Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2206.07024 · Physical Review A

Entanglement perspective on the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Maxime Dupont, Nicolas Didier, Mark J. Hodson, Joel E. Moore, Matthew J. Reagor

Published Aug 22, 2022• 39 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Many quantum algorithms seek to output a specific bitstring solving the problem of interest---or a few if the solution is degenerate. It is the case for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) in the limit of large circuit depth, which aims to solve quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Hence, the expected final state for these algorithms is either a product state or a low-entangled superposition involving a few bitstrings. What happens in between the initial $N$-qubit product state ${|0\ensuremath{\rangle}}^{\ensuremath{\bigotimes}N}$ and the final one regarding entanglement? Here, we consider the QAOA algorithm for solving the paradigmatic MaxCut problem on different types of graphs. We study the entanglement growth and spread resulting from randomized and optimized QAOA circuits and find that there is a volume-law entanglement barrier between the initial and final states. We also investigate the entanglement spectrum in connection with random matrix theory. In addition, we compare the entanglement production with a quantum annealing protocol aiming to solve the same MaxCut problems. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for the simulation of QAOA circuits with tensor network-based methods relying on low-entanglement for efficiency, such as matrix product states.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.106.022423

Related papers

Entanglement-entropy-based scaling relation in QAOA tensor network simulations for the MAXCUT problem

Goro Miki, 康弘 都倉

With the rapid development of quantum computers in recent years, the importance of performance evaluation in quantum algorithms has been increasing. One method that has gained attention for performing this evaluation on classical computers is tensor networks. Tensor networks not only reduce the computational cost required for simulations by using approximations but are also deeply connected to entanglement. Entanglement is one of the most important elements for the quantum advantages of quantum algorithms, but the direct relationship between quantum advantages and entanglement remains largely unexplored. Tensor networks are promising as a means to address this question. In this study, we focus on the entanglement in the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). This study aims to investigate entanglement in QAOA by examining the relationship between the approximation rates of tensor networks and the performance of QAOA. Specifically, we actually perform tensor network simulations of QAOA on a classical computer and extend the study of the scaling relations presented in previous research. We have discovered that scaling relations hold even when entanglement entropy is used as the vertical axis. Furthermore, by analyzing the results of the numerical calculations, we propose a new function for the scaling relation. Additionally, we discovered interesting relationships regarding the behavior of entanglement in QAOA during our analysis. This research is expected to provide new insights into the theoretical foundation of the scaling relations presented in previous studies.

arXiv:2505.23256•Physical Review A•Jun 10, 2026•0 citations

A Depth-Independent Linear Chain Ansatz for Large-Scale Quantum Approximate Optimization

Zixu Wang, Mandell, Jack, Yangyang Xu +1 more

Combinatorial optimization lies at the heart of numerous real-world applications. For a broad category of optimization problems, quantum computing is expected to exhibit quantum speed-up over classic computing. Among various quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), as one of variational quantum algorithms, shows promise on demonstrating quantum advantage on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. However, with increasing problem size, the circuit depth demanded by original QAOA scales rapidly and quickly surpasses the threshold at which meaningful results can be obtained. To address this challenge, in this work, we propose a variant of QAOA (termed linear chain QAOA) and demonstrate its advantages over original QAOA on paradigmatic MaxCut problems. In original QAOA, each graph edge is encoded with one entangling gate. In our ansatz, we locate a linear chain from the original MaxCut graph and place entangling gates sequentially along this chain. This linear-chain ansatz is featured by shallow quantum circuits and with the low execution time that scales independently of the problem size. Leveraging this ansatz, we demonstrate an approximation ratio of 0.78 (without post-processing) on non-hardware-native random regular MaxCut instances with 100 vertices in a digital quantum processor using 100 qubits. Our findings offer new insights into the design of hardware-efficient ansatz and point toward a promising route for tackling large-scale combinatorial optimization problems on NISQ devices.

arXiv:2509.17296•Sep 22, 2025•0 citations

Quantum annealing initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Stefan H. Sack, Maksym Serbyn

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a prospective near-term quantum algorithm due to its modest circuit depth and promising benchmarks. However, an external parameter optimization required in QAOA could become a performance bottleneck. This motivates studies of the optimization landscape and search for heuristic ways of parameter initialization. In this work we visualize the optimization landscape of the QAOA applied to the MaxCut problem on random graphs, demonstrating that random initialization of the QAOA is prone to converging to local minima with sub-optimal performance. We introduce the initialization of QAOA parameters based on the Trotterized quantum annealing (TQA) protocol, parameterized by the Trotter time step. We find that the TQA initialization allows to circumvent the issue of false minima for a broad range of time steps, yielding the same performance as the best result out of an exponentially scaling number of random initializations. Moreover, we demonstrate that the optimal value of the time step coincides with the point of proliferation of Trotter errors in quantum annealing. Our results suggest practical ways of initializing QAOA protocols on near-term quantum devices and reveals new connections between QAOA and quantum annealing.

arXiv:2101.05742•Quantum•Jul 1, 2021•145 citations

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm performance with low entanglement and high circuit depth

Rishi Sreedhar, Pontus Vikstål, Marika Svensson +3 more

Variational quantum algorithms constitute one of the most widespread methods for using current noisy quantum computers. However, it is unknown if these heuristic algorithms provide any quantum-computational speedup, although we cannot simulate them classically for intermediate sizes. Since entanglement lies at the core of quantum computing power, we investigate its role in these heuristic methods for solving optimization problems. In particular, we use matrix product states to simulate the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with reduced bond dimensions $D$, a parameter bounding the system entanglement. Moreover, we restrict the simulation further by deterministically sampling solutions. We conclude that entanglement plays a minor role in the MaxCut and Exact Cover 3 problems studied here since the simulated algorithm analysis, with up to $60$ qubits and $p=100$ algorithm layers, shows that it provides solutions for bond dimension $D \approx 10$ and depth $p \approx 30$. Additionally, we study the classical optimization loop in the approximated algorithm simulation with $12$ qubits and depth up to $p=4$ and show that the approximated optimal parameters with low entanglement approach the exact ones.

arXiv:2207.03404•Jul 7, 2022•8 citations

Solving General QUBOs with Warm-Start QAOA via a Reduction to Max-Cut

Bikrant Bhattacharyya, Michael Capriotti, Reuben Tate

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum algorithm that finds approximate solutions to problems in combinatorial optimization, especially those that can be formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem. In prior work, researchers have considered various ways of "warm-starting" QAOA by constructing an initial quantum state using classically-obtained solutions or information; these warm-starts typically cause QAOA to yield better approximation ratios at much lower circuit depths. For the Max-Cut problem, one warm-start approaches constructs the initial state using the high-dimensional vectors that are output from an SDP relaxation of the corresponding Max-Cut problem. This work leverages these semidefinite warmstarts for a broader class of problem instances by using a standard reduction that transforms any QUBO instance into a Max-Cut instance. We empirically compare this approach to a "QUBO-relaxation" approach that relaxes the QUBO directly. Our results consider a variety of QUBO instances ranging from randomly generated QUBOs to QUBOs corresponding to specific problems such as the traveling salesman problem, maximum independent set, and portfolio optimization. We find that the best choice of warmstart approach is strongly dependent on the problem type.

arXiv:2504.06253•Apr 8, 2025•1 citation

Entanglement Scaling and Problem Structure in Quantum Approximate and Adiabatic Optimization Algorithms

Georgios Arapantonis, Paraj Titum, Gregory Quiroz

Entanglement is widely regarded as a key resource underlying the power of quantum algorithms and their potential to achieve quantum advantage. With the emergence of variational quantum algorithms, however, questions have arisen regarding how entanglement relates to problem structure and algorithmic performance in near-term quantum applications. Here, we examine this relationship through the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), a specific class of variational algorithms, applied to the MaxCut problem. We show that suboptimal variational parameter training can significantly modify the observed entanglement profile, obscuring its scaling behavior. By employing a high-performance optimizer, we find empirical evidence that QAOA exhibits entanglement scaling consistent with that of fermionic Gaussian states (up to a scaling factor) across a broad range of MaxCut instances. We further compare these results with adiabatic quantum computation, observing annealing-schedule-dependent entanglement profiles whose scaling behavior differs markedly from that of QAOA. Together, these findings provide new insight into how entanglement manifests in and distinguishes these two algorithmic paradigms, highlighting its connection to both computational performance and problem structure.

quant-pharXiv:2606.19502•Jun 19, 2026•0 citations
Many quantum algorithms seek to output a specific bitstring solving the problem of interest---or a few if the solution is degenerate. It is the case for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) in the limit of large circuit depth, which aims to solve quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. Hence, the expected final state for these algorithms is either a product state or a low-entangled superposition involving a few bitstrings. What happens in between the initial NNN-qubit product state ∣0\ensuremath⟩\ensuremath⨂N{|0\ensuremath{\rangle}}^{\ensuremath{\bigotimes}N}∣0\ensuremath⟩\ensuremath⨂N and the final one regarding entanglement? Here, we consider the QAOA algorithm for solving the paradigmatic MaxCut problem on different types of graphs. We study the entanglement growth and spread resulting from randomized and optimized QAOA circuits and find that there is a volume-law entanglement barrier between the initial and final states. We also investigate the entanglement spectrum in connection with random matrix theory. In addition, we compare the entanglement production with a quantum annealing protocol aiming to solve the same MaxCut problems. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for the simulation of QAOA circuits with tensor network-based methods relying on low-entanglement for efficiency, such as matrix product states.
With the rapid development of quantum computers in recent years, the importance of performance evaluation in quantum algorithms has been increasing. One method that has gained attention for performing this evaluation on classical computers is tensor networks. Tensor networks not only reduce the computational cost required for simulations by using approximations but are also deeply connected to entanglement. Entanglement is one of the most important elements for the quantum advantages of quantum algorithms, but the direct relationship between quantum advantages and entanglement remains largely unexplored. Tensor networks are promising as a means to address this question. In this study, we focus on the entanglement in the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). This study aims to investigate entanglement in QAOA by examining the relationship between the approximation rates of tensor networks and the performance of QAOA. Specifically, we actually perform tensor network simulations of QAOA on a classical computer and extend the study of the scaling relations presented in previous research. We have discovered that scaling relations hold even when entanglement entropy is used as the vertical axis. Furthermore, by analyzing the results of the numerical calculations, we propose a new function for the scaling relation. Additionally, we discovered interesting relationships regarding the behavior of entanglement in QAOA during our analysis. This research is expected to provide new insights into the theoretical foundation of the scaling relations presented in previous studies.
Combinatorial optimization lies at the heart of numerous real-world applications. For a broad category of optimization problems, quantum computing is expected to exhibit quantum speed-up over classic computing. Among various quantum algorithms, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), as one of variational quantum algorithms, shows promise on demonstrating quantum advantage on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. However, with increasing problem size, the circuit depth demanded by original QAOA scales rapidly and quickly surpasses the threshold at which meaningful results can be obtained. To address this challenge, in this work, we propose a variant of QAOA (termed linear chain QAOA) and demonstrate its advantages over original QAOA on paradigmatic MaxCut problems. In original QAOA, each graph edge is encoded with one entangling gate. In our ansatz, we locate a linear chain from the original MaxCut graph and place entangling gates sequentially along this chain. This linear-chain ansatz is featured by shallow quantum circuits and with the low execution time that scales independently of the problem size. Leveraging this ansatz, we demonstrate an approximation ratio of 0.78 (without post-processing) on non-hardware-native random regular MaxCut instances with 100 vertices in a digital quantum processor using 100 qubits. Our findings offer new insights into the design of hardware-efficient ansatz and point toward a promising route for tackling large-scale combinatorial optimization problems on NISQ devices.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a prospective near-term quantum algorithm due to its modest circuit depth and promising benchmarks. However, an external parameter optimization required in QAOA could become a performance bottleneck. This motivates studies of the optimization landscape and search for heuristic ways of parameter initialization. In this work we visualize the optimization landscape of the QAOA applied to the MaxCut problem on random graphs, demonstrating that random initialization of the QAOA is prone to converging to local minima with sub-optimal performance. We introduce the initialization of QAOA parameters based on the Trotterized quantum annealing (TQA) protocol, parameterized by the Trotter time step. We find that the TQA initialization allows to circumvent the issue of false minima for a broad range of time steps, yielding the same performance as the best result out of an exponentially scaling number of random initializations. Moreover, we demonstrate that the optimal value of the time step coincides with the point of proliferation of Trotter errors in quantum annealing. Our results suggest practical ways of initializing QAOA protocols on near-term quantum devices and reveals new connections between QAOA and quantum annealing.
Variational quantum algorithms constitute one of the most widespread methods for using current noisy quantum computers. However, it is unknown if these heuristic algorithms provide any quantum-computational speedup, although we cannot simulate them classically for intermediate sizes. Since entanglement lies at the core of quantum computing power, we investigate its role in these heuristic methods for solving optimization problems. In particular, we use matrix product states to simulate the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with reduced bond dimensions DDD, a parameter bounding the system entanglement. Moreover, we restrict the simulation further by deterministically sampling solutions. We conclude that entanglement plays a minor role in the MaxCut and Exact Cover 3 problems studied here since the simulated algorithm analysis, with up to 606060 qubits and p=100p=100p=100 algorithm layers, shows that it provides solutions for bond dimension D≈10D \approx 10D≈10 and depth p≈30p \approx 30p≈30. Additionally, we study the classical optimization loop in the approximated algorithm simulation with 121212 qubits and depth up to p=4p=4p=4 and show that the approximated optimal parameters with low entanglement approach the exact ones.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum algorithm that finds approximate solutions to problems in combinatorial optimization, especially those that can be formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem. In prior work, researchers have considered various ways of "warm-starting" QAOA by constructing an initial quantum state using classically-obtained solutions or information; these warm-starts typically cause QAOA to yield better approximation ratios at much lower circuit depths. For the Max-Cut problem, one warm-start approaches constructs the initial state using the high-dimensional vectors that are output from an SDP relaxation of the corresponding Max-Cut problem. This work leverages these semidefinite warmstarts for a broader class of problem instances by using a standard reduction that transforms any QUBO instance into a Max-Cut instance. We empirically compare this approach to a "QUBO-relaxation" approach that relaxes the QUBO directly. Our results consider a variety of QUBO instances ranging from randomly generated QUBOs to QUBOs corresponding to specific problems such as the traveling salesman problem, maximum independent set, and portfolio optimization. We find that the best choice of warmstart approach is strongly dependent on the problem type.
Entanglement is widely regarded as a key resource underlying the power of quantum algorithms and their potential to achieve quantum advantage. With the emergence of variational quantum algorithms, however, questions have arisen regarding how entanglement relates to problem structure and algorithmic performance in near-term quantum applications. Here, we examine this relationship through the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), a specific class of variational algorithms, applied to the MaxCut problem. We show that suboptimal variational parameter training can significantly modify the observed entanglement profile, obscuring its scaling behavior. By employing a high-performance optimizer, we find empirical evidence that QAOA exhibits entanglement scaling consistent with that of fermionic Gaussian states (up to a scaling factor) across a broad range of MaxCut instances. We further compare these results with adiabatic quantum computation, observing annealing-schedule-dependent entanglement profiles whose scaling behavior differs markedly from that of QAOA. Together, these findings provide new insight into how entanglement manifests in and distinguishes these two algorithmic paradigms, highlighting its connection to both computational performance and problem structure.