In this paper, we propose an ansatz approximation approach for variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) that uses one of the hardware's main attributes, its crosstalk behavior, as its main approximation driver. By utilizing crosstalk-adaptive scheduling, we are able to apply a circuit-level approximation/optimization to our ansatz. Our design procedure involves first characterizing the hardware's crosstalk and then approximating the circuit by a desired level of crosstalk mitigation, all while effectively reducing its duration and gate counts. We demonstrate the effect of crosstalk mitigation on expressibility, trainability, and entanglement: key components that drive the utility of parameterized circuits. We tested our approach on real quantum hardware against a base configuration, and our results showed superior performance for the circuit-level optimized ansatz over a base ansatz for two quantum chemistry benchmarks. We take into consideration that applications vary in their response to crosstalk, and we believe that this approximation strategy can be used to create ansatze that are expressive, trainable, and with crosstalk mitigation levels tailored for specific workloads.
In this paper, we propose an ansatz approximation approach for variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) that uses one of the hardware's main attributes, its crosstalk behavior, as its main approximation driver. By utilizing crosstalk-adaptive scheduling, we are able to apply a circuit-level approximation/optimization to our ansatz. Our design procedure involves first characterizing the hardware's crosstalk and then approximating the circuit by a desired level of crosstalk mitigation, all while effectively reducing its duration and gate counts. We demonstrate the effect of crosstalk mitigation on expressibility, trainability, and entanglement: key components that drive the utility of parameterized circuits. We tested our approach on real quantum hardware against a base configuration, and our results showed superior performance for the circuit-level optimized ansatz over a base ansatz for two quantum chemistry benchmarks. We take into consideration that applications vary in their response to crosstalk, and we believe that this approximation strategy can be used to create ansatze that are expressive, trainable, and with crosstalk mitigation levels tailored for specific workloads.
Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as a powerful class of algorithms that is highly suitable for noisy quantum devices. Therefore, investigating their design has become key in quantum computing research. Previous works have shown that choosing an effective parameterized quantum circuit (PQC) or ansatz for a VQA is crucial to its overall performance, especially on near-term devices. In this paper, we utilize pulse-level access to quantum machines, our understanding of their two-qubit interactions, and, more importantly, our knowledge of VQAs, to customize the design of two-qubit entanglers. Our analysis shows that utilizing customized pulse gates for ansatze reduces state preparation times by more than half, maintains expressibility relative to standard ansatze, and produces PQCs that are more trainable through local cost function analysis. Our algorithm performance results show that in three cases, our PQC configuration outperforms the base implementation. Experiments using IBM Quantum hardware demonstrate that our pulse-based PQC configurations are more capable of solving MaxCut and Chemistry problems compared to a standard configuration.
Quantum computers promise a great computational advantage over classical computers, which might help solve various computational challenges such as the simulation of complicated quantum systems, finding optimum in large optimization problems, and solving large-scale linear algebra problems. Current available quantum devices have only a limited amount of qubits and a high level of noise, limiting the size of problems that can be solved accurately with those devices. Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as a leading strategy to address these limitations by optimizing cost function based on measurement results of shallow depth circuits. Recently, various pulse engineering methods were suggested in order to improve VQA results, including optimizing pulse parameters instead of gate angles as part of the VQA optimization process. In this paper, we suggest a novel pulse-based ansatz, which is parameterized mainly by pulses’ duration of pre-defined pulse structures. This ansatz structure provides relatively low amounts of optimization parameters while maintaining high expressibility, allowing fast convergence. In addition, the ansatz has structured adaptivity to the entanglement level required by the problem, allowing low noise and accurate results. We tested this ansatz against quantum chemistry problems. Specifically, finding the ground-state energy associated with the electron configuration problem, using the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm for several different molecules. We manage to achieve chemical accuracy both in simulation for several molecules and on one of IBM’s NISQ devices for the H2 molecule in the STO-3G basis, without the need for extensive error mitigation. Our results are compared to a common gate-based ansatz and show better accuracy and significant latency reduction—up to 7× shorter ansatz schedules.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as a promising quantum alternative for solving optimization and machine learning problems using parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs). The design of these circuits influences the ability of the algorithm to efficiently explore the solution space and converge to more optimal solutions. Quantum architecture search (QAS) is therefore a highly relevant topic, in which the selection of an appropriate circuit topology, gate set, and parameterization scheme is determinant to achieve good performance. In addition, it is not only problem-dependent, but the quantum hardware used also has a significant impact on the results. Therefore, we present BPQCO, a Bayesian optimization-based strategy to search for optimal PQCs adapted to the problem to be solved and to the characteristics and limitations of the chosen quantum hardware. To this end, we experimentally demonstrate the influence of the circuit design on the performance obtained for two classification problems (a synthetic dataset and the well-known Iris dataset), focusing on the design of the circuit ansatz. In addition, we study the degradation of the obtained circuits in the presence of noise when simulating real quantum computers. To mitigate the effect of noise, two alternative optimization strategies based on the characteristics of the quantum system are proposed. The results obtained confirm the relevance of the presented approach and allow its adoption in further work based on the use of PQCs.
Abstract Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) are expected to be a path to quantum advantages on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. However, both empirical and theoretical results exhibit that the deployed ansatz heavily affects the performance of VQAs such that an ansatz with a larger number of quantum gates enables a stronger expressivity, while the accumulated noise may render a poor trainability. To maximally improve the robustness and trainability of VQAs, here we devise a resource and runtime efficient scheme termed quantum architecture search (QAS). In particular, given a learning task, QAS automatically seeks a near-optimal ansatz (i.e., circuit architecture) to balance benefits and side-effects brought by adding more noisy quantum gates to achieve a good performance. We implement QAS on both the numerical simulator and real quantum hardware, via the IBM cloud, to accomplish data classification and quantum chemistry tasks. In the problems studied, numerical and experimental results show that QAS cannot only alleviate the influence of quantum noise and barren plateaus but also outperforms VQAs with pre-selected ansatze.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have shown strong evidence to gain provable computational advantages in diverse fields such as finance, machine learning, and chemistry. However, the heuristic ansatz exploited in modern VQAs is incapable of balancing the trade-off between expressivity and trainability, which may lead to degraded performance when executed on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) machines. To address this issue, here, we demonstrate the first proof-of-principle experiment of applying an efficient automatic ansatz design technique, i.e., quantum architecture search (QAS), to enhance VQAs on an 8-qubit superconducting quantum processor. In particular, we apply QAS to tailor the hardware-efficient ansatz toward classification tasks. Compared with heuristic ansätze, the ansatz designed by QAS improves the test accuracy from 31% to 98%. We further explain this superior performance by visualizing the loss landscape and analyzing effective parameters of all ansätze. Our work provides concrete guidance for developing variable ansätze to tackle various large-scale quantum learning problems with advantages.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) rely on parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs), whose performance is governed by expressibility and trainability. Existing studies typically evaluate these properties at the logical circuit level, implicitly assuming that designed PQCs remain unchanged during hardware execution. In practice, however, hardware-aware transpilation modifies circuit structure through qubit mapping, routing, and basis decomposition, potentially altering PQC behavior. In this paper, we perform a systematic hardware-aware analysis of expressibility and trainability by comparing logical and transpiled PQCs across multiple ansatz families, qubit counts, and circuit depths. Expressibility is measured using fidelity-based KL divergence, while trainability is quantified through gradient variance. Our results show that transpilation acts as an implicit architectural perturbation, producing strongly ansatz-dependent effects. Expressibility deviations exceed upto 125% in some cases, while trainability variations reach up to 25%. Structured ansatzes are generally more robust, whereas highly entangled architectures are more sensitive to transpilation-induced transformations. We further show that transpilation can alter the commonly assumed expressibility-trainability trade-off, demonstrating that logical-level analyses may not reliably predict hardware-level behavior. These findings highlight the importance of hardware-aware evaluation for accurate characterization of VQAs.