its magnitude and phase-affect key performance metrics. In this work, we instead explore the relationship between the dynamical behaviors of entanglement and the execution of variational quantum algorithms from a geometric perspective. We find that, in contrast to conventional Hamiltonian dynamics where the evolution process is dominated by the dynamical phase, quantum state evolution in quantum algorithms is primarily governed by the geometric phase with the trajectory determined by the parameter-dependent Hilbert space geometry. In the problem-agnostic Hardware-Efficient Ansatz (HEA), entanglement dynamics and state evolution are decoupled. Conversely, in the problem-inspired Hamiltonian Variational Ansatz (HVA), the dynamical phase contribution is enhanced, allowing entanglement to function as a dynamical resource: more entanglement consumption correlates directly with faster quantum state evolution.
Variational quantum optimization provides a useful setting for examining how circuit structure, parameterization, and trainability interact in practice. Objectives: Among the most promising variational quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) depends critically on circuit architecture, but greater circuit complexity does not necessarily lead to easier optimization or better solutions. Using the Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problem on graphs as a controlled setting, we investigate how variational behavior changes as problem-specific QAOA structure is progressively removed, with particular attention to representational capacity, optimization geometry, and finite-budget trainability. Methods: We analytically characterize a graph-agnostic product-state formulation of MaxCut and derive exact equivalences, redundancies, and local-landscape properties. These results motivate a controlled comparison among separable product ansätze, a representative graphagnostic entangling circuit, and graph-structured QAOA at several depths, including a parameter-count-matched control. The numerical benchmark comprises 95 small unweighted graph instances optimized under a common objective-evaluation budget. Results: The product-state formulation preserves the exact discrete MaxCut optimum, while its strict local maxima correspond to classical cuts that are stable under singlevertex flips. Redundant phase parameters increase optimization effort without enlarging the objective-relevant family. Under the prescribed optimization budget, the productstate ansatz attains higher average solution quality than the tested QAOA depths while requiring substantially fewer objective evaluations. The graph-agnostic entangling comparator provides no consistent advantage over the separable baseline, and a simple classical local-search method remains highly competitive. Conclusion: In the regime considered here, objective-relevant parameterization and optimization geometry can be as important as circuit richness.
Combinatorial optimization is a promising application for near-term quantum computers, however, identifying performant algorithms suited to noisy quantum hardware remains as an important goal to potentially realizing quantum computational advantages. To address this we present a variational quantum algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems with linear-depth circuits. Our algorithm uses an ansatz composed of Hamiltonian generators designed to control each term in the target combinatorial function, along with parameter updates following a modified version of quantum imaginary time evolution. We evaluate this ansatz in numerical simulations that target solutions to the MAXCUT problem. The state evolution is shown to closely mimic imaginary time evolution, and its optimal-solution convergence is further improved using adaptive transformations of the classical Hamiltonian spectrum. With these innovations, the algorithm consistently converges to optimal solutions, with interesting highly-entangled dynamics along the way. We further demonstrate the success of this approach by performing optimization of a truncated version of our ansatz with up to 32 qubits in a trapped-ion quantum computer, using measurements from the quantum computer to train the ansatz and prepare optimal solutions with high fidelity in the majority of cases we consider. The success of these large-scale quantum circuit optimizations, in the presence of realistic hardware constraints and without error mitigation, mark significant progress on the path towards solving combinatorial problems using quantum computers. We conclude our performant and resource-minimal approach is a promising candidate for potential quantum computational advantages.
Many classical optimization problems can be mapped to finding the ground states of diagonal Ising Hamiltonians, for which variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) provide heuristic methods. Because the solutions of such classical optimization problems are necessarily product states, it is unclear how entanglement affects their performance. An Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Problem-Tailored (ADAPT) variation of QAOA improves the convergence rate by allowing entangling operations in the mixer layers whereas it requires fewer CNOT gates in the entire circuit. In this work, we study the entanglement generated during the execution of ADAPT-QAOA. Through simulations of the weighted Max-Cut problem, we show that ADAPT-QAOA exhibits substantial flexibility in entangling and disentangling qubits. By incrementally restricting this flexibility, we find that a larger amount of entanglement entropy at earlier stages coincides with faster convergence at later stages. In contrast, while the standard QAOA quickly generates entanglement within a few layers, it cannot remove excess entanglement efficiently. Our results demonstrate that the role of entanglement in quantum optimization is subtle and provide guidance for building favorable features into quantum optimization algorithms.
Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) are promising approaches for solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. However, the role played by quantum resources such as entanglement and coherence during the optimization process remains poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the evolution of these resources in two VQAs--the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and the Feedback-based Algorithm for Quantum Optimization (FALQON)--applied to the Minimum Vertex Cover problem. We employ a variational resource-quantification framework based on the Bures metric and Uhlmann's theorem, in which an auxiliary quantum circuit is optimized to identify the closest resource-free states. This approach allows us to quantify Bures entanglement and Bures coherence of the algorithmic states without requiring full quantum state tomography. For the considered problem instance, QAOA exhibits a pronounced accumulation of entanglement in its initial layers, followed by a progressive reduction as the algorithm converges toward the optimal solution. Its coherence likewise decreases overall with increasing circuit depth, although a finite residual value persists due to the degeneracy of the optimal-solution subspace. In contrast, FALQON exhibits a substantially lower entanglement peak, reached at larger circuit depth, followed by a decay as convergence proceeds. Its coherence decreases smoothly and monotonically together with the optimization error. These results reveal distinct quantum-resource trajectories associated with the two optimization strategies and illustrate how entanglement and coherence evolve as variational quantum states approach solutions of a classical combinatorial optimization problem.